Anti-Hindu propaganda by Muslims in TN

rawemotions wrote:Haven't you learnt to use Google Translate? Why are you bluffing by saying that it is asking Muslims not to worship Hindu temple. Whom are you fooling by playing down Political Islam ?

This notice put up right in front of the famous temple asks people (especially Hindus to worship) Allah and not any other gods.
Ethnic Cleansing against Hindus (after Ghiyasuddin) now starts in TN. It is going on in North Kerala,Assam, West Bengal . UP. Bihar. Now it has reached TN also.

rawemotions wrote:

...asks people (especially Hindus to worship) Allah and not any other gods.
Ethnic Cleansing against Hindus (after Ghiyasuddin) now starts in TN. It is going on in North Kerala,Assam, West Bengal . UP. Bihar. Now it has reached TN also.

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

rawemotions wrote:

...asks people (especially Hindus to worship) Allah and not any other gods.
Ethnic Cleansing against Hindus (after Ghiyasuddin) now starts in TN. It is going on in North Kerala,Assam, West Bengal . UP. Bihar. Now it has reached TN also.

NO it does not. the title of the article says that, but the sign itself does not mention the word hindu. rawemotions is lying at worst and being careless at best. i agree the placement of the sign is not coincidental but criticism loses its bite if it is combined with lying.

here is a translation: night and day; the sun and the moon -- these bear witnesses to god. if you are a true believer of god, don't pray to these but to the god who created these, namely allah.

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

rawemotions wrote:

...asks people (especially Hindus to worship) Allah and not any other gods.
Ethnic Cleansing against Hindus (after Ghiyasuddin) now starts in TN. It is going on in North Kerala,Assam, West Bengal . UP. Bihar. Now it has reached TN also.

NO it does not. the title of the article says that, but the sign itself does not mention the word hindu. rawemotions is lying at worst and being careless at best. i agree the placement of the sign is not coincidental but criticism loses its bite if it is combined with lying.

here is a translation: night and day; the sun and the moon -- these bear witnesses to god. if you are a true believer of god, don't pray to these but to the god who created these, namely allah.

Kris wrote:

>>>It may not mention 'hindu' specifically, but this seems to be a technicality in this context. Isn't it? The gist of the message and whom it is directed at is abundantly clear.

Merlot Daruwala wrote:The religious belief of some people is so fragile that a little advertisement for a different religion is enough to send them into a kolaveri.

Looking at rawmotions' frenzied and focused breastbeating on the topic of Hindu victimization at the hands of the evil minorities in our midst (the only topic which apparently interests this person), I cant help wondering if he/she/it underwent a similar post-8pm trauma that pushed Upps-Unkil off the deep end.

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:The religious belief of some people is so fragile that a little advertisement for a different religion is enough to send them into a kolaveri.

Looking at rawmotions' frenzied and focused breastbeating on the topic of Hindu victimization at the hands of the evil minorities in our midst (the only topic which apparently interests this person), I cant help wondering if he/she/it underwent a similar post-8pm trauma that pushed Upps-Unkil off the deep end.

You (still) don't get the point. In a true secular democracy EVERYONE is expected to respect other religions. When hindus dislike some negative signboard in front of their temples, they are called people with fragile beliefs. When the some pig meat is thrown in front of a mosque leading to a riot by the muslims, they are fully justified and supported in their cause for religious rights.

I don't expect you or the fakularists to understand this obvious difference.

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Kris wrote:

>>>It may not mention 'hindu' specifically, but this seems to be a technicality in this context. Isn't it? The gist of the message and whom it is directed at is abundantly clear.

i don't think it is a mere technicality. i think it is critically important because it pertains to the legality of the matter. no laws have been broken by this act because it cannot be counted as proselytization. and in a civilized democracy laws are critically important.

it certainly was strategically placed just outside a hindu temple; no question about it. but these are matters that should be settled through negotiation between the aggressor and the aggrieved. and i have to agree with MD about the fragility of the person who gets exercised about this!

Rashmun wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:The religious belief of some people is so fragile that a little advertisement for a different religion is enough to send them into a kolaveri.

Looking at rawmotions' frenzied and focused breastbeating on the topic of Hindu victimization at the hands of the evil minorities in our midst (the only topic which apparently interests this person), I cant help wondering if he/she/it underwent a similar post-8pm trauma that pushed Upps-Unkil off the deep end.

You (still) don't get the point. In a true secular democracy EVERYONE is expected to respect other religions. When hindus dislike some negative signboard in front of their temples, they are called people with fragile beliefs. When the some pig meat is thrown in front of a mosque leading to a riot by the muslims, they are fully justified and supported in their cause for religious rights.

I don't expect you or the fakularists to understand this obvious difference.

could it be that the signboard is not actually in front of the temple but somewhere else and has been made to appear before the temple through some software.