Decoding Modi’s Foreign Policy

by confuzzled dude Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:04 pm

Modi’s foreign policy is likely to be a mix of nationalist-led geopolitics and expedient geoeconomics. These twin foci mean that democracy and human rights issues will become second-order issues.

The nationalist in Modi would like to revive India’s “civilizational role” and restore its ancient glory

Finally, it remains to be seen how he addresses some of the key structural bottlenecks constraining India’s foreign policy. For a country and society as diverse and as complicated as India, foreign policy should not be made in a straitjacket. The biggest challenge will likely not come from Pakistan or China; it will be internal, coming from India’s ambitious regional leaders and from Modi’s own backers in the BJP and its affiliates.

http://carnegieendowment.org/2014/09/23/decoding-modi-s-foreign-policy/hpqy

Pretty much the negatives of this leader/party we've been harping on suCH.

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:33 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
Modi’s foreign policy is likely to be a mix of nationalist-led geopolitics and expedient geoeconomics. These twin foci mean that democracy and human rights issues will become second-order issues.
The nationalist in Modi would like to revive India’s “civilizational role” and restore its ancient glory

Finally, it remains to be seen how he addresses some of the key structural bottlenecks constraining India’s foreign policy. For a country and society as diverse and as complicated as India, foreign policy should not be made in a straitjacket. The biggest challenge will likely not come from Pakistan or China; it will be internal, coming from India’s ambitious regional leaders and from Modi’s own backers in the BJP and its affiliates.
http://carnegieendowment.org/2014/09/23/decoding-modi-s-foreign-policy/hpqy

Pretty much the negatives of this leader/party we've been harping on suCH.

???....????

by Guest Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:57 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
The nationalist in Modi would like to revive India’s “civilizational role” and restore its ancient glory

"The nationalist in Modi would like to revive India’s “civilizational role” and restore its ancient glory. To that end, India must assume a larger role in the shift of global power toward Asia. This can only be achieved on the basis of domestic strength. Modi’s pre-election statements suggested he would eschew any exaggerated portrayal of India’s power. As he said, “we have to put our own house in order so that the world is attracted to us.”² For him, membership in international clubs or regional groupings does not in and of itself make India a serious contender for a seat at the high table of global power. Its path there begins with real changes in the economy, governance, and national power. “India first,”oft repeated during the election, is his clarion call."

negative? scratch

by confuzzled dude Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:59 pm

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Modi’s foreign policy is likely to be a mix of nationalist-led geopolitics and expedient geoeconomics. These twin foci mean that democracy and human rights issues will become second-order issues.
The nationalist in Modi would like to revive India’s “civilizational role” and restore its ancient glory

Finally, it remains to be seen how he addresses some of the key structural bottlenecks constraining India’s foreign policy. For a country and society as diverse and as complicated as India, foreign policy should not be made in a straitjacket. The biggest challenge will likely not come from Pakistan or China; it will be internal, coming from India’s ambitious regional leaders and from Modi’s own backers in the BJP and its affiliates.
http://carnegieendowment.org/2014/09/23/decoding-modi-s-foreign-policy/hpqy

Pretty much the negatives of this leader/party we've been harping on suCH.

???....????

Was referring well balanced, unbiased and level headed SuCHers

by Guest Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:02 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Modi’s foreign policy is likely to be a mix of nationalist-led geopolitics and expedient geoeconomics. These twin foci mean that democracy and human rights issues will become second-order issues.
The nationalist in Modi would like to revive India’s “civilizational role” and restore its ancient glory

Finally, it remains to be seen how he addresses some of the key structural bottlenecks constraining India’s foreign policy. For a country and society as diverse and as complicated as India, foreign policy should not be made in a straitjacket. The biggest challenge will likely not come from Pakistan or China; it will be internal, coming from India’s ambitious regional leaders and from Modi’s own backers in the BJP and its affiliates.
http://carnegieendowment.org/2014/09/23/decoding-modi-s-foreign-policy/hpqy

Pretty much the negatives of this leader/party we've been harping on suCH.

???....????
Was referring well balanced, unbiased and level headed SuCHers

Then you shouldn't be using 'we' here. It should be in third person.

by confuzzled dude Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:11 pm

Kinnera wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Modi’s foreign policy is likely to be a mix of nationalist-led geopolitics and expedient geoeconomics. These twin foci mean that democracy and human rights issues will become second-order issues.
The nationalist in Modi would like to revive India’s “civilizational role” and restore its ancient glory

Finally, it remains to be seen how he addresses some of the key structural bottlenecks constraining India’s foreign policy. For a country and society as diverse and as complicated as India, foreign policy should not be made in a straitjacket. The biggest challenge will likely not come from Pakistan or China; it will be internal, coming from India’s ambitious regional leaders and from Modi’s own backers in the BJP and its affiliates.
http://carnegieendowment.org/2014/09/23/decoding-modi-s-foreign-policy/hpqy

Pretty much the negatives of this leader/party we've been harping on suCH.

???....????
Was referring well balanced, unbiased and level headed SuCHers
Then you shouldn't be using 'we' here. It should be in third person.

Yes you definitely should reference in third person

by truthbetold Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:14 pm

I guess swapna/michelle2/ flimflam only highlights errors in non pseudo secular posts. Even crammer policing is politicized in pseudo secular world.

by smArtha Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:26 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
Modi’s foreign policy is likely to be a mix of nationalist-led geopolitics and expedient geoeconomics. These twin foci mean that democracy and human rights issues will become second-order issues.
The nationalist in Modi would like to revive India’s “civilizational role” and restore its ancient glory

Finally, it remains to be seen how he addresses some of the key structural bottlenecks constraining India’s foreign policy. For a country and society as diverse and as complicated as India, foreign policy should not be made in a straitjacket. The biggest challenge will likely not come from Pakistan or China; it will be internal, coming from India’s ambitious regional leaders and from Modi’s own backers in the BJP and its affiliates.
http://carnegieendowment.org/2014/09/23/decoding-modi-s-foreign-policy/hpqy

Pretty much the negatives of this leader/party we've been harping on suCH.

How are 'internal problems from ambitious local leaders' part of the Foreign Policy?

by smArtha Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:28 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:

Was referring well balanced, unbiased and level headed SuCHers

If you didn't know, you cannot use 'we' when referring to a group that you are not part of.

by confuzzled dude Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:34 pm

smArtha wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Modi’s foreign policy is likely to be a mix of nationalist-led geopolitics and expedient geoeconomics. These twin foci mean that democracy and human rights issues will become second-order issues.
The nationalist in Modi would like to revive India’s “civilizational role” and restore its ancient glory

Finally, it remains to be seen how he addresses some of the key structural bottlenecks constraining India’s foreign policy. For a country and society as diverse and as complicated as India, foreign policy should not be made in a straitjacket. The biggest challenge will likely not come from Pakistan or China; it will be internal, coming from India’s ambitious regional leaders and from Modi’s own backers in the BJP and its affiliates.
http://carnegieendowment.org/2014/09/23/decoding-modi-s-foreign-policy/hpqy

Pretty much the negatives of this leader/party we've been harping on suCH.

How are 'internal problems from ambitious local leaders' part of the Foreign Policy?

Such as being denied entry to leading countries

by confuzzled dude Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:35 pm

smArtha wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:

Was referring well balanced, unbiased and level headed SuCHers

If you didn't know, you cannot use 'we' when referring to a group that you are not part of.

That makes it 3 of us; can I use 'we' now Razz

by smArtha Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:41 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
smArtha wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:

Was referring well balanced, unbiased and level headed SuCHers

If you didn't know, you cannot use 'we' when referring to a group that you are not part of.
That makes it 3 of us; can I use 'we' now

Oh dude.. how many ways you can be confuzzled non-stop. First it was the 'internal issues' vs foreign policy. Then about what constitutes 'we' and now what makes count '3'. Sorry, as much as I'd like to help you out, I have only so much patience and time. Try some other friends on SuCH.

by confuzzled dude Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:43 pm

smArtha wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
smArtha wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:

Was referring well balanced, unbiased and level headed SuCHers

If you didn't know, you cannot use 'we' when referring to a group that you are not part of.
That makes it 3 of us; can I use 'we' now

Oh dude.. how many ways you can be confuzzled non-stop. First it was the 'internal issues' vs foreign policy. Then about what constitutes 'we' and now what makes count '3'. Sorry, as much as I'd like to help you out, I have only so much patience and time. Try some other friends on SuCH.

Snooty Brahmin posing as highly intellectual, again. If don't have time get the heck out of here like anyone cares

by smArtha Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:52 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:

Snooty Brahmin posing as highly intellectual, again. If don't have time get the heck out of here like anyone cares

Another RC issue again. I said I had not much time to help you out of your confusions. I have some time and energy for the forum itself.

by Guest Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:55 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
Kinnera wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:

http://carnegieendowment.org/2014/09/23/decoding-modi-s-foreign-policy/hpqy

Pretty much the negatives of this leader/party we've been harping on suCH.

???....????
Was referring well balanced, unbiased and level headed SuCHers
Then you shouldn't be using 'we' here. It should be in third person.
Yes you definitely should reference in third person

http://www.grammar-monster.com/glossary/third_person.htm

i hope you get what i am trying to say

by Propagandhi711 Wed Sep 24, 2014 6:20 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Modi’s foreign policy is likely to be a mix of nationalist-led geopolitics and expedient geoeconomics. These twin foci mean that democracy and human rights issues will become second-order issues.
The nationalist in Modi would like to revive India’s “civilizational role” and restore its ancient glory

Finally, it remains to be seen how he addresses some of the key structural bottlenecks constraining India’s foreign policy. For a country and society as diverse and as complicated as India, foreign policy should not be made in a straitjacket. The biggest challenge will likely not come from Pakistan or China; it will be internal, coming from India’s ambitious regional leaders and from Modi’s own backers in the BJP and its affiliates.
http://carnegieendowment.org/2014/09/23/decoding-modi-s-foreign-policy/hpqy

Pretty much the negatives of this leader/party we've been harping on suCH.

???....????
Was referring well balanced, unbiased and level headed SuCHers

this must be your new straight faced comedy act. congrats, it was a funny line

by Kayalvizhi Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:37 pm

As with all Indian govs since at least 1983, the prime foreign and defense policy is "above all else, make sure Tamil culture is destroyed everywhere around the globe.

I am neither joking nor frivolous. It is based on a systematic analysis of its relationships with all countries with significant Tamil population.

by Kris Thu Sep 25, 2014 1:58 am

Kayalvizhi wrote:As with all Indian govs since at least 1983, the prime foreign and defense policy is "above all else, make sure Tamil culture is destroyed everywhere around the globe.

I am neither joking nor frivolous. It is based on a systematic analysis of its relationships with all countries with significant Tamil population.

>>>Of course not, just seriously challenged in understanding even the rudiments of what goes into policy making in these matters. What are these countries with significant Tamil populations and what would India's gain by by destroying Tamil culture in those countries? Could you provide your brilliant insight? Even by troll standards, your lack of logic or coherence is astounding.

by Kris Thu Sep 25, 2014 2:09 am

confuzzled dude wrote:
Modi’s foreign policy is likely to be a mix of nationalist-led geopolitics and expedient geoeconomics. These twin foci mean that democracy and human rights issues will become second-order issues.
The nationalist in Modi would like to revive India’s “civilizational role” and restore its ancient glory

Finally, it remains to be seen how he addresses some of the key structural bottlenecks constraining India’s foreign policy. For a country and society as diverse and as complicated as India, foreign policy should not be made in a straitjacket. The biggest challenge will likely not come from Pakistan or China; it will be internal, coming from India’s ambitious regional leaders and from Modi’s own backers in the BJP and its affiliates.
http://carnegieendowment.org/2014/09/23/decoding-modi-s-foreign-policy/hpqy

Pretty much the negatives of this leader/party we've been harping on suCH.

>>>This guy wants to throw everything against the wall to see if something will stick.

#1) Modi’s foreign policy is likely to be a mix of nationalist-led geopolitics and expedient geoeconomics. These twin foci mean that democracy and human rights issues will become second-order issues

>>>>This makes no sense. The former deals with foreign policy, the latter with domestic considerations. The US does this everyday.

#2) The nationalist in Modi would like to revive India’s “civilizational role” and restore its ancient glory

>>>>And this is wrong because?

#3) it remains to be seen how he addresses some of the key structural bottlenecks constraining India’s foreign policy. For a country and society as diverse and as complicated as India, foreign policy should not be made in a straitjacket. The biggest challenge will likely not come from Pakistan or China; it will be internal, coming from India’s ambitious regional leaders and from Modi’s own backers in the BJP and its affiliates.

>>> Foreign policy is neither a black and white issue, nor is it a static issue. Once this basic is understood, the above is essentially gibberish.

by Kayalvizhi Thu Sep 25, 2014 11:45 am

>> what would India's gain by by destroying Tamil culture in those countries?

India as a country does not gain anything by the anti-Tamil foreign, military policies but the ruling elite politicians hailing from Hindi belt who want an Arya-Sanskriti-Hindi empire find Tamil people and Tamil culture a road block.

These "elites" want to establish Sanskrit supremacy claiming it to be the mother of all languages. It was said during constitutional assembly speeches. Recently Your Home Minister Rajnath Singh said that. A letter to CNSE schools from Human Resources Ministry said that. They have a p[roblem. Tamil is outside the Sanskrit family.

Kill off Tamil culture and make Tamil language a half-dead one. Do not allow Tamils to raise their head anywhere in the world lest they prop up Tamil and challenge Sanskrit claims. That is the reason.

by Kayalvizhi Thu Sep 25, 2014 12:04 pm

Actually a neutral or pro-Tamil policy with Sri Lanka is good for India's security in the South. An indep Tamil Eelam would keep China further away from Indian subcontinent and Pak spies and operatives would not be using Lanka occupied Eelam as a kaunching pad.

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Thu Sep 25, 2014 2:14 pm

Kayalvizhi wrote:Actually a neutral or pro-Tamil policy with Sri Lanka is good for India's security in the South. An indep Tamil Eelam would keep China further away from Indian subcontinent and Pak spies and operatives would not be using Lanka occupied Eelam as a kaunching pad.

Let us now forget who passed on the Kaboom technology to the Al-Queda and the Paki Talibanis...

An independent Ealam will not be so independent for more than 6 months. It will be ruled by child-killing gun runners like Somali tribals/pirates

by Kris Fri Sep 26, 2014 1:18 am

Kayalvizhi wrote:>> what would India's gain by by destroying Tamil culture in those countries?

India as a country does not gain anything by the anti-Tamil foreign, military policies but the ruling elite politicians hailing from Hindi belt who want an Arya-Sanskriti-Hindi empire find Tamil people and Tamil culture a road block.

These "elites" want to establish Sanskrit supremacy claiming it to be the mother of all languages. It was said during constitutional assembly speeches. Recently Your Home Minister Rajnath Singh said that. A letter to CNSE schools from Human Resources Ministry said that. They have a p[roblem. Tamil is outside the Sanskrit family.

Kill off Tamil culture and make Tamil language a half-dead one. Do not allow Tamils to raise their head anywhere in the world lest they prop up Tamil and challenge Sanskrit claims. That is the reason.

>>>It is difficult to believe that even for a troll you are this clueless about the world.

by SomeProfile Fri Sep 26, 2014 12:43 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
smArtha wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
smArtha wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:

Was referring well balanced, unbiased and level headed SuCHers

If you didn't know, you cannot use 'we' when referring to a group that you are not part of.
That makes it 3 of us; can I use 'we' now

Oh dude.. how many ways you can be confuzzled non-stop. First it was the 'internal issues' vs foreign policy. Then about what constitutes 'we' and now what makes count '3'. Sorry, as much as I'd like to help you out, I have only so much patience and time. Try some other friends on SuCH.
Snooty Brahmin posing as highly intellectual, again. If don't have time get the heck out of here like anyone cares

The butt-hurt is strong in this one! rofl

by Sponsored content

Decoding Modi’s Foreign Policy

Decoding Modi’s Foreign Policy

Re: Decoding Modi’s Foreign Policy

Re: Decoding Modi’s Foreign Policy

Re: Decoding Modi’s Foreign Policy

Re: Decoding Modi’s Foreign Policy

Re: Decoding Modi’s Foreign Policy

Re: Decoding Modi’s Foreign Policy

Re: Decoding Modi’s Foreign Policy

Re: Decoding Modi’s Foreign Policy

Re: Decoding Modi’s Foreign Policy

Re: Decoding Modi’s Foreign Policy

Re: Decoding Modi’s Foreign Policy

Re: Decoding Modi’s Foreign Policy

Re: Decoding Modi’s Foreign Policy

Re: Decoding Modi’s Foreign Policy

Re: Decoding Modi’s Foreign Policy

Re: Decoding Modi’s Foreign Policy

Re: Decoding Modi’s Foreign Policy

Re: Decoding Modi’s Foreign Policy

Re: Decoding Modi’s Foreign Policy

Re: Decoding Modi’s Foreign Policy

Re: Decoding Modi’s Foreign Policy

Re: Decoding Modi’s Foreign Policy

Re: Decoding Modi’s Foreign Policy

Re: Decoding Modi’s Foreign Policy