Rashmun wrote:http://sulekha.forumotion.com/t292-the-philosopher-and-the-law-giver-adi-sankaracharya-and-manu

harharmahadev wrote:

Rashmun wrote:http://sulekha.forumotion.com/t292-the-philosopher-and-the-law-giver-adi-sankaracharya-and-manu

Rashmun - Whenever I visit this site, I notice that you are on a one-track agenda to bash Hinduism.  I have to admire you for your tenacity and persistence.

harharmahadev wrote:

Rashmun wrote:http://sulekha.forumotion.com/t292-the-philosopher-and-the-law-giver-adi-sankaracharya-and-manu

Rashmun - Whenever I visit this site, I notice that you are on a one-track agenda to bash Hinduism.  I have to admire you for your tenacity and persistence.

harharmahadev wrote:

Rashmun wrote:http://sulekha.forumotion.com/t292-the-philosopher-and-the-law-giver-adi-sankaracharya-and-manu

Rashmun - Whenever I visit this site, I notice that you are on a one-track agenda to bash Hinduism.  I have to admire you for your tenacity and persistence.

harharmahadev wrote:

Rashmun wrote:http://sulekha.forumotion.com/t292-the-philosopher-and-the-law-giver-adi-sankaracharya-and-manu

Rashmun - Whenever I visit this site, I notice that you are on a one-track agenda to bash Hinduism.  I have to admire you for your tenacity and persistence.

Rashmun wrote:

harharmahadev wrote:

Rashmun wrote:http://sulekha.forumotion.com/t292-the-philosopher-and-the-law-giver-adi-sankaracharya-and-manu

Rashmun - Whenever I visit this site, I notice that you are on a one-track agenda to bash Hinduism.  I have to admire you for your tenacity and persistence.

i reject your claim that i am indulging in hinduism bashing; on numerous occasions i have expressed admiration for many schools of hindu philosophy(Nyaya-Vaisesika, original Sankhya, Lokayata/Charvaka, aspects of Mimansa, etc.)  and for many hindu philosophers (like Kumarila Bhatta, Vachaspati Mishra, etc.) who i respect.

harharmahadev wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

harharmahadev wrote:

Rashmun wrote:http://sulekha.forumotion.com/t292-the-philosopher-and-the-law-giver-adi-sankaracharya-and-manu

Rashmun - Whenever I visit this site, I notice that you are on a one-track agenda to bash Hinduism.  I have to admire you for your tenacity and persistence.

i reject your claim that i am indulging in hinduism bashing; on numerous occasions i have expressed admiration for many schools of hindu philosophy(Nyaya-Vaisesika, original Sankhya, Lokayata/Charvaka, aspects of Mimansa, etc.)  and for many hindu philosophers (like Kumarila Bhatta, Vachaspati Mishra, etc.) who i respect.

Let me modify claim details and resubmit.

Check your previous 100 posts.  All 100 posts were pertaining to hindu bashing.

Rashmun wrote:http://sulekha.forumotion.com/t292-the-philosopher-and-the-law-giver-adi-sankaracharya-and-manu

Seva Lamberdar wrote:

Rashmun wrote:http://sulekha.forumotion.com/t292-the-philosopher-and-the-law-giver-adi-sankaracharya-and-manu

Rashmun, you simply are not equipped well-enough intellectually and knowledge-wise to call anyone an idiot in philosophy. So quit making these silly posts.

Rashmun wrote:

Seva Lamberdar wrote:

Rashmun wrote:http://sulekha.forumotion.com/t292-the-philosopher-and-the-law-giver-adi-sankaracharya-and-manu

Rashmun, you simply are not equipped well-enough intellectually and knowledge-wise to call anyone an idiot in philosophy. So quit making these silly posts.

didn't you claim on sulekha that i am a tenured professor of philosophy in your estimate? why are you making this U-turn now? 

Rashmun wrote:

harharmahadev wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

harharmahadev wrote:

Rashmun wrote:http://sulekha.forumotion.com/t292-the-philosopher-and-the-law-giver-adi-sankaracharya-and-manu

Rashmun - Whenever I visit this site, I notice that you are on a one-track agenda to bash Hinduism.  I have to admire you for your tenacity and persistence.

i reject your claim that i am indulging in hinduism bashing; on numerous occasions i have expressed admiration for many schools of hindu philosophy(Nyaya-Vaisesika, original Sankhya, Lokayata/Charvaka, aspects of Mimansa, etc.)  and for many hindu philosophers (like Kumarila Bhatta, Vachaspati Mishra, etc.) who i respect.

Let me modify claim details and resubmit.

Check your previous 100 posts.  All 100 posts were pertaining to hindu bashing.

You are interpreting my posts to be anti-Hindu probably because of your essential ignorance of Hinduism and Hindu philosophy. Vigorous debates have been a part of the Hindu ethos--unfortunately this aspect of Hindu tradition is something the Chaddis are trying to suppress.
Just because I criticize a certain Hindu philosophy or certain Hindu philosophers does not make me anti-Hindu; after all I am doing the same thing that Adi Sankaracharya has done when he attacks various Hindu philosophies like Sankhya, Nyaya-Vaisesika, Mimansa, Charvaka, etc in his writings and even speculates that the founder of the Sankhya philosophy was a demon. Of course Madhavacharya later claimed that Adi Sankaracharya was himself a demon ( the demon Manimat from the Mahabharata). If you don't know these things than shouldn't you just shut up and learn from those more knowledgeable than you instead of shouting "anti-Hindu, anti-Hindu".

harharmahadev wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

harharmahadev wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

harharmahadev wrote:

Rashmun - Whenever I visit this site, I notice that you are on a one-track agenda to bash Hinduism.  I have to admire you for your tenacity and persistence.

i reject your claim that i am indulging in hinduism bashing; on numerous occasions i have expressed admiration for many schools of hindu philosophy(Nyaya-Vaisesika, original Sankhya, Lokayata/Charvaka, aspects of Mimansa, etc.)  and for many hindu philosophers (like Kumarila Bhatta, Vachaspati Mishra, etc.) who i respect.

Let me modify claim details and resubmit.

Check your previous 100 posts.  All 100 posts were pertaining to hindu bashing.

You are interpreting my posts to be anti-Hindu probably because of your essential ignorance of Hinduism and Hindu philosophy. Vigorous debates have been a part of the Hindu ethos--unfortunately this aspect of Hindu tradition is something the Chaddis are trying to suppress.
Just because I criticize a certain Hindu philosophy or certain Hindu philosophers does not make me anti-Hindu; after all I am doing the same thing that Adi Sankaracharya has done when he attacks various Hindu philosophies like Sankhya, Nyaya-Vaisesika, Mimansa, Charvaka, etc in his writings and even speculates that the founder of the Sankhya philosophy was a demon. Of course Madhavacharya later claimed that Adi Sankaracharya was himself a demon ( the demon Manimat from the Mahabharata). If you don't know these things than shouldn't you just shut up and learn from those more knowledgeable than you instead of shouting "anti-Hindu, anti-Hindu".

I am not anti-Rashmun because I'm criticizing you either.  I may not know as much about Adi Sankracharya as you do, but I do know how to read and interpret articles. 

The content of your articles doesn't appear balanced and well-researched.  There isn't any discussion on pros and cons of various perspectives or belief systems.  It doesn't read as a critique of any specific school of thought either.  It just comes across as lambasting adherents of the hindu faith for their beliefs ... in other words ... hindu-bashing.  Just sayin'.