Jahangir Chauhan (pk) wrote:

Rusi wrote:
I don't think this unification will happen in our lifetime or even in the lifetimes of our grandchildren.

well no body was thinking of separation in 1920's then just after 30 year time there emerged two different countries with different names, maps borders flags etc but that happened it depends on the leadership of both the countries. But in my weak opinion both countries will benefit in economic and cultural grounds and will be a force in the world, when we invest on our public/ masses instead of weapons.

Rashmun wrote:http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-Pakistan-Bangladesh-must-reunite-Katju-says/articleshow/21381537.cms?intenttarget=no

The readers's comments is interesting.

Jahangir Chauhan (pk) wrote:

Rusi wrote:
I don't think this unification will happen in our lifetime or even in the lifetimes of our grandchildren.

well no body was thinking of separation in 1920's then just after 30 year time there emerged two different countries with different names, maps borders flags etc but that happened it depends on the leadership of both the countries. But in my weak opinion both countries will benefit in economic and cultural grounds and will be a force in the world, when we invest on our public/ masses instead of weapons.

haripriya rao wrote:Even my 13 year old son is suggesting that India, Bungladesh and Pakistan must unite. (One more reason he is telling is that Indian cricket team will become very powerful) Why we all are struck after 1947? Where is the real freedom, real growth and peace? We needed peace after Independence but we got pieces. Time to think.

Rashmun wrote:http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-Pakistan-Bangladesh-must-reunite-Katju-says/articleshow/21381537.cms?intenttarget=no

The readers's comments is interesting.

Jahangir Chauhan (pk) wrote:

Rusi wrote:
I don't think this unification will happen in our lifetime or even in the lifetimes of our grandchildren.

well no body was thinking of separation in 1920's then just after 30 year time there emerged two different countries with different names, maps borders flags etc but that happened it depends on the leadership of both the countries. But in my weak opinion both countries will benefit in economic and cultural grounds and will be a force in the world, when we invest on our public/ masses instead of weapons.

Rashmun wrote:
Max, what about the fact that the cricket team of united India will become very powerful after reunification ? As a cricket fan, you of all people should be supporting reunification for this reason.

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Rashmun wrote:
Max, what about the fact that the cricket team of united India will become very powerful after reunification ? As a cricket fan, you of all people should be supporting reunification for this reason.

i think playing cricket together as one team is a great idea. this is like the west indies, a test team formed out of players from different countries. pathan fast bowlers, marathi and southern indian batsmen, southern indian spinners, and punjabi and haryanavi allrounders. unbeatable. this will also give a proper venue for pakistani cricketers since international cricketers won't visit their country due to fear of terrorist attacks. no need for political unification though.

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Rashmun wrote:
Max, what about the fact that the cricket team of united India will become very powerful after reunification ? As a cricket fan, you of all people should be supporting reunification for this reason.

i think playing cricket together as one team is a great idea. this is like the west indies, a test team formed out of players from different countries. pathan fast bowlers, marathi and southern indian batsmen, southern indian spinners, and punjabi and haryanavi allrounders. unbeatable. this will also give a proper venue for pakistani cricketers since international cricketers won't visit their country due to fear of terrorist attacks. no need for political unification though.

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Rashmun wrote:http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-Pakistan-Bangladesh-must-reunite-Katju-says/articleshow/21381537.cms?intenttarget=no

The readers's comments is interesting.

Jahangir Chauhan (pk) wrote:

Rusi wrote:
I don't think this unification will happen in our lifetime or even in the lifetimes of our grandchildren.

well no body was thinking of separation in 1920's then just after 30 year time there emerged two different countries with different names, maps borders flags etc but that happened it depends on the leadership of both the countries. But in my weak opinion both countries will benefit in economic and cultural grounds and will be a force in the world, when we invest on our public/ masses instead of weapons.

Now what.... when did you become a nikkarwala ? They were/are the ones who were for Akhand Bharat.

I can see why and Katlu are now proposing the same, while the RSS has stopped preaching the Akhand Bharat.  The muslims of the three countries have now realized that a combined/akhand "India" will have have a 1.6 billion with the muslims will form a commanding "majority" with some 750 million. Naturally, they can impose Shariat/Jizziya/Kulla-Purdah with a weak of the merger.

Naturally, you are all for it.

Rashmun wrote:
http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/kerala/katjus-remarks-hailed/article4479475.ece

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Rashmun wrote:
http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/kerala/katjus-remarks-hailed/article4479475.ece

Only goes to prove the lack of principles on the part of the Pseudo-Islamic Secularists.  RSS has been pushing for Akhand Bharat for evternity and it was criticized as a Hindutva, and now Katlu says it converting that into a Wah-wah what a great idea.

These PIS have no original brains, and only good in stealing ideas and credits and of course in corruption.

Rashmun wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

These PIS have no original brains, and only good in stealing ideas and credits and of course in corruption.

isn't there a difference between a secular greater india, and an akhand bharat hindu rashtra?

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

These PIS have no original brains, and only good in stealing ideas and credits and of course in corruption.

isn't there a difference between a secular greater india, and an akhand bharat hindu rashtra?

First get the pakis to accept secularism and then come here and talk.

Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

These PIS have no original brains, and only good in stealing ideas and credits and of course in corruption.

isn't there a difference between a secular greater india, and an akhand bharat hindu rashtra?

First get the pakis to accept secularism and then come here and talk.

 Better yet, go to Swat valley and preach mullahs on secularism. If he survives, that means they would have converted him into the pieceful fold.

Rashmun wrote:

that is why i said it will not happen now but after 40-50 years.

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

that is why i said it will not happen now but after 40-50 years.

I agree.... bcz by then you and your Pseudo-Islamic Secular Gang would have converted Bharath into an Islamic majority state, making the merger easy and implementation of "secularism" AKA shariat across the United India.

Rashmun wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

that is why i said it will not happen now but after 40-50 years.

I agree.... bcz by then you and your Pseudo-Islamic Secular Gang would have converted Bharath into an Islamic majority state, making the merger easy and implementation of "secularism" AKA shariat across the United India.

with the passage of time the role of religion in public life will inevitably grow weaker not stronger all over the world.

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

that is why i said it will not happen now but after 40-50 years.

I agree.... bcz by then you and your Pseudo-Islamic Secular Gang would have converted Bharath into an Islamic majority state, making the merger easy and implementation of "secularism" AKA shariat across the United India.

with the passage of time the role of religion in public life will inevitably grow weaker not stronger all over the world.

not with the way your iSlam is making the whole world turn against it.  but i can understand that you are just trying to do your job of converting the whole of India into an iSlamic country.

Rashmun wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

that is why i said it will not happen now but after 40-50 years.

I agree.... bcz by then you and your Pseudo-Islamic Secular Gang would have converted Bharath into an Islamic majority state, making the merger easy and implementation of "secularism" AKA shariat across the United India.

with the passage of time the role of religion in public life will inevitably grow weaker not stronger all over the world.

confuzzled dude wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

that is why i said it will not happen now but after 40-50 years.

I agree.... bcz by then you and your Pseudo-Islamic Secular Gang would have converted Bharath into an Islamic majority state, making the merger easy and implementation of "secularism" AKA shariat across the United India.

with the passage of time the role of religion in public life will inevitably grow weaker not stronger all over the world.

But 40-50 years is too short of a period for that happen. India, Pak, BD have only grown further apart since partition, what makes you think that Pak & B'Desh would want to lose their identity; Unless the world goes back to monarchy I don't see this happening.

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

that is why i said it will not happen now but after 40-50 years.

I agree.... bcz by then you and your Pseudo-Islamic Secular Gang would have converted Bharath into an Islamic majority state, making the merger easy and implementation of "secularism" AKA shariat across the United India.

with the passage of time the role of religion in public life will inevitably grow weaker not stronger all over the world.

But 40-50 years is too short of a period for that happen. India, Pak, BD have only grown further apart since partition, what makes you think that Pak & B'Desh would want to lose their identity; Unless the world goes back to monarchy I don't see this happening.

In 60 years what has been resolved between PakiSaitan and India?

Nothing - not Kashmir, Not trade, Not terrorism, Not non-interference, not coming in support of each other in world forums....NADA

India is not even accorded a most favored nation by Saitans and here the Maualana Rashmunullah is coming out as all too peaceful and self-flaggelating hindu so that he appears as liberal and broad minded.  An honest unbiased one should be supporting - on own term - hindus and muslims on roughly comparable terms.  He knows full well that India and PakiSaitan can and will never become one. Yet he wants to put up this drama to score brownie points.

To this day not one criticism of muslims or one praise of hindus has come out Maulana. Well-trained and brain washed by Pseudo-Islamic Secularists.

Rashmun wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

I agree.... bcz by then you and your Pseudo-Islamic Secular Gang would have converted Bharath into an Islamic majority state, making the merger easy and implementation of "secularism" AKA shariat across the United India.

with the passage of time the role of religion in public life will inevitably grow weaker not stronger all over the world.

But 40-50 years is too short of a period for that happen. India, Pak, BD have only grown further apart since partition, what makes you think that Pak & B'Desh would want to lose their identity; Unless the world goes back to monarchy I don't see this happening.

In 60 years what has been resolved between PakiSaitan and India?

Nothing - not Kashmir, Not trade, Not terrorism, Not non-interference, not coming in support of each other in world forums....NADA

India is not even accorded a most favored nation by Saitans and here the Maualana Rashmunullah is coming out as all too peaceful and self-flaggelating hindu so that he appears as liberal and broad minded.  An honest unbiased one should be supporting - on own term - hindus and muslims on roughly comparable terms.  He knows full well that India and PakiSaitan can and will never become one. Yet he wants to put up this drama to score brownie points.

To this day not one criticism of muslims or one praise of hindus has come out Maulana. Well-trained and brain washed by Pseudo-Islamic Secularists.

If i would really have been a brainwashed Maulana, i would not have written this blog:

http://sulekha.forumotion.com/t382-akbar-and-the-problem-of-reforming-islam-in-india

Uppili has this habit of calling people he believes to be hindu brahmins as maulanas, mullahs, etc. as he did on chat once. Perhaps he got dumped by some brahmin girl he was in love with and is now taking out his anger on people he believes to be brahmins.