Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
The Jet is on the ground somewhere in Xinjiang OR Afghanistan.

The Pilots flying the plane all the way to the Indian Ocean for 7 hours so that he can kill the 250 people just does not make any sense.

Rishi wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
The Jet is on the ground somewhere in Xinjiang OR Afghanistan.

The Pilots flying the plane all the way to the Indian Ocean for 7 hours so that he can kill the 250 people just does not make any sense.

>>>Are those 200 plus passengers on that plane kept in a secret location, fed every day and kept healthy? Quite a few people including pilots and crews of some other airlines must have seen the plane on the runway. How is that word never got out of the borders of those countries?

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Rishi wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
The Jet is on the ground somewhere in Xinjiang OR Afghanistan.

The Pilots flying the plane all the way to the Indian Ocean for 7 hours so that he can kill the 250 people just does not make any sense.

>>>Are those 200 plus passengers on that plane kept in a secret location, fed every day and kept healthy? Quite a few people including pilots and crews of some other airlines must have seen the plane on the runway. How is that word never got out of the borders of those countries?

If the plane can escape all the ATCs, radars and the military installations in the dense Malaysia/Thailand/Vietnam/Singapore, it should not be too difficult to fly through the backward areas of Burma, east of Assam, Tibet, and to Xinjiang (remember the Indians save electricity by turning off the Radars whenever there is power supply?).

As one news item said yesterday "find the motive to find where the plane is." To kill, drown a plane, there is no need to escape, evade, and fly 8 hours....

There is "enough evidence" to point out that it cannot be in the Ocean. Now to prove and prosecute, people like MAX and Maria can collect all the SOLID evidence they want to prosecute.  MAX is like those iSlamis who still think there is not enough proof against the terrorists on 9/11 and that it was all a jewish and american conspiracy. In disappearance cases, one is assumed to be alive till body or an evidence is found to establish death. So naturally, it only makes sense to assume that this plane is still "alive"

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Rishi wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
The Jet is on the ground somewhere in Xinjiang OR Afghanistan.

The Pilots flying the plane all the way to the Indian Ocean for 7 hours so that he can kill the 250 people just does not make any sense.

>>>Are those 200 plus passengers on that plane kept in a secret location, fed every day and kept healthy? Quite a few people including pilots and crews of some other airlines must have seen the plane on the runway. How is that word never got out of the borders of those countries?

If the plane can escape all the ATCs, radars and the military installations in the dense Malaysia/Thailand/Vietnam/Singapore, it should not be too difficult to fly through the backward areas of Burma, east of Assam, Tibet, and to Xinjiang (remember the Indians save electricity by turning off the Radars whenever there is power supply?).

As one news item said yesterday "find the motive to find where the plane is." To kill, drown a plane, there is no need to escape, evade, and fly 8 hours....

There is "enough evidence" to point out that it cannot be in the Ocean. Now to prove and prosecute, people like MAX and Maria can collect all the SOLID evidence they want to prosecute.  MAX is like those iSlamis who still think there is not enough proof against the terrorists on 9/11 and that it was all a jewish and american conspiracy. In disappearance cases, one is assumed to be alive till body or an evidence is found to establish death. So naturally, it only makes sense to assume that this plane is still "alive"

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Rishi wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
The Jet is on the ground somewhere in Xinjiang OR Afghanistan.

The Pilots flying the plane all the way to the Indian Ocean for 7 hours so that he can kill the 250 people just does not make any sense.

>>>Are those 200 plus passengers on that plane kept in a secret location, fed every day and kept healthy? Quite a few people including pilots and crews of some other airlines must have seen the plane on the runway. How is that word never got out of the borders of those countries?

If the plane can escape all the ATCs, radars and the military installations in the dense Malaysia/Thailand/Vietnam/Singapore, it should not be too difficult to fly through the backward areas of Burma, east of Assam, Tibet, and to Xinjiang (remember the Indians save electricity by turning off the Radars whenever there is power supply?).

As one news item said yesterday "find the motive to find where the plane is." To kill, drown a plane, there is no need to escape, evade, and fly 8 hours....

There is "enough evidence" to point out that it cannot be in the Ocean. Now to prove and prosecute, people like MAX and Maria can collect all the SOLID evidence they want to prosecute.  MAX is like those iSlamis who still think there is not enough proof against the terrorists on 9/11 and that it was all a jewish and american conspiracy. In disappearance cases, one is assumed to be alive till body or an evidence is found to establish death. So naturally, it only makes sense to assume that this plane is still "alive"

thats right, we dont need no stinkin' evidence