Tracy Whitney wrote:

Rishi wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42luHhrsNhg&feature=kp

Haha. Very funny. Anyway, if someone makes a post about me and I know they are lying, I quote that post and confront and challenge them on their face. What does the sneaky angel do here instead? Makes a generic universal post. Now I am no psychology expert but I think that's sneaky. Or maybe that's how South Indians from elite public schools behave. *shrug* can someone in the know how guide me regarding the rules? Should I continue to talk to him in third person or should I address him directly?

>>>TW,

How do you know HA went tp an elite school?

Did he go to HPS?

Rishi, I will tell you but then I will have to kill you lol. J/K... No it's a guess on my part. I picked up my cues from different posts by different posters on the nadella and other threads and of course I might be wrong.

Rishi wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:

Rishi wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42luHhrsNhg&feature=kp

Haha. Very funny. Anyway, if someone makes a post about me and I know they are lying, I quote that post and confront and challenge them on their face. What does the sneaky angel do here instead? Makes a generic universal post. Now I am no psychology expert but I think that's sneaky. Or maybe that's how South Indians from elite public schools behave. *shrug* can someone in the know how guide me regarding the rules? Should I continue to talk to him in third person or should I address him directly?

>>>TW,

How do you know HA went tp an elite school?

Did he go to HPS?

Rishi, I will tell you but then I will have to kill you lol. J/K... No it's a guess on my part. I picked up my cues from different posts by different posters on the nadella and other threads and of course I might be wrong.

>>>TW,

All the schools I went to were considered either second rate and some of them even third rate.  I am really happy with how life as a whole worked out for me.

Silly Point wrote:Rishi,

Where you went to school is not an issue, it is what you learned there and what did you do with it..

If you are happy thats all that matters

Krithi

Silly Point wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42luHhrsNhg&feature=kp

Haha. Very funny. Anyway, if someone makes a post about me and I know they are lying, I quote that post and confront and challenge them on their face. What does the sneaky angel do here instead? Makes a generic universal post. Now I am no psychology expert but I think that's sneaky. Or maybe that's how South Indians from elite public schools behave. *shrug* can someone in the know how guide me regarding the rules? Should I continue to talk to him in third person or should I address him directly?

He is not from an Elite South Indian public School, I can guarantee you.. even if he is, he learned nothing there
He gets jealous of other people's accomplishments and that is a clear give away of a background filled with academic disappointments.. Anyone who went to an elite school would be used to accomplishments both personally and socially. I am a product of Bishop Cotton's Girls School before he stays braying about where I went to school, this would also save him the trouble of stalking me to get the information.
I am also going to put this out there, calling me names on a public forum of a personal nature also is indicative of class or lack of it. This class can only be attained by education or culture from mum and dad. IF you have a problem with me ( Iyer, Mensa member, more degrees than your schlong is long) or is it something I said? then Take it up with me on a public forum refute what I said not stalk me endlessly and call me names children or ghatti uneducated people resort to..

if i wanted to get personal dakkan, I would said something like this..
I bet you scream like a girl in a fight and your penis needs a microscope to prove its existence.

But guess what I am not going to say that, coz I am a product of class and will do my education and family proud by debating points of view not the person who owns them

*peace*

PS I know I am not going to get a response to this post, but i need to have my say and I have.

Silly Point wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:What just because I'm well hung I got to have all the answers?

*giggle*

Why do guys say that?? it is the worst possible..

*giggle*

Krithi

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:
yes. HA has never claimed gk = atcg. only b_A has. but you are convinced otherwise -- that is a dead giveaway. dig up a post where HA ha claimed that gk = atcg.

I will try digging any post if I have to. But if you are that interested, ask him in private if he told me or anyone that he thinks GK = Petri. He will either admit, or deny. If he denies, then I will think of a next step.

you are changing goal posts. HA has been whispering that in my ear since, and i will go by your expert opinion, since late 2012; but i never believed him. if he or somebody else told you in private that is your problem. but please tell me where HA has insinuated that gk = atcg. unless you wish to withdraw in the defense that HA whispered that to b_A (over PM) and nuclear reaction happened thereafter.

What goalpost. Your post made me think HA has never told this to anyone, forums or private.

I keep an open mind regarding all rumors, like i said in BW thread to petri too that I was mildly amused in the beginning. Now, I never told before today to anyone that HA had told me that GK = Petri. So if petri is asking that question to bw, that means either HA told him that on forums, or he is convinced that b_A = HA. Better to ask Petri his source of info.

I will admit this much. Whispering + posts get mixed up in my memory all the time. I read HA's posts to Petri and GK with the knowledge in my mind that he thinks the two are the same. People can be tricky enough to not tell things openly in public while use others to say it out loud. But if I have time, I will try digging the posts. However, it would be an unpleasant experience for me, so I might refrain.

fair enough. atcg's source of info might be something other than forum, like chat (with bw), and he did not mention it in that thread.

Silly Point wrote:Seriously?? you want to play this game?? Really think long and hard before you answer this question..

Tracy Whitney wrote:what does Paavam peNN aaNai mean?

Tracy Whitney wrote:what does Paavam peNN aaNai mean?

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:who gets the award for the most irritated female in this thread now?

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:who gets the award for the most irritated female in this thread now?

Silly Point wrote:G-K,

You know what I am going to let it go, becoz I know one thing, if this was a face-face interaction he wouldn't have said that.. becoz if he did, that would be the last thing he would  say for a while. He would be drinking his food for a while..

*looking for inner peace*

Krithi

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:who gets the award for the most irritated female in this thread now?

garam_kuta wrote:

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:

I will try digging any post if I have to. But if you are that interested, ask him in private if he told me or anyone that he thinks GK = Petri. He will either admit, or deny. If he denies, then I will think of a next step.

you are changing goal posts. HA has been whispering that in my ear since, and i will go by your expert opinion, since late 2012; but i never believed him. if he or somebody else told you in private that is your problem. but please tell me where HA has insinuated that gk = atcg. unless you wish to withdraw in the defense that HA whispered that to b_A (over PM) and nuclear reaction happened thereafter.

What goalpost. Your post made me think HA has never told this to anyone, forums or private.

I keep an open mind regarding all rumors, like i said in BW thread to petri too that I was mildly amused in the beginning. Now, I never told before today to anyone that HA had told me that GK = Petri. So if petri is asking that question to bw, that means either HA told him that on forums, or he is convinced that b_A = HA. Better to ask Petri his source of info.

I will admit this much. Whispering + posts get mixed up in my memory all the time. I read HA's posts to Petri and GK with the knowledge in my mind that he thinks the two are the same. People can be tricky enough to not tell things openly in public while use others to say it out loud. But if I have time, I will try digging the posts. However, it would be an unpleasant experience for me, so I might refrain.

fair enough. atcg's source of info might be something other than forum, like chat (with bw), and he did not mention it in that thread.

funny though. ha told me he thinks gk = petri, he told you too, repeatedly i suppose. god knows who else he kept telling the same over last year, and yet, he didn't have the balls to say that on forums? if that's true, then that's one sneaky angel we have on our forums. guess now i have more respect for b_A who atleast had the confidence to say what he thought. as per tbt's recent conclusion about men and women of such, maybe b_A is a woman

Silly Point wrote:Seriously?? you want to play this game?? Really think long and hard before you answer this question..

garam_kuta wrote:

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:who gets the award for the most irritated female in this thread now?

ha, ha..right?   

garam_kuta wrote:

Silly Point wrote:G-K,

You know what I am going to let it go, becoz I know one thing, if this was a face-face interaction he wouldn't have said that.. becoz if he did, that would be the last thing he would  say for a while. He would be drinking his food for a while..

*looking for inner peace*

Krithi

still does...that explains the perennial smegma on his face     ah..i didn't know that he has crossed you and you know him well. sometimes, forgiving is a virtue1

Rishi wrote:

garam_kuta wrote:

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:who gets the award for the most irritated female in this thread now?

ha, ha..right?   

Is HA a woman?

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:

garam_kuta wrote:

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:
you are changing goal posts. HA has been whispering that in my ear since, and i will go by your expert opinion, since late 2012; but i never believed him. if he or somebody else told you in private that is your problem. but please tell me where HA has insinuated that gk = atcg. unless you wish to withdraw in the defense that HA whispered that to b_A (over PM) and nuclear reaction happened thereafter.

What goalpost. Your post made me think HA has never told this to anyone, forums or private.

I keep an open mind regarding all rumors, like i said in BW thread to petri too that I was mildly amused in the beginning. Now, I never told before today to anyone that HA had told me that GK = Petri. So if petri is asking that question to bw, that means either HA told him that on forums, or he is convinced that b_A = HA. Better to ask Petri his source of info.

I will admit this much. Whispering + posts get mixed up in my memory all the time. I read HA's posts to Petri and GK with the knowledge in my mind that he thinks the two are the same. People can be tricky enough to not tell things openly in public while use others to say it out loud. But if I have time, I will try digging the posts. However, it would be an unpleasant experience for me, so I might refrain.

fair enough. atcg's source of info might be something other than forum, like chat (with bw), and he did not mention it in that thread.

funny though. ha told me he thinks gk = petri, he told you too, repeatedly i suppose. god knows who else he kept telling the same over last year, and yet, he didn't have the balls to say that on forums? if that's true, then that's one sneaky angel we have on our forums. guess now i have more respect for b_A who atleast had the confidence to say what he thought. as per tbt's recent conclusion about men and women of such, maybe b_A is a woman

Silly Point wrote:Seriously?? you want to play this game?? Really think long and hard before you answer this question..

TW, i chatted with HA just now. he said he never told you gk = petri. it is another matter that he  hardly chats. is he a lying that he never told you?

Tracy Whitney wrote:

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:

garam_kuta wrote:

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:

What goalpost. Your post made me think HA has never told this to anyone, forums or private.

I keep an open mind regarding all rumors, like i said in BW thread to petri too that I was mildly amused in the beginning. Now, I never told before today to anyone that HA had told me that GK = Petri. So if petri is asking that question to bw, that means either HA told him that on forums, or he is convinced that b_A = HA. Better to ask Petri his source of info.

I will admit this much. Whispering + posts get mixed up in my memory all the time. I read HA's posts to Petri and GK with the knowledge in my mind that he thinks the two are the same. People can be tricky enough to not tell things openly in public while use others to say it out loud. But if I have time, I will try digging the posts. However, it would be an unpleasant experience for me, so I might refrain.

fair enough. atcg's source of info might be something other than forum, like chat (with bw), and he did not mention it in that thread.

funny though. ha told me he thinks gk = petri, he told you too, repeatedly i suppose. god knows who else he kept telling the same over last year, and yet, he didn't have the balls to say that on forums? if that's true, then that's one sneaky angel we have on our forums. guess now i have more respect for b_A who atleast had the confidence to say what he thought. as per tbt's recent conclusion about men and women of such, maybe b_A is a woman

Silly Point wrote:Seriously?? you want to play this game?? Really think long and hard before you answer this question..

TW, i chatted with HA just now. he said he never told you gk = petri. it is another matter that he  hardly chats. is he a lying that he never told you?

he is lying.

Tracy Whitney wrote:

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:

garam_kuta wrote:

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:

What goalpost. Your post made me think HA has never told this to anyone, forums or private.

I keep an open mind regarding all rumors, like i said in BW thread to petri too that I was mildly amused in the beginning. Now, I never told before today to anyone that HA had told me that GK = Petri. So if petri is asking that question to bw, that means either HA told him that on forums, or he is convinced that b_A = HA. Better to ask Petri his source of info.

I will admit this much. Whispering + posts get mixed up in my memory all the time. I read HA's posts to Petri and GK with the knowledge in my mind that he thinks the two are the same. People can be tricky enough to not tell things openly in public while use others to say it out loud. But if I have time, I will try digging the posts. However, it would be an unpleasant experience for me, so I might refrain.

fair enough. atcg's source of info might be something other than forum, like chat (with bw), and he did not mention it in that thread.

funny though. ha told me he thinks gk = petri, he told you too, repeatedly i suppose. god knows who else he kept telling the same over last year, and yet, he didn't have the balls to say that on forums? if that's true, then that's one sneaky angel we have on our forums. guess now i have more respect for b_A who atleast had the confidence to say what he thought. as per tbt's recent conclusion about men and women of such, maybe b_A is a woman

Silly Point wrote:Seriously?? you want to play this game?? Really think long and hard before you answer this question..

TW, i chatted with HA just now. he said he never told you gk = petri. it is another matter that he  hardly chats. is he a lying that he never told you?

he is lying.

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:

garam_kuta wrote:

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:
fair enough. atcg's source of info might be something other than forum, like chat (with bw), and he did not mention it in that thread.

funny though. ha told me he thinks gk = petri, he told you too, repeatedly i suppose. god knows who else he kept telling the same over last year, and yet, he didn't have the balls to say that on forums? if that's true, then that's one sneaky angel we have on our forums. guess now i have more respect for b_A who atleast had the confidence to say what he thought. as per tbt's recent conclusion about men and women of such, maybe b_A is a woman

Silly Point wrote:Seriously?? you want to play this game?? Really think long and hard before you answer this question..

TW, i chatted with HA just now. he said he never told you gk = petri. it is another matter that he  hardly chats. is he a lying that he never told you?

he is lying.

  how when why? did you chat with him in suchat? if you say yes then chapter closed.

truthbetold wrote:Tw
i do not know the relevance of proving ha's alleged past chat statements?
ha now is not willing to support that theory.

Tracy Whitney wrote:

truthbetold wrote:Tw
i do not know the relevance of proving ha's alleged past chat statements?
ha now is not willing to support that theory.

u need to see how the discussion evolved. i said ha posted on forums. hk asked me to give proof. i then realized that if hk is saying it so confidently, then maybe ha didn't post that  (not that I checked) but maybe i am thinking so coz he had told that to me off-forums. hence the relevance. now ha is denying that too. so the question now is - did ha lie or did i lie?

Tracy Whitney wrote:

truthbetold wrote:Tw
i do not know the relevance of proving ha's alleged past chat statements?
ha now is not willing to support that theory.

u need to see how the discussion evolved. i said ha posted on forums. hk asked me to give proof. i then realized that if hk is saying it so confidently, then maybe ha didn't post that  (not that I checked) but maybe i am thinking so coz he had told that to me off-forums. hence the relevance. now ha is denying that too. so the question now is - did ha lie or did i lie?

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:

truthbetold wrote:Tw
i do not know the relevance of proving ha's alleged past chat statements?
ha now is not willing to support that theory.

u need to see how the discussion evolved. i said ha posted on forums. hk asked me to give proof. i then realized that if hk is saying it so confidently, then maybe ha didn't post that  (not that I checked) but maybe i am thinking so coz he had told that to me off-forums. hence the relevance. now ha is denying that too. so the question now is - did ha lie or did i lie?

correct! who lied? HA has already denied he told you that gk = atcg in person. let us assume he is correct. who told you, back in july 2012 (guest id), that gk is atcg? by the way you are doing a good job proving you don't have a brain of our own or that you are ditzy.

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:

truthbetold wrote:Tw
i do not know the relevance of proving ha's alleged past chat statements?
ha now is not willing to support that theory.

u need to see how the discussion evolved. i said ha posted on forums. hk asked me to give proof. i then realized that if hk is saying it so confidently, then maybe ha didn't post that  (not that I checked) but maybe i am thinking so coz he had told that to me off-forums. hence the relevance. now ha is denying that too. so the question now is - did ha lie or did i lie?

correct! who lied? HA has already denied he told you that gk = atcg in person. let us assume he is correct. who told you, back in july 2012 (guest id), that gk is atcg? by the way you are doing a good job proving you don't have a brain of our own or that you are ditzy.

truthbetold wrote:

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:

truthbetold wrote:Tw
i do not know the relevance of proving ha's alleged past chat statements?
ha now is not willing to support that theory.

u need to see how the discussion evolved. i said ha posted on forums. hk asked me to give proof. i then realized that if hk is saying it so confidently, then maybe ha didn't post that  (not that I checked) but maybe i am thinking so coz he had told that to me off-forums. hence the relevance. now ha is denying that too. so the question now is - did ha lie or did i lie?

correct! who lied? HA has already denied he told you that gk = atcg in person. let us assume he is correct. who told you, back in july 2012 (guest id), that gk is atcg? by the way you are doing a good job proving you don't have a brain of our own or that you are ditzy.

did ha and Tw meet in person?

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:

truthbetold wrote:Tw
i do not know the relevance of proving ha's alleged past chat statements?
ha now is not willing to support that theory.

u need to see how the discussion evolved. i said ha posted on forums. hk asked me to give proof. i then realized that if hk is saying it so confidently, then maybe ha didn't post that  (not that I checked) but maybe i am thinking so coz he had told that to me off-forums. hence the relevance. now ha is denying that too. so the question now is - did ha lie or did i lie?

correct! who lied? HA has already denied he told you that gk = atcg in person. let us assume he is correct. who told you, back in july 2012 (guest id), that gk is atcg? by the way you are doing a good job proving you don't have a brain of our own or that you are ditzy.

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:

truthbetold wrote:

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:

truthbetold wrote:Tw
i do not know the relevance of proving ha's alleged past chat statements?
ha now is not willing to support that theory.

u need to see how the discussion evolved. i said ha posted on forums. hk asked me to give proof. i then realized that if hk is saying it so confidently, then maybe ha didn't post that  (not that I checked) but maybe i am thinking so coz he had told that to me off-forums. hence the relevance. now ha is denying that too. so the question now is - did ha lie or did i lie?

correct! who lied? HA has already denied he told you that gk = atcg in person. let us assume he is correct. who told you, back in july 2012 (guest id), that gk is atcg? by the way you are doing a good job proving you don't have a brain of our own or that you are ditzy.

did ha and Tw meet in person?

how is the relevant to SI's complete autonomy within the indian sovereign?

Tracy Whitney wrote:

b_A wrote:

Rishi wrote:

b_A wrote:

truthbetold wrote:clarification:

I am not implying who petrichor/sillypoint/bittu/GK are?  I am merely saying these handles are other egos of other regular posters (to use a rashmun term). 

For me there are different individuals as long as they post different POVs. But not gang up to push a single POV.

There is a reason for these alternate handles. Generally the original handles are seen as respectable members of the society. They cannot post their true feelings sometimes.
To give vent to their suppressed desires , they create these alternate handles like GK so that they can post creepy sleazy stuff.  In the case of KV , the original handle cannot afford to appear to be supporting an organization that is banned. Hence the creation of alternate handle.

>>> What is the real handle of GK?
What is the creepy sleazy stuff that GK posted?

There were enough hints dropped in the ashkenazi thread.
GK was absent in SUCH from last week of December to January first week. If you are upto it, find the other handle that posted only one message in SuCH during that period. (Hint: When you click on a handle name and go to statistics, you can find all the posts of a particular handle.)

so like, two people cannot take off during the biggest holiday season of the world.

b_A wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:

b_A wrote:

Rishi wrote:

b_A wrote:

There is a reason for these alternate handles. Generally the original handles are seen as respectable members of the society. They cannot post their true feelings sometimes.
To give vent to their suppressed desires , they create these alternate handles like GK so that they can post creepy sleazy stuff.  In the case of KV , the original handle cannot afford to appear to be supporting an organization that is banned. Hence the creation of alternate handle.

>>> What is the real handle of GK?
What is the creepy sleazy stuff that GK posted?

There were enough hints dropped in the ashkenazi thread.
GK was absent in SUCH from last week of December to January first week. If you are upto it, find the other handle that posted only one message in SuCH during that period. (Hint: When you click on a handle name and go to statistics, you can find all the posts of a particular handle.)

so like, two people cannot take off during the biggest holiday season of the world.

TW ,
You had your suspicions on GK's handle back in 2012 itself according to your posts as Guest. And when I told Rishi about the common vacation , why did you try to discredit that?  
What is the chance that two people in the same demographic ,who speak the same language and self admitted iyers among the small group of SuCH'ers take vacation at the same time ?

b_A wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:

b_A wrote:

Rishi wrote:

b_A wrote:

There is a reason for these alternate handles. Generally the original handles are seen as respectable members of the society. They cannot post their true feelings sometimes.
To give vent to their suppressed desires , they create these alternate handles like GK so that they can post creepy sleazy stuff.  In the case of KV , the original handle cannot afford to appear to be supporting an organization that is banned. Hence the creation of alternate handle.

>>> What is the real handle of GK?
What is the creepy sleazy stuff that GK posted?

There were enough hints dropped in the ashkenazi thread.
GK was absent in SUCH from last week of December to January first week. If you are upto it, find the other handle that posted only one message in SuCH during that period. (Hint: When you click on a handle name and go to statistics, you can find all the posts of a particular handle.)

so like, two people cannot take off during the biggest holiday season of the world.

TW ,
You had your suspicions on GK's handle back in 2012 itself according to your posts as Guest. And when I told Rishi about the common vacation , why did you try to discredit that?
What is the chance that two people in the same demographic ,who speak the same language and self admitted iyers among the small group of SuCH'ers take vacation at the same time ?

Silly Point wrote:

b_A wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:

b_A wrote:

Rishi wrote:

>>> What is the real handle of GK?
What is the creepy sleazy stuff that GK posted?

There were enough hints dropped in the ashkenazi thread.
GK was absent in SUCH from last week of December to January first week. If you are upto it, find the other handle that posted only one message in SuCH during that period. (Hint: When you click on a handle name and go to statistics, you can find all the posts of a particular handle.)

so like, two people cannot take off during the biggest holiday season of the world.

TW ,
You had your suspicions on GK's handle back in 2012 itself according to your posts as Guest. And when I told Rishi about the common vacation , why did you try to discredit that?  
What is the chance that two people in the same demographic ,who speak the same language and self admitted iyers among the small group of SuCH'ers take vacation at the same time ?

What is that??
like a self admitted drug addict?

Krithi

Tracy Whitney wrote:b_A. I may not remember everything that was going in my mind in July 2012 but let me try. I/ we play the handle game on ch since the beginning of times. You suspect something and you blurt it out. If it sticks it sticks. Sooner or later it becomes clearer to you. I saw a clear post written by gk that day, I joke with him about the handle. I don't say he it was petri. And I don't keep on hounding him.

Now, I don't rememebr GK ever stating his exact location. I know Petri's location. Also, over a period of time petri and I chatted a lot on suchat and it was clear at least in my mind that the two are not the same.

Now again. I think petri declared he was going on vacation. I don't remember gk doing that. If you have a post to that effect, feel free to correct me. I vaguely remember Petri logging from his vacation on suchat and sharing pictures, but I am not sure as I think even I was on vacation. Did he post in forums too? I am not sure really. I am not that sharp keeping a tab on posters these days. So ya. The internet connectivity argument is out.

truthbetold wrote:

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:

truthbetold wrote:

Brigadier HK (Retd) wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:

u need to see how the discussion evolved. i said ha posted on forums. hk asked me to give proof. i then realized that if hk is saying it so confidently, then maybe ha didn't post that  (not that I checked) but maybe i am thinking so coz he had told that to me off-forums. hence the relevance. now ha is denying that too. so the question now is - did ha lie or did i lie?

correct! who lied? HA has already denied he told you that gk = atcg in person. let us assume he is correct. who told you, back in july 2012 (guest id), that gk is atcg? by the way you are doing a good job proving you don't have a brain of our own or that you are ditzy.

did ha and Tw meet in person?

how is the relevant to SI's complete autonomy within the indian sovereign?

brig
did you suddenly get religion?  don't pull this relevant stuff when you just hit upon the most important  data point. Take a chill pill and let information flow.

truthbetold wrote:Tw
you do not have to say anything that you do not like. But that information gave me a data point about ha.

garam_kuta wrote:

truthbetold wrote:Tw
you do not have to say anything that you do not like. But that information gave me a data point about ha.

allow me to ask you one, TBT: Do you think b_A has another handle?