Assam vs Kashmir

by confuzzled dude Mon May 05, 2014 11:57 pm

Kashmir : Between 250 and 650 pandits were killed since the '80s, Around 150,000 were displaced
Assam : Between 3000 and 10,000 (Majority were Muslims from Bangladesh) were killed since '83 and about 400,000 were forced to leave Assam.

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Tue May 06, 2014 12:02 am

confuzzled dude wrote:Kashmir : Between 250 and 650 pandits were killed since the '80s, Around 150,000 were displaced
Assam : Between 3000 and 10,000 (Majority were Muslims from Bangladesh) were killed since '83 and about 400,000 were forced to leave Assam.

Addendum:

Kashmir: No pandit returned or any Indian citizen allowed to buy land and settle in kashmir

Assam: Millions more Bangladesh - mostly muslims - settled in Assam and Tripura and elsewhere.

by Vakavaka Pakapaka Tue May 06, 2014 12:06 am

So, your sikular argument is that Kshmiri Muslim killers are nicer compared to Assamese non-Muslim killers.

1984 CONmen are better than 2002 Modi-wallahs.

Indian Mujhideen are better than Ram Sene.

ISI is better than Saffron terrorists.

Rahul is better than Modi

----------------------------

Muslims are better than Hindus.

Garibi Hatao.

by confuzzled dude Tue May 06, 2014 12:07 am

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:Kashmir : Between 250 and 650 pandits were killed since the '80s, Around 150,000 were displaced
Assam : Between 3000 and 10,000 (Majority were Muslims from Bangladesh) were killed since '83 and about 400,000 were forced to leave Assam.

Addendum:

Kashmir: No pandit returned or any Indian citizen allowed to buy land and settle in kashmir

Assam: Millions more Bangladesh - mostly muslims - settled in Assam and Tripura and elsewhere.

You are not allowed to buy land in Sevaji's state and other north eastern states either.

by confuzzled dude Tue May 06, 2014 12:09 am

Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:So, your sikular argument is that Kshmiri Muslim killers are nicer compared to Assamese non-Muslim killers.

1984 CONmen are better than 2002 Modi-wallahs.

Indian Mujhideen are better than Ram Sene.

ISI is better than Saffron terrorists.

Rahul is better than Modi

----------------------------

Muslims are better than Hindus.

Garibi Hatao.

Nope, my point is about the double standards practiced by the chaddi party.

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Tue May 06, 2014 12:24 am

confuzzled dude wrote:
Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:So, your sikular argument is that Kshmiri Muslim killers are nicer compared to Assamese non-Muslim killers.

1984 CONmen are better than 2002 Modi-wallahs.

Indian Mujhideen are better than Ram Sene.

ISI is better than Saffron terrorists.

Rahul is better than Modi

----------------------------

Muslims are better than Hindus.

Garibi Hatao.

Nope, my point is about the double standards practiced by the chaddi party.

Lemme quote your fellow Pseudo-secular Flimmy:

"Illegals in Assam are Bangladeshis. hence, irrelevant"

by confuzzled dude Tue May 06, 2014 12:38 am

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:So, your sikular argument is that Kshmiri Muslim killers are nicer compared to Assamese non-Muslim killers.

1984 CONmen are better than 2002 Modi-wallahs.

Indian Mujhideen are better than Ram Sene.

ISI is better than Saffron terrorists.

Rahul is better than Modi

----------------------------

Muslims are better than Hindus.

Garibi Hatao.

Nope, my point is about the double standards practiced by the chaddi party.

Lemme quote your fellow Pseudo-secular Flimmy:

"Illegals in Assam are Bangladeshis. hence, irrelevant"

that's right! I forgot illegals lives are worth zilch.

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Tue May 06, 2014 12:56 am

confuzzled dude wrote:
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:So, your sikular argument is that Kshmiri Muslim killers are nicer compared to Assamese non-Muslim killers.

1984 CONmen are better than 2002 Modi-wallahs.

Indian Mujhideen are better than Ram Sene.

ISI is better than Saffron terrorists.

Rahul is better than Modi

----------------------------

Muslims are better than Hindus.

Garibi Hatao.

Nope, my point is about the double standards practiced by the chaddi party.

Lemme quote your fellow Pseudo-secular Flimmy:

"Illegals in Assam are Bangladeshis. hence, irrelevant"
that's right! I forgot illegals lives are worth zilch.

really....hw come I have never seen the Pseudo-seculars never cared or shed a tear for hindus in Pakistan or elsewhere - if Bangladeshi muslim illegal lives are so very imprtant?

or

you guys think that 1 muslim life == 10 hindu lives, and they dont matter?

by confuzzled dude Tue May 06, 2014 1:06 am

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

really....hw come I have never seen the Pseudo-seculars never cared or shed a tear for hindus in Pakistan or elsewhere - if Bangladeshi muslim illegal lives are so very imprtant?

or

you guys think that 1 muslim life == 10 hindu lives, and they dont matter?

There is a good reason for holding democratic nations like US & India to higher standards than your favorite nation. Unlike NRI patriots to whom Pakistan is a golden standard for everything they do, others don't care much about that hopeless country, we're talking about atrocities committed in India thus your argument has no merit.

by confuzzled dude Tue May 06, 2014 10:19 pm

"The worst outbreak of violence, in 2012, when over 100 died and about 4.5 lakh were displaced in rioting and killings, was described as the most extensive internal displacement since Partition. A majority of victims and homeless were Muslim; the involvement of the BPF turned up in the arrest of one of its council members, who was accused by witnesses of leading the attacks.

The area’s demography is one reason why trouble will fester rather than abate: it has nothing to do with illegal migration, Bangladeshis, etc. It has everything to do with the fact of how a minority of the population (the Bodos are some 30 per cent of the BTC area) controls the lives and destinies of the others.

In this situation, tossing out the mantra of “Bangladeshi” immigrants as being at the heart of the problem would be extremely ill-advised. Nothing could be further from the truth, so insidiously easy to push, so dangerous to stoke. The Bharatiya Janata Party needs to understand these issues in greater depth before asserting positions which could have devastating consequences on a fragile landscape."

http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/where-everyone-is-a-minority/article5983030.ece?homepage=true

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Tue May 06, 2014 11:07 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
In this situation, tossing out the mantra of “Bangladeshi” immigrants as being at the heart of the problem would be extremely ill-advised. Nothing could be further from the truth, so insidiously easy to push, so dangerous to stoke. The Bharatiya Janata Party needs to understand these issues in greater depth before asserting positions which could have devastating consequences on a fragile landscape."

http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/where-everyone-is-a-minority/article5983030.ece?homepage=true

The #1 enemy of hindus in Hindu India is the Hindu.

by confuzzled dude Wed May 07, 2014 7:35 am

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
In this situation, tossing out the mantra of “Bangladeshi” immigrants as being at the heart of the problem would be extremely ill-advised. Nothing could be further from the truth, so insidiously easy to push, so dangerous to stoke. The Bharatiya Janata Party needs to understand these issues in greater depth before asserting positions which could have devastating consequences on a fragile landscape."

http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/where-everyone-is-a-minority/article5983030.ece?homepage=true

The #1 enemy of hindus in Hindu India is the Hindu.

No surprise; response from a fanatic supporter of a party with single-point agenda & no proven foreign policy acumen, is along the expected lines

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Wed May 07, 2014 9:13 am

confuzzled dude wrote:
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
In this situation, tossing out the mantra of “Bangladeshi” immigrants as being at the heart of the problem would be extremely ill-advised. Nothing could be further from the truth, so insidiously easy to push, so dangerous to stoke. The Bharatiya Janata Party needs to understand these issues in greater depth before asserting positions which could have devastating consequences on a fragile landscape."

http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/where-everyone-is-a-minority/article5983030.ece?homepage=true

The #1 enemy of hindus in Hindu India is the Hindu.
No surprise; response from a fanatic supporter of a party with single-point agenda & no proven foreign policy acumen, is along the expected lines

The Apologists should be ashamed to say that illegals (be it in India or US) should be allowed to run their writ on the original citizens - irrespective of the reasons and excuses.

by confuzzled dude Wed May 07, 2014 12:25 pm

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
In this situation, tossing out the mantra of “Bangladeshi” immigrants as being at the heart of the problem would be extremely ill-advised. Nothing could be further from the truth, so insidiously easy to push, so dangerous to stoke. The Bharatiya Janata Party needs to understand these issues in greater depth before asserting positions which could have devastating consequences on a fragile landscape."

http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/where-everyone-is-a-minority/article5983030.ece?homepage=true

The #1 enemy of hindus in Hindu India is the Hindu.
No surprise; response from a fanatic supporter of a party with single-point agenda & no proven foreign policy acumen, is along the expected lines

The Apologists should be ashamed to say that illegals (be it in India or US) should be allowed to run their writ on the original citizens - irrespective of the reasons and excuses.

So taking matters into ones own hands is justified and supporters of that approach are patriots.

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Wed May 07, 2014 12:40 pm

[quote="confuzzled dude"]

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:

The Apologists should be ashamed to say that illegals (be it in India or US) should be allowed to run their writ on the original citizens - irrespective of the reasons and excuses.
So taking matters into ones own hands is justified and supporters of that approach are patriots.

read Modi's speech. If following supreme Court ruling, existing law, and acting per law is hindutva - so be it.

I think we should call all Bangladeshi illegals as criminals - after all they broke the law. That will make the apologists supporters of criminals.

by confuzzled dude Wed May 07, 2014 1:02 pm

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote: read Modi's speech. If following supreme Court ruling, existing law, and acting per law is hindutva - so be it.

million dollar question is, does he even know what the heck he is even talking about?

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
I think we should call all Bangladeshi illegals as criminals - after all they broke the law. That will make the apologists supporters of criminals.

Right the guys that crossed the border are criminals but the ones took thousands of lives are saints err.. saffron-clad sadhus

by Sponsored content

Assam vs Kashmir

Assam vs Kashmir

Re: Assam vs Kashmir

Re: Assam vs Kashmir

Re: Assam vs Kashmir

Re: Assam vs Kashmir

Re: Assam vs Kashmir

Re: Assam vs Kashmir

Re: Assam vs Kashmir

Re: Assam vs Kashmir

Re: Assam vs Kashmir

Re: Assam vs Kashmir

Re: Assam vs Kashmir

Re: Assam vs Kashmir

Re: Assam vs Kashmir

Re: Assam vs Kashmir

Re: Assam vs Kashmir

Re: Assam vs Kashmir