This is a Hitskin.com skin preview
Install the skin • Return to the skin page
[Good Citizen]
+11
b_A
bw
Jeremiah Mburuburu
Marathadi-Saamiyaar
Propagandhi711
Nila
MaxEntropy_Man
Idéfix
Hellsangel
Impedimenta
southindian
15 posters
Page 4 of 4
Page 4 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Re: [Good Citizen]
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:rashmun -- i have no friends here. do you think the people here are friends? i have news for you. i don't know about you, but it takes a lot more to win my friendship.
and i'm sorry i'm not voluble enough to satisfy you. i made my opinion absolute clear in that thread. i have no desire to keep repeating myself ad nauseam.
oh and btw, what is this thing about quoting JM from sulekha and here incessantly? i'm curious.
Please at least consider not mollycoddling rogue posters immediately after they have posted private information of another poster.
i have no idea what you are talking about with respect to JM and Sulekha.
Guest- Guest
Re: [Good Citizen]
Max, would you care to confirm whether you have communicated with PP through email and/or phone?
Guest- Guest
Re: [Good Citizen]
Rashmun wrote:i have no idea what you are talking about with respect to JM and Sulekha.
i was wondering about your tendency to quote from JM's posts.
MaxEntropy_Man- Posts : 14702
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: [Good Citizen]
i did not reveal a lot of private info about bw. she did it first, without provocation; she used info about me that she knew from long acquaintance with me, from behind the cover of a new i.d.Vidya Bagchi wrote:Rashmun wrote:
i have no issues with your approach of being totally frank in sharing your views. i have never liked people pussyfooting around myself.
I will just state that JM has never used the private information of HA in forum posts to my knowledge. JM did it to PP but that was like a last resort. In your post you state that 'JM has his ways of using private information'. I am not sure what you meant by this because i have never seen JM use the private information of HA in any forum posts.
he revealed a lot of bw's private info. does that count, or no?
Jeremiah Mburuburu- Posts : 1251
Join date : 2011-09-09
Re: [Good Citizen]
Rashmun wrote:Max, would you care to confirm whether you have communicated with PP through email and/or phone?
not that it's any of your business, but no. i have shared one PM with him here to request the removal of what i thought was your real name. since then i have decided the best course of action about such things is to post them publicly in the admin request thread.
i have never spoken to PP over the phone, although i might look him up the next time i'm in SFO for a conference if he has the time and inclination. there are some nice brew pubs that i like.
MaxEntropy_Man- Posts : 14702
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: [Good Citizen]
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Rashmun wrote:i have no idea what you are talking about with respect to JM and Sulekha.
i was wondering about your tendency to quote from JM's posts.
please to give an example post where i have done this.
Guest- Guest
Re: [Good Citizen]
Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:i did not reveal a lot of private info about bw. she did it first, without provocation; she used info about me that she knew from long acquaintance with me, from behind the cover of a new i.d.Vidya Bagchi wrote:Rashmun wrote:
i have no issues with your approach of being totally frank in sharing your views. i have never liked people pussyfooting around myself.
I will just state that JM has never used the private information of HA in forum posts to my knowledge. JM did it to PP but that was like a last resort. In your post you state that 'JM has his ways of using private information'. I am not sure what you meant by this because i have never seen JM use the private information of HA in any forum posts.
he revealed a lot of bw's private info. does that count, or no?
perhaps there has been some genuine misunderstanding. both bw and you come across as honorable people to me when it comes to respecting the privacy of other posters. I am impressed with the fact that she took on Hellsangel when he was revealing private information about you.
https://such.forumotion.com/t674-admin-can-see-your-ip-address#5792
Guest- Guest
Re: [Good Citizen]
Rashmun wrote:Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:i did not reveal a lot of private info about bw. she did it first, without provocation; she used info about me that she knew from long acquaintance with me, from behind the cover of a new i.d.Vidya Bagchi wrote:Rashmun wrote:
i have no issues with your approach of being totally frank in sharing your views. i have never liked people pussyfooting around myself.
I will just state that JM has never used the private information of HA in forum posts to my knowledge. JM did it to PP but that was like a last resort. In your post you state that 'JM has his ways of using private information'. I am not sure what you meant by this because i have never seen JM use the private information of HA in any forum posts.
he revealed a lot of bw's private info. does that count, or no?
perhaps there has been some genuine misunderstanding. both bw and you come across as honorable people to me when it comes to respecting the privacy of other posters. I am impressed with the fact that she took on Hellsangel when he was revealing private information about you.
https://such.forumotion.com/t674-admin-can-see-your-ip-address#5792
i have never, ever revealed a thing about anyone here to anyone else. i have known/do know a lot of people on sulekha/SUCH very well over the years and all their private info have been safe with me, even after we lost touch or had disagreements and broke our connections.
there are a lot of fairy tales written about me and i really have no interest in "defending" myself.
bw- Posts : 2922
Join date : 2012-11-15
Re: [Good Citizen]
bw wrote:Rashmun wrote:Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:i did not reveal a lot of private info about bw. she did it first, without provocation; she used info about me that she knew from long acquaintance with me, from behind the cover of a new i.d.Vidya Bagchi wrote:Rashmun wrote:
i have no issues with your approach of being totally frank in sharing your views. i have never liked people pussyfooting around myself.
I will just state that JM has never used the private information of HA in forum posts to my knowledge. JM did it to PP but that was like a last resort. In your post you state that 'JM has his ways of using private information'. I am not sure what you meant by this because i have never seen JM use the private information of HA in any forum posts.
he revealed a lot of bw's private info. does that count, or no?
perhaps there has been some genuine misunderstanding. both bw and you come across as honorable people to me when it comes to respecting the privacy of other posters. I am impressed with the fact that she took on Hellsangel when he was revealing private information about you.
https://such.forumotion.com/t674-admin-can-see-your-ip-address#5792
i have never, ever revealed a thing about anyone here to anyone else. i have known/do know a lot of people on sulekha/SUCH very well over the years and all their private info have been safe with me, even after we lost touch or had disagreements and broke our connections.
there are a lot of fairy tales written about me and i really have no interest in "defending" myself.
i am sure there has been some terrible misunderstanding.
Guest- Guest
Re: [Good Citizen]
Rashmun wrote:i did not reveal a lot of private info about bw. she did it first, without provocation; she used info about me that she knew from long acquaintance with me, from behind the cover of a new i.d.Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:
he revealed a lot of bw's private info. does that count, or no?
perhaps there has been some genuine misunderstanding. both bw and you come across as honorable people to me when it comes to respecting the privacy of other posters. I am impressed with the fact that she took on Hellsangel when he was revealing private information about you.
https://such.forumotion.com/t674-admin-can-see-your-ip-address#5792[/quote]
Sorry.....noi chance for any "Access"
I have only seen you abuse wives, sisters and mothers of posters. How about abusing husbands, fathers, and brothers of female posters for a change. You are the best in that specialty and let us see if you are equally good in that sub-section.
Marathadi-Saamiyaar- Posts : 17675
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 110
Re: [Good Citizen]
This is why people on this forum consider you "worse than malicious." You think you are the cat that closes its eyes while stealing milk and thinks the world cannot see it in the middle of the theft. I have news for you. You and Frodo Baggins here are the only ones who wasn't shocked by your reprehensible behavior.Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:i merely made you poop in your pants by asking whether you should compensate your company - i referred to it with three initials, not the name by which it is known - for stealing time from it and using its equipment to harass posters every day. i was kind to you.
The policy was in effect for over a year now. I have provided links to it multiple times when relevant. The sticky thread was simply a codification of prior discussions, and does not represent any deviation from prior policy.Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:you formulated a privacy policy a year and a half after you started this forum
During all that time, I have been amply clear: if any poster believed their information was disclosed, they needed to take action to protect it. There are some among us who prefer to whine rather than take appropriate, effective action to protect their information. To them, I say: whatever floats your boat!Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:while during all that time, privacy had been routinely violated in front of your eyes, by people you incite.
It was interesting to observe the people vote about your behavior here. I trust you saw the results.Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:it was interesting to watch you shit in your pants, lie, and display your hypocrisy.
Idéfix- Posts : 8808
Join date : 2012-04-26
Location : Berkeley, CA
Re: [Good Citizen]
Jerji, you are lying. You specifically threatened BW on old CH with the revelation of her personal information. You have absolutely no locus standi to lecture anyone about the treatment of personal information. You are one of the worst offenders in this matter in the history of this community.Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:i did not reveal a lot of private info about bw. she did it first, without provocation; she used info about me that she knew from long acquaintance with me, from behind the cover of a new i.d.
Idéfix- Posts : 8808
Join date : 2012-04-26
Location : Berkeley, CA
Re: [Good Citizen]
Rashmun wrote:you were not here when the whole fight started, so a brief recap for your benefit.
Jeepers! What has gone on here? Too many pages to sift through! Could someone give me the low down? TIA.
goodcitizn- Posts : 3263
Join date : 2011-05-03
Re: [Good Citizen]
Max, do let me know when you are in SFO next.MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Rashmun wrote:Max, would you care to confirm whether you have communicated with PP through email and/or phone?
not that it's any of your business, but no. i have shared one PM with him here to request the removal of what i thought was your real name. since then i have decided the best course of action about such things is to post them publicly in the admin request thread.
i have never spoken to PP over the phone, although i might look him up the next time i'm in SFO for a conference if he has the time and inclination. there are some nice brew pubs that i like.
I have only met one CHer in person so far, and that CHer is pretty open about their real identity here. I have never spoken with any other CHers on the phone.
Idéfix- Posts : 8808
Join date : 2012-04-26
Location : Berkeley, CA
Re: [Good Citizen]
You've become a celebrity; that's what happened.goodcitizn wrote:Rashmun wrote:you were not here when the whole fight started, so a brief recap for your benefit.
Jeepers! What has gone on here? Too many pages to sift through! Could someone give me the low down? TIA.
Idéfix- Posts : 8808
Join date : 2012-04-26
Location : Berkeley, CA
Re: [Good Citizen]
goodcitizn wrote:Rashmun wrote:you were not here when the whole fight started, so a brief recap for your benefit.
Jeepers! What has gone on here? Too many pages to sift through! Could someone give me the low down? TIA.
Even "kanniTheevu" might come to an end, but not the soap opera of Rashmunullah Jehadi Sir ji.
Marathadi-Saamiyaar- Posts : 17675
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 110
Re: [Good Citizen]
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:goodcitizn wrote:Rashmun wrote:you were not here when the whole fight started, so a brief recap for your benefit.
Jeepers! What has gone on here? Too many pages to sift through! Could someone give me the low down? TIA.
Even "kanniTheevu" might come to an end, but not the soap opera of Rashmunullah Jehadi Sir ji.
Leaving now with a couple of relatives to M.G.Road for shopping. Will check back tonight.
goodcitizn- Posts : 3263
Join date : 2011-05-03
Re: [Good Citizen]
The absolute hypocrisy and complete shamelessness of both Rashmun and JM is what makes this so pathetic. Both these posters have disclosed personal information about others without any regard for privacy. Rashmun did this with my information soon after I questioned his methods. JM did this years ago before this forum was started. Today he says rather coyly, "i did not reveal a lot of private info about bw."MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Rashmun wrote:MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Rashmun wrote:
Consider the public shaming of HA in this thread:
https://such.forumotion.com/t4792-regarding-hellsangel-s-persistent-usage-of-purported-real-names-of-posters-he-disagrees-with#38099
and i have said what i wanted to say on that thread. so what's your point?
i have also said whatever i wanted to say in my posts so far.
maybe you didn't understand. you posted a thread where we seem to have discussed public disclosure of private information, and then went on a rant and said i was silent about it. on that very thread i have expressed my opinion about this issue and you seem to have not only quoted me but agreed with me. why do you then say that i remained silent? what am i missing?
In my judgement, most posters on this forum have maintained a rather high degree of respect for others' privacy. The only exceptions are JM, HA, Propagandhi, Rashmun and HK, who have all at various times disclosed personal information about others. It is interesting that two of those posters are the ones constantly whining and ranting about privacy! I wish the other three (HA, Propagandhi and HK) had not disclosed personal information, but at least they don't go around lecturing others about privacy in manufactured tones of holier-than-thou outrage.
Last edited by panini press on Fri Feb 08, 2013 3:38 am; edited 3 times in total
Idéfix- Posts : 8808
Join date : 2012-04-26
Location : Berkeley, CA
Re: [Good Citizen]
It is called Rashmun Method for a reason.Vidya Bagchi wrote:lol.. first rashmun complains max never condemned. then he himself posts the proof of him doing so. uff rashmun.
Idéfix- Posts : 8808
Join date : 2012-04-26
Location : Berkeley, CA
Re: [Good Citizen]
On this lovely friday...
I have 2 doubt-u- Is good citizen Soloman Papaiya of such? Why is this long thread addressed to him?
Rashmun- When copy paste n type down long post do u smile or frown or have a straight face?
P.S. With grt difficulty i managed to tok tok type this post from phone..pls reply.
Thank u
I have 2 doubt-u- Is good citizen Soloman Papaiya of such? Why is this long thread addressed to him?
Rashmun- When copy paste n type down long post do u smile or frown or have a straight face?
P.S. With grt difficulty i managed to tok tok type this post from phone..pls reply.
Thank u
Rekz- Posts : 1086
Join date : 2011-04-30
Re: [Good Citizen]
this has to be the only thread in the history of New CH that spawned 4 full pages well under a day. it took me over an hour to read it all. some of the recent developments are shocking. i see some close allies going a little stiff and some bitter enemies going soft. i think this guarantees wholesome entertainment for the likes of me over the next few months.
Captain Bhankas- Posts : 676
Join date : 2013-02-05
Re: [Good Citizen]
yes. the icing would be if this thread also gets moving: https://such.forumotion.com/t10027-its-a-shame#76502Captain Bhankas wrote:i think this guarantees wholesome entertainment for the likes of me over the next few months.
Guest- Guest
Re: [Good Citizen]
OMG, how do you all not get fired? seriously, i got back to work after two weeks and have tons to catch up with plus dance, gym, kids and home. and today, SNOW as well.
even [seemingly] single people spend copious amt of time here wasting and withering away into oblivion to prove what to whom? is there a market for [supposed] expertise in "online debating" on useless topis? is that something you guys put on your resume these days?
perspective, seriously posters here need a course on perspective.
even [seemingly] single people spend copious amt of time here wasting and withering away into oblivion to prove what to whom? is there a market for [supposed] expertise in "online debating" on useless topis? is that something you guys put on your resume these days?
perspective, seriously posters here need a course on perspective.
Impedimenta- Posts : 2791
Join date : 2011-04-29
Re: [Good Citizen]
yeah. i was mighty surprised to see this snake on such this morning when i clicked it. 4 pages long while i was asleep.
Guest- Guest
Re: [Good Citizen]
Impedimenta wrote:OMG, how do you all not get fired? seriously, i got back to work after two weeks and have tons to catch up with plus dance, gym, kids and home. and today, SNOW as well.
even [seemingly] single people spend copious amt of time here wasting and withering away into oblivion to prove what to whom? is there a market for [supposed] expertise in "online debating" on useless topis? is that something you guys put on your resume these days?
perspective, seriously posters here need a course on perspective.
You have life. Bye. EOD.
Propagandhi711- Posts : 6941
Join date : 2011-04-29
Re: [Good Citizen]
Huzefa Kapasi wrote:yes. the icing would be if this thread also gets moving: https://such.forumotion.com/t10027-its-a-shame#76502Captain Bhankas wrote:i think this guarantees wholesome entertainment for the likes of me over the next few months.
That was a fine thread I missed....rodl@bhokachoda & Dungee, not donkey
Propagandhi711- Posts : 6941
Join date : 2011-04-29
Re: [Good Citizen]
Captain Bhankas wrote:this has to be the only thread in the history of New CH that spawned 4 full pages well under a day. it took me over an hour to read it all. some of the recent developments are shocking. i see some close allies going a little stiff and some bitter enemies going soft. i think this guarantees wholesome entertainment for the likes of me over the next few months.
Nothing less than nonstop entertainment these days...douchemuni's soap opera is longer running than Dallas.
Propagandhi711- Posts : 6941
Join date : 2011-04-29
Re: [Good Citizen]
panini press wrote:The absolute hypocrisy and complete shamelessness of both Rashmun and JM is what makes this so pathetic. Both these posters have disclosed personal information about others without any regard for privacy. Rashmun did this with my information soon after I questioned his methods. JM did this years ago before this forum was started. Today he says rather coyly, "i did not reveal a lot of private info about bw."MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Rashmun wrote:MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Rashmun wrote:
Consider the public shaming of HA in this thread:
https://such.forumotion.com/t4792-regarding-hellsangel-s-persistent-usage-of-purported-real-names-of-posters-he-disagrees-with#38099
and i have said what i wanted to say on that thread. so what's your point?
i have also said whatever i wanted to say in my posts so far.
maybe you didn't understand. you posted a thread where we seem to have discussed public disclosure of private information, and then went on a rant and said i was silent about it. on that very thread i have expressed my opinion about this issue and you seem to have not only quoted me but agreed with me. why do you then say that i remained silent? what am i missing?
In my judgement, most posters on this forum have maintained a rather high degree of respect for others' privacy. The only exceptions are JM, HA, Propagandhi, Rashmun and HK, who have all at various times disclosed personal information about others. It is interesting that two of those posters are the ones constantly whining and ranting about privacy! I wish the other three (HA, Propagandhi and HK) had not disclosed personal information, but at least they don't go around lecturing others about privacy in manufactured tones of holier-than-thou outrage.
I deny using the full purported name of Panini Press (PP) in my posts although i admit that i have given links to his posts on sulekha (where he posted under his purported real name) for the purpose of showing his reaction to my philosophy posts ('Great Post', etc.).
On one (and only one) occasion i copied the entire post of the poster NG (PP knows who i am talking about) along with the link in which she uses his purported real name. This was an error on my part and i regret it. But, on second thoughts, PP has no concern for his privacy. For instance his blogs on sulekha continue to be under his real name. His forum posts on sulekha continue to be present on the site under his real name although he knows he can write to Sulekha to edit out his purported real name from the posts. Nobody can stop me from posting portions of PP's sulekha blogs on this forum (where he uses his purported real name) but i choose not to do this. I have always confined my fight with PP to this forum and have no desire to inflict any professional damage to him in any way.
Compare my approach with the approach of PP's buddies Hellsangel and Propagandhi who have taken a special delight in repeatedly posting the entire purported real name of the poster JM. In addition, Propa has given links to the purported photographs of JM's wife and daughter on chat with the claim that he would like to make love to both of them.
Guest- Guest
Re: [Good Citizen]
panini press wrote:It is called Rashmun Method for a reason.Vidya Bagchi wrote:lol.. first rashmun complains max never condemned. then he himself posts the proof of him doing so. uff rashmun.
PP Method also includes honest mistakes, Saar.
Guest- Guest
Re: [Good Citizen]
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
I have only seen you abuse wives, sisters and mothers of posters. How about abusing husbands, fathers, and brothers of female posters for a change. You are the best in that specialty and let us see if you are equally good in that sub-section.
Please give the link to any post on this forum where i have abused the wife, sister, or mother of any poster. It is true that i have used proportionate extreme language on the old sulekha forum when abusive posters like you have abused my family repeatedly. My intention was to 'fight fire with fire' and get people like you to shut up, with respect to abusive languge, and almost always i succeeded. This is similar to the fact that you immediately stop calling me jehadi when i call you Uppili the Poopili. Perhaps you will now continue to call me jehadi, in which case i will continue calling you Uppili the Poopili.
Guest- Guest
Re: [Good Citizen]
4 pages long? Oh wow! So much whining.
Looks like the paranoia has set in fully with the dementia.
i did not reveal a lot of private info about bw. she did it first, without provocation; she used info about me that she knew from long acquaintance with me, from behind the cover of a new i.d.
Looks like the paranoia has set in fully with the dementia.
Hellsangel- Posts : 14721
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: [Good Citizen]
Rashmun wrote:[
You are free to have your opinion on PP. I know that you are great friends with Hellsangel--someone i completely despise because of his penchant for revealing private information of other posters repeatedly. Till date you have not bothered to correct him on this presumably because of your own personal vendetta against JM.
That is right, Rashman. Snoopy was a rogue WWI pilot
until Lucy reformed him and set him on the path of the straight and narrow.
Hellsangel- Posts : 14721
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: [Good Citizen]
Hellsangel wrote:Rashmun wrote:[
You are free to have your opinion on PP. I know that you are great friends with Hellsangel--someone i completely despise because of his penchant for revealing private information of other posters repeatedly. Till date you have not bothered to correct him on this presumably because of your own personal vendetta against JM.
That is right, Rashman. Snoopy was a rogue WWI pilot
until Lucy reformed him and set him on the path of the straight and narrow.
Little puppy, recent experience of this forum shows that the rogue continues to be a rogue. It has been speculated that ethics and morality were not inculcated into you in your formative years due to which we now see the sad spectacle of someone running around mining and revealing private information of other posters.
Guest- Guest
Re: [Good Citizen]
Vidya Bagchi wrote:
Now that no one will deny it, it will become the great truth by Rashman logic.
Hellsangel- Posts : 14721
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: [Good Citizen]
Hellsangel wrote:Vidya Bagchi wrote:
Now that no one will deny it, it will become the great truth by Rashman logic.
one does not and should not care to comment on the harmless fantasies of little puppy.
Guest- Guest
Re: [Good Citizen]
Hellsangel wrote:Vidya Bagchi wrote:
Now that no one will deny it, it will become the great truth by Rashman logic.
Too many [private info] revelations going on. whether Lucy ran away or not, dunno how many hearts got broken today.
Guest- Guest
Re: [Good Citizen]
Rashmun wrote:Hellsangel wrote:Vidya Bagchi wrote:
Now that no one will deny it, it will become the great truth by Rashman logic.
one does not and should not care to comment on the harmless fantasies of little puppy.
Munmun, is HA vicious, malicious, vindictive, and what-was-the-fourth-term, or is he a little puppy? Nakki karke jaldi batao. Uff, too much confusion.
Guest- Guest
Re: [Good Citizen]
Vidya Bagchi wrote:Rashmun wrote:Hellsangel wrote:Vidya Bagchi wrote:
Now that no one will deny it, it will become the great truth by Rashman logic.
one does not and should not care to comment on the harmless fantasies of little puppy.
Munmun, is HA vicious, malicious, vindictive, and what-was-the-fourth-term, or is he a little puppy? Nakki karke jaldi batao. Uff, too much confusion.
Bollywood Aunty, the fourth term is mean. And yes he is all of those. This has been confirmed by Huzefa Kapasi who used to be a good friend of HA but who now refuses to communicate with HA because of HA's penchant of mining and revealing private information of another poster.
Guest- Guest
Re: [Good Citizen]
Rashmun wrote:Hellsangel wrote:Vidya Bagchi wrote:
Now that no one will deny it, it will become the great truth by Rashman logic.
one does not and should not care to comment on the harmless fantasies of little puppy.
you commented - does it mean that it isn't so harmless after all? shd i be worried?
bw- Posts : 2922
Join date : 2012-11-15
Re: [Good Citizen]
bw wrote:Rashmun wrote:Hellsangel wrote:Vidya Bagchi wrote:
Now that no one will deny it, it will become the great truth by Rashman logic.
one does not and should not care to comment on the harmless fantasies of little puppy.
you commented - does it mean that it isn't so harmless after all? shd i be worried?
patience test - level 1 - Passed
Impedimenta- Posts : 2791
Join date : 2011-04-29
Re: [Good Citizen]
bw wrote:Rashmun wrote:Hellsangel wrote:Vidya Bagchi wrote:
Now that no one will deny it, it will become the great truth by Rashman logic.
one does not and should not care to comment on the harmless fantasies of little puppy.
you commented - does it mean that it isn't so harmless after all? shd i be worried?
I made a clarification for the benefit of HA.
Guest- Guest
Re: [Good Citizen]
Rashmun wrote:bw wrote:Rashmun wrote:Hellsangel wrote:Vidya Bagchi wrote:
Now that no one will deny it, it will become the great truth by Rashman logic.
one does not and should not care to comment on the harmless fantasies of little puppy.
you commented - does it mean that it isn't so harmless after all? shd i be worried?
I made a clarification for the benefit of HA.
patience test - Level 2 - weakening pass
Impedimenta- Posts : 2791
Join date : 2011-04-29
Re: [Good Citizen]
Impedimenta wrote:bw wrote:Rashmun wrote:Hellsangel wrote:Vidya Bagchi wrote:
Now that no one will deny it, it will become the great truth by Rashman logic.
one does not and should not care to comment on the harmless fantasies of little puppy.
you commented - does it mean that it isn't so harmless after all? shd i be worried?
patience test - level 1 - Passed
Not too busy to read threads are you, POKCTAP?
Hellsangel- Posts : 14721
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: [Good Citizen]
Hellsangel wrote:Impedimenta wrote:bw wrote:Rashmun wrote:Hellsangel wrote:
Now that no one will deny it, it will become the great truth by Rashman logic.
one does not and should not care to comment on the harmless fantasies of little puppy.
you commented - does it mean that it isn't so harmless after all? shd i be worried?
patience test - level 1 - Passed
Not too busy to read threads are you, POKCTAP?
not at all snoopy, is it? unlike you all hipsters, i have no life. EOD.
Impedimenta- Posts : 2791
Join date : 2011-04-29
Re: [Good Citizen]
goodcitizn wrote:Rashmun wrote:you were not here when the whole fight started, so a brief recap for your benefit.
Jeepers! What has gone on here? Too many pages to sift through! Could someone give me the low down? TIA.
garam_kuta- Posts : 3768
Join date : 2011-05-18
Re: [Good Citizen]
garam_kuta wrote:goodcitizn wrote:Rashmun wrote:you were not here when the whole fight started, so a brief recap for your benefit.
Jeepers! What has gone on here? Too many pages to sift through! Could someone give me the low down? TIA.
hahaha.
MaxEntropy_Man- Posts : 14702
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: [Good Citizen]
garam_kuta wrote:goodcitizn wrote:Rashmun wrote:you were not here when the whole fight started, so a brief recap for your benefit.
Jeepers! What has gone on here? Too many pages to sift through! Could someone give me the low down? TIA.
very appropriate.
Guest- Guest
Re: [Good Citizen]
best summary of the thread!garam_kuta wrote:goodcitizn wrote:Rashmun wrote:you were not here when the whole fight started, so a brief recap for your benefit.
Jeepers! What has gone on here? Too many pages to sift through! Could someone give me the low down? TIA.
Idéfix- Posts : 8808
Join date : 2012-04-26
Location : Berkeley, CA
Re: [Good Citizen]
panini press wrote:best summary of the thread!garam_kuta wrote:goodcitizn wrote:Rashmun wrote:you were not here when the whole fight started, so a brief recap for your benefit.
Jeepers! What has gone on here? Too many pages to sift through! Could someone give me the low down? TIA.
I agree. By the way you are being represented by the cat in the picture.
The obligatory
Guest- Guest
Page 4 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Similar topics
» I am a poor Indian citizen...there is no way I can pay for the PhD. I would like to come but...
» Rahul Gandhi is an Italian citizen
» Raghuram Rajan is an Indian citizen
» "Ashamed to call myself a citizen of India"
» Manhole swallos a senior citizen in Hyderabad
» Rahul Gandhi is an Italian citizen
» Raghuram Rajan is an Indian citizen
» "Ashamed to call myself a citizen of India"
» Manhole swallos a senior citizen in Hyderabad
Page 4 of 4
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|