This is a Hitskin.com skin preview
Install the skin • Return to the skin page
should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
+6
Hellsangel
Vakavaka Pakapaka
goodcitizn
Marathadi-Saamiyaar
Idéfix
Jeremiah Mburuburu
10 posters
Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
during the last one to two years, admin charvak has spent, and continues to spend, a great amount of time at suCH, much of it in the daytime, harassing members, especially those who are not telugus or hindus, slandering relatives of members who play no role at suCH, and providing his accomplices a platform from which to attack "the others" with impunity. is charvak's employer, [name removed by Admin], entitled to compensation from him for the time he diligently spends here?
This post has been edited by Admin due to a violation of policy. JM, please do NOT disclose personal information about posters.
This post has been edited by Admin due to a violation of policy. JM, please do NOT disclose personal information about posters.
Jeremiah Mburuburu- Posts : 1251
Join date : 2011-09-09
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
lol, will max now protest and ask for deletion of this thread?
Guest- Guest
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
JM, you have just violated a basic rule of this forum when you mentioned the private information of a poster -- in this case, the name of my purported employer. As a poster, I do want this information removed.
Please do not disclose private information about other posters. I remember you suggesting that doing so may be illegal.
Please do not disclose private information about other posters. I remember you suggesting that doing so may be illegal.
Idéfix- Posts : 8808
Join date : 2012-04-26
Location : Berkeley, CA
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:during the last one to two years, admin charvak has spent, and continues to spend, a great amount of time at suCH, much of it in the daytime, harassing members, especially those who are not telugus or hindus, slandering relatives of members who play no role at suCH, and providing his accomplices a platform from which to attack "the others" with impunity. is charvak's employer, [name removed by Admin], entitled to compensation from him for the time he diligently spends here?
The survey is mischievously flawed. It combines different issues; stealing time from company, spending time on SuCH. For example either of the 2 answers will implicate PP. That is a seriously biased survey.
Also, PP harassing those who are NOT hindus??? Like who ? You ? if it is you, then you are disqualified in starting a survey that involves you indirectly. Then who else is he harassing ?
Rashmunullah ? Are you saying he is not a Hindu ? Beware that you newfound gay friendship will be jeopardized.
Marathadi-Saamiyaar- Posts : 17675
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 110
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:during the last one to two years, admin charvak has spent, and continues to spend, a great amount of time at suCH, much of it in the daytime, harassing members, especially those who are not telugus or hindus, slandering relatives of members who play no role at suCH, and providing his accomplices a platform from which to attack "the others" with impunity. is charvak's employer, [name removed by Admin], entitled to compensation from him for the time he diligently spends here?
This post has been edited by Admin due to a violation of policy. JM, please do NOT disclose personal information about posters.
would have been good if you would have been as proactive when JM's personal information was being disclosed by others.
Guest- Guest
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
panini press wrote:JM, you have just violated a basic rule of this forum when you mentioned the private information of a poster -- in this case, the name of my purported employer. As a poster, I do want this information removed.
Please do not disclose private information about other posters. I remember you suggesting that doing so may be illegal.
he is following the cue of your friends Hellsangel and Propagandhi. you never rebuked them, so why are you now rebuking him?
Guest- Guest
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:during the last one to two years, admin charvak has spent, and continues to spend, a great amount of time at suCH, much of it in the daytime, harassing members, especially those who are not telugus or hindus, slandering relatives of members who play no role at suCH, and providing his accomplices a platform from which to attack "the others" with impunity. is charvak's employer, [name removed by Admin], entitled to compensation from him for the time he diligently spends here?
The survey is mischievously flawed. It combines different issues; stealing time from company, spending time on SuCH. For example either of the 2 answers will implicate PP. That is a seriously biased survey.
Also, PP harassing those who are NOT hindus??? Like who ? You ? if it is you, then you are disqualified in starting a survey that involves you indirectly. Then who else is he harassing ?
Rashmunullah ? Are you saying he is not a Hindu ? Beware that you newfound gay friendship will be jeopardized.
Yes, the survey is completely one-sided so disqualified. Who are the non-Hindus being harassed here? If Luke is one of those, he is usually the harasser not the harassed. Speaking of which, he used to harass Maria (a non-Hindu) as the Kishtian girl. Is that okay in his book because he is a fellow Christian? This survey is nothing but a vendetta to settle scores with Carvaka.
goodcitizn- Posts : 3263
Join date : 2011-05-03
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:during the last one to two years, admin charvak has spent, and continues to spend, a great amount of time at suCH, much of it in the daytime, harassing members, especially those who are not telugus or hindus, slandering relatives of members who play no role at suCH, and providing his accomplices a platform from which to attack "the others" with impunity. is charvak's employer, [name removed by Admin], entitled to compensation from him for the time he diligently spends here?
This post has been edited by Admin due to a violation of policy. JM, please do NOT disclose personal information about posters.
Are you indirectly hinting that Rashmun's employers should seek compensation? He spends a lot more time on SU-CH than anyone else.
Vakavaka Pakapaka- Posts : 7611
Join date : 2012-08-24
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:during the last one to two years, admin charvak has spent, and continues to spend, a great amount of time at suCH, much of it in the daytime, harassing members, especially those who are not telugus or hindus, slandering relatives of members who play no role at suCH, and providing his accomplices a platform from which to attack "the others" with impunity. is charvak's employer, [name removed by Admin], entitled to compensation from him for the time he diligently spends here?
This post has been edited by Admin due to a violation of policy. JM, please do NOT disclose personal information about posters.
Are you indirectly hinting that Rashmun's employers should seek compensation? He spends a lot more time on SU-CH than anyone else.
i am self employed.
Guest- Guest
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Rashmun wrote:Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:during the last one to two years, admin charvak has spent, and continues to spend, a great amount of time at suCH, much of it in the daytime, harassing members, especially those who are not telugus or hindus, slandering relatives of members who play no role at suCH, and providing his accomplices a platform from which to attack "the others" with impunity. is charvak's employer, [name removed by Admin], entitled to compensation from him for the time he diligently spends here?
This post has been edited by Admin due to a violation of policy. JM, please do NOT disclose personal information about posters.
Are you indirectly hinting that Rashmun's employers should seek compensation? He spends a lot more time on SU-CH than anyone else.
i am self employed.
Sorry that you have such a horrible boss, Rashman.
Hellsangel- Posts : 14721
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Hellsangel wrote:Rashmun wrote:Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:during the last one to two years, admin charvak has spent, and continues to spend, a great amount of time at suCH, much of it in the daytime, harassing members, especially those who are not telugus or hindus, slandering relatives of members who play no role at suCH, and providing his accomplices a platform from which to attack "the others" with impunity. is charvak's employer, [name removed by Admin], entitled to compensation from him for the time he diligently spends here?
This post has been edited by Admin due to a violation of policy. JM, please do NOT disclose personal information about posters.
Are you indirectly hinting that Rashmun's employers should seek compensation? He spends a lot more time on SU-CH than anyone else.
i am self employed.
Sorry that you have such a horrible boss, Rashman.
Slave, looks like JM has managed to shut you up for good with respect to your using his real name on this forum.
Guest- Guest
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Rashmun wrote: respect to your using his real name on this forum.
You mean unlike here?
http://indiapulse.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse_vivekananda-on-caste-system-1083049#1083240
Hellsangel- Posts : 14721
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Hellsangel wrote:Rashmun wrote: respect to your using his real name on this forum.
You mean unlike here?
http://indiapulse.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse_vivekananda-on-caste-system-1083049#1083240
you are confined to giving links to other forums but you do not dare to write his name in a forum post.
Guest- Guest
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Rashmun wrote:Hellsangel wrote:Rashmun wrote: respect to your using his real name on this forum.
You mean unlike here?
http://indiapulse.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse_vivekananda-on-caste-system-1083049#1083240
you are confined to giving links to other forums but you do not dare to write his name in a forum post.
Oh! Now he is he-who-shall-not-be named?
Hellsangel- Posts : 14721
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote: is charvak's employer entitled to compensation from him for the time he diligently spends here?
Seriously, who died and made you the Time Card Nazi?
Most people who post here during the day do so on their employer's clock. So what is the "time threshold" before you decide to cry foul and threaten to call their employer -- 30 mins/day? an hour/day? 2 hours/day? Or, do you only go by the time someone spends criticizing you for not living up to the same ethical standards you expect of others and for being a hypocrite?
goodcitizn- Posts : 3263
Join date : 2011-05-03
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Everyone missed this important lesson. You can teach an old dog a new trick! He learned how to create a poll.
Hellsangel- Posts : 14721
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Not quite. Yes and No are not mutually exclusive options on his poll. Damn you, IIT aerospace engineers!Hellsangel wrote:Everyone missed this important lesson. You can teach an old dog a new trick! He learned how to create a poll.
Idéfix- Posts : 8808
Join date : 2012-04-26
Location : Berkeley, CA
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
i have lived up to those ethical standards. in particular, i haven't disclosed anyone's private info; i haven't encouraged anyone to do so. the "time threshold" for using the employer's time to encourage and support extreme incivility is zero.goodcitizn wrote:Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote: is charvak's employer entitled to compensation from him for the time he diligently spends here?
Seriously, who died and made you the Time Card Nazi?
Most people who post here during the day do so on their employer's clock. So what is the "time threshold" before you decide to cry foul and threaten to call their employer -- 30 mins/day? an hour/day? 2 hours/day? Or, do you only go by the time someone spends criticizing you for not living up to the same ethical standards you expect of others and for being a hypocrite?
Jeremiah Mburuburu- Posts : 1251
Join date : 2011-09-09
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
You are lying.Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:i have lived up to those ethical standards. in particular, i haven't disclosed anyone's private info
Repeating a lie a hundred times is not a way to make it the truth.
Idéfix- Posts : 8808
Join date : 2012-04-26
Location : Berkeley, CA
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
you posted lies about me. you need education and training to help you recognize that many of your words are dishonest and unethical.panini press wrote:You are lying.Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:i have lived up to those ethical standards. in particular, i haven't disclosed anyone's private info
Repeating a lie a hundred times is not a way to make it the truth.
Jeremiah Mburuburu- Posts : 1251
Join date : 2011-09-09
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Looks like a certain consultancy in a University town of not insignificant size in good old Texas has branched out into education and training.
Hellsangel- Posts : 14721
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Good to see JM standing up to PP and his slaves.
Guest- Guest
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Hellsangel wrote:Looks like a certain consultancy in a University town of not insignificant size in good old Texas has branched out into education and training.
the so called consultancy that had total revenues of <110k? will they also teach spelling, grammar and proper (and the only way) to make dosa(i)?
Propagandhi711- Posts : 6941
Join date : 2011-04-29
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
You are full of empty lies. You cannot prove any of your claims that I am lying. I can prove it to you that you are lying right now.Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:you posted lies about me. you need education and training to help you recognize that many of your words are dishonest and unethical.panini press wrote:You are lying.Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:i have lived up to those ethical standards. in particular, i haven't disclosed anyone's private info
Repeating a lie a hundred times is not a way to make it the truth.
In hundreds of posts over the years, you have used the purported names of several posters. In your own wrods: whether or not those names are actually those of the posters in question, your deeds violate criminal and civil laws, and well-known ethical standards.
Here are three quick instances of your deeds that violate criminal and civil laws, and well-known ethical standards.
http://indiapulse.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse_sulekha-why-did-you-delete-my-posts-968791: ... (mrs.) XXX "tiana" XXX's ...
http://indiapulse.sulekha.com/forums/personal_does-size-matters-277529: there's a fella here called propagandhi, aka sandeep DUTtarajulu seetharamayya
http://indiapulse.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse_rekha-788642: sandeep seetharamayya, did you buy your wife vijayasundari
Idéfix- Posts : 8808
Join date : 2012-04-26
Location : Berkeley, CA
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:i have lived up to those ethical standards. in particular, i haven't disclosed anyone's private info; i haven't encouraged anyone to do so. the "time threshold" for using the employer's time to encourage and support extreme incivility is zero.goodcitizn wrote:Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote: is charvak's employer entitled to compensation from him for the time he diligently spends here?
Seriously, who died and made you the Time Card Nazi?
Most people who post here during the day do so on their employer's clock. So what is the "time threshold" before you decide to cry foul and threaten to call their employer -- 30 mins/day? an hour/day? 2 hours/day? Or, do you only go by the time someone spends criticizing you for not living up to the same ethical standards you expect of others and for being a hypocrite?
I know for a fact that you brought up Tiana's real name to mock her on several occasions. I also remember Moxi asking you to refrain from doing so because of privacy rights but that never stopped you. Frankly, I don't care if it was you or someone else who initially "outed" Tiana because that is irrelevant. What is relevant as being unethical and incivil is that you continued to harass Tiana using her real name despite protests from her and others. So it is untrue that you never disclosed anyone's private info.
I think it is silly to threaten anyone here about calling their employer because most posters are at work during the day. By your definition they are all cheating on their employers when they browse or post, so why pick on Carvaka in particular? Why should the time threshold apply only to the time spent (real or imagined) in incivility?
goodcitizn- Posts : 3263
Join date : 2011-05-03
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
you and hellsangel searched years of posts, and this is all you could dig out!panini press wrote:You are full of empty lies. You cannot prove any of your claims that I am lying. I can prove it to you that you are lying right now.Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:you posted lies about me. you need education and training to help you recognize that many of your words are dishonest and unethical.panini press wrote:You are lying.Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:i have lived up to those ethical standards. in particular, i haven't disclosed anyone's private info
Repeating a lie a hundred times is not a way to make it the truth.
In hundreds of posts over the years, you have used the purported names of several posters. In your own wrods: whether or not those names are actually those of the posters in question, your deeds violate criminal and civil laws, and well-known ethical standards.
Here are three quick instances of your deeds that violate criminal and civil laws, and well-known ethical standards.
http://indiapulse.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse_sulekha-why-did-you-delete-my-posts-968791: ... (mrs.) meghna "tiana" joshi's ...
http://indiapulse.sulekha.com/forums/personal_does-size-matters-277529: there's a fella here called propagandhi, aka sandeep DUTtarajulu seetharamayya
http://indiapulse.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse_rekha-788642: sandeep seetharamayya, did you buy your wife vijayasundari
the last two are obvious parodies of incongruent names i made up for self-loathing southern indians who aspire to more "fashionable" northindian names. and it was tiana herself who disclosed her pen-name to be meghana joshi; you'll have to ask her why.
i used "mrs" with meghana joshi for the same reason i use mrs with vidya bagchi and shrivastav-khare -- to stress my belief that they are traditional, firmly-married women with children, and not the mini-skirted, nubile young maidens over whom your bro propagandhi experiences spontaneous ejaculations.
you have always been angry and upset about my parodying telugus for their self-loathing ways, but that doesn't mean that i violate people's privacy or break laws. others do, especially propagandhi and hellsangel; they do so routinely. you knew all this, and yet you accused me of violating laws and ethics! you are therefore a liar and a hypocrite of low ethical standards who needs to be sent off to reform school or whipped by the employer you steal from every day.
Jeremiah Mburuburu- Posts : 1251
Join date : 2011-09-09
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Hahaha! Your paranoia is my best reward from this thread. I don't need HA's help to find many, many more instances. I even posted the first time you mentioned Tiana's real name several years ago. You conveniently went groundhog on that thread. I also posted a warning given to you several years ago to not disclose the names, etc. of other posters.Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:you and hellsangel searched years of posts, and this is all you could dig out!panini press wrote:Here are three quick instances of your deeds that violate criminal and civil laws, and well-known ethical standards.
http://indiapulse.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse_sulekha-why-did-you-delete-my-posts-968791: ... (mrs.) meghna "tiana" joshi's ...
http://indiapulse.sulekha.com/forums/personal_does-size-matters-277529: there's a fella here called propagandhi, aka sandeep DUTtarajulu seetharamayya
http://indiapulse.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse_rekha-788642: sandeep seetharamayya, did you buy your wife vijayasundari
What were your words again? Ah, here they are; I hope you chose your words carefully when you said this:Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:the last two are obvious parodies of incongruent names i made up
whether or not the names you publish as mine ... are actually mine, ... your deeds violate criminal and civil laws, and well-known ethical standards.
Some fantasies you have!Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote: needs to be sent off to reform school or whipped by the employer you steal from every day.
Idéfix- Posts : 8808
Join date : 2012-04-26
Location : Berkeley, CA
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Your parodying of Telugus has nothing to do with privacy violations. Your repeated use of purported names of people, despite several warnings from other posters, violates people's privacy and break laws. I am no lawyer; I am just relying on your considered opinion on this matter.Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:you have always been angry and upset about my parodying telugus for their self-loathing ways, but that doesn't mean that i violate people's privacy or break laws.
Idéfix- Posts : 8808
Join date : 2012-04-26
Location : Berkeley, CA
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:during the last one to two years, admin charvak has spent, and continues to spend, a great amount of time at suCH, much of it in the daytime, harassing members, especially those who are not telugus or hindus, slandering relatives of members who play no role at suCH, and providing his accomplices a platform from which to attack "the others" with impunity.
You are extremely angry. You are extremely upset.
Trivia question - Whose patented mocking words are those?
"Religion is the last refuge of a Scoundrel" .
Quiz question - Who is credited with the above quote?
Bonus : Correct any spellings , Grammatical/semantic errors in this post.
b_A- Posts : 1642
Join date : 2011-05-08
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Rashmun wrote:i am self employed.
Is that an euphemism for "Unemployed" ? Maybe , Propa was onto something about your failed Ph D. Doesn't come as a surprise to anyone who has been witnessing your IQ and EQ levels.
Personally , I think jobless is the more appropriate word for you.
b_A- Posts : 1642
Join date : 2011-05-08
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Rashmun wrote:Good to see JM standing up to PP and his slaves.
Good to to see you bare your hypocrisy about revealing personal details of posters.
b_A- Posts : 1642
Join date : 2011-05-08
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
b_A wrote:Rashmun wrote:i am self employed.
Is that an euphemism for "Unemployed" ? Maybe , Propa was onto something about your failed Ph D. Doesn't come as a surprise to anyone who has been witnessing your IQ and EQ levels.
Personally , I think jobless is the more appropriate word for you.
you are reminding me of a crow who keeps croaking 'kai kai'.
Guest- Guest
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Rashmun wrote:b_A wrote:Rashmun wrote:i am self employed.
Is that an euphemism for "Unemployed" ? Maybe , Propa was onto something about your failed Ph D. Doesn't come as a surprise to anyone who has been witnessing your IQ and EQ levels.
Personally , I think jobless is the more appropriate word for you.
you are reminding me of a crow who keeps croaking 'kai kai'.
Do hindian crows croak as "kai kai" ? Telugu crows go "kav kav".
b_A- Posts : 1642
Join date : 2011-05-08
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
b_A wrote:Rashmun wrote:b_A wrote:Rashmun wrote:i am self employed.
Is that an euphemism for "Unemployed" ? Maybe , Propa was onto something about your failed Ph D. Doesn't come as a surprise to anyone who has been witnessing your IQ and EQ levels.
Personally , I think jobless is the more appropriate word for you.
you are reminding me of a crow who keeps croaking 'kai kai'.
Do hindian crows croak as "kai kai" ? Telugu crows go "kav kav".
ok "kav kav" then.
Guest- Guest
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
tiana is the one who disclosed her own pen-name, and it's entirely legitimate to use it.goodcitizn wrote:I don't care if it was you or someone else who initially "outed" Tiana because that is irrelevant.
i didn't harass her; i used her pen-name, and criticized certain romantic notions that she held, and possibly her writing.goodcitizn wrote:What is relevant as being unethical and incivil is that you continued to harass Tiana using her real name...
i feel free to express my opinion.goodcitizn wrote:...despite protests from her and others.
it is true because i never disclosed anyone's name, address, telephone number, email address, or relatives' names. that's a remarkable statement because i've been here for approx 14 years, and people have called me and those close to me many names.goodcitizn wrote:So it is untrue that you never disclosed anyone's private info.
"time threshold" is your term. because of the malicious use to which the employer's time is put, the employer should know, so that they can educate and retrain the rogue poster, or otherwise deter him. this applies particularly to charvaka because he set up this site and made himself its admin, so that he and his tribe can engage in incivility with impunity.goodcitizn wrote:I think it is silly to threaten anyone here about calling their employer because most posters are at work during the day. By your definition they are all cheating on their employers when they browse or post, so why pick on Carvaka in particular? Why should the time threshold apply only to the time spent (real or imagined) in incivility?
Jeremiah Mburuburu- Posts : 1251
Join date : 2011-09-09
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Let's guess who cast the third vote in this poll. First two votes are obviously of JM and Rashmunemployed.
b_A- Posts : 1642
Join date : 2011-05-08
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Let me give you a hint. If I remember right, this site limits you to giving 20 + or - ratings to a post per day. On some days, I post more than 20 posts. But almost every post eventually gets a negative vote.b_A wrote:Let's guess who cast the third vote in this poll. First two votes are obviously of JM and Rashmunemployed.
Idéfix- Posts : 8808
Join date : 2012-04-26
Location : Berkeley, CA
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Looks like Rashman has Caca on his mind a lot these days.
Hellsangel- Posts : 14721
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
panini press wrote:Let me give you a hint. If I remember right, this site limits you to giving 20 + or - ratings to a post per day. On some days, I post more than 20 posts. But almost every post eventually gets a negative vote.b_A wrote:Let's guess who cast the third vote in this poll. First two votes are obviously of JM and Rashmunemployed.
just to keep things in perspective, you have made more than 3,000 posts in your PP handle and more than 4,000 posts in your Charvaka handle.
Guest- Guest
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
panini press wrote:Let me give you a hint. If I remember right, this site limits you to giving 20 + or - ratings to a post per day. On some days, I post more than 20 posts. But almost every post eventually gets a negative vote.b_A wrote:Let's guess who cast the third vote in this poll. First two votes are obviously of JM and Rashmunemployed.
Are you saying Rashmunployed has another handle? Maybe , that's why , he is quick to see that b_a== HA .
b_A- Posts : 1642
Join date : 2011-05-08
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
hahaha. he's one busy boy! he's also mother to propa and hellsangel.Rashmun wrote:panini press wrote:Let me give you a hint. If I remember right, this site limits you to giving 20 + or - ratings to a post per day. On some days, I post more than 20 posts. But almost every post eventually gets a negative vote.b_A wrote:Let's guess who cast the third vote in this poll. First two votes are obviously of JM and Rashmunemployed.
just to keep things in perspective, you have made more than 3,000 posts in your PP handle and more than 4,000 posts in your Charvaka handle.
Jeremiah Mburuburu- Posts : 1251
Join date : 2011-09-09
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
https://such.forumotion.com/t2818-why-you-should-give-charvaka-multiple-negative-votesb_A wrote:panini press wrote:Let me give you a hint. If I remember right, this site limits you to giving 20 + or - ratings to a post per day. On some days, I post more than 20 posts. But almost every post eventually gets a negative vote.b_A wrote:Let's guess who cast the third vote in this poll. First two votes are obviously of JM and Rashmunemployed.
Are you saying Rashmunployed has another handle? Maybe , that's why , he is quick to see that b_a== HA .
Idéfix- Posts : 8808
Join date : 2012-04-26
Location : Berkeley, CA
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
panini press wrote:https://such.forumotion.com/t2818-why-you-should-give-charvaka-multiple-negative-votesb_A wrote:panini press wrote:Let me give you a hint. If I remember right, this site limits you to giving 20 + or - ratings to a post per day. On some days, I post more than 20 posts. But almost every post eventually gets a negative vote.b_A wrote:Let's guess who cast the third vote in this poll. First two votes are obviously of JM and Rashmunemployed.
Are you saying Rashmunployed has another handle? Maybe , that's why , he is quick to see that b_a== HA .
That was a protest post. It worked because you fixed the problem and i was again able to cast negative votes.
Guest- Guest
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:hahaha. he's one busy boy! he's also mother to propa and hellsangel.Rashmun wrote:panini press wrote:Let me give you a hint. If I remember right, this site limits you to giving 20 + or - ratings to a post per day. On some days, I post more than 20 posts. But almost every post eventually gets a negative vote.b_A wrote:Let's guess who cast the third vote in this poll. First two votes are obviously of JM and Rashmunemployed.
just to keep things in perspective, you have made more than 3,000 posts in your PP handle and more than 4,000 posts in your Charvaka handle.
do you know how many posts your pet monkey made over the same time? 7100....most of them consist of:
a) dotting, b) cross posting crap about places he knows nothing abt, from wiki sources, c) complaining about ppl from places he knows nothing about.
Propagandhi711- Posts : 6941
Join date : 2011-04-29
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
I suspect you are not at all busy. So how about producing evidence for the slanderous accusations you have made against me? Perhaps you think I am biased against you, so here are questions you need to answer from those more favorably disposed towards you.Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:hahaha. he's one busy boy!
https://such.forumotion.com/t10234-warning-to-jeremiah-mburuburu-from-luke-warmus#78286
https://such.forumotion.com/t10172-poll-was-jm-malicious#77782
https://such.forumotion.com/t10234-warning-to-jeremiah-mburuburu-from-luke-warmus#78290
Go ahead, answer them.
Idéfix- Posts : 8808
Join date : 2012-04-26
Location : Berkeley, CA
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
7,000 posts? amazing! you are one efficient cheat!panini press wrote:I suspect you are not at all busy. So how about producing evidence for the slanderous accusations you have made against me? Perhaps you think I am biased against you, so here are questions you need to answer from those more favorably disposed towards you.Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:hahaha. he's one busy boy!
https://such.forumotion.com/t10234-warning-to-jeremiah-mburuburu-from-luke-warmus#78286
https://such.forumotion.com/t10172-poll-was-jm-malicious#77782
https://such.forumotion.com/t10234-warning-to-jeremiah-mburuburu-from-luke-warmus#78290
Go ahead, answer them.
Jeremiah Mburuburu- Posts : 1251
Join date : 2011-09-09
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
I take it that you are going to stick to name-calling, libel and slander. Enjoy yourself.Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:7,000 posts? amazing! you are one efficient cheat!panini press wrote:I suspect you are not at all busy. So how about producing evidence for the slanderous accusations you have made against me? Perhaps you think I am biased against you, so here are questions you need to answer from those more favorably disposed towards you.Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:hahaha. he's one busy boy!
https://such.forumotion.com/t10234-warning-to-jeremiah-mburuburu-from-luke-warmus#78286
https://such.forumotion.com/t10172-poll-was-jm-malicious#77782
https://such.forumotion.com/t10234-warning-to-jeremiah-mburuburu-from-luke-warmus#78290
Go ahead, answer them.
Idéfix- Posts : 8808
Join date : 2012-04-26
Location : Berkeley, CA
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:7,000 posts? amazing! you are one efficient cheat!panini press wrote:I suspect you are not at all busy. So how about producing evidence for the slanderous accusations you have made against me? Perhaps you think I am biased against you, so here are questions you need to answer from those more favorably disposed towards you.Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:hahaha. he's one busy boy!
https://such.forumotion.com/t10234-warning-to-jeremiah-mburuburu-from-luke-warmus#78286
https://such.forumotion.com/t10172-poll-was-jm-malicious#77782
https://such.forumotion.com/t10234-warning-to-jeremiah-mburuburu-from-luke-warmus#78290
Go ahead, answer them.
phlegmy, funny how when you have no answers to questions, you repeat yourself like your failed phd understudy, who incidentally uses the same tactics. did you teach him or did you absorb them as part of some reverse osmosis process while he was changing your diaper?
Propagandhi711- Posts : 6941
Join date : 2011-04-29
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
congratulations JM for having discovered google! we are now hopeful you will discover life on another planet in 2013. old, ganjedi kutta (one of the k's stands for kutta) is back in business. tum sale kuttey se bhi gaye beetey ho madarchod.
Guest- Guest
Re: should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?
HK, here is a Bangla sher for you...
na shokha karEnge na gIlA karEngE
tum, shAlA, mat rahO, yehI duA karEngE!
And here is the Hindian original:
na shikwA karEnge na gilA karEngE,
tum salAmat rahO yehI duA karEngE!
na shokha karEnge na gIlA karEngE
tum, shAlA, mat rahO, yehI duA karEngE!
And here is the Hindian original:
na shikwA karEnge na gilA karEngE,
tum salAmat rahO yehI duA karEngE!
Idéfix- Posts : 8808
Join date : 2012-04-26
Location : Berkeley, CA
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» dear [name removed by Admin]
» admin -- is there a reason you removed HA's posts from the nader thread? (EOM)
» Hyderabad's last Nizam named all-time richest Indian
» For the nth time , India is 'close' to buying the Rafale because this time the price seems to have been fixed
» a well spent friday eve...
» admin -- is there a reason you removed HA's posts from the nader thread? (EOM)
» Hyderabad's last Nizam named all-time richest Indian
» For the nth time , India is 'close' to buying the Rafale because this time the price seems to have been fixed
» a well spent friday eve...
Page 1 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|