The contrasts!

Kinnera wrote:A satire on Hinduism can reward you with 300 crores...but a satire on Islam can land you in your grave.

When someone draws naked pix of hindu gods and godesses, it is claimed as freedom of expression. When someone draws satirical cartoons of a prophet, the very champions of freedom of expression justify the execution of the cartoonists coz they were wrong in 'hurting someone's religious sentiments'. 

The hypocrisy of it all!

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Kinnera wrote:A satire on Hinduism can reward you with 300 crores...but a satire on Islam can land you in your grave.

When someone draws naked pix of hindu gods and godesses, it is claimed as freedom of expression. When someone draws satirical cartoons of a prophet, the very champions of freedom of expression justify the execution of the cartoonists coz they were wrong in 'hurting someone's religious sentiments'. 

The hypocrisy of it all!

who did that?

Kinnera wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Kinnera wrote:A satire on Hinduism can reward you with 300 crores...but a satire on Islam can land you in your grave.

When someone draws naked pix of hindu gods and godesses, it is claimed as freedom of expression. When someone draws satirical cartoons of a prophet, the very champions of freedom of expression justify the execution of the cartoonists coz they were wrong in 'hurting someone's religious sentiments'. 

The hypocrisy of it all!

who did that?

When you blame the dead victims for what they did (even calling them and others of the magazine names derogatorily (read your comment where you mentioned 'hippie'), you are indirectly justifying their killings. That's so shameful!

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Kinnera wrote:A satire on Hinduism can reward you with 300 crores...but a satire on Islam can land you in your grave.

When someone draws naked pix of hindu gods and godesses, it is claimed as freedom of expression. When someone draws satirical cartoons of a prophet, the very champions of freedom of expression justify the execution of the cartoonists coz they were wrong in 'hurting someone's religious sentiments'. 

The hypocrisy of it all!

who did that?

When you blame the dead victims for what they did (even calling them and others of the magazine names derogatorily (read your comment where you mentioned 'hippie'), you are indirectly justifying their killings. That's so shameful!

hippie is not a derogatory term, last i checked. i never called the dead any derogatory names. don't make up stuff. the newspaper article gave a history of the rather straightforward and simple type of satire that charlie hebdo engaged in and how it stands apart from the more serious political satire of american comedians like jon stewart and stephen colbert. like someone else said, we are entitled to our own opinions, but not our own facts.

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:hi kinns

Kinnera wrote:
Hippie is not a derogatory term, but the way you said it, it does point to sarcasm. Check your posts. You were trying to blame the victims and charlie hebdo.

For all the ppl trying to criticize the victims and charlie hebdo, wait patiently for some time pls. This is not the right time to do so, when the whole world is shocked at the executions. It would be so insensitive to do it now. Do so when everything calms down.
 If you want to cease to be champions of free speech and expression, use the same standards for all the religions. Don't be hypocrites. Condemn hussain's paintings, PK, etc with the same fervor with which you do for charile hebdo, the danish cartoons, etc.

Kinnera wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:hi kinns

Hi!

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Kinnera wrote:
Hippie is not a derogatory term, but the way you said it, it does point to sarcasm. Check your posts. You were trying to blame the victims and charlie hebdo.

For all the ppl trying to criticize the victims and charlie hebdo, wait patiently for some time pls. This is not the right time to do so, when the whole world is shocked at the executions. It would be so insensitive to do it now. Do so when everything calms down.
 If you want to cease to be champions of free speech and expression, use the same standards for all the religions. Don't be hypocrites. Condemn hussain's paintings, PK, etc with the same fervor with which you do for charile hebdo, the danish cartoons, etc.

i don't need to check my posts. i know what i said, and it certainly was not said in a sarcastic mode or in a blame the victim mode. it's absurd to suggest that i did. i was trying to understand what these charlie hebdo folks were actually about since i had never heard of them prior to the shootings. that newspaper article referred to the longstanding French tradition of making fun of authority dating back several centuries. earlier targets included the catholic church and Charles de gaulle. but the type of satire was seldom of any political nature and was rather simplistic. if anything, the article and my reposting of it was sympathetic that these guys are not even of the hard hitting acerbic type of satire that jon stewart and Colbert do on comedy central.

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:hi kinns

Hi!

u on suchat vrit currently?

Kinnera wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:hi kinns

Hi!

u on suchat vrit currently?

Ya, on and off. Will go back to it again!

Kinnera wrote:A satire on Hinduism can reward you with 300 crores...but a satire on Islam can land you in your grave.

When someone draws naked pix of hindu gods and godesses, it is claimed as freedom of expression. When someone draws satirical cartoons of a prophet, the very champions of freedom of expression justify the execution of the cartoonists coz they were wrong in 'hurting someone's religious sentiments'. 

The hypocrisy of it all!

hi kinns

Hi! 

u on suchat vrit currently?

Ya, on and off. Will go back to it again! 

k... am working today and am on chat... come if you have time.

Kinnera wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Kinnera wrote:
Hippie is not a derogatory term, but the way you said it, it does point to sarcasm. Check your posts. You were trying to blame the victims and charlie hebdo.

For all the ppl trying to criticize the victims and charlie hebdo, wait patiently for some time pls. This is not the right time to do so, when the whole world is shocked at the executions. It would be so insensitive to do it now. Do so when everything calms down.
 If you want to cease to be champions of free speech and expression, use the same standards for all the religions. Don't be hypocrites. Condemn hussain's paintings, PK, etc with the same fervor with which you do for charile hebdo, the danish cartoons, etc.

i don't need to check my posts. i know what i said, and it certainly was not said in a sarcastic mode or in a blame the victim mode. it's absurd to suggest that i did. i was trying to understand what these charlie hebdo folks were actually about since i had never heard of them prior to the shootings. that newspaper article referred to the longstanding French tradition of making fun of authority dating back several centuries. earlier targets included the catholic church and Charles de gaulle. but the type of satire was seldom of any political nature and was rather simplistic. if anything, the article and my reposting of it was sympathetic that these guys are not even of the hard hitting acerbic type of satire that jon stewart and Colbert do on comedy central.

If you didn't, then you don't have to feel uncomfortable or conscious abt what i said in my OP. You should know better. That doesn't apply to you then.

This is what you wrote:...the very champions of freedom of expression justify the execution of the cartoonists...

Kinnera wrote:A satire on Hinduism can reward you with 300 crores...but a satire on Islam can land you in your grave.

When someone draws naked pix of hindu gods and godesses, it is claimed as freedom of expression. When someone draws satirical cartoons of a prophet, the very champions of freedom of expression justify the execution of the cartoonists coz they were wrong in 'hurting someone's religious sentiments'. 

The hypocrisy of it all!

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

Kinnera wrote:A satire on Hinduism can reward you with 300 crores...but a satire on Islam can land you in your grave.

When someone draws naked pix of hindu gods and godesses, it is claimed as freedom of expression. When someone draws satirical cartoons of a prophet, the very champions of freedom of expression justify the execution of the cartoonists coz they were wrong in 'hurting someone's religious sentiments'. 

The hypocrisy of it all!

Well said, Kinny. We should eliminate such hypocrisy. Let us shed this thin veneer of civilization and embrace our inner Togadia. Let us show those apostates that we Hindus are as tough as Muslims in defending our religion from insults. Sickulars should think a hundred times before they write a single word against our glorious religion. Je suis Owaisi! Death to MF Hussein! Death to Raju Hirani! A 100 lashes to Aamir Khan! Castrate all the love-jihadists!

Onward, brave Ramzaadon! Eat more goat. Kill those haramzaadon. NRI Patriots, send in your contributions. Every dollar you send buys us more goat! Jai Shri Ram! Bharat Mata ki Jai!

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Kinnera wrote:
Hippie is not a derogatory term, but the way you said it, it does point to sarcasm. Check your posts. You were trying to blame the victims and charlie hebdo.

For all the ppl trying to criticize the victims and charlie hebdo, wait patiently for some time pls. This is not the right time to do so, when the whole world is shocked at the executions. It would be so insensitive to do it now. Do so when everything calms down.
 If you want to cease to be champions of free speech and expression, use the same standards for all the religions. Don't be hypocrites. Condemn hussain's paintings, PK, etc with the same fervor with which you do for charile hebdo, the danish cartoons, etc.

i don't need to check my posts. i know what i said, and it certainly was not said in a sarcastic mode or in a blame the victim mode. it's absurd to suggest that i did. i was trying to understand what these charlie hebdo folks were actually about since i had never heard of them prior to the shootings. that newspaper article referred to the longstanding French tradition of making fun of authority dating back several centuries. earlier targets included the catholic church and Charles de gaulle. but the type of satire was seldom of any political nature and was rather simplistic. if anything, the article and my reposting of it was sympathetic that these guys are not even of the hard hitting acerbic type of satire that jon stewart and Colbert do on comedy central.

If you didn't, then you don't have to feel uncomfortable or conscious abt what i said in my OP. You should know better. That doesn't apply to you then.

Kinny, you are being extremely dishonest. Let's do a quick recap.

This is what you wrote:...the very champions of freedom of expression justify the execution of the cartoonists...

Max asked you a simple question: who had justified the killings? And *you* specifically pointed to something he had posted, which turned out to be no justification by any stretch of imagination. So for you to now back out and pretend that Max was spontaneously discomfited by your OP just shows your lack of integrity. Shame on you.

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Kinnera wrote:
Hippie is not a derogatory term, but the way you said it, it does point to sarcasm. Check your posts. You were trying to blame the victims and charlie hebdo.

For all the ppl trying to criticize the victims and charlie hebdo, wait patiently for some time pls. This is not the right time to do so, when the whole world is shocked at the executions. It would be so insensitive to do it now. Do so when everything calms down.
 If you want to cease to be champions of free speech and expression, use the same standards for all the religions. Don't be hypocrites. Condemn hussain's paintings, PK, etc with the same fervor with which you do for charile hebdo, the danish cartoons, etc.

i don't need to check my posts. i know what i said, and it certainly was not said in a sarcastic mode or in a blame the victim mode. it's absurd to suggest that i did. i was trying to understand what these charlie hebdo folks were actually about since i had never heard of them prior to the shootings. that newspaper article referred to the longstanding French tradition of making fun of authority dating back several centuries. earlier targets included the catholic church and Charles de gaulle. but the type of satire was seldom of any political nature and was rather simplistic. if anything, the article and my reposting of it was sympathetic that these guys are not even of the hard hitting acerbic type of satire that jon stewart and Colbert do on comedy central.

If you didn't, then you don't have to feel uncomfortable or conscious abt what i said in my OP. You should know better. That doesn't apply to you then.

Kinny, you are being extremely dishonest. Let's do a quick recap.

This is what you wrote:...the very champions of freedom of expression justify the execution of the cartoonists...

Max asked you a simple question: who had justified the killings? And *you* specifically pointed to something he had posted, which turned out to be no justification by any stretch of imagination. So for you to now back out and pretend that Max was spontaneously discomfited by your OP just shows your lack of integrity. Shame on you.

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

Kinnera wrote:A satire on Hinduism can reward you with 300 crores...but a satire on Islam can land you in your grave.

When someone draws naked pix of hindu gods and godesses, it is claimed as freedom of expression. When someone draws satirical cartoons of a prophet, the very champions of freedom of expression justify the execution of the cartoonists coz they were wrong in 'hurting someone's religious sentiments'. 

The hypocrisy of it all!

Well said, Kinny. We should eliminate such hypocrisy. Let us shed this thin veneer of civilization and embrace our inner Togadia. Let us show those apostates that we Hindus are as tough as Muslims in defending our religion from insults. Sickulars should think a hundred times before they write a single word against our glorious religion. Je suis Owaisi! Death to MF Hussein! Death to Raju Hirani! A 100 lashes to Aamir Khan! Castrate all the love-jihadists!

Onward, brave Ramzaadon! Eat more goat. Kill those haramzaadon. NRI Patriots, send in your contributions. Every dollar you send buys us more goat! Jai Shri Ram! Bharat Mata ki Jpai!

ashaNirasha wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Kinnera wrote:
Hippie is not a derogatory term, but the way you said it, it does point to sarcasm. Check your posts. You were trying to blame the victims and charlie hebdo.

For all the ppl trying to criticize the victims and charlie hebdo, wait patiently for some time pls. This is not the right time to do so, when the whole world is shocked at the executions. It would be so insensitive to do it now. Do so when everything calms down.
 If you want to cease to be champions of free speech and expression, use the same standards for all the religions. Don't be hypocrites. Condemn hussain's paintings, PK, etc with the same fervor with which you do for charile hebdo, the danish cartoons, etc.

i don't need to check my posts. i know what i said, and it certainly was not said in a sarcastic mode or in a blame the victim mode. it's absurd to suggest that i did. i was trying to understand what these charlie hebdo folks were actually about since i had never heard of them prior to the shootings. that newspaper article referred to the longstanding French tradition of making fun of authority dating back several centuries. earlier targets included the catholic church and Charles de gaulle. but the type of satire was seldom of any political nature and was rather simplistic. if anything, the article and my reposting of it was sympathetic that these guys are not even of the hard hitting acerbic type of satire that jon stewart and Colbert do on comedy central.

If you didn't, then you don't have to feel uncomfortable or conscious abt what i said in my OP. You should know better. That doesn't apply to you then.

Kinny, you are being extremely dishonest. Let's do a quick recap.

This is what you wrote:...the very champions of freedom of expression justify the execution of the cartoonists...

Max asked you a simple question: who had justified the killings? And *you* specifically pointed to something he had posted, which turned out to be no justification by any stretch of imagination. So for you to now back out and pretend that Max was spontaneously discomfited by your OP just shows your lack of integrity. Shame on you.

I always used to wonder how people get radicalized. Not so much these days after looking at this forum. The only consolation is that, this is made up of people with busy lives and families (hopefully) which prevents them from doing much else except post here. Imagine all this coming from hot blooded teens. I can see atleast one Chaddi version of Jihadi Jane, reciting some Advaita stuff while lobbing grenades at people, and then saying LOL and EOD.

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Kinnera wrote:
Hippie is not a derogatory term, but the way you said it, it does point to sarcasm. Check your posts. You were trying to blame the victims and charlie hebdo.

For all the ppl trying to criticize the victims and charlie hebdo, wait patiently for some time pls. This is not the right time to do so, when the whole world is shocked at the executions. It would be so insensitive to do it now. Do so when everything calms down.
 If you want to cease to be champions of free speech and expression, use the same standards for all the religions. Don't be hypocrites. Condemn hussain's paintings, PK, etc with the same fervor with which you do for charile hebdo, the danish cartoons, etc.

i don't need to check my posts. i know what i said, and it certainly was not said in a sarcastic mode or in a blame the victim mode. it's absurd to suggest that i did. i was trying to understand what these charlie hebdo folks were actually about since i had never heard of them prior to the shootings. that newspaper article referred to the longstanding French tradition of making fun of authority dating back several centuries. earlier targets included the catholic church and Charles de gaulle. but the type of satire was seldom of any political nature and was rather simplistic. if anything, the article and my reposting of it was sympathetic that these guys are not even of the hard hitting acerbic type of satire that jon stewart and Colbert do on comedy central.

If you didn't, then you don't have to feel uncomfortable or conscious abt what i said in my OP. You should know better. That doesn't apply to you then.

Kinny, you are being extremely dishonest. Let's do a quick recap.

This is what you wrote:...the very champions of freedom of expression justify the execution of the cartoonists...

Max asked you a simple question: who had justified the killings? And *you* specifically pointed to something he had posted, which turned out to be no justification by any stretch of imagination. So for you to now back out and pretend that Max was spontaneously discomfited by your OP just shows your lack of integrity. Shame on you.

Kinnera wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

Kinnera wrote:A satire on Hinduism can reward you with 300 crores...but a satire on Islam can land you in your grave.

When someone draws naked pix of hindu gods and godesses, it is claimed as freedom of expression. When someone draws satirical cartoons of a prophet, the very champions of freedom of expression justify the execution of the cartoonists coz they were wrong in 'hurting someone's religious sentiments'. 

The hypocrisy of it all!

Well said, Kinny. We should eliminate such hypocrisy. Let us shed this thin veneer of civilization and embrace our inner Togadia. Let us show those apostates that we Hindus are as tough as Muslims in defending our religion from insults. Sickulars should think a hundred times before they write a single word against our glorious religion. Je suis Owaisi! Death to MF Hussein! Death to Raju Hirani! A 100 lashes to Aamir Khan! Castrate all the love-jihadists!

Onward, brave Ramzaadon! Eat more goat. Kill those haramzaadon. NRI Patriots, send in your contributions. Every dollar you send buys us more goat! Jai Shri Ram! Bharat Mata ki Jpai!

I have been talking against the hypocrisy and double standards of pseudos like you, all along...from the time of hussain's paintings to pk. Go read my posts.

ashaNirasha wrote:
I always used to wonder how people get radicalized. Not so much these days after looking at this forum. The only consolation is that, this is made up of people with busy lives and families (hopefully) which prevents them from doing much else except post here. Imagine all this coming from hot blooded teens. I can see atleast one Chaddi version of Jihadi Jane, reciting some Advaita stuff while lobbing grenades at people, and then saying LOL and EOD.

ashaNirasha wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Kinnera wrote:
Hippie is not a derogatory term, but the way you said it, it does point to sarcasm. Check your posts. You were trying to blame the victims and charlie hebdo.

For all the ppl trying to criticize the victims and charlie hebdo, wait patiently for some time pls. This is not the right time to do so, when the whole world is shocked at the executions. It would be so insensitive to do it now. Do so when everything calms down.
 If you want to cease to be champions of free speech and expression, use the same standards for all the religions. Don't be hypocrites. Condemn hussain's paintings, PK, etc with the same fervor with which you do for charile hebdo, the danish cartoons, etc.

i don't need to check my posts. i know what i said, and it certainly was not said in a sarcastic mode or in a blame the victim mode. it's absurd to suggest that i did. i was trying to understand what these charlie hebdo folks were actually about since i had never heard of them prior to the shootings. that newspaper article referred to the longstanding French tradition of making fun of authority dating back several centuries. earlier targets included the catholic church and Charles de gaulle. but the type of satire was seldom of any political nature and was rather simplistic. if anything, the article and my reposting of it was sympathetic that these guys are not even of the hard hitting acerbic type of satire that jon stewart and Colbert do on comedy central.

If you didn't, then you don't have to feel uncomfortable or conscious abt what i said in my OP. You should know better. That doesn't apply to you then.

Kinny, you are being extremely dishonest. Let's do a quick recap.

This is what you wrote:...the very champions of freedom of expression justify the execution of the cartoonists...

Max asked you a simple question: who had justified the killings? And *you* specifically pointed to something he had posted, which turned out to be no justification by any stretch of imagination. So for you to now back out and pretend that Max was spontaneously discomfited by your OP just shows your lack of integrity. Shame on you.

I always used to wonder how people get radicalized. Not so much these days after looking at this forum. The only consolation is that, this is made up of people with busy lives and families (hopefully) which prevents them from doing much else except post here. Imagine all this coming from hot blooded teens. I can see atleast one Chaddi version of Jihadi Jane, reciting some Advaita stuff while lobbing grenades at people, and then saying LOL and EOD.

truthbetold wrote:

Kinnera wrote:A satire on Hinduism can reward you with 300 crores...but a satire on Islam can land you in your grave.

When someone draws naked pix of hindu gods and godesses, it is claimed as freedom of expression. When someone draws satirical cartoons of a prophet, the very champions of freedom of expression justify the execution of the cartoonists coz they were wrong in 'hurting someone's religious sentiments'. 

The hypocrisy of it all!

Kinnera

Those Indian origin pseudos who are predicting indian doom should note that PK is reported to have made 300 crores (600 crores according to another source) in backward intolerant chaddi hindu nation. 

What the pseudos do is equalize normal religious acrimony in India with terrorist actions of Islam. When you challenge them they will deny it.  Hinduism is not the same as islam.  Hindu fanatics are not the sane as islamic terrorists.  But such acceptance would deprive Indian pseudos of their illusionary  ignorant arrogance.