Wow Ammachi!

indophile wrote:Who? the one here, or the one who spreads love by hugging?

truthbetold wrote:

indophile wrote:Who? the one here, or the one who spreads love by hugging?

such ammachi would also like to hug people. but he told us that his wife spurned him and does not allow him to come near her. his constant negatives drives him to deeper jealous rages against all such posters and more particularly against female handles.

confuzzled dude wrote:What's the need for this? Please keep personal details out of our discussions

truthbetold wrote:

indophile wrote:Who? the one here, or the one who spreads love by hugging?

such ammachi would also like to hug people. but he told us that his wife spurned him and does not allow him to come near her. his constant negatives drives him to deeper jealous rages against all such poster's and more particularly against female handles.

swapna wrote:

truthbetold wrote:

indophile wrote:Who? the one here, or the one who spreads love by hugging?

such ammachi would also like to hug people. but he told us that his wife spurned him and does not allow him to come near her. his constant negatives drives him to deeper jealous rages against all such poster's and more particularly against female handles.

Good news: this post is a vast improvement on all of TBT's previous posts, for it contains only two errors.

Bad news: those errors, however, are serious grammatical errors, which will not be forgiven even in Lithuania, where he apparently lives.

+1 + (-2) = -1

Rashmun wrote:

truthbetold wrote:

indophile wrote:Who? the one here, or the one who spreads love by hugging?

such ammachi would also like to hug people. but he told us that his wife spurned him and does not allow him to come near her. his constant negatives drives him to deeper jealous rages against all such posters and more particularly against female handles.

TBT, show some class. bringing someone's wife into an internet discussion as a means of slamming a poster you dislike is completely tasteless and trashy.

i am sure u would not mind my giving you this unsolicited advice since not long ago u were imploring me to show more class.

b_A wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

truthbetold wrote:

indophile wrote:Who? the one here, or the one who spreads love by hugging?

such ammachi would also like to hug people. but he told us that his wife spurned him and does not allow him to come near her. his constant negatives drives him to deeper jealous rages against all such posters and more particularly against female handles.

TBT, show some class. bringing someone's wife into an internet discussion as a means of slamming a poster you dislike is completely tasteless and trashy.

i am sure u would not mind my giving you this unsolicited advice since not long ago u were imploring me to show more class.

Your sanctimonious lectures would've had so much more credibility if only you had ticked off the evil loser when he/she/it made inappropriate comments about Tracy's mother , GC's mother and Propa's wife.

b_A wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

truthbetold wrote:

indophile wrote:Who? the one here, or the one who spreads love by hugging?

such ammachi would also like to hug people. but he told us that his wife spurned him and does not allow him to come near her. his constant negatives drives him to deeper jealous rages against all such posters and more particularly against female handles.

TBT, show some class. bringing someone's wife into an internet discussion as a means of slamming a poster you dislike is completely tasteless and trashy.

i am sure u would not mind my giving you this unsolicited advice since not long ago u were imploring me to show more class.

Your sanctimonious lectures would've had so much more credibility if only you had ticked off the evil loser when he/she/it made inappropriate comments about Tracy's mother , GC's mother and Propa's wife.

nevada wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:What's the need for this? Please keep personal details out of our discussions

+1.

goodcitizn wrote:

b_A wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

truthbetold wrote:

indophile wrote:Who? the one here, or the one who spreads love by hugging?

such ammachi would also like to hug people. but he told us that his wife spurned him and does not allow him to come near her. his constant negatives drives him to deeper jealous rages against all such posters and more particularly against female handles.

TBT, show some class. bringing someone's wife into an internet discussion as a means of slamming a poster you dislike is completely tasteless and trashy.

i am sure u would not mind my giving you this unsolicited advice since not long ago u were imploring me to show more class.

Your sanctimonious lectures would've had so much more credibility if only you had ticked off the evil loser when he/she/it made inappropriate comments about Tracy's mother , GC's mother and Propa's wife.

+1.

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

b_A wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

truthbetold wrote:

indophile wrote:Who? the one here, or the one who spreads love by hugging?

such ammachi would also like to hug people. but he told us that his wife spurned him and does not allow him to come near her. his constant negatives drives him to deeper jealous rages against all such posters and more particularly against female handles.

TBT, show some class. bringing someone's wife into an internet discussion as a means of slamming a poster you dislike is completely tasteless and trashy.

i am sure u would not mind my giving you this unsolicited advice since not long ago u were imploring me to show more class.

Your sanctimonious lectures would've had so much more credibility if only you had ticked off the evil loser when he/she/it made inappropriate comments about Tracy's mother , GC's mother and Propa's wife.

Oh...that is normal and game as well for Maulana Rashmunullah Al-Akbari, who actually started that strategy...of threatening to rape them.

Rashmun wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:

b_A wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

truthbetold wrote:
such ammachi would also like to hug people. but he told us that his wife spurned him and does not allow him to come near her. his constant negatives drives him to deeper jealous rages against all such posters and more particularly against female handles.

TBT, show some class. bringing someone's wife into an internet discussion as a means of slamming a poster you dislike is completely tasteless and trashy.

i am sure u would not mind my giving you this unsolicited advice since not long ago u were imploring me to show more class.

Your sanctimonious lectures would've had so much more credibility if only you had ticked off the evil loser when he/she/it made inappropriate comments about Tracy's mother , GC's mother and Propa's wife.

+1.

GC, why do u hate Luke so much? is it because you want to fit in with the crowd and ingratiate yourself with people who love to abuse Luke? how come i did not see u complaining when certain posters posted private details of Luke and also Luke's wife and daughter? it is sad to see you behaving like a hypocrite.

goodcitizn wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:

b_A wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

TBT, show some class. bringing someone's wife into an internet discussion as a means of slamming a poster you dislike is completely tasteless and trashy.

i am sure u would not mind my giving you this unsolicited advice since not long ago u were imploring me to show more class.

Your sanctimonious lectures would've had so much more credibility if only you had ticked off the evil loser when he/she/it made inappropriate comments about Tracy's mother , GC's mother and Propa's wife.

+1.

GC, why do u hate Luke so much? is it because you want to fit in with the crowd and ingratiate yourself with people who love to abuse Luke? how come i did not see u complaining when certain posters posted private details of Luke and also Luke's wife and daughter? it is sad to see you behaving like a hypocrite.

Why are you sucking up to him? This guy has a very mean and dirty streak which shows up periodically. You have conveniently turned a blind eye to his vulgar, cheap shots at many of us here dragging up personal matters. If you pride yourself as being a long term member of CH, then you'd have seen such events. Kindly refrain from the audacity to lecture us on what is proper behavior.

Rashmun wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:

b_A wrote:

Your sanctimonious lectures would've had so much more credibility if only you had ticked off the evil loser when he/she/it made inappropriate comments about Tracy's mother , GC's mother and Propa's wife.

+1.

GC, why do u hate Luke so much? is it because you want to fit in with the crowd and ingratiate yourself with people who love to abuse Luke? how come i did not see u complaining when certain posters posted private details of Luke and also Luke's wife and daughter? it is sad to see you behaving like a hypocrite.

Why are you sucking up to him? This guy has a very mean and dirty streak which shows up periodically. You have conveniently turned a blind eye to his vulgar, cheap shots at many of us here dragging up personal matters. If you pride yourself as being a long term member of CH, then you'd have seen such events. Kindly refrain from the audacity to lecture us on what is proper behavior.

Luke has never divulged details like residential address, phone number, and personal information about any poster's wife and daughter. but other posters have done this to Luke. Luke may have used sharp words while criticizing others, and that is the right of any online poster. This cliquish behavior of certain posters where they keep sniping at Luke, and revealing private details about him, in order to ingratiate themselves with those who hate Luke or else because they just have a mean and dirty streak needs to come to an end now. Enough is enough. Your hypocritical behavior where you snipe at Luke and turn a blind eye to those who post details about his residential address, phone number and the facebook pages of his wife and daughter has no place in decent discourse.

goodcitizn wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:

+1.

GC, why do u hate Luke so much? is it because you want to fit in with the crowd and ingratiate yourself with people who love to abuse Luke? how come i did not see u complaining when certain posters posted private details of Luke and also Luke's wife and daughter? it is sad to see you behaving like a hypocrite.

Why are you sucking up to him? This guy has a very mean and dirty streak which shows up periodically. You have conveniently turned a blind eye to his vulgar, cheap shots at many of us here dragging up personal matters. If you pride yourself as being a long term member of CH, then you'd have seen such events. Kindly refrain from the audacity to lecture us on what is proper behavior.

Luke has never divulged details like residential address, phone number, and personal information about any poster's wife and daughter. but other posters have done this to Luke. Luke may have used sharp words while criticizing others, and that is the right of any online poster. This cliquish behavior of certain posters where they keep sniping at Luke, and revealing private details about him, in order to ingratiate themselves with those who hate Luke or else because they just have a mean and dirty streak needs to come to an end now. Enough is enough. Your hypocritical behavior where you snipe at Luke and turn a blind eye to those who post details about his residential address, phone number and the facebook pages of his wife and daughter has no place in decent discourse.

Cut the crap. If you are speaking about me, show one incident where I mentioned anything about his personal info. Outside of that, I am neither the gatekeeper of morality nor the moral police of SuCH. If you want to be one, go ahead and have a blast being one. And when you take on that role be sure to ask your paragon of virtue to not divulge the employer of someone he dislikes. What is good for the goose is good for the gander.

Rashmun wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

GC, why do u hate Luke so much? is it because you want to fit in with the crowd and ingratiate yourself with people who love to abuse Luke? how come i did not see u complaining when certain posters posted private details of Luke and also Luke's wife and daughter? it is sad to see you behaving like a hypocrite.

Why are you sucking up to him? This guy has a very mean and dirty streak which shows up periodically. You have conveniently turned a blind eye to his vulgar, cheap shots at many of us here dragging up personal matters. If you pride yourself as being a long term member of CH, then you'd have seen such events. Kindly refrain from the audacity to lecture us on what is proper behavior.

Luke has never divulged details like residential address, phone number, and personal information about any poster's wife and daughter. but other posters have done this to Luke. Luke may have used sharp words while criticizing others, and that is the right of any online poster. This cliquish behavior of certain posters where they keep sniping at Luke, and revealing private details about him, in order to ingratiate themselves with those who hate Luke or else because they just have a mean and dirty streak needs to come to an end now. Enough is enough. Your hypocritical behavior where you snipe at Luke and turn a blind eye to those who post details about his residential address, phone number and the facebook pages of his wife and daughter has no place in decent discourse.

Cut the crap. If you are speaking about me, show one incident where I mentioned anything about his personal info. Outside of that, I am neither the gatekeeper of morality nor the moral police of SuCH. If you want to be one, go ahead and have a blast being one. And when you take on that role be sure to ask your paragon of virtue to not divulge the employer of someone he dislikes. What is good for the goose is good for the gander.

Luke divulged the name of PP's employer because he knew that would ensure that PP's buddies will henceforth refrain from posting private details about him. It was a retaliatory tactic; he did not initiate this fight about revealing private details of another poster. Following this retaliatory tactic PP was forced to come up with a privacy policy for this forum which did not exist before until his own privacy started being compromised.

yes, you have never mentioned Luke's private info. nor have u reprimanded others for mentioning his private info. you see his faults, but u do not see the faults of those who provoke him presumably because u wish to ingratiate yourself with certain posters in this forum who hate him.

goodcitizn wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:

Why are you sucking up to him? This guy has a very mean and dirty streak which shows up periodically. You have conveniently turned a blind eye to his vulgar, cheap shots at many of us here dragging up personal matters. If you pride yourself as being a long term member of CH, then you'd have seen such events. Kindly refrain from the audacity to lecture us on what is proper behavior.

Luke has never divulged details like residential address, phone number, and personal information about any poster's wife and daughter. but other posters have done this to Luke. Luke may have used sharp words while criticizing others, and that is the right of any online poster. This cliquish behavior of certain posters where they keep sniping at Luke, and revealing private details about him, in order to ingratiate themselves with those who hate Luke or else because they just have a mean and dirty streak needs to come to an end now. Enough is enough. Your hypocritical behavior where you snipe at Luke and turn a blind eye to those who post details about his residential address, phone number and the facebook pages of his wife and daughter has no place in decent discourse.

Cut the crap. If you are speaking about me, show one incident where I mentioned anything about his personal info. Outside of that, I am neither the gatekeeper of morality nor the moral police of SuCH. If you want to be one, go ahead and have a blast being one. And when you take on that role be sure to ask your paragon of virtue to not divulge the employer of someone he dislikes. What is good for the goose is good for the gander.

Luke divulged the name of PP's employer because he knew that would ensure that PP's buddies will henceforth refrain from posting private details about him. It was a retaliatory tactic; he did not initiate this fight about revealing private details of another poster. Following this retaliatory tactic PP was forced to come up with a privacy policy for this forum which did not exist before until his own privacy started being compromised.

yes, you have never mentioned Luke's private info. nor have u reprimanded others for mentioning his private info. you see his faults, but u do not see the faults of those who provoke him presumably because u wish to ingratiate yourself with certain posters in this forum who hate him.

So he can divulge personal info on a fellow CHer and you can conveniently rationalize it as a tactical maneuver, yet you can't see the slightest rationale behind someone else resorting to the same tactic with him. That to me is the definition of hypocrisy.

Did you hear what I said? I am not the moral police here. I don't reprimand anyone here nor do I have any inclination to do so.

Rashmun wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Luke has never divulged details like residential address, phone number, and personal information about any poster's wife and daughter. but other posters have done this to Luke. Luke may have used sharp words while criticizing others, and that is the right of any online poster. This cliquish behavior of certain posters where they keep sniping at Luke, and revealing private details about him, in order to ingratiate themselves with those who hate Luke or else because they just have a mean and dirty streak needs to come to an end now. Enough is enough. Your hypocritical behavior where you snipe at Luke and turn a blind eye to those who post details about his residential address, phone number and the facebook pages of his wife and daughter has no place in decent discourse.

Cut the crap. If you are speaking about me, show one incident where I mentioned anything about his personal info. Outside of that, I am neither the gatekeeper of morality nor the moral police of SuCH. If you want to be one, go ahead and have a blast being one. And when you take on that role be sure to ask your paragon of virtue to not divulge the employer of someone he dislikes. What is good for the goose is good for the gander.

Luke divulged the name of PP's employer because he knew that would ensure that PP's buddies will henceforth refrain from posting private details about him. It was a retaliatory tactic; he did not initiate this fight about revealing private details of another poster. Following this retaliatory tactic PP was forced to come up with a privacy policy for this forum which did not exist before until his own privacy started being compromised.

yes, you have never mentioned Luke's private info. nor have u reprimanded others for mentioning his private info. you see his faults, but u do not see the faults of those who provoke him presumably because u wish to ingratiate yourself with certain posters in this forum who hate him.

So he can divulge personal info on a fellow CHer and you can conveniently rationalize it as a tactical maneuver, yet you can't see the slightest rationale behind someone else resorting to the same tactic with him. That to me is the definition of hypocrisy.

Did you hear what I said? I am not the moral police here. I don't reprimand anyone here nor do I have any inclination to do so.

with respect to the divulgence of private information, the question is: who started it? what would you have done in Luke's place if you wanted PP's buddies to refrain from posting private information about yourself and also about your wife and daughter? i know i would have done exactly what he did. In fact he behaved like a gentleman; he refrained from sharing PP's personal info for several months (maybe as long as an year). But when it continued on and on, he put an end to it in the only way that he could.

i am not asking you to be the moral police here. i am only asking you to stop sniping at him because you are seeing his faults but not the faults of certain posters on this forum who are guilty of provoking him in unacceptable ways.

b_A wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:

Cut the crap. If you are speaking about me, show one incident where I mentioned anything about his personal info. Outside of that, I am neither the gatekeeper of morality nor the moral police of SuCH. If you want to be one, go ahead and have a blast being one. And when you take on that role be sure to ask your paragon of virtue to not divulge the employer of someone he dislikes. What is good for the goose is good for the gander.

Luke divulged the name of PP's employer because he knew that would ensure that PP's buddies will henceforth refrain from posting private details about him. It was a retaliatory tactic; he did not initiate this fight about revealing private details of another poster. Following this retaliatory tactic PP was forced to come up with a privacy policy for this forum which did not exist before until his own privacy started being compromised.

yes, you have never mentioned Luke's private info. nor have u reprimanded others for mentioning his private info. you see his faults, but u do not see the faults of those who provoke him presumably because u wish to ingratiate yourself with certain posters in this forum who hate him.

So he can divulge personal info on a fellow CHer and you can conveniently rationalize it as a tactical maneuver, yet you can't see the slightest rationale behind someone else resorting to the same tactic with him. That to me is the definition of hypocrisy.

Did you hear what I said? I am not the moral police here. I don't reprimand anyone here nor do I have any inclination to do so.

with respect to the divulgence of private information, the question is: who started it? what would you have done in Luke's place if you wanted PP's buddies to refrain from posting private information about yourself and also about your wife and daughter? i know i would have done exactly what he did. In fact he behaved like a gentleman; he refrained from sharing PP's personal info for several months (maybe as long as an year). But when it continued on and on, he put an end to it in the only way that he could.

i am not asking you to be the moral police here. i am only asking you to stop sniping at him because you are seeing his faults but not the faults of certain posters on this forum who are guilty of provoking him in unacceptable ways.

What kind of a sick evil #@%@#$ tries to harm someone's career by reporting to the HR department ?
Just because you don't have any friends and you think the evil loser is your only friend , you are trying to defend his actions. Let me tell you something. The evil loser has very low opinion of you. He is just tolerating you because you are being useful to him. Don't divulge any of your personal information to him because tomorrow, if he gets upset with you for the slightest of reasons , he will complain to your HR department too.

Rashmun wrote:

b_A wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Luke divulged the name of PP's employer because he knew that would ensure that PP's buddies will henceforth refrain from posting private details about him. It was a retaliatory tactic; he did not initiate this fight about revealing private details of another poster. Following this retaliatory tactic PP was forced to come up with a privacy policy for this forum which did not exist before until his own privacy started being compromised.

yes, you have never mentioned Luke's private info. nor have u reprimanded others for mentioning his private info. you see his faults, but u do not see the faults of those who provoke him presumably because u wish to ingratiate yourself with certain posters in this forum who hate him.

So he can divulge personal info on a fellow CHer and you can conveniently rationalize it as a tactical maneuver, yet you can't see the slightest rationale behind someone else resorting to the same tactic with him. That to me is the definition of hypocrisy.

Did you hear what I said? I am not the moral police here. I don't reprimand anyone here nor do I have any inclination to do so.

with respect to the divulgence of private information, the question is: who started it? what would you have done in Luke's place if you wanted PP's buddies to refrain from posting private information about yourself and also about your wife and daughter? i know i would have done exactly what he did. In fact he behaved like a gentleman; he refrained from sharing PP's personal info for several months (maybe as long as an year). But when it continued on and on, he put an end to it in the only way that he could.

i am not asking you to be the moral police here. i am only asking you to stop sniping at him because you are seeing his faults but not the faults of certain posters on this forum who are guilty of provoking him in unacceptable ways.

What kind of a sick evil #@%@#$ tries to harm someone's career by reporting to the HR department ?
Just because you don't have any friends and you think the evil loser is your only friend , you are trying to defend his actions. Let me tell you something. The evil loser has very low opinion of you. He is just tolerating you because you are being useful to him. Don't divulge any of your personal information to him because tomorrow, if he gets upset with you for the slightest of reasons , he will complain to your HR department too.

if Luke would have really complained to Panini Press's  HR department, then i am sure the HR department would have had a word with PP. But PP has assured us that no such thing has happened and that nobody has complained to his HR department. I think we should  trust PP's word on this issue.

goodcitizn wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:

+1.

GC, why do u hate Luke so much? is it because you want to fit in with the crowd and ingratiate yourself with people who love to abuse Luke? how come i did not see u complaining when certain posters posted private details of Luke and also Luke's wife and daughter? it is sad to see you behaving like a hypocrite.

Why are you sucking up to him? This guy has a very mean and dirty streak which shows up periodically. You have conveniently turned a blind eye to his vulgar, cheap shots at many of us here dragging up personal matters. If you pride yourself as being a long term member of CH, then you'd have seen such events. Kindly refrain from the audacity to lecture us on what is proper behavior.

Luke has never divulged details like residential address, phone number, and personal information about any poster's wife and daughter. but other posters have done this to Luke. Luke may have used sharp words while criticizing others, and that is the right of any online poster. This cliquish behavior of certain posters where they keep sniping at Luke, and revealing private details about him, in order to ingratiate themselves with those who hate Luke or else because they just have a mean and dirty streak needs to come to an end now. Enough is enough. Your hypocritical behavior where you snipe at Luke and turn a blind eye to those who post details about his residential address, phone number and the facebook pages of his wife and daughter has no place in decent discourse.

Cut the crap. If you are speaking about me, show one incident where I mentioned anything about his personal info. Outside of that, I am neither the gatekeeper of morality nor the moral police of SuCH. If you want to be one, go ahead and have a blast being one. And when you take on that role be sure to ask your paragon of virtue to not divulge the employer of someone he dislikes. What is good for the goose is good for the gander.

swapna wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

GC, why do u hate Luke so much? is it because you want to fit in with the crowd and ingratiate yourself with people who love to abuse Luke? how come i did not see u complaining when certain posters posted private details of Luke and also Luke's wife and daughter? it is sad to see you behaving like a hypocrite.

Why are you sucking up to him? This guy has a very mean and dirty streak which shows up periodically. You have conveniently turned a blind eye to his vulgar, cheap shots at many of us here dragging up personal matters. If you pride yourself as being a long term member of CH, then you'd have seen such events. Kindly refrain from the audacity to lecture us on what is proper behavior.

Luke has never divulged details like residential address, phone number, and personal information about any poster's wife and daughter. but other posters have done this to Luke. Luke may have used sharp words while criticizing others, and that is the right of any online poster. This cliquish behavior of certain posters where they keep sniping at Luke, and revealing private details about him, in order to ingratiate themselves with those who hate Luke or else because they just have a mean and dirty streak needs to come to an end now. Enough is enough. Your hypocritical behavior where you snipe at Luke and turn a blind eye to those who post details about his residential address, phone number and the facebook pages of his wife and daughter has no place in decent discourse.

Cut the crap. If you are speaking about me, show one incident where I mentioned anything about his personal info. Outside of that, I am neither the gatekeeper of morality nor the moral police of SuCH. If you want to be one, go ahead and have a blast being one. And when you take on that role be sure to ask your paragon of virtue to not divulge the employer of someone he dislikes. What is good for the goose is good for the gander.

"What is good for the goose is good for the gander gaaNDoo." -- The GaaNDoo.

Don't be so hard on yourself, Gdctzn.

swapna wrote:
"What is good for the goose is good for the gander gaaNDoo." -- The GaaNDoo.

Don't be so hard on yourself, Gdctzn.

Hellsangel wrote:In two weeks you will be 70.

Propagandhi711 wrote:ammachi celebrated his 70'd b'day (spawnday?) in glorious fashion: by blowing a single candle on a sugary cupcake from winn-dixie. after waiting futilely for d, s & ex-w to call and wish him, he rode his pink bicycle to the city library, his skinny frame cutting a forlorn figure pedaling in furious anger while braving the texas sun.

Rashmun wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

b_A wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:

So he can divulge personal info on a fellow CHer and you can conveniently rationalize it as a tactical maneuver, yet you can't see the slightest rationale behind someone else resorting to the same tactic with him. That to me is the definition of hypocrisy.

Did you hear what I said? I am not the moral police here. I don't reprimand anyone here nor do I have any inclination to do so.

with respect to the divulgence of private information, the question is: who started it? what would you have done in Luke's place if you wanted PP's buddies to refrain from posting private information about yourself and also about your wife and daughter? i know i would have done exactly what he did. In fact he behaved like a gentleman; he refrained from sharing PP's personal info for several months (maybe as long as an year). But when it continued on and on, he put an end to it in the only way that he could.

i am not asking you to be the moral police here. i am only asking you to stop sniping at him because you are seeing his faults but not the faults of certain posters on this forum who are guilty of provoking him in unacceptable ways.

What kind of a sick evil #@%@#$ tries to harm someone's career by reporting to the HR department ?
Just because you don't have any friends and you think the evil loser is your only friend , you are trying to defend his actions. Let me tell you something. The evil loser has very low opinion of you. He is just tolerating you because you are being useful to him. Don't divulge any of your personal information to him because tomorrow, if he gets upset with you for the slightest of reasons , he will complain to your HR department too.

if Luke would have really complained to Panini Press's  HR department, then i am sure the HR department would have had a word with PP. But PP has assured us that no such thing has happened and that nobody has complained to his HR department. I think we should  trust PP's word on this issue.

this whole thing of Luke complaining to Panini's HR department was probably nothing more than rumor mongering. Luke has never claimed to have done such a thing, and PP has also said that such a thing has not taken place.

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

b_A wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

with respect to the divulgence of private information, the question is: who started it? what would you have done in Luke's place if you wanted PP's buddies to refrain from posting private information about yourself and also about your wife and daughter? i know i would have done exactly what he did. In fact he behaved like a gentleman; he refrained from sharing PP's personal info for several months (maybe as long as an year). But when it continued on and on, he put an end to it in the only way that he could.

i am not asking you to be the moral police here. i am only asking you to stop sniping at him because you are seeing his faults but not the faults of certain posters on this forum who are guilty of provoking him in unacceptable ways.

What kind of a sick evil #@%@#$ tries to harm someone's career by reporting to the HR department ?
Just because you don't have any friends and you think the evil loser is your only friend , you are trying to defend his actions. Let me tell you something. The evil loser has very low opinion of you. He is just tolerating you because you are being useful to him. Don't divulge any of your personal information to him because tomorrow, if he gets upset with you for the slightest of reasons , he will complain to your HR department too.

if Luke would have really complained to Panini Press's  HR department, then i am sure the HR department would have had a word with PP. But PP has assured us that no such thing has happened and that nobody has complained to his HR department. I think we should  trust PP's word on this issue.

this whole thing of Luke complaining to Panini's HR department was probably nothing more than rumor mongering. Luke has never claimed to have done such a thing, and PP has also said that such a thing has not taken place.

rumor mongering, douchemun? your geriatric boyfriend himself bragged to have emailed admin's employer HR dept. he threatened to do the same to me, but when I provided my employer's name and location, he slinked back into his hole without much of a reaction.

chameli wrote:ammachi is a guy ?
on another note  are you guys happy to see me again ?
please say  yes  )

Propagandhi711 wrote:ammachi will celebrate his 70'd b'day (spawnday?) in glorious fashion: by blowing a single candle on a sugary cupcake from winn-dixie. after waiting futilely for d, s & ex-w to call and wish him, he will ride his pink bicycle to the city library, his skinny frame cutting a forlorn figure pedaling in furious anger while braving the texas sun.

*on june 28th

Rashmun wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

b_A wrote:

What kind of a sick evil #@%@#$ tries to harm someone's career by reporting to the HR department ?
Just because you don't have any friends and you think the evil loser is your only friend , you are trying to defend his actions. Let me tell you something. The evil loser has very low opinion of you. He is just tolerating you because you are being useful to him. Don't divulge any of your personal information to him because tomorrow, if he gets upset with you for the slightest of reasons , he will complain to your HR department too.

if Luke would have really complained to Panini Press's  HR department, then i am sure the HR department would have had a word with PP. But PP has assured us that no such thing has happened and that nobody has complained to his HR department. I think we should  trust PP's word on this issue.

this whole thing of Luke complaining to Panini's HR department was probably nothing more than rumor mongering. Luke has never claimed to have done such a thing, and PP has also said that such a thing has not taken place.

rumor mongering, douchemun? your geriatric boyfriend himself bragged to have emailed admin's employer HR dept. he threatened to do the same to me, but when I provided my employer's name and location, he slinked back into his hole without much of a reaction.

no, Luke did not say anything anywhere about complaining to PP's HR dept. your memory has failed you. you are now becoming an old man. On another note, how is your boyfriend Bruce? I recall you had posted his picture in green thong underwear on the old sulekha forum.

michelle2 wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:ammachi will celebrate his 70'd b'day (spawnday?) in glorious fashion: by blowing a single candle on a sugary cupcake from winn-dixie. after waiting futilely for d, s & ex-w to call and wish him, he will ride his pink bicycle to the city library, his skinny frame cutting a forlorn figure pedaling in furious anger while braving the texas sun.

*on june 28th

stealing time from your employer again? at 8:56 in the morning on a monday? no coding to be done today? or have you lost your job for watching porn in your cubicle - famous quote: "korean girls can be hotttttttt!" - and spilling your seed on the floor?

Propagandhi711 wrote:## I recommend you go to denny's and tell them it's your b'day, they might wish you happy b'day and give you free pancakes and syrup

Hellsangel wrote:Achachan Ammachi, your front yard looks like it could use some work. Would you like lawn/landscape service as a birthday present?

chameli wrote:ammachi is a guy ?
on another note  are you guys happy to see me again ?
please say  yes  )