This is a Hitskin.com skin preview
Install the skin • Return to the skin page
1984 riots case: US court asks Sonia Gandhi to respond by January 2
+3
Kris
peace_lover
Seva Lamberdar
7 posters
Page 1 of 1
1984 riots case: US court asks Sonia Gandhi to respond by January 2
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/1984-riots-case-US-court-asks-Sonia-Gandhi-to-respond-by-January-2/articleshow/27457247.cms
>>> The rioting in Delhi seems to have started when people there saw some members of Sikh community distributing sweets ('laddoo') in the streets following the assassination of Mrs. Gandhi by her Sikh bodyguards. Would the similar thing have happened if people in Dallas had seen some non-Catholics distributing sweets (chocolate) following the fatal shooting of Pres. Kennedy (a Catholic) by Mr. Oswald?
>>> The rioting in Delhi seems to have started when people there saw some members of Sikh community distributing sweets ('laddoo') in the streets following the assassination of Mrs. Gandhi by her Sikh bodyguards. Would the similar thing have happened if people in Dallas had seen some non-Catholics distributing sweets (chocolate) following the fatal shooting of Pres. Kennedy (a Catholic) by Mr. Oswald?
Re: 1984 riots case: US court asks Sonia Gandhi to respond by January 2
What is the reason for the U.S. court to allow this case, related to the events in India following the killing of Indian prime minister Indira Gandhi by her bodyguards.
It's like if a member of certain American community (X) on the staff (security detail) of U.S. Pres. harms or kills him, and then some people belonging to the X community in the U.S. start distributing sweets in the the streets. Seeing this on the part of members of X community, the members of Y community in the U.S. get mad and start beating and harming the members of X community. Is there any reason or justification for a court in Delhi (India) to have this case heard about the events in the U.S.?
It's like if a member of certain American community (X) on the staff (security detail) of U.S. Pres. harms or kills him, and then some people belonging to the X community in the U.S. start distributing sweets in the the streets. Seeing this on the part of members of X community, the members of Y community in the U.S. get mad and start beating and harming the members of X community. Is there any reason or justification for a court in Delhi (India) to have this case heard about the events in the U.S.?
Re: 1984 riots case: US court asks Sonia Gandhi to respond by January 2
This is the real reason behind Indian government's so called retaliation against U.S.A. They don't give a shit about Indians or its officials.
peace_lover- Posts : 54
Join date : 2013-11-27
Re: 1984 riots case: US court asks Sonia Gandhi to respond by January 2
>>>I am puzzled too. What is their jurisdiction?Seva Lamberdar wrote:What is the reason for the U.S. court to allow this case, related to the events in India following the killing of Indian prime minister Indira Gandhi by her bodyguards.
It's like if a member of certain American community (X) on the staff (security detail) of U.S. Pres. harms or kills him, and then some people belonging to the X community in the U.S. start distributing sweets in the the streets. Seeing this on the part of members of X community, the members of Y community in the U.S. get mad and start beating and harming the members of X community. Is there any reason or justification for a court in Delhi (India) to have this case heard about the events in the U.S.?
Kris- Posts : 5461
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: 1984 riots case: US court asks Sonia Gandhi to respond by January 2
Kris wrote:>>>I am puzzled too. What is their jurisdiction?Seva Lamberdar wrote:What is the reason for the U.S. court to allow this case, related to the events in India following the killing of Indian prime minister Indira Gandhi by her bodyguards.
It's like if a member of certain American community (X) on the staff (security detail) of U.S. Pres. harms or kills him, and then some people belonging to the X community in the U.S. start distributing sweets in the the streets. Seeing this on the part of members of X community, the members of Y community in the U.S. get mad and start beating and harming the members of X community. Is there any reason or justification for a court in Delhi (India) to have this case heard about the events in the U.S.?
Americans are overwhelmingly white. Hence considered superior to everyone else in the word and acknowledged as such by the browns and blacks.
So the Americans are always right in whatever they do.
Marathadi-Saamiyaar- Posts : 17675
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 110
Re: 1984 riots case: US court asks Sonia Gandhi to respond by January 2
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:Kris wrote:>>>I am puzzled too. What is their jurisdiction?Seva Lamberdar wrote:What is the reason for the U.S. court to allow this case, related to the events in India following the killing of Indian prime minister Indira Gandhi by her bodyguards.
It's like if a member of certain American community (X) on the staff (security detail) of U.S. Pres. harms or kills him, and then some people belonging to the X community in the U.S. start distributing sweets in the the streets. Seeing this on the part of members of X community, the members of Y community in the U.S. get mad and start beating and harming the members of X community. Is there any reason or justification for a court in Delhi (India) to have this case heard about the events in the U.S.?
Americans are overwhelmingly white. Hence considered superior to everyone else in the word and acknowledged as such by the browns and blacks.
So the Americans are always right in whatever they do.
Your Holiness, you should really stop drinking that Peyote tea.
Hellsangel- Posts : 14721
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: 1984 riots case: US court asks Sonia Gandhi to respond by January 2
Kris wrote:>>>I am puzzled too. What is their jurisdiction?Seva Lamberdar wrote:What is the reason for the U.S. court to allow this case, related to the events in India following the killing of Indian prime minister Indira Gandhi by her bodyguards.
It's like if a member of certain American community (X) on the staff (security detail) of U.S. Pres. harms or kills him, and then some people belonging to the X community in the U.S. start distributing sweets in the the streets. Seeing this on the part of members of X community, the members of Y community in the U.S. get mad and start beating and harming the members of X community. Is there any reason or justification for a court in Delhi (India) to have this case heard about the events in the U.S.?
Excerpt from the link provided
"The SFJ complaint against Sonia Gandhi invokes the federal court jurisdiction over the case based on Alien Tort Statute and the Torture Victim Protection Act of 1992 giving the survivors of human rights abuses the right to sue the perpetrators in the US."
confuzzled dude- Posts : 10205
Join date : 2011-05-08
Re: 1984 riots case: US court asks Sonia Gandhi to respond by January 2
confuzzled dude wrote:Kris wrote:>>>I am puzzled too. What is their jurisdiction?Seva Lamberdar wrote:What is the reason for the U.S. court to allow this case, related to the events in India following the killing of Indian prime minister Indira Gandhi by her bodyguards.
It's like if a member of certain American community (X) on the staff (security detail) of U.S. Pres. harms or kills him, and then some people belonging to the X community in the U.S. start distributing sweets in the the streets. Seeing this on the part of members of X community, the members of Y community in the U.S. get mad and start beating and harming the members of X community. Is there any reason or justification for a court in Delhi (India) to have this case heard about the events in the U.S.?
Excerpt from the link provided
"The SFJ complaint against Sonia Gandhi invokes the federal court jurisdiction over the case based on Alien Tort Statute and the Torture Victim Protection Act of 1992 giving the survivors of human rights abuses the right to sue the perpetrators in the US."
What human rights abuses? It was mostly the outcome of members of one community distributing 'laddoo' (sweets) in the streets after the prime minister was shot dead. People basically got mad as a result of 'laddoo' distribution after the P.M. killing and attacked the community which had some of its members distributing the 'laddoo'. Even though very unfortunate, it was more of a spontaneous and short-lived mob reaction rather than any well-planned and systematic human rights abuse against the particular community.
Re: 1984 riots case: US court asks Sonia Gandhi to respond by January 2
Is sonia listed as defendant as an individual? she was not even a member of congress in 1984. is she asked to respond as president of congress?
truthbetold- Posts : 6799
Join date : 2011-06-07
Re: 1984 riots case: US court asks Sonia Gandhi to respond by January 2
truthbetold wrote:Is sonia listed as defendant as an individual? she was not even a member of congress in 1984. is she asked to respond as president of congress?
who knows what's going on in the judge's 'mind'?
Similar topics
» 1984 anti-Sikh riots: US court asks Sonia Gandhi to provide copy of passport
» 1984 anti-Sikh riots case: SC sets aside conviction of 15 in Trilokpuri case
» How did Sonia Gandhi become so rich? Maneka Gandhi asks
» Uma Bharti Defends Smriti Irani, Asks, 'What is Sonia Gandhi's Qualification'?
» Am Sanjay Gandhi's Daughter, She Says, Asks Court To Stop 'Indu Sarkar'
» 1984 anti-Sikh riots case: SC sets aside conviction of 15 in Trilokpuri case
» How did Sonia Gandhi become so rich? Maneka Gandhi asks
» Uma Bharti Defends Smriti Irani, Asks, 'What is Sonia Gandhi's Qualification'?
» Am Sanjay Gandhi's Daughter, She Says, Asks Court To Stop 'Indu Sarkar'
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|