list of men douchemunullah admires

Propagandhi711 wrote:douchemunullah gangotridwivedi garg is a latent homo with daddy issues. he wishes to have perceived strong male figures in his life that he can cuddle upto. when alone he likes nothing better than to rub his face against their greying chest hairs after praising them effusively or in case of phlegmy to LOL joyously at stupid one liners that phlegmy produces from the depths of his malfunctioning bowels. he simpers like a little girl in their presence and practices craven heroworship cloaked as 'research'. given a chance he'll wear kajal, put on some frilly panties, do the tuck job and dance to an oldish bollywood number with BN mudras, referrring to the diapered 1 as his 'jaan' and 'dilruba'.

Propagandhi711 wrote:in addition to being a douche, you're also a crybaby. you should know that about yourself.

Hellsangel wrote:Rashman, you swallow what your geriatric boyfriend feeds you like it is the gospel truth, don't you?

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:Rashman, you swallow what your geriatric boyfriend feeds you like it is the gospel truth, don't you?

although i was not present on chat at the time, i was present on sulekha at the time this episode took place. Not once on sulekha did Propa accuse JM of lying. Propa's response was to accuse JM of having an incestuous relationship with his daughter whenever JM would bring this up.

I was also not on chat when Propa gave links to pictures of JM's wife and daughter and expressed a desire to have sex with them. JM has brought it up on this forum and Propa has never denied doing this either.

Hellsangel wrote:So Rashman, by your logic if someone does not deny something, that makes it true? If your geriatric boyfriend makes up a wild story about someone and they choose to ignore it, that makes it the truth for you?

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:Rashman, you swallow what your geriatric boyfriend feeds you like it is the gospel truth, don't you?

although i was not present on chat at the time, i was present on sulekha at the time this episode took place. Not once on sulekha did Propa accuse JM of lying. Propa's response was to accuse JM of having an incestuous relationship with his daughter whenever JM would bring this up.

I was also not on chat when Propa gave links to pictures of JM's wife and daughter and expressed a desire to have sex with them. JM has brought it up on this forum and Propa has never denied doing this either.

douchemun, I insinuated on the old forum that phlegmy's daughter indulged in paid sex and he never denied it. per your formula, that is a fact then? this is exactly why you're a douche.

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:So Rashman, by your logic if someone does not deny something, that makes it true? If your geriatric boyfriend makes up a wild story about someone and they choose to ignore it, that makes it the truth for you?

in this case, Propa did not just ignore JM's statement nor did he bother issuing any kind of clarification. Propa's response to this issue was to claim that JM is having an incestuous relationship with his daughter and to give death threats to JM. This carried on for years. Based on my reading of those posts (over several years) i conclude that JM is telling the truth.

Hellsangel wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:So Rashman, by your logic if someone does not deny something, that makes it true? If your geriatric boyfriend makes up a wild story about someone and they choose to ignore it, that makes it the truth for you?

in this case, Propa did not just ignore JM's statement nor did he bother issuing any kind of clarification. Propa's response to this issue was to claim that JM is having an incestuous relationship with his daughter and to give death threats to JM. This carried on for years. Based on my reading of those posts (over several years) i conclude that JM is telling the truth.

Did the old dog ever deny it or issue any kind of clarification?

Rashmun wrote:
one does not dignify a patently false charge about one's child with a response. Further, Knowing Propa and his foul mouth one can readily believe that he said everything JM accuses him of doing.

Hellsangel wrote:

Rashmun wrote:
one does not dignify a patently false charge about one's child with a response. Further, Knowing Propa and his foul mouth one can readily believe that he said everything JM accuses him of doing.

By what logic is one a patently false charge and not the other?

panini press wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

Rashmun wrote:
one does not dignify a patently false charge about one's child with a response. Further, Knowing Propa and his foul mouth one can readily believe that he said everything JM accuses him of doing.

By what logic is one a patently false charge and not the other?

One was made by a poster Rashmun likes. The other was made by a poster Rashmun does not like. Duh!

PS: For more on this, see any encyclopedia under the title Rashmun Method.

Rashmun wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:Rashman, you swallow what your geriatric boyfriend feeds you like it is the gospel truth, don't you?

although i was not present on chat at the time, i was present on sulekha at the time this episode took place. Not once on sulekha did Propa accuse JM of lying. Propa's response was to accuse JM of having an incestuous relationship with his daughter whenever JM would bring this up.

I was also not on chat when Propa gave links to pictures of JM's wife and daughter and expressed a desire to have sex with them. JM has brought it up on this forum and Propa has never denied doing this either.

douchemun, I insinuated on the old forum that phlegmy's daughter indulged in paid sex and he never denied it. per your formula, that is a fact then? this is exactly why you're a douche.

you may have said this once or twice. i do not recall you saying it. further, one does not bother to dignify by any clarification an obscene comment about one's child. your case of the hairy legs was different as i explained in my previous post.

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:Rashman, you swallow what your geriatric boyfriend feeds you like it is the gospel truth, don't you?

although i was not present on chat at the time, i was present on sulekha at the time this episode took place. Not once on sulekha did Propa accuse JM of lying. Propa's response was to accuse JM of having an incestuous relationship with his daughter whenever JM would bring this up.

I was also not on chat when Propa gave links to pictures of JM's wife and daughter and expressed a desire to have sex with them. JM has brought it up on this forum and Propa has never denied doing this either.

douchemun, I insinuated on the old forum that phlegmy's daughter indulged in paid sex and he never denied it. per your formula, that is a fact then? this is exactly why you're a douche.

you may have said this once or twice. i do not recall you saying it. further, one does not bother to dignify by any clarification an obscene comment about one's child. your case of the hairy legs was different as i explained in my previous post.

now you have a stratification based on how many times someone has repeated an accusation such that it becomes a fact? if so, someone calls you a motherfucker 200 times and you only respond once it becomes a fact?

also the severity of family abuse differs on who gets abused and there is a grading now? this is why I call you a douche.

Rashmun wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

although i was not present on chat at the time, i was present on sulekha at the time this episode took place. Not once on sulekha did Propa accuse JM of lying. Propa's response was to accuse JM of having an incestuous relationship with his daughter whenever JM would bring this up.

I was also not on chat when Propa gave links to pictures of JM's wife and daughter and expressed a desire to have sex with them. JM has brought it up on this forum and Propa has never denied doing this either.

douchemun, I insinuated on the old forum that phlegmy's daughter indulged in paid sex and he never denied it. per your formula, that is a fact then? this is exactly why you're a douche.

you may have said this once or twice. i do not recall you saying it. further, one does not bother to dignify by any clarification an obscene comment about one's child. your case of the hairy legs was different as i explained in my previous post.

now you have a stratification based on how many times someone has repeated an accusation such that it becomes a fact? if so, someone calls you a motherfucker 200 times and you only respond once it becomes a fact?

also the severity of family abuse differs on who gets abused and there is a grading now? this is why I call you a douche.

as mentioned earlier talking about the hairy legs of a family member might be unusual for others but for a completely foul mouthed person with filth oozing out of his mouth every second it is nothing unusual and in fact something to be expected.

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

douchemun, I insinuated on the old forum that phlegmy's daughter indulged in paid sex and he never denied it. per your formula, that is a fact then? this is exactly why you're a douche.

you may have said this once or twice. i do not recall you saying it. further, one does not bother to dignify by any clarification an obscene comment about one's child. your case of the hairy legs was different as i explained in my previous post.

now you have a stratification based on how many times someone has repeated an accusation such that it becomes a fact? if so, someone calls you a motherfucker 200 times and you only respond once it becomes a fact?

also the severity of family abuse differs on who gets abused and there is a grading now? this is why I call you a douche.

as mentioned earlier talking about the hairy legs of a family member might be unusual for others but for a completely foul mouthed person with filth oozing out of his mouth every second it is nothing unusual and in fact something to be expected.

go fuck yourself, monkey. you've abused ppl's mothers and family member in a much worse fashion and are now giving me the holier than thou spiel. go give your geriatric boyfriend a blowjob.

Propagandhi711 wrote:go fuck yourself, monkey.

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:go fuck yourself, monkey.

hahaha, how old are you, propa?

Hellsangel wrote:

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:go fuck yourself, monkey.

hahaha, how old are you, propa?

Hello, old dog. Here is a new trick to learn.

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:go fuck yourself, monkey.

hahaha, how old are you, propa?

Hello, old dog. Here is a new trick to learn.

Hello, little puppy.

Hellsangel wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:go fuck yourself, monkey.

hahaha, how old are you, propa?

Hello, old dog. Here is a new trick to learn.

Hello, little puppy.

Rashman, why do you feel the need to rush to the old dog's defense? Is it some kind of a strategic alliance or just loyalty?

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:hahaha, how old are you, propa?

Hello, old dog. Here is a new trick to learn.

Hello, little puppy.

Rashman, why do you feel the need to rush to the old dog's defense? Is it some kind of a strategic alliance or just loyalty?

I just wanted to have some fun with you little puppy.

Hellsangel wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

Hello, old dog. Here is a new trick to learn.

Hello, little puppy.

Rashman, why do you feel the need to rush to the old dog's defense? Is it some kind of a strategic alliance or just loyalty?

I just wanted to have some fun with you little puppy.

Do you realize that it is you who is actually providing me the entertainment, Rashman?

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Hello, little puppy.

Rashman, why do you feel the need to rush to the old dog's defense? Is it some kind of a strategic alliance or just loyalty?

I just wanted to have some fun with you little puppy.

Do you realize that it is you who is actually providing me the entertainment, Rashman?

And do you realize you provide me with loads of entertainment yourself, little puppy?

Hellsangel wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

Rashman, why do you feel the need to rush to the old dog's defense? Is it some kind of a strategic alliance or just loyalty?

I just wanted to have some fun with you little puppy.

Do you realize that it is you who is actually providing me the entertainment, Rashman?

And do you realize you provide me with loads of entertainment yourself, little puppy?

If you say so, Rashman. After all that epic whining today, I guess your meds started reacting again.

PS: I like puppies. I think they are cute.

Hellsangel wrote:Oh! So it is about calling the old dog, old dog? Loyalty to the old dog?

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:Oh! So it is about calling the old dog, old dog? Loyalty to the old dog?

not really. i thought this is how you greet each other in your family by calling each other dogs, old dogs, and puppies.

Hellsangel wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:Oh! So it is about calling the old dog, old dog? Loyalty to the old dog?

not really. i thought this is how you greet each other in your family by calling each other dogs, old dogs, and puppies.

No loyalty to the old dog?

Rashmun wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

you may have said this once or twice. i do not recall you saying it. further, one does not bother to dignify by any clarification an obscene comment about one's child. your case of the hairy legs was different as i explained in my previous post.

now you have a stratification based on how many times someone has repeated an accusation such that it becomes a fact? if so, someone calls you a motherfucker 200 times and you only respond once it becomes a fact?

also the severity of family abuse differs on who gets abused and there is a grading now? this is why I call you a douche.

as mentioned earlier talking about the hairy legs of a family member might be unusual for others but for a completely foul mouthed person with filth oozing out of his mouth every second it is nothing unusual and in fact something to be expected.

go fuck yourself, monkey. you've abused ppl's mothers and family member in a much worse fashion and are now giving me the holier than thou spiel. go give your geriatric boyfriend a blowjob.

i have only indulged in a proportionate usage of extreme language and that too i have greatly reduced since my younger days. also, i have never abused children of any posters like you have. Let's face it. You're essentially a big bag of filth.