Hellsangel wrote:Do you have a link to show he is a member of the NRA?

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:Do you have a link to show he is a member of the NRA?

he is a self proclaimed NRA member. the NRA doesn't publish their membership.

Hellsangel wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:Do you have a link to show he is a member of the NRA?

he is a self proclaimed NRA member. the NRA doesn't publish their membership.

When did he proclaim that? I must have missed that news.

Here's what we know about Dunn: The 45-year-old father of three is a software developer who lives in Satellite Beach in Brevard County. Lemonidis said her client is well-trained in firearms and is a member of the National Rifle Association. She said he frequently went to the range to target shoot.

Hellsangel wrote:Hmm. So he is thug coz he belongs to the NRA?

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:Hmm. So he is thug coz he belongs to the NRA?

why was that not your first question instead of the one you asked?

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:wayne lapierre of the NRA called federal law enforcement agents jack booted thugs. are federal law enforcement agents thugs because they are enforcing laws?

Hellsangel wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:wayne lapierre of the NRA called federal law enforcement agents jack booted thugs. are federal law enforcement agents thugs because they are enforcing laws?

During the Clinton Administration?

truthbetold wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:wayne lapierre of the NRA called federal law enforcement agents jack booted thugs. are federal law enforcement agents thugs because they are enforcing laws?

During the Clinton Administration?

An enforcement agent can be a thug in one admin and turn into patriotic enforcer in another admin?

truthbetold wrote:Hell
Do you realize that two people died. there is no justifiable cause in either case. whatever may be legal implications of those shootings, can a society sustain such unfortunate loss of life? the lack of remorse by killers and their supporters is even worse. the idiots like rush limbaugh are more interested in polemics of gun laws than the lives of ordinary citizens.
nra's inability to support reasonable background search puts them in the same class as tea party extremists.
i have to disagree with you on the issue.

Hellsangel wrote:

truthbetold wrote:Hell
Do you realize that two people died. there is no justifiable cause in either case. whatever may be legal implications of those shootings, can a society sustain such unfortunate loss of life? the lack of remorse by killers and their supporters is even worse. the idiots like rush limbaugh are more interested in polemics of gun laws than the lives of ordinary citizens.
nra's inability to support reasonable background search puts them in the same class as tea party extremists.
i have to disagree with you on the issue.

OK. In this case, what would a background check on Michael Dunn have proved?

truthbetold wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

truthbetold wrote:Hell
Do you realize that two people died. there is no justifiable cause in either case. whatever may be legal implications of those shootings, can a society sustain such unfortunate loss of life? the lack of remorse by killers and their supporters is even worse. the idiots like rush limbaugh are more interested in polemics of gun laws than the lives of ordinary citizens.
nra's inability to support reasonable background search puts them in the same class as tea party extremists.
i have to disagree with you on the issue.

OK. In this case, what would a background check on Michael Dunn have proved?

Am tryting to understand the connection between what I wrote and what you asked?  

The irrationality of NRA is displayed through its refusal to agree to a background search supported by large majority of Americans and a significant portion of NRA members. The background check is NRA related issue.  The benefits and importance of background checks were widely known and appreciated.  I did not suggest any remedies to Dunn's particular case.

truthbetold wrote:Hell,
Pew research, with international reputation, is not credible.  NRA,  who has self interest in putting out facts to suits its own goals,  is more credible with its own self survey.  Does that make sense?

NRA does not release it membership rolls. Does not allow gun registry. Does not allow govt to computerize gun records.  Threatens people's representatives of electoral consequences at every chance.  Do these actions make them more credible?