Splitting India II

by Rishi Fri May 23, 2014 4:12 pm

In this regard, let me address a major criticism some readers have made of my argument that the partition of India was not necessarily the best option for Muslims. They have pointed out that the Indian Muslims have remained one of the poorest groups in secular India. Therefore the creation of Pakistan was necessary to save the Muslims from permanent Hindu domination. In principle this is a compelling argument in favour of creating Pakistan, but it needs to be put into perspective.

Mr Jinnah had prepared his brief on a separate Pakistan on the basis of categorical rejection that a Hindu-majority government could ever be fair to the Muslims. When he was asked what would happen to the most vulnerable, deprived and poor sections of Muslims from Muslim-minority provinces if they were left behind in India, he had asserted that one-third of Muslims should not prevent two-thirds of them escaping Hindu domination. It was a typical utilitarian argument deriving from the notion of the greatest good of the greatest number rather than the greatest good of all. However, in August 1947 when some reporters asked him before he left Delhi for Karachi as to what message he wanted to give to the Muslims who would remain behind he said that they should become loyal Indian citizens and he expected the Indian government to treat them fairly. His line of argument had thus changed fundamentally - it acknowledged that a Congress government (upper-caste Hindu dominated) could treat them fairly.

See more at: http://www.thefridaytimes.com/beta3/tft/article.php?issue=20130927&page=24#sthash.V7EpL8CC.dpuf

by Vakavaka Pakapaka Fri May 23, 2014 5:31 pm

May be Jinnah was right. Muslims should start moving out of India, go to Bangladesh and PakiSatan, and "prosper" in the midst of their ummah.

Rashmun will miss them.

Good bye and good riddance!

Hitskin.com

Splitting India II

Splitting India II

Re: Splitting India II