confuzzled dude wrote:If State division was done purely for political gains by political terrorists.

confuzzled dude wrote:If State division was done purely for political gains by political terrorists.

truthbetold wrote:T people are celebrating. What else do you expect them to do?

Kinnera wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:If State division was done purely for political gains by political terrorists.

Why will they protest against it as they are the ones who are going to gain from it, along with the political terrorists? They have a state of the art capital, developed by and at the cost of the APites, offered in a platter. If they have a conscience, i am sure it will be pricking them deep inside.

"Telangana born in the dark", the headlines of Deccan Chronicle rightly said.

confuzzled dude wrote:

truthbetold wrote:T people are celebrating. What else do you expect them to do?

then stop blaming this as a ploy by certain political parties based on political calculations.

truthbetold wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

truthbetold wrote:T people are celebrating. What else do you expect them to do?

then stop blaming this as a ploy by certain political parties based on political calculations.

cd
i am beginning to worry about you. sounding more and more like the old women who is seeing things in the dark.
this is a virtual forum. spell out your fears.
don't worry we keep your secrets safe.

confuzzled dude wrote:


What's wrong with my comment? Without support from Telangana common man,  'T' movement would not have sustained for a decade. It's high time that Andhra folks come to grips with the reality and refrain from blaming this party that party.

SuCH is turning into a Senior Center so no wonder ...

b_A wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:


What's wrong with my comment? Without support from Telangana common man,  'T' movement would not have sustained for a decade. It's high time that Andhra folks come to grips with the reality and refrain from blaming this party that party.

SuCH is turning into a Senior Center so no wonder ...

The Common wisdom is that the common man from Telanagana reconciled and voted for Cong/YSR 2009 elections. TRS was humiliated in those elections. The movement was about to die. The movement was re-re-revived after YSR's death. Again it was about to die before Chidamabaram's 2009 announcement and the movement was re-re-re-revived.  Then again it petered out and was about to die before the CWC announcement.  If it really had people's support , there would've been no need for so many re-re-re-re-revives.

nevada wrote:My relatives are all happy. I don't care one way or another because I don't even live there.

b_A wrote:

nevada wrote:My relatives are all happy. I don't care one way or another because I don't even live there.

People never turn it down when something is offered to them. Would they have protested/fought for it,  if it was not offered is the question.

confuzzled dude wrote:

b_A wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:


What's wrong with my comment? Without support from Telangana common man,  'T' movement would not have sustained for a decade. It's high time that Andhra folks come to grips with the reality and refrain from blaming this party that party.

SuCH is turning into a Senior Center so no wonder ...

The Common wisdom is that the common man from Telanagana reconciled and voted for Cong/YSR 2009 elections. TRS was humiliated in those elections. The movement was about to die. The movement was re-re-revived after YSR's death. Again it was about to die before Chidamabaram's 2009 announcement and the movement was re-re-re-revived.  Then again it petered out and was about to die before the CWC announcement.  If it really had people's support , there would've been no need for so many re-re-re-re-revives.

How was it revived so many times if people were against or neutral about it?

b_A wrote:
Except for the sakala janula samme where basically the govt employees went on strike , there was never a common man's protest. To revivie is easy for short bursts. A bunch of party workers call for a bundh , go around and shut the schools and businesses for a couple of days. A JAC was formed just to keep the movement going. Their only agenda was to sustain the movement.
People were getting fed up with these movements , the parents were starting to protest about frequent school closings and finally just before the CWC decision , the people were even revolting against the frequent bundh calls.

nevada wrote:

b_A wrote:

nevada wrote:My relatives are all happy. I don't care one way or another because I don't even live there.

People never turn it down when something is offered to them. Would they have protested/fought for it,  if it was not offered is the question.

Many students killed themselves for the cause of Telangana. Seems like a strong case of people protesting/fighting for a cause to me.

confuzzled dude wrote:

b_A wrote:
Except for the sakala janula samme where basically the govt employees went on strike , there was never a common man's protest. To revivie is easy for short bursts. A bunch of party workers call for a bundh , go around and shut the schools and businesses for a couple of days. A JAC was formed just to keep the movement going. Their only agenda was to sustain the movement.
People were getting fed up with these movements , the parents were starting to protest about frequent school closings and finally just before the CWC decision , the people were even revolting against the frequent bundh calls.

Every bit of the above para applies to SeemAndhra agitations as well.