This is a Hitskin.com skin preview
Install the skin • Return to the skin page
Calculus misconception cleared
5 posters
Page 1 of 1
Calculus misconception cleared
So far I thought (x0,f(x0)) is an inflection point if the second derivative f"(x0) = 0.
It seems that it is a misconception.
1. (xo, y0) being an inflection point does not imply that f"(x0) = 0.
2. Conversely f"(x0)=0 does not imply that x0,f(x0)) is an inflection point.
This I got it from another MOOC calculus course.
Looks like I have to watch all the Calculus videos from different teachers to get the concepts completely correct in my head.
It seems that it is a misconception.
1. (xo, y0) being an inflection point does not imply that f"(x0) = 0.
2. Conversely f"(x0)=0 does not imply that x0,f(x0)) is an inflection point.
This I got it from another MOOC calculus course.
Looks like I have to watch all the Calculus videos from different teachers to get the concepts completely correct in my head.
Rishi- Posts : 5129
Join date : 2011-09-02
Re: Calculus misconception cleared
Rishi wrote:So far I thought (x0,f(x0)) is an inflection point if the second derivative f"(x0) = 0.
It seems that it is a misconception.
1. (xo, y0) being an inflection point does not imply that f"(x0) = 0.
2. Conversely f"(x0)=0 does not imply that x0,f(x0)) is an inflection point.
This I got it from another MOOC calculus course.
Looks like I have to watch all the Calculus videos from different teachers to get the concepts completely correct in my head.
IyerE:
OrEy late GnanOdhayam.
Marathadi-Saamiyaar- Posts : 17675
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 110
Re: Calculus misconception cleared
yes that's a classic example of a necessary but not sufficient condition. in addition to that you need the first higher order derivative (above the second derivative) that is non-zero to be an odd-order derivative.
MaxEntropy_Man- Posts : 14702
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: Calculus misconception cleared
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:yes that's a classic example of a necessary but not sufficient condition. in addition to that you need the first higher order derivative (above the second derivative) that is non-zero to be an odd-order derivative.
Why do you say necessary?
I saw an example of an inflection point which was not differentiable at all.
Rishi- Posts : 5129
Join date : 2011-09-02
Re: Calculus misconception cleared
Rishi wrote:MaxEntropy_Man wrote:yes that's a classic example of a necessary but not sufficient condition. in addition to that you need the first higher order derivative (above the second derivative) that is non-zero to be an odd-order derivative.
Why do you say necessary?
I saw an example of an inflection point which was not differentiable at all.
for continuous differentiable functions what i said is true. i suppose one could think up some examples where the second derivative doesn't exist.
let me put it this way, if at some point, the second derivative is zero and the next higher non-zero derivative is of odd order, then that point is an inflection point.
MaxEntropy_Man- Posts : 14702
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: Calculus misconception cleared
Just tell me if f(x)=x^4 has an inflection point?
Rishi- Posts : 5129
Join date : 2011-09-02
Re: Calculus misconception cleared
Rishi wrote:Just tell me if f(x)=x^4 has an inflection point?
the only point at which the second derivative is zero is x=0, but all higher order derivatives of odd order are also zero at x=0. so i think no inflection points.
MaxEntropy_Man- Posts : 14702
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: Calculus misconception cleared
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Rishi wrote:Just tell me if f(x)=x^4 has an inflection point?
the only point at which the second derivative is zero is x=0, but all higher order derivatives of odd order are also zero at x=0. so i think no inflection points.
The professor explained the following way.
f"(x) = 12x^2
f"(x) = 0 for x0=0
But f"(x)=12x^2 > 0 means concave up on both sides of x0
Which means that is not an inflection point.
Rishi- Posts : 5129
Join date : 2011-09-02
Re: Calculus misconception cleared
Rishi wrote:MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Rishi wrote:Just tell me if f(x)=x^4 has an inflection point?
the only point at which the second derivative is zero is x=0, but all higher order derivatives of odd order are also zero at x=0. so i think no inflection points.
The professor explained the following way.
f"(x) = 12x^2
f"(x) = 0 for x0=0
But f"(x)=12x^2 > 0 means concave up on both sides of x0
Which means that is not an inflection point.
for a point (x0, f(x0)) to be an inflection point, in addition to f''(x0) being equal to zero, the second derivative immediately to the right and to the left of x0 must have opposite signs, i.e. f″(x0+δ) and f″(x0-δ), (where δ→0 is an infinitesimally small but positive quantity), must have opposite signs. i.e. the third derivative [f″(x0+δ)- f″(x0-δ)]/(2δ) should be non-zero. that is not the case for x0=0. hence no inflection point.
MaxEntropy_Man- Posts : 14702
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: Calculus misconception cleared
here's a true statement:Rishi wrote:So far I thought (x0,f(x0)) is an inflection point if the second derivative f"(x0) = 0.
It seems that it is a misconception.
1. (xo, y0) being an inflection point does not imply that f"(x0) = 0.
2. Conversely f"(x0)=0 does not imply that x0,f(x0)) is an inflection point.
This I got it from another MOOC calculus course.
Looks like I have to watch all the Calculus videos from different teachers to get the concepts completely correct in my head.
A. if (xo, yo) is an inflection point of f, then f ''(xo) = 0.
the converse of A is not true.
f ''(xo) being = 0 is only a necessary condition for (xo, yo) being an inflection point of f, but is a useful condition for finding inflection points.
a statement that helps one to truly understand the necessary condition is the contrapositive of A, which is equivalent to A:
B. if f ''(xo) is not = 0, then (xo, yo) is not an inflection point of f.
B tells one that one need examine only those points in f for which f ''(x) = 0; some of them may be inflection points, and others won't be, but one won't find any outside that set. thus, one can restrict one's attention to those points for which f ''(x) = 0.
one will then need to scrutinize each point for which f ''(x) = 0 for being an inflection point.
here's the test: if f ''(xo) = 0, and f '' changes sign at xo, i.e. from the left of xo to the right of xo, then (xo, yo) is an inflection point, otherwise not.
a change in the sign of f '' signals a change in the concavity of f around xo. a negative f '' indicates an f that is concave down, and a positive f '' indicates an f that is concave up.
one can also perform a first-derivative test for a point of inflection where f ''(x) = 0. you may enjoy developing that test yourself.
Jeremiah Mburuburu- Posts : 1251
Join date : 2011-09-09
Re: Calculus misconception cleared
rishi,
- what's MOOC?
- i found it odd that you didn't participate in or acknowledge the discussion of your limit problem.
enna vayaththu valiA?
- what's MOOC?
- i found it odd that you didn't participate in or acknowledge the discussion of your limit problem.
enna vayaththu valiA?
Jeremiah Mburuburu- Posts : 1251
Join date : 2011-09-09
Re: Calculus misconception cleared
Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:
one can also perform a first-derivative test for a point of inflection where f ''(x) = 0. you may enjoy developing that test yourself.
great suggestion.
MaxEntropy_Man- Posts : 14702
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: Calculus misconception cleared
Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:rishi,
- what's MOOC?
- i found it odd that you didn't participate in or acknowledge the discussion of your limit problem.
enna vayaththu valiA?
Oops.
I forgot to thank you, Max and Seva.
Thank you guys.
Your answer is correct. It is -1.
The approach you and Max took is correct. In fact, I checked with a co-worker who majored in Math.
sqrt(x^2) is indeed equal to abs(x).
The problem in effect reduces to sqrt(x^2)/x which is abs(x)/x.
Since x takes on negative value, abs(x)/x indeed is negative when x goes to negative infinity.
The discussion ended up as a long argument with Seva. So I moved on.
But I am curious, I wonder why the text books do not have examples involving limits approaching negative infinity.
MOOC is an acronym for the online courses offered free by the consortium of many schools.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massive_open_online_course
Last edited by Rishi on Wed May 01, 2013 7:03 am; edited 1 time in total
Rishi- Posts : 5129
Join date : 2011-09-02
Re: Calculus misconception cleared
Before I forget, thanks for Max and JM for their inputs on the test for inflection point.
Rishi- Posts : 5129
Join date : 2011-09-02
Re: Calculus misconception cleared
Rishi wrote:
The discussion ended up as a long argument with Seva. So I moved on.
future episodes will involve less text and this concise rendering of my emotions:
MaxEntropy_Man- Posts : 14702
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: Calculus misconception cleared
[quote="Rishi"]
You are always welcome Rishi.
Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:rishi,
I forgot to thank you, Max and Seva.
Thank you guys.
You are always welcome Rishi.
Re: Calculus misconception cleared
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:
one can also perform a first-derivative test for a point of inflection where f ''(x) = 0. you may enjoy developing that test yourself.
great suggestion.
f(x) = x^4
f'(x)= 4x^3
f'(0) = 0
Since f'(0) = 0, x=0 should be a maximum or minimum point.
Therefore it cannot be an inflection point
Testing for f' on both sides of x = 0,
f'(1) = 4 and f'(-1) = -4
f' goes from negative to positive. The curve changes from decreasing to increasing. It is a minimum point.
Btw I think if I really explain to myself conceptually from first principles instead of mindlessly applying the tests, I find there is clarity.
Rishi- Posts : 5129
Join date : 2011-09-02
Re: Calculus misconception cleared
Rishi wrote:
f(x) = x^4
f'(x)= 4x^3
f'(0) = 0
Since f'(0) = 0, x=0 should be a maximum or minimum point.
Therefore it cannot be an inflection point
Testing for f' on both sides of x = 0,
f'(1) = 4 and f'(-1) = -4
f' goes from negative to positive. The curve changes from decreasing to increasing. It is a minimum point.
Btw I think if I really explain to myself conceptually from first principles instead of mindlessly applying the tests, I find there is clarity.
What happens (at x=0) if f(x) = x^3?
Re: Calculus misconception cleared
oops
Th blanket statement "Since f'(0) = 0, x=0 should be a maximum or minimum point." I made is not totally accurate.
It should also be a critical number you get by solving f'(x) =0 for x and then test for f'(x) > 0 and f'(x) < 0 for x values on both sides of the critical number.
f(x) = 3x^2 fails that test for x=0.
So x=0 is not min or max for y=x^3
Th blanket statement "Since f'(0) = 0, x=0 should be a maximum or minimum point." I made is not totally accurate.
It should also be a critical number you get by solving f'(x) =0 for x and then test for f'(x) > 0 and f'(x) < 0 for x values on both sides of the critical number.
f(x) = 3x^2 fails that test for x=0.
So x=0 is not min or max for y=x^3
Rishi- Posts : 5129
Join date : 2011-09-02
Similar topics
» Road to telangana formation cleared
» Polavaram cleared in Rajya Sabha
» Ex-Gujarat Univ Prof says papers 'cleared' by Narendra Modi were not on curriculum
» MIT calculus
» Need some help with Calculus
» Polavaram cleared in Rajya Sabha
» Ex-Gujarat Univ Prof says papers 'cleared' by Narendra Modi were not on curriculum
» MIT calculus
» Need some help with Calculus
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|