This is a Hitskin.com skin preview
Install the skin • Return to the skin page
Two Questions to Rashmun
5 posters
Page 1 of 1
Two Questions to Rashmun
1. Now that you are no longer self-employed ( https://such.forumotion.com/t21566-my-foolish-friend ) because you have a colleague and not an employee , and you spend a lot of time on SuCH posting numerous posts during working and non working hours thereby stealing your employer's time and you have defended your friend vile-one-with-no-accomplishments-suffering-from-negative-self-worth (referrred as VOWNASFNSW henceforth ) 's action of complaining to the HR about people stealing employer's time , will it be OK if I or someone else complain to your HR( yes , some people do know your employer and other details) about your time stealing ?
2. You defended VOWNASFNSW 's action of revealing and referring Tiana's real name because, according to your , she herself revealed it herself in blogs so it is OK , logic right? Now that you have voluntarily revealed your last name ( https://such.forumotion.com/t22673-how-india-is-split-over-bjp-s-narendra-modi#152961 ) , you will be OK if everyone uses your last name in SuCH postings henceforth , right ?
If you don't answer these question with clear and convincing answers , it will be deemed that you are giving your consent to complain to your HR and use your last name in SuCH postings.
2. You defended VOWNASFNSW 's action of revealing and referring Tiana's real name because, according to your , she herself revealed it herself in blogs so it is OK , logic right? Now that you have voluntarily revealed your last name ( https://such.forumotion.com/t22673-how-india-is-split-over-bjp-s-narendra-modi#152961 ) , you will be OK if everyone uses your last name in SuCH postings henceforth , right ?
If you don't answer these question with clear and convincing answers , it will be deemed that you are giving your consent to complain to your HR and use your last name in SuCH postings.
b_A- Posts : 1642
Join date : 2011-05-08
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
b_A wrote:1. Now that you are no longer self-employed ( https://such.forumotion.com/t21566-my-foolish-friend ) because you have a colleague and not an employee , and you spend a lot of time on SuCH posting numerous posts during working and non working hours thereby stealing your employer's time and you have defended your friend vile-one-with-no-accomplishments-suffering-from-negative-self-worth (referrred as VOWNASFNSW henceforth ) 's action of complaining to the HR about people stealing employer's time , will it be OK if I or someone else complain to your HR( yes , some people do know your employer and other details) about your time stealing ?
2. You defended VOWNASFNSW 's action of revealing and referring Tiana's real name because, according to your , she herself revealed it herself in blogs so it is OK , logic right? Now that you have voluntarily revealed your last name ( https://such.forumotion.com/t22673-how-india-is-split-over-bjp-s-narendra-modi#152961 ) , you will be OK if everyone uses your last name in SuCH postings henceforth , right ?
If you don't answer these question with clear and convincing answers , it will be deemed that you are giving your consent to complain to your HR and use your last name in SuCH postings.
1. It is true that I was an employee for some time but these days I have again gone back to being self-employed.
2. No I am not ok with this. I have the dirt on many posters and the shit will hit the fan if anyone tries this stunt.
Guest- Guest
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
b_A wrote:1. Now that you are no longer self-employed ( https://such.forumotion.com/t21566-my-foolish-friend ) because you have a colleague and not an employee , and you spend a lot of time on SuCH posting numerous posts during working and non working hours thereby stealing your employer's time and you have defended your friend vile-one-with-no-accomplishments-suffering-from-negative-self-worth (referrred as VOWNASFNSW henceforth ) 's action of complaining to the HR about people stealing employer's time , will it be OK if I or someone else complain to your HR( yes , some people do know your employer and other details) about your time stealing ?
2. You defended VOWNASFNSW 's action of revealing and referring Tiana's real name because, according to your , she herself revealed it herself in blogs so it is OK , logic right? Now that you have voluntarily revealed your last name ( https://such.forumotion.com/t22673-how-india-is-split-over-bjp-s-narendra-modi#152961 ) , you will be OK if everyone uses your last name in SuCH postings henceforth , right ?
If you don't answer these question with clear and convincing answers , it will be deemed that you are giving your consent to complain to your HR and use your last name in SuCH postings.
I have 2 more questions:
3. We - the posters/readers - would like you to link specific posts and not 8-page threads in an infinite loop.
4. b_A is practicallywhoever Rashmunullah imagines to be on a given day. I guess today b_A = Kinny.
Personally, I am against referring to anyone's personal information or real information and take these posts from public to private to personal, irrespective of reasoning and using twisted logic.
Marathadi-Saamiyaar- Posts : 17675
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 110
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
Rashmun wrote:b_A wrote:1. Now that you are no longer self-employed ( https://such.forumotion.com/t21566-my-foolish-friend ) because you have a colleague and not an employee , and you spend a lot of time on SuCH posting numerous posts during working and non working hours thereby stealing your employer's time and you have defended your friend vile-one-with-no-accomplishments-suffering-from-negative-self-worth (referrred as VOWNASFNSW henceforth ) 's action of complaining to the HR about people stealing employer's time , will it be OK if I or someone else complain to your HR( yes , some people do know your employer and other details) about your time stealing ?
2. You defended VOWNASFNSW 's action of revealing and referring Tiana's real name because, according to your , she herself revealed it herself in blogs so it is OK , logic right? Now that you have voluntarily revealed your last name ( https://such.forumotion.com/t22673-how-india-is-split-over-bjp-s-narendra-modi#152961 ) , you will be OK if everyone uses your last name in SuCH postings henceforth , right ?
If you don't answer these question with clear and convincing answers , it will be deemed that you are giving your consent to complain to your HR and use your last name in SuCH postings.
1. It is true that I was an employee for some time but these days I have again gone back to being self-employed.
Yes. You become conveniently self employed whenever the topic of stealing time from employers comes up. That thread was just about a month ago and you were employed then and now you are not. Be aware that telling lies doesn't fit with the first part of your name.
Also be aware that there is somebody out there who knows your employment details and since you support tattling to the HR departments , you may face the same situation that you cheer and encourage VOWNASFNSW's of this world.
Rashmun wrote:
2. No I am not ok with this. I have the dirt on many posters and the shit will hit the fan if anyone tries this stunt.
Why is it that you think it was OK for Tiana to face that and not OK for you ? We need a convincing answer. Otherwise , the thing that hits the fan first may well be yours.
b_A- Posts : 1642
Join date : 2011-05-08
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:b_A wrote:1. Now that you are no longer self-employed ( https://such.forumotion.com/t21566-my-foolish-friend ) because you have a colleague and not an employee , and you spend a lot of time on SuCH posting numerous posts during working and non working hours thereby stealing your employer's time and you have defended your friend vile-one-with-no-accomplishments-suffering-from-negative-self-worth (referrred as VOWNASFNSW henceforth ) 's action of complaining to the HR about people stealing employer's time , will it be OK if I or someone else complain to your HR( yes , some people do know your employer and other details) about your time stealing ?
2. You defended VOWNASFNSW 's action of revealing and referring Tiana's real name because, according to your , she herself revealed it herself in blogs so it is OK , logic right? Now that you have voluntarily revealed your last name ( https://such.forumotion.com/t22673-how-india-is-split-over-bjp-s-narendra-modi#152961 ) , you will be OK if everyone uses your last name in SuCH postings henceforth , right ?
If you don't answer these question with clear and convincing answers , it will be deemed that you are giving your consent to complain to your HR and use your last name in SuCH postings.
I have 2 more questions:
3. We - the posters/readers - would like you to link specific posts and not 8-page threads in an infinite loop.
I don't know if this is directed to me but the second link that I provided take you a specific post. Not the beginning of the thread. For the first link anyway , the relevant post is at the begining.
b_A- Posts : 1642
Join date : 2011-05-08
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
b_A wrote:Rashmun wrote:b_A wrote:1. Now that you are no longer self-employed ( https://such.forumotion.com/t21566-my-foolish-friend ) because you have a colleague and not an employee , and you spend a lot of time on SuCH posting numerous posts during working and non working hours thereby stealing your employer's time and you have defended your friend vile-one-with-no-accomplishments-suffering-from-negative-self-worth (referrred as VOWNASFNSW henceforth ) 's action of complaining to the HR about people stealing employer's time , will it be OK if I or someone else complain to your HR( yes , some people do know your employer and other details) about your time stealing ?
2. You defended VOWNASFNSW 's action of revealing and referring Tiana's real name because, according to your , she herself revealed it herself in blogs so it is OK , logic right? Now that you have voluntarily revealed your last name ( https://such.forumotion.com/t22673-how-india-is-split-over-bjp-s-narendra-modi#152961 ) , you will be OK if everyone uses your last name in SuCH postings henceforth , right ?
If you don't answer these question with clear and convincing answers , it will be deemed that you are giving your consent to complain to your HR and use your last name in SuCH postings.
1. It is true that I was an employee for some time but these days I have again gone back to being self-employed.
Yes. You become conveniently self employed whenever the topic of stealing time from employers comes up. That thread was just about a month ago and you were employed then and now you are not. Be aware that telling lies doesn't fit with the first part of your name.
Also be aware that there is somebody out there who knows your employment details and since you support tattling to the HR departments , you may face the same situation that you cheer and encourage VOWNASFNSW's of this world.Rashmun wrote:
2. No I am not ok with this. I have the dirt on many posters and the shit will hit the fan if anyone tries this stunt.
Why is it that you think it was OK for Tiana to face that and not OK for you ? We need a convincing answer. Otherwise , the thing that hits the fan first may well be yours.
Tiana was blogging on Sulekha under her own name and giving links to these blogs in her Sulekha forum posts claiming these were her blogs and asking for feedback. It seemed evident that she had no problem with being referred to by her real name.
Lamberdar Seva on this forum has also given links to blogs written by him where he has used his real name. Seva has said that he has no problem with being referred to by his real name.
Charvaka has also blogged using his real name on Sulekha. But I have never resorted to using his real name or other personal information about him as a means to attack him. Observe the class I have shown in this matter and emulate me.
Guest- Guest
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
Rashmun wrote:b_A wrote:Rashmun wrote:b_A wrote:1. Now that you are no longer self-employed ( https://such.forumotion.com/t21566-my-foolish-friend ) because you have a colleague and not an employee , and you spend a lot of time on SuCH posting numerous posts during working and non working hours thereby stealing your employer's time and you have defended your friend vile-one-with-no-accomplishments-suffering-from-negative-self-worth (referrred as VOWNASFNSW henceforth ) 's action of complaining to the HR about people stealing employer's time , will it be OK if I or someone else complain to your HR( yes , some people do know your employer and other details) about your time stealing ?
2. You defended VOWNASFNSW 's action of revealing and referring Tiana's real name because, according to your , she herself revealed it herself in blogs so it is OK , logic right? Now that you have voluntarily revealed your last name ( https://such.forumotion.com/t22673-how-india-is-split-over-bjp-s-narendra-modi#152961 ) , you will be OK if everyone uses your last name in SuCH postings henceforth , right ?
If you don't answer these question with clear and convincing answers , it will be deemed that you are giving your consent to complain to your HR and use your last name in SuCH postings.
1. It is true that I was an employee for some time but these days I have again gone back to being self-employed.
Yes. You become conveniently self employed whenever the topic of stealing time from employers comes up. That thread was just about a month ago and you were employed then and now you are not. Be aware that telling lies doesn't fit with the first part of your name.
Also be aware that there is somebody out there who knows your employment details and since you support tattling to the HR departments , you may face the same situation that you cheer and encourage VOWNASFNSW's of this world.Rashmun wrote:
2. No I am not ok with this. I have the dirt on many posters and the shit will hit the fan if anyone tries this stunt.
Why is it that you think it was OK for Tiana to face that and not OK for you ? We need a convincing answer. Otherwise , the thing that hits the fan first may well be yours.
Tiana was blogging on Sulekha under her own name and giving links to these blogs in her Sulekha forum posts claiming these were her blogs and asking for feedback. It seemed evident that she had no problem with being referred to by her real name.
Lamberdar Seva on this forum has also given links to blogs written by him where he has used his real name. Seva has said that he has no problem with being referred to by his real name.
Charvaka has also blogged using his real name on Sulekha. But I have never resorted to using his real name or other personal information about him as a means to attack him.
Tiana specifically told VOWNASFNSW to stop using her real name and he mocked her and continued to use her real name and you supported him. And you supported VOWNASFNSW when he used Carvaka's real name here in SuCH ( after he stopped using it long before) and used the public information to contact his employer.
You know what , your arguments have no meat and nobody should have a problem if your real name is revealed.
Thanks for the laughs and BTW you didn't say anything about the first part of my reply. I take it that it is Ok to contact your employer.Rashmun wrote: Observe the class I have shown in this matter and emulate me.
b_A- Posts : 1642
Join date : 2011-05-08
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
b_A wrote:
Thanks for the laughs and BTW you didn't say anything about the first part of my reply. I take it that it is Ok to contact your employer.
Please..please don't...Rashmuhnllah's employer should be knowing abut all his activities fully. The reason the employer may not want to take any action bcz it removes the inefficient Rashmunullah away from real work - thus improving productivity. The employer may be terrified if Rashmunullah got back to REAL work.
Marathadi-Saamiyaar- Posts : 17675
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 110
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
b_A wrote:Rashmun wrote:b_A wrote:Rashmun wrote:b_A wrote:1. Now that you are no longer self-employed ( https://such.forumotion.com/t21566-my-foolish-friend ) because you have a colleague and not an employee , and you spend a lot of time on SuCH posting numerous posts during working and non working hours thereby stealing your employer's time and you have defended your friend vile-one-with-no-accomplishments-suffering-from-negative-self-worth (referrred as VOWNASFNSW henceforth ) 's action of complaining to the HR about people stealing employer's time , will it be OK if I or someone else complain to your HR( yes , some people do know your employer and other details) about your time stealing ?
2. You defended VOWNASFNSW 's action of revealing and referring Tiana's real name because, according to your , she herself revealed it herself in blogs so it is OK , logic right? Now that you have voluntarily revealed your last name ( https://such.forumotion.com/t22673-how-india-is-split-over-bjp-s-narendra-modi#152961 ) , you will be OK if everyone uses your last name in SuCH postings henceforth , right ?
If you don't answer these question with clear and convincing answers , it will be deemed that you are giving your consent to complain to your HR and use your last name in SuCH postings.
1. It is true that I was an employee for some time but these days I have again gone back to being self-employed.
Yes. You become conveniently self employed whenever the topic of stealing time from employers comes up. That thread was just about a month ago and you were employed then and now you are not. Be aware that telling lies doesn't fit with the first part of your name.
Also be aware that there is somebody out there who knows your employment details and since you support tattling to the HR departments , you may face the same situation that you cheer and encourage VOWNASFNSW's of this world.Rashmun wrote:
2. No I am not ok with this. I have the dirt on many posters and the shit will hit the fan if anyone tries this stunt.
Why is it that you think it was OK for Tiana to face that and not OK for you ? We need a convincing answer. Otherwise , the thing that hits the fan first may well be yours.
Tiana was blogging on Sulekha under her own name and giving links to these blogs in her Sulekha forum posts claiming these were her blogs and asking for feedback. It seemed evident that she had no problem with being referred to by her real name.
Lamberdar Seva on this forum has also given links to blogs written by him where he has used his real name. Seva has said that he has no problem with being referred to by his real name.
Charvaka has also blogged using his real name on Sulekha. But I have never resorted to using his real name or other personal information about him as a means to attack him.
Tiana specifically told VOWNASFNSW to stop using her real name and he mocked her and continued to use her real name and you supported him. And you supported VOWNASFNSW when he used Carvaka's real name here in SuCH ( after he stopped using it long before) and used the public information to contact his employer.
You know what , your arguments have no meat and nobody should have a problem if your real name is revealed.Thanks for the laughs and BTW you didn't say anything about the first part of my reply. I take it that it is Ok to contact your employer.Rashmun wrote: Observe the class I have shown in this matter and emulate me.
I don't recall supporting Luke when he had his tiff with Tiana. Considering that Tiana had repeatedly given links to her Sulekha blogs in her Sulekha posts and she was blogging using her real name and in her forum posts she was admitting these were her blogs and requesting for feedback the whole thing becomes a grey area if Luke started addressing her using the name she had used in her blogs.
Charvaka was repeatedly trying to bully Luke with the help of his buddies like Propagandhi and others. Charvaka never reprimanded Propa when Propa posted links to pictures of Luke's wife and daughter on chaikaapi chat or when he insisted on addressing Luke by his real name. Luke could have chosen to leave this forum as Charvaka & co. wanted him to do ( indeed I recall Charvaka asking Luke point blank why Luke does not quit this forum), but Luke decided to take the bull by its horns and fight back. As I see it Luke helped develop Charvaka's character. Charvaka stopped being a bully after his confrontation with Luke.
Now in my case I have never tried to form a clique of friends and then instigate the clique against people I dislike. That is a low tactic and Charvaka used it against Luke.
Guest- Guest
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
Really? then who told you that tracy shared my picture with someone? Who could it be if you claim not to have cliques?Rashmun wrote:Now in my case I have never tried to form a clique of friends and then instigate the clique against people I dislike. That is a low tactic and Charvaka used it against Luke.
Guest- Guest
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
Kinnera wrote:Really? then who told you that tracy shared my picture with someone? Who could it be if you claim not to have cliques?Rashmun wrote:Now in my case I have never tried to form a clique of friends and then instigate the clique against people I dislike. That is a low tactic and Charvaka used it against Luke.
It's different. I was not instigating multiple people to go fight with u or Tracy.
Guest- Guest
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
But you were instigating me to fight with tracy. btw, who told you that? an anonymous handle pm'ed you?Rashmun wrote:Kinnera wrote:Really? then who told you that tracy shared my picture with someone? Who could it be if you claim not to have cliques?Rashmun wrote:Now in my case I have never tried to form a clique of friends and then instigate the clique against people I dislike. That is a low tactic and Charvaka used it against Luke.
It's different. I was not instigating multiple people to go fight with u or Tracy.
Guest- Guest
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
Kinnera wrote:But you were instigating me to fight with tracy. btw, who told you that? an anonymous handle pm'ed you?Rashmun wrote:Kinnera wrote:Really? then who told you that tracy shared my picture with someone? Who could it be if you claim not to have cliques?Rashmun wrote:Now in my case I have never tried to form a clique of friends and then instigate the clique against people I dislike. That is a low tactic and Charvaka used it against Luke.
It's different. I was not instigating multiple people to go fight with u or Tracy.
No I never instigated you to fight with Tracy. In fact u were not even on that thread when I asked The question to Tracy nor did I reply to any of your posts on that thread.
I simply asked Tracy a question on that thread and that was it. Incidentally I got a reply from Tracy to my question--as a private note.
Guest- Guest
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
My question is, how did you come to know about that? You can pm me. I knew about it even before you said it on the forum. Tracy did let me know about it before you did.Rashmun wrote:
No I never instigated you to fight with Tracy. In fact u were not even on that thread when I asked The question to Tracy nor did I reply to any of your posts on that thread.
I simply asked Tracy a question on that thread and that was it. Incidentally I got a reply from Tracy to my question--as a private note.
Guest- Guest
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
Kinnera wrote:My question is, how did you come to know about that? You can pm me. I knew about it even before you said it on the forum. Tracy did let me know about it before you did.Rashmun wrote:
No I never instigated you to fight with Tracy. In fact u were not even on that thread when I asked The question to Tracy nor did I reply to any of your posts on that thread.
I simply asked Tracy a question on that thread and that was it. Incidentally I got a reply from Tracy to my question--as a private note.
I am not sharing that information with you. Suffice to say that there is a lot more juice that I know and that I am keeping to myself.
Guest- Guest
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
I know! Hardcore jerks around. I wonder how you're getting all the juice if you aren't part of the cliques.Rashmun wrote:Kinnera wrote:My question is, how did you come to know about that? You can pm me. I knew about it even before you said it on the forum. Tracy did let me know about it before you did.Rashmun wrote:
No I never instigated you to fight with Tracy. In fact u were not even on that thread when I asked The question to Tracy nor did I reply to any of your posts on that thread.
I simply asked Tracy a question on that thread and that was it. Incidentally I got a reply from Tracy to my question--as a private note.
I am not sharing that information with you. Suffice to say that there is a lot more juice that I know and that I am keeping to myself.
Guest- Guest
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
Kinnera wrote:I know! Hardcore jerks around. I wonder how you're getting all the juice if you aren't part of the cliques.Rashmun wrote:Kinnera wrote:My question is, how did you come to know about that? You can pm me. I knew about it even before you said it on the forum. Tracy did let me know about it before you did.Rashmun wrote:
No I never instigated you to fight with Tracy. In fact u were not even on that thread when I asked The question to Tracy nor did I reply to any of your posts on that thread.
I simply asked Tracy a question on that thread and that was it. Incidentally I got a reply from Tracy to my question--as a private note.
I am not sharing that information with you. Suffice to say that there is a lot more juice that I know and that I am keeping to myself.
I thought u would appreciate the fact that I was keeping the juice to myself.
Guest- Guest
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
Rashmun wrote:b_A wrote:Rashmun wrote:b_A wrote:Rashmun wrote:
1. It is true that I was an employee for some time but these days I have again gone back to being self-employed.
Yes. You become conveniently self employed whenever the topic of stealing time from employers comes up. That thread was just about a month ago and you were employed then and now you are not. Be aware that telling lies doesn't fit with the first part of your name.
Also be aware that there is somebody out there who knows your employment details and since you support tattling to the HR departments , you may face the same situation that you cheer and encourage VOWNASFNSW's of this world.Rashmun wrote:
2. No I am not ok with this. I have the dirt on many posters and the shit will hit the fan if anyone tries this stunt.
Why is it that you think it was OK for Tiana to face that and not OK for you ? We need a convincing answer. Otherwise , the thing that hits the fan first may well be yours.
Tiana was blogging on Sulekha under her own name and giving links to these blogs in her Sulekha forum posts claiming these were her blogs and asking for feedback. It seemed evident that she had no problem with being referred to by her real name.
Lamberdar Seva on this forum has also given links to blogs written by him where he has used his real name. Seva has said that he has no problem with being referred to by his real name.
Charvaka has also blogged using his real name on Sulekha. But I have never resorted to using his real name or other personal information about him as a means to attack him.
Tiana specifically told VOWNASFNSW to stop using her real name and he mocked her and continued to use her real name and you supported him. And you supported VOWNASFNSW when he used Carvaka's real name here in SuCH ( after he stopped using it long before) and used the public information to contact his employer.
You know what , your arguments have no meat and nobody should have a problem if your real name is revealed.Thanks for the laughs and BTW you didn't say anything about the first part of my reply. I take it that it is Ok to contact your employer.Rashmun wrote: Observe the class I have shown in this matter and emulate me.
I don't recall supporting Luke when he had his tiff with Tiana. Considering that Tiana had repeatedly given links to her Sulekha blogs in her Sulekha posts and she was blogging using her real name and in her forum posts she was admitting these were her blogs and requesting for feedback the whole thing becomes a grey area if Luke started addressing her using the name she had used in her blogs.
Charvaka was repeatedly trying to bully Luke with the help of his buddies like Propagandhi and others. Charvaka never reprimanded Propa when Propa posted links to pictures of Luke's wife and daughter on chaikaapi chat or when he insisted on addressing Luke by his real name. Luke could have chosen to leave this forum as Charvaka & co. wanted him to do ( indeed I recall Charvaka asking Luke point blank why Luke does not quit this forum), but Luke decided to take the bull by its horns and fight back. As I see it Luke helped develop Charvaka's character. Charvaka stopped being a bully after his confrontation with Luke.
Now in my case I have never tried to form a clique of friends and then instigate the clique against people I dislike. That is a low tactic and Charvaka used it against Luke.
Do you see any need to develop Rashmun's character ?
Regarding the rest of your post , you are just going in circles and I am convinced that if we apply your own rules , you are OK if your personal information is revealed and your HR is contacted.
b_A- Posts : 1642
Join date : 2011-05-08
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
The ones listening to the gossips are as culpable as the ones spreading it. You were a participant in hearing that juice from someone. There's nothing to appreciate there.Rashmun wrote:Kinnera wrote:I know! Hardcore jerks around. I wonder how you're getting all the juice if you aren't part of the cliques.Rashmun wrote:Kinnera wrote:My question is, how did you come to know about that? You can pm me. I knew about it even before you said it on the forum. Tracy did let me know about it before you did.Rashmun wrote:
No I never instigated you to fight with Tracy. In fact u were not even on that thread when I asked The question to Tracy nor did I reply to any of your posts on that thread.
I simply asked Tracy a question on that thread and that was it. Incidentally I got a reply from Tracy to my question--as a private note.
I am not sharing that information with you. Suffice to say that there is a lot more juice that I know and that I am keeping to myself.
I thought u would appreciate the fact that I was keeping the juice to myself.
I am least interested in the juice that you have. I don't want to hear any of that shit. I just wanted to know how you knew about tracy sharing my pic with someone.
Last edited by Kinnera on Sat Apr 26, 2014 10:52 pm; edited 1 time in total
Guest- Guest
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
b_A wrote:Rashmun wrote:b_A wrote:Rashmun wrote:b_A wrote:
Yes. You become conveniently self employed whenever the topic of stealing time from employers comes up. That thread was just about a month ago and you were employed then and now you are not. Be aware that telling lies doesn't fit with the first part of your name.
Also be aware that there is somebody out there who knows your employment details and since you support tattling to the HR departments , you may face the same situation that you cheer and encourage VOWNASFNSW's of this world.
Why is it that you think it was OK for Tiana to face that and not OK for you ? We need a convincing answer. Otherwise , the thing that hits the fan first may well be yours.
Tiana was blogging on Sulekha under her own name and giving links to these blogs in her Sulekha forum posts claiming these were her blogs and asking for feedback. It seemed evident that she had no problem with being referred to by her real name.
Lamberdar Seva on this forum has also given links to blogs written by him where he has used his real name. Seva has said that he has no problem with being referred to by his real name.
Charvaka has also blogged using his real name on Sulekha. But I have never resorted to using his real name or other personal information about him as a means to attack him.
Tiana specifically told VOWNASFNSW to stop using her real name and he mocked her and continued to use her real name and you supported him. And you supported VOWNASFNSW when he used Carvaka's real name here in SuCH ( after he stopped using it long before) and used the public information to contact his employer.
You know what , your arguments have no meat and nobody should have a problem if your real name is revealed.Thanks for the laughs and BTW you didn't say anything about the first part of my reply. I take it that it is Ok to contact your employer.Rashmun wrote: Observe the class I have shown in this matter and emulate me.
I don't recall supporting Luke when he had his tiff with Tiana. Considering that Tiana had repeatedly given links to her Sulekha blogs in her Sulekha posts and she was blogging using her real name and in her forum posts she was admitting these were her blogs and requesting for feedback the whole thing becomes a grey area if Luke started addressing her using the name she had used in her blogs.
Charvaka was repeatedly trying to bully Luke with the help of his buddies like Propagandhi and others. Charvaka never reprimanded Propa when Propa posted links to pictures of Luke's wife and daughter on chaikaapi chat or when he insisted on addressing Luke by his real name. Luke could have chosen to leave this forum as Charvaka & co. wanted him to do ( indeed I recall Charvaka asking Luke point blank why Luke does not quit this forum), but Luke decided to take the bull by its horns and fight back. As I see it Luke helped develop Charvaka's character. Charvaka stopped being a bully after his confrontation with Luke.
Now in my case I have never tried to form a clique of friends and then instigate the clique against people I dislike. That is a low tactic and Charvaka used it against Luke.
Do you see any need to develop Rashmun's character ?
Regarding the rest of your post , you are just going in circles and I am convinced that if we apply your own rules , you are OK if your personal information is revealed and your HR is contacted.
Considering that I have never sought to incite a clique of posters to attack a specific poster I dislike my answer would be NO.
Guest- Guest
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
hello, b_a, your posts are fascinating; i enjoy reading them. this time, you forgot to mention how much you despise chemical engineers and how unaccomplished they are; they're incapable of counting the number of bytes needed to store a string, and they can't format the reports that the marketing analyst on the fourth floor needs by 3 pm today.
i wonder if you're undertaking this battle on behalf of charvakan and tiana because of caste or sub-caste loyalty. or could it be language/regional loyalty? it's futile to hope that tiana will turn up here and make you an offer you can't refuse. all this is almost surely wasted effort., i.e. lots of pain, but no gain. you'll accomplish more by counting bytes and formatting reports.
i wonder if you're undertaking this battle on behalf of charvakan and tiana because of caste or sub-caste loyalty. or could it be language/regional loyalty? it's futile to hope that tiana will turn up here and make you an offer you can't refuse. all this is almost surely wasted effort., i.e. lots of pain, but no gain. you'll accomplish more by counting bytes and formatting reports.
michelle2- Posts : 481
Join date : 2013-11-12
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
Flimflam
Are you stating that only caste or subcaste or brahmins turned Syrian Christian loyalty or language/regional loyalty are the only motivators in your life? Is that the source of your hatred?
Are you stating that only caste or subcaste or brahmins turned Syrian Christian loyalty or language/regional loyalty are the only motivators in your life? Is that the source of your hatred?
truthbetold- Posts : 6799
Join date : 2011-06-07
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
All you guys are silly, childish, idiotic bumbling bozoes fighting like a bunch of 10 yr olds.
As a uniform hater of everyone and every issue, I can preach you kids one thing. No matter what dont drag in personal information of anyone, and then circuitously justify your outing. A lot of people here know personal information about a lot of folks here and there are many motormouths who leak information constantly behind the scenes. Many can bring heartburn to others and to their professional/personal lives.
So all of you grow up.
As a uniform hater of everyone and every issue, I can preach you kids one thing. No matter what dont drag in personal information of anyone, and then circuitously justify your outing. A lot of people here know personal information about a lot of folks here and there are many motormouths who leak information constantly behind the scenes. Many can bring heartburn to others and to their professional/personal lives.
So all of you grow up.
Marathadi-Saamiyaar- Posts : 17675
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 110
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
Completely agreed. There is no excuse for that.Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:All you guys are silly, childish, idiotic bumbling bozoes fighting like a bunch of 10 yr olds.
As a uniform hater of everyone and every issue, I can preach you kids one thing. No matter what dont drag in personal information of anyone, and then circuitously justify your outing. A lot of people here know personal information about a lot of folks here and there are many motormouths who leak information constantly behind the scenes. Many can bring heartburn to others and to their professional/personal lives.
So all of you grow up.
confuzzled dude- Posts : 10205
Join date : 2011-05-08
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
thank you for your post, tbt. as usual, i don't know what it means, but thank you all the same.truthbetold wrote:Flimflam
Are you stating that only caste or subcaste or brahmins turned Syrian Christian loyalty or language/regional loyalty are the only motivators in your life? Is that the source of your hatred?
michelle2- Posts : 481
Join date : 2013-11-12
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
As usual you run away from posts that clearly show who you really are.michelle2 wrote:thank you for your post, tbt. as usual, i don't know what it means, but thank you all the same.truthbetold wrote:Flimflam
Are you stating that only caste or subcaste or brahmins turned Syrian Christian loyalty or language/regional loyalty are the only motivators in your life? Is that the source of your hatred?
truthbetold- Posts : 6799
Join date : 2011-06-07
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
michelle2 wrote:hello, b_a, your posts are fascinating; i enjoy reading them. this time, you forgot to mention how much you despise chemical engineers and how unaccomplished they are; they're incapable of counting the number of bytes needed to store a string, and they can't format the reports that the marketing analyst on the fourth floor needs by 3 pm today.
Spoken a like a true barely-qualified-in-JEE-bottom-dweller-in-class-who-just-managed-to-graduate-forced-to-retire-in-40s-not-because-of financial independence- but-not-able-to-find-employment-let-me-mock-othes-and-see-if-my-self-esteem-goes-up-momentarily-loser-in-all-aspects-of-life-VOWNASFNSW.
Petty minds produce petty thoughts and extremely-extremely petty mind produces the above drivel.michelle2 wrote:i wonder if you're undertaking this battle on behalf of charvakan and tiana because of caste or sub-caste loyalty. or could it be language/regional loyalty? it's futile to hope that tiana will turn up here and make you an offer you can't refuse. all this is almost surely wasted effort., i.e. lots of pain, but no gain. you'll accomplish more by counting bytes and formatting reports.
b_A- Posts : 1642
Join date : 2011-05-08
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
I repeat , your arguments have no substance and your NO may be disregarded.Rashmun wrote:b_A wrote:Rashmun wrote:b_A wrote:Rashmun wrote:
Tiana was blogging on Sulekha under her own name and giving links to these blogs in her Sulekha forum posts claiming these were her blogs and asking for feedback. It seemed evident that she had no problem with being referred to by her real name.
Lamberdar Seva on this forum has also given links to blogs written by him where he has used his real name. Seva has said that he has no problem with being referred to by his real name.
Charvaka has also blogged using his real name on Sulekha. But I have never resorted to using his real name or other personal information about him as a means to attack him.
Tiana specifically told VOWNASFNSW to stop using her real name and he mocked her and continued to use her real name and you supported him. And you supported VOWNASFNSW when he used Carvaka's real name here in SuCH ( after he stopped using it long before) and used the public information to contact his employer.
You know what , your arguments have no meat and nobody should have a problem if your real name is revealed.Thanks for the laughs and BTW you didn't say anything about the first part of my reply. I take it that it is Ok to contact your employer.Rashmun wrote: Observe the class I have shown in this matter and emulate me.
I don't recall supporting Luke when he had his tiff with Tiana. Considering that Tiana had repeatedly given links to her Sulekha blogs in her Sulekha posts and she was blogging using her real name and in her forum posts she was admitting these were her blogs and requesting for feedback the whole thing becomes a grey area if Luke started addressing her using the name she had used in her blogs.
Charvaka was repeatedly trying to bully Luke with the help of his buddies like Propagandhi and others. Charvaka never reprimanded Propa when Propa posted links to pictures of Luke's wife and daughter on chaikaapi chat or when he insisted on addressing Luke by his real name. Luke could have chosen to leave this forum as Charvaka & co. wanted him to do ( indeed I recall Charvaka asking Luke point blank why Luke does not quit this forum), but Luke decided to take the bull by its horns and fight back. As I see it Luke helped develop Charvaka's character. Charvaka stopped being a bully after his confrontation with Luke.
Now in my case I have never tried to form a clique of friends and then instigate the clique against people I dislike. That is a low tactic and Charvaka used it against Luke.
Do you see any need to develop Rashmun's character ?
Regarding the rest of your post , you are just going in circles and I am convinced that if we apply your own rules , you are OK if your personal information is revealed and your HR is contacted.
Considering that I have never sought to incite a clique of posters to attack a specific poster I dislike my answer would be NO.
b_A- Posts : 1642
Join date : 2011-05-08
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
b_A wrote:I repeat , your arguments have no substance and your NO may be disregarded.Rashmun wrote:b_A wrote:Rashmun wrote:b_A wrote:
Tiana specifically told VOWNASFNSW to stop using her real name and he mocked her and continued to use her real name and you supported him. And you supported VOWNASFNSW when he used Carvaka's real name here in SuCH ( after he stopped using it long before) and used the public information to contact his employer.
You know what , your arguments have no meat and nobody should have a problem if your real name is revealed.
Thanks for the laughs and BTW you didn't say anything about the first part of my reply. I take it that it is Ok to contact your employer.
I don't recall supporting Luke when he had his tiff with Tiana. Considering that Tiana had repeatedly given links to her Sulekha blogs in her Sulekha posts and she was blogging using her real name and in her forum posts she was admitting these were her blogs and requesting for feedback the whole thing becomes a grey area if Luke started addressing her using the name she had used in her blogs.
Charvaka was repeatedly trying to bully Luke with the help of his buddies like Propagandhi and others. Charvaka never reprimanded Propa when Propa posted links to pictures of Luke's wife and daughter on chaikaapi chat or when he insisted on addressing Luke by his real name. Luke could have chosen to leave this forum as Charvaka & co. wanted him to do ( indeed I recall Charvaka asking Luke point blank why Luke does not quit this forum), but Luke decided to take the bull by its horns and fight back. As I see it Luke helped develop Charvaka's character. Charvaka stopped being a bully after his confrontation with Luke.
Now in my case I have never tried to form a clique of friends and then instigate the clique against people I dislike. That is a low tactic and Charvaka used it against Luke.
Do you see any need to develop Rashmun's character ?
Regarding the rest of your post , you are just going in circles and I am convinced that if we apply your own rules , you are OK if your personal information is revealed and your HR is contacted.
Considering that I have never sought to incite a clique of posters to attack a specific poster I dislike my answer would be NO.
go screw yourself.
Last edited by Rashmun on Sun Apr 27, 2014 5:07 pm; edited 1 time in total
Guest- Guest
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
Is this fisherman's language or UP brahmin intellectual's language ?Rashmun wrote:b_A wrote:I repeat , your arguments have no substance and your NO may be disregarded.Rashmun wrote:b_A wrote:Rashmun wrote:
I don't recall supporting Luke when he had his tiff with Tiana. Considering that Tiana had repeatedly given links to her Sulekha blogs in her Sulekha posts and she was blogging using her real name and in her forum posts she was admitting these were her blogs and requesting for feedback the whole thing becomes a grey area if Luke started addressing her using the name she had used in her blogs.
Charvaka was repeatedly trying to bully Luke with the help of his buddies like Propagandhi and others. Charvaka never reprimanded Propa when Propa posted links to pictures of Luke's wife and daughter on chaikaapi chat or when he insisted on addressing Luke by his real name. Luke could have chosen to leave this forum as Charvaka & co. wanted him to do ( indeed I recall Charvaka asking Luke point blank why Luke does not quit this forum), but Luke decided to take the bull by its horns and fight back. As I see it Luke helped develop Charvaka's character. Charvaka stopped being a bully after his confrontation with Luke.
Now in my case I have never tried to form a clique of friends and then instigate the clique against people I dislike. That is a low tactic and Charvaka used it against Luke.
Do you see any need to develop Rashmun's character ?
Regarding the rest of your post , you are just going in circles and I am convinced that if we apply your own rules , you are OK if your personal information is revealed and your HR is contacted.
Considering that I have never sought to incite a clique of posters to attack a specific poster I dislike my answer would be NO.
Propagandhi, go screw yourself.
Changed your mind already after declaring that b_a=Kinnera as if it was the absolute truth ( What is absolute truth in Sanskrit, rashji) ?
b_A- Posts : 1642
Join date : 2011-05-08
Re: Two Questions to Rashmun
b_A wrote:Is this fisherman's language or UP brahmin intellectual's language ?Rashmun wrote:b_A wrote:I repeat , your arguments have no substance and your NO may be disregarded.Rashmun wrote:b_A wrote:
Do you see any need to develop Rashmun's character ?
Regarding the rest of your post , you are just going in circles and I am convinced that if we apply your own rules , you are OK if your personal information is revealed and your HR is contacted.
Considering that I have never sought to incite a clique of posters to attack a specific poster I dislike my answer would be NO.
go screw yourself.
Changed your mind already after declaring that b_a=Kinnera as if it was the absolute truth ( What is absolute truth in Sanskrit, rashji) ?
Oh get lost.
Guest- Guest
Similar topics
» Blast from the Past Part 4: Charvaka asks Rashmun for clarification and then thanks Rashmun
» Rashmun can't wait for the day Brie kicks the bucket. SHAME ON RASHMUN
» Rashmun goes berserk after marathadi saamiyar reveals that rashmun threatens to rape wife and sisters of posters when losing an argument
» Rashmun Vs QB - Who will make a better Admin on Rashmun's Forum
» RASHMUN method: the SENILE OLD MAN corrects that he is a SENILE MAN and that he taught RASHMUN about UNDERWEAR
» Rashmun can't wait for the day Brie kicks the bucket. SHAME ON RASHMUN
» Rashmun goes berserk after marathadi saamiyar reveals that rashmun threatens to rape wife and sisters of posters when losing an argument
» Rashmun Vs QB - Who will make a better Admin on Rashmun's Forum
» RASHMUN method: the SENILE OLD MAN corrects that he is a SENILE MAN and that he taught RASHMUN about UNDERWEAR
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|