This is a Hitskin.com skin preview
Install the skin • Return to the skin page
Stupid white woman and her weird theories
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
Stupid white woman and her weird theories
This isn’t just an issue of defending sexual expression and fantasy, though. As the Atlantic Wire reports, “The connection between actual real-life violence and porn is blurry at best — India, which bans all forms of porn, has been in the news thanks to a rash of brutal rapes. Meanwhile, in the United States the incidence of rape declined 85 percent over a period of 25 years while access to pornography has increased.”
http://www.salon.com/2013/11/20/in_defense_of_rape_fantasies/
>>>What should Indians do? Allow porn cable in their country?
http://www.salon.com/2013/11/20/in_defense_of_rape_fantasies/
>>>What should Indians do? Allow porn cable in their country?
Rishi- Posts : 5129
Join date : 2011-09-02
Re: Stupid white woman and her weird theories
>> She seems to be saying there is no correlation between access to porn and sexual violence, rather than an inverse relationship, based what you have highlighted. Incidentally, I am not sure these things are that clear cut. How do we know that is the only variable? For instance, another variable may be sexual freedom. For a more valid comparison, the societies compared need to be have the same level of restriction on sexual freedom with the variable being access to porn. There could be other factors as well, but that one jumps out the most.Rishi wrote:This isn’t just an issue of defending sexual expression and fantasy, though. As the Atlantic Wire reports, “The connection between actual real-life violence and porn is blurry at best — India, which bans all forms of porn, has been in the news thanks to a rash of brutal rapes. Meanwhile, in the United States the incidence of rape declined 85 percent over a period of 25 years while access to pornography has increased.”
http://www.salon.com/2013/11/20/in_defense_of_rape_fantasies/
>>>What should Indians do? Allow porn cable in their country?
Kris- Posts : 5461
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: Stupid white woman and her weird theories
Kris wrote:>> She seems to be saying there is no correlation between access to porn and sexual violence, rather than an inverse relationship, based what you have highlighted. Incidentally, I am not sure these things are that clear cut. How do we know that is the only variable? For instance, another variable may be sexual freedom. For a more valid comparison, the societies compared need to be have the same level of restriction on sexual freedom with the variable being access to porn. There could be other factors as well, but that one jumps out the most.Rishi wrote:This isn’t just an issue of defending sexual expression and fantasy, though. As the Atlantic Wire reports, “The connection between actual real-life violence and porn is blurry at best — India, which bans all forms of porn, has been in the news thanks to a rash of brutal rapes. Meanwhile, in the United States the incidence of rape declined 85 percent over a period of 25 years while access to pornography has increased.”
http://www.salon.com/2013/11/20/in_defense_of_rape_fantasies/
>>>What should Indians do? Allow porn cable in their country?
>>>An inverse relation also implies correlation, a negative one though.
http://mtweb.mtsu.edu/stats/dictionary/popup_definitions/inverse_correlation.html
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Does_a_negative_correlation_coefficient_indicate_an_inverse_relationship?#slide=2
Rishi- Posts : 5129
Join date : 2011-09-02
Re: Stupid white woman and her weird theories
>>True, but what I am saying is that seems to be suggesting there is no correlation one way or the other. I am saying that could even be a direct correlation. It is just that the Indian comparison of hers may not be adjusting for the factor of sexual freedom. Unless there is an apples-to-apples comparison, we can't verify any correlational hypothesis.Rishi wrote:Kris wrote:>> She seems to be saying there is no correlation between access to porn and sexual violence, rather than an inverse relationship, based what you have highlighted. Incidentally, I am not sure these things are that clear cut. How do we know that is the only variable? For instance, another variable may be sexual freedom. For a more valid comparison, the societies compared need to be have the same level of restriction on sexual freedom with the variable being access to porn. There could be other factors as well, but that one jumps out the most.Rishi wrote:This isn’t just an issue of defending sexual expression and fantasy, though. As the Atlantic Wire reports, “The connection between actual real-life violence and porn is blurry at best — India, which bans all forms of porn, has been in the news thanks to a rash of brutal rapes. Meanwhile, in the United States the incidence of rape declined 85 percent over a period of 25 years while access to pornography has increased.”
http://www.salon.com/2013/11/20/in_defense_of_rape_fantasies/
>>>What should Indians do? Allow porn cable in their country?
>>>An inverse relation also implies correlation, a negative one though.
http://mtweb.mtsu.edu/stats/dictionary/popup_definitions/inverse_correlation.html
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Does_a_negative_correlation_coefficient_indicate_an_inverse_relationship?#slide=2
Kris- Posts : 5461
Join date : 2011-04-28
Similar topics
» Stupid White Woman
» Uma Bharti is a stupid woman
» Prathiba Patil, a stupid woman
» Watch the videos. How stupid a woman can be?
» White woman gives advice to Kerala CM
» Uma Bharti is a stupid woman
» Prathiba Patil, a stupid woman
» Watch the videos. How stupid a woman can be?
» White woman gives advice to Kerala CM
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|