Hitskin.comThis is a Hitskin.com skin preview
Install the skin • Return to the skin page
Home
Latest imagesMughals and the efflorescence of Hinduism
3 posters
Page 1 of 1
Mughals and the efflorescence of Hinduism
by Guest Sun May 01, 2011 3:23 pm
Yet, despite Babur’s protestations of religious zeal, it is clear from the pages of his autobiography that he was no bigot. Hindus evidently frequented his court and many entered his service. The Sikhs - who were to become dedicated adversaries of the Mogul state in the 17th century - have long cherished a story, preserved in their scriptural tradition, about an encounter between Babur and the founder of their faith, Guru Nanak. In the process of sacking a town in the Punjab, Babur’s soldiers are said to have imprisoned Guru Nanak and one of his disciples. Learning of a miracle performed by the Guru, Babur visited him in prison. Such was the presence of the Guru that Babur is said to have fallen at his feet, with the cry: "On the face of this faqir one sees God himself."
In any event, it is beyond dispute that Babur’s descendants presided over a virtually unprecedented efflorescence in Hindu religious activity. Hinduism as we know it today - especially the Hinduism of north India - was essentially shaped under Mogul rule, often with the active participation and support of the rulers and their officials and feudatories. The Ramcharitmanas, for example, the version of the Ramayana that was to be canonised as the central text of north Indian devotional practice, was composed in Akbar’s reign by the great saint-poet Tulsidas. The early years of Mogul rule also coincided with a great renaissance in the theology of Krishna. It was in this period that Rupa Goswami and other disciples of Chaitanya Mahaprabhu rediscovered and mapped out the sacred geography of the Krishna legend.
Brajbhumi - the region that is most sacred to Krishna bhakti - lies between Agra and Delhi, the two principal centres of Mogul power in the 16th century. The road connecting these two imperial cities runs right past the sacred sites of Braj. It is self-evident that if the Moguls had wished to persecute Vaishnavites they could easily have done so. But far from suppressing the burgeoning activity in this area, Akbar and his nobles actively supported it. The Hindu generals and officials of his court built several of the most important temples in this area, with Akbar’s encouragement. Akbar was personally responsible for sustaining some of these temples: he granted land and revenue in perpetuity to no less than 35 of them.
Hinduism would scarcely be recognisable today if Vaishnavism had been actively suppressed in the 16th century: other devotional forms may have taken its place, but we cannot know what those would have been. It is a simple fact that contemporary Hinduism as a living practice would not be what it is if it were not for the devotional practices initiated under Mogul rule.
Above extract taken from page 2 of a fine article about Babur and the mughals:
http://www.littlemag.com/2000/amitav.htm
In any event, it is beyond dispute that Babur’s descendants presided over a virtually unprecedented efflorescence in Hindu religious activity. Hinduism as we know it today - especially the Hinduism of north India - was essentially shaped under Mogul rule, often with the active participation and support of the rulers and their officials and feudatories. The Ramcharitmanas, for example, the version of the Ramayana that was to be canonised as the central text of north Indian devotional practice, was composed in Akbar’s reign by the great saint-poet Tulsidas. The early years of Mogul rule also coincided with a great renaissance in the theology of Krishna. It was in this period that Rupa Goswami and other disciples of Chaitanya Mahaprabhu rediscovered and mapped out the sacred geography of the Krishna legend.
Brajbhumi - the region that is most sacred to Krishna bhakti - lies between Agra and Delhi, the two principal centres of Mogul power in the 16th century. The road connecting these two imperial cities runs right past the sacred sites of Braj. It is self-evident that if the Moguls had wished to persecute Vaishnavites they could easily have done so. But far from suppressing the burgeoning activity in this area, Akbar and his nobles actively supported it. The Hindu generals and officials of his court built several of the most important temples in this area, with Akbar’s encouragement. Akbar was personally responsible for sustaining some of these temples: he granted land and revenue in perpetuity to no less than 35 of them.
Hinduism would scarcely be recognisable today if Vaishnavism had been actively suppressed in the 16th century: other devotional forms may have taken its place, but we cannot know what those would have been. It is a simple fact that contemporary Hinduism as a living practice would not be what it is if it were not for the devotional practices initiated under Mogul rule.
Above extract taken from page 2 of a fine article about Babur and the mughals:
http://www.littlemag.com/2000/amitav.htm
Guest- Guest
Re: Mughals and the efflorescence of Hinduism
by rawemotions Wed May 04, 2011 12:09 am
It looks like this guy forgot about the wanton destruction of Mathura temple was destroyed and its conversion to a Mosque.
rawemotions- Posts : 1690
Join date : 2011-05-03
Re: Mughals and the efflorescence of Hinduism
by Guest Wed May 04, 2011 1:30 am
rawemotions wrote:It looks like this guy forgot about the wanton destruction of Mathura temple was destroyed and its conversion to a Mosque.
Aurangzeb was an aberration.
Guest- Guest
Re: Mughals and the efflorescence of Hinduism
by rawemotions Sat May 14, 2011 7:55 pm
Are you saying that , an article that is supposedly dealing with a supposedly Mughal interference (I do not how the hell the Author can call genocide of millions of Hindus and wanton destruction as efflorescence) should not cover all the aspects. Would you at the least then agree, that this is a one-sided article, prejudiced, and poorly written ?
rawemotions- Posts : 1690
Join date : 2011-05-03
Re: Mughals and the efflorescence of Hinduism
by Propagandhi711 Sun May 15, 2011 1:59 pm
is there a term called intellectual stockholm syndrome?
Propagandhi711- Posts : 6941
Join date : 2011-04-29
Re: Mughals and the efflorescence of Hinduism
by truthbetold Tue Jun 07, 2011 1:15 pm
This post reminds me of Dileep Desouza theory of how native American Indians and African Americans benefited from events in US history, ie slavery and Treaties.
truthbetold- Posts : 6799
Join date : 2011-06-07
Similar topics» Mughals and Hinduism
» Diggy Raja: "Mughals saved Hinduism from extinction"
» Amitava Ghosh: It is a simple fact that contemporary Hinduism would not be what it is if not for the Mughals
» Akbar and the problem of reforming Hinduism: How a muslim king initiated reforms in Hinduism
» What did the Mughals do for us?
» Diggy Raja: "Mughals saved Hinduism from extinction"
» Amitava Ghosh: It is a simple fact that contemporary Hinduism would not be what it is if not for the Mughals
» Akbar and the problem of reforming Hinduism: How a muslim king initiated reforms in Hinduism
» What did the Mughals do for us?
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum