to goodcitizen

goodcitizn wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:I want to hear about why this guy was on the FBI watch list and nothing was done about it. I want to hear about how Republican obstinacy about background checks and preventing sales to terrorists enabled this guy. I want to know how this guy got his weapons. I don't want to hear about thoughts and prayers.

Blaming the Republican Party or the NRA is not going to solve anything. The real problem is the easy availability of illegal guns and assault weapons. This blackmarket must be eradicated by legal means.

Hellsangel wrote:People are denied gun permits all the time. With this guy the FBI dropped the ball. Probably because they don't want to be viewed as going after people for their religion, in other words out of political correctness that Obambi has been preaching.

goodcitizn wrote:Yes, I also read the article. While the guns in most cases were acquired legally (except for a neighbor buying the assault rifles for the Farooks), there was a real problem in documenting the backgrounds of these individuals. Until a crime is committed such lapses don't surface. FBI goofed in the Orlando shooting case in my opinion.

I think these nutcases will get their weapons even if more gun control measures are put in place because of the black market. Nothing is being done to eradicate this. Nobody seems to be highlighting this problem.

I have said in the past that I am against the sale of assault weapons to ordinary citizens.

http://www.floridatoday.com/story/news/crime/2016/06/12/who-omar-mateen/85791280/ wrote:Gilroy, a former Fort Pierce police officer, said Mateen frequently made homophobic and racial comments. Gilroy said he complained to his employer several times but it did nothing because he was Muslim.

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:Yes, I also read the article. While the guns in most cases were acquired legally (except for a neighbor buying the assault rifles for the Farooks), there was a real problem in documenting the backgrounds of these individuals. Until a crime is committed such lapses don't surface. FBI goofed in the Orlando shooting case in my opinion.

I think these nutcases will get their weapons even if more gun control measures are put in place because of the black market. Nothing is being done to eradicate this. Nobody seems to be highlighting this problem.

I have said in the past that I am against the sale of assault weapons to ordinary citizens.

your post reminds of the guy who lost his keys and was searching right under a streetlight. someone asked him where he had lost it, and he pointed to a dark spot a few hundred meters away. when asked why he was looking for it at a spot much further from he dropped his keys, he replied that there was more light where he was searching. when you know there is an obvious problem, fix it. most of the guns used in mass shootings have been acquired legally by people on terror watch lists, people with mental illness etc. so how about we fix it?

and fixing that problem doesn't preclude one from stanching the flow of guns through the black market. it's not an either/or proposition.

goodcitizn wrote:. The Second Amendment won't be repealed even if you stand on a rooftop and yell to your heart's content.

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:. The Second Amendment won't be repealed even if you stand on a rooftop and yell to your heart's content.

Nowhere in any of my posts did I say that the second should be repealed. I have lived here for over two decades to know that the second is seared into the American psyche. We may as well try and outlaw hot dogs. Please read my posts more carefully. I meant exactly what I said.

If you are for preventing unqualified buyers from acquiring guns, then we are in violent agreement. My list of unqualified buyers among others would include people on terror watch lists and the mentally ill.

goodcitizn wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:. The Second Amendment won't be repealed even if you stand on a rooftop and yell to your heart's content.

Nowhere in any of my posts did I say that the second should be repealed. I have lived here for over two decades to know that the second is seared into the American psyche. We may as well try and outlaw hot dogs. Please read my posts more carefully. I meant exactly what I said.

If you are for preventing unqualified buyers from acquiring guns, then we are in violent agreement. My list of unqualified buyers among others would include people on terror watch lists and the mentally ill.

You may not have verbalized it but that's how I have construed your stand to be after reading a multitude of your posts on this topic. I stand corrected.

Violent agreement? LOL.

Hellsangel wrote:

http://www.floridatoday.com/story/news/crime/2016/06/12/who-omar-mateen/85791280/ wrote:Gilroy, a former Fort Pierce police officer, said Mateen frequently made homophobic and racial comments. Gilroy said he complained to his employer several times but it did nothing because he was Muslim.

America is absolutely awash with easily obtainable firearms," said Gadahn, who is known as Azzam al-Amriki. "You can go down to a gun show at the local convention center and come away with a fully automatic assault rifle without a background check and most likely without having to show an identification card.

"So what are you waiting for?" he asked in a matter-of-fact tone.

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:. The Second Amendment won't be repealed even if you stand on a rooftop and yell to your heart's content.

Nowhere in any of my posts did I say that the second should be repealed. I have lived here for over two decades to know that the second is seared into the American psyche. We may as well try and outlaw hot dogs. Please read my posts more carefully. I meant exactly what I said.

If you are for preventing unqualified buyers from acquiring guns, then we are in violent agreement. My list of unqualified buyers among others would include people on terror watch lists and the mentally ill.

You may not have verbalized it but that's how I have construed your stand to be after reading a multitude of your posts on this topic. I stand corrected.

Violent agreement? LOL.

despite my non-support for repealing the second, i still have a huge beef with the NRA and their republican enablers. they have stood against every sensible legislative proposal that has been proposed by the president and the dems -- deeper background checks, preventing known and suspected terrorists and the mentally ill from acquiring guns, preventing introduction of smart gun legislation and on and on.  the NRA's truculent and obstinate position that any move towards a more sensible gun policy is an affront to the second amendment and is a slippery slope towards a full repeal is the principal reason why we have so many mass shootings in this country. and they run a mafia like operation, grading politicians and running or threatening to run candidates against incumbents in primaries if they even deviate an iota from full-on obeisance to the NRA.

goodcitizn wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:. The Second Amendment won't be repealed even if you stand on a rooftop and yell to your heart's content.

Nowhere in any of my posts did I say that the second should be repealed. I have lived here for over two decades to know that the second is seared into the American psyche. We may as well try and outlaw hot dogs. Please read my posts more carefully. I meant exactly what I said.

If you are for preventing unqualified buyers from acquiring guns, then we are in violent agreement. My list of unqualified buyers among others would include people on terror watch lists and the mentally ill.

You may not have verbalized it but that's how I have construed your stand to be after reading a multitude of your posts on this topic. I stand corrected.

Violent agreement? LOL.

despite my non-support for repealing the second, i still have a huge beef with the NRA and their republican enablers. they have stood against every sensible legislative proposal that has been proposed by the president and the dems -- deeper background checks, preventing known and suspected terrorists and the mentally ill from acquiring guns, preventing introduction of smart gun legislation and on and on.  the NRA's truculent and obstinate position that any move towards a more sensible gun policy is an affront to the second amendment and is a slippery slope towards a full repeal is the principal reason why we have so many mass shootings in this country. and they run a mafia like operation, grading politicians and running or threatening to run candidates against incumbents in primaries if they even deviate an iota from full-on obeisance to the NRA.

I have had a big beef with the insurance and pharmaceutical lobbies over the years to no avail. NRA is no different. I predict the next weeks to be focusing more on Islamic radicals and less on gun laws. Our media knows what sells.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/06/13/orlando-killer-worked-for-dhs-state-contractor-that-helps-secure-us-embassies.html wrote:FBI Director James Comey on Monday also detailed the nature of the original complaints the bureau received back in 2013.
He said co-workers were concerned about "inflammatory and contradictory" statements he had made, including claiming family connections to Al Qaeda. Mateen later admitted making the statements but said he did so out of anger because he thought his co-workers were discriminating against him. The FBI closed the preliminary investigation, before briefly looking at him one more time in 2014. 

Hellsangel wrote:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/06/13/orlando-killer-worked-for-dhs-state-contractor-that-helps-secure-us-embassies.html wrote:FBI Director James Comey on Monday also detailed the nature of the original complaints the bureau received back in 2013.
He said co-workers were concerned about "inflammatory and contradictory" statements he had made, including claiming family connections to Al Qaeda. Mateen later admitted making the statements but said he did so out of anger because he thought his co-workers were discriminating against him. The FBI closed the preliminary investigation, before briefly looking at him one more time in 2014. 

So much for the FBI investigation!