Merlot Daruwala wrote:Very true. Single parent households are the root cause of social misery. Do away with easy divorces. Criminalize out-of-wedlock babymaking. Legislate mandatory marriage - women by age 18, men by 21. That'll show those bleedin heart liberals.

confuzzled dude wrote:Are those black dots symbolic representation of black women? Check with faux-headturds and resubmit with proper representation.

Propagandhi711 wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:Are those black dots symbolic representation of black women? Check with faux-headturds and resubmit with proper representation.

more kneejerk obfuscation that you're famous for

Propagandhi711 wrote:expansion of social programs, particularly making it viable for single head families to be viable starting in the 60s, along with other cultural/social changes led to long term destruction of joint family in america. it's no longer a necessity for families to have both mother and father to survive as a result and this ironically leads to chronic under employment of males that grow up in such fatherless families and subsequent poverty. liberal agendas usually sound good and "feel right" but long term impact is another. we can only speculate on what obama's policies will bring 20 to 30 yrs down the line:

confuzzled dude wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:Are those black dots symbolic representation of black women? Check with faux-headturds and resubmit with proper representation.

more kneejerk obfuscation that you're famous for

 Obfuscation is what that graph you posted doing hiding behind single women; masquerading true agenda

Idéfix wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:expansion of social programs, particularly making it viable for single head families to be viable starting in the 60s, along with other cultural/social changes led to long term destruction of joint family in america. it's no longer a necessity for families to have both mother and father to survive as a result and this ironically leads to chronic under employment of males that grow up in such fatherless families and subsequent poverty. liberal agendas usually sound good and "feel right" but long term impact is another. we can only speculate on what obama's policies will bring 20 to 30 yrs down the line:

Excellent logical leaps. I think there is also a connection to the Apollo program -- that also happened in the '60s and was started by a liberal president.

PS: The best part of the original thesis: destruction of the joint family in America starting in the '60s.

Propagandhi711 wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:Are those black dots symbolic representation of black women? Check with faux-headturds and resubmit with proper representation.

more kneejerk obfuscation that you're famous for

 Obfuscation is what that graph you posted doing hiding behind single women; masquerading true agenda

true agenda, my ass. typical kneejerk rant. this chart was taken from a study supported by admin's friend krugman who's a lefty economist if there ever was one

confuzzled dude wrote:5. Free guns for everyone older than four

Propagandhi711 wrote:let me change that to start of family disintegration. will that make you happy, kind sir?

Idéfix wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:let me change that to start of family disintegration. will that make you happy, kind sir?

If you want to find the "start" of "family disintegration," I suggest you look into a phenomenon called slavery.

Your "argument" made just as much sense about families in general as it did about "joint" families.

Idéfix wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:5. Free guns for everyone older than four

Why this blatant discrimination against those who are four or younger? Does the Second Amendment not mean anything to you?

confuzzled dude wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:Are those black dots symbolic representation of black women? Check with faux-headturds and resubmit with proper representation.

more kneejerk obfuscation that you're famous for

 Obfuscation is what that graph you posted doing hiding behind single women; masquerading true agenda

true agenda, my ass. typical kneejerk rant. this chart was taken from a study supported by admin's friend krugman who's a lefty economist if there ever was one

Propa, since I'm only good at knee-jerk reactions, logically challenged & devoid of critical thinking skills, what do you think should be done, would the following moves help fix this menace?
1. Abolish social welfare programs
2. Ban abortion & Contraceptives
3. Make pre-marital sex & divoce illegal
4. Repeal Obamacare
3. Taxcuts for top 1% earners
4. Bring slavery back
 
oh yeah last but not least
5. Free guns for everyone older than four
 
please add as you deem fit.

Idéfix wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:let me change that to start of family disintegration. will that make you happy, kind sir?

If you want to find the "start" of "family disintegration," I suggest you look into a phenomenon called slavery.

Your "argument" made just as much sense about families in general as it did about "joint" families.

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Idéfix wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:let me change that to start of family disintegration. will that make you happy, kind sir?

If you want to find the "start" of "family disintegration," I suggest you look into a phenomenon called slavery.

Your "argument" made just as much sense about families in general as it did about "joint" families.

Sorry to interfere...

The start of the family disintegration - actually started in 532 AD

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Idéfix wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:let me change that to start of family disintegration. will that make you happy, kind sir?

If you want to find the "start" of "family disintegration," I suggest you look into a phenomenon called slavery.

Your "argument" made just as much sense about families in general as it did about "joint" families.

yes, african americans did have a strong family structure with two parents until the 60s, regardless of what you like everyone else to believe. their current economic malaise is rooted in slavery but is vastly exacerbated by their family breakdown which is a newer phenomenon that kaffe klatch lefties hate to acknowledge as they need institutional victims on an ongoing basis. and nowhere in my post did I say family breakdown is a black only issue, kneejerk libbies like to assume too much and create strawmen.

Idéfix wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Idéfix wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:let me change that to start of family disintegration. will that make you happy, kind sir?

If you want to find the "start" of "family disintegration," I suggest you look into a phenomenon called slavery.

Your "argument" made just as much sense about families in general as it did about "joint" families.

yes, african americans did have a strong family structure with two parents until the 60s, regardless of what you like everyone else to believe. their current economic malaise is rooted in slavery but is vastly exacerbated by their family breakdown which is a newer phenomenon that kaffe klatch lefties hate to acknowledge as they need institutional victims on an ongoing basis. and nowhere in my post did I say family breakdown is a black only issue, kneejerk libbies like to assume too much and create strawmen.

Lots of name-calling, but no substance. It is interesting to note that you have not suggested any specific alternatives to the agenda that you are railing against. What would you rather have? Make divorces more difficult? Make it more difficult to have children out of wedlock? What sort of agenda do you propose in order to ensure that two-parent households become the norm?

Propagandhi711 wrote:oh you want me to give you alternatives now that the agenda had failed? I was highlighting the long term impact of what happens when partisan agendas are pushed through recklessly.