truthbetold wrote:I wonder why cd or merlot did not post this news item.

truthbetold wrote:I wonder why cd or merlot did not post this news item.

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

truthbetold wrote:I wonder why cd or merlot did not post this news item.

Only chaddis and closeted chaddis like you obsess over Muslims and their weird hangups. Why would I care abt what goes on at some provincial cesspool like the AMU??

truthbetold wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

truthbetold wrote:I wonder why cd or merlot did not post this news item.

Only chaddis and closeted chaddis like you obsess over Muslims and their weird hangups. Why would I care abt what goes on at some provincial cesspool like the AMU??

Yeah right.  You only worry about provincial cesspool like mangalore bar when Hindu zealots were involved. Whatever suits your self created illusionary logic.

Seva Lamberdar wrote:ALIGARH: Turning down the demand of students of Women's College, Aligarh Muslim University, for access to the varsity's Maulana Azad Library, vice-chancellor Lt Gen Zameer Uddin Shah has said there would be "four times more boys" in the library if girls were allowed in.

           .  .

Kris wrote:

Seva Lamberdar wrote:ALIGARH: Turning down the demand of students of Women's College, Aligarh Muslim University, for access to the varsity's Maulana Azad Library, vice-chancellor Lt Gen Zameer Uddin Shah has said there would be "four times more boys" in the library if girls were allowed in.

           .  .

There is something sexy about girls who hang out libraries>>> That will attract boys to the library---->>> That is a bad thing

Seva Lamberdar wrote:

Kris wrote:

Seva Lamberdar wrote:ALIGARH: Turning down the demand of students of Women's College, Aligarh Muslim University, for access to the varsity's Maulana Azad Library, vice-chancellor Lt Gen Zameer Uddin Shah has said there would be "four times more boys" in the library if girls were allowed in.

           .  .

There is something sexy about girls who hang out libraries>>> That will attract boys to the library---->>> That is a bad thing

This Univ. also has a significant number of non-Muslim male students. That could also be the reason in having the girls, mostly Muslims, kept out of the main library (a hang out for many male students, Muslim and non-Muslim).

truthbetold wrote:Some people get limp wristed and tongue tied when comes to be critical of Islamic terrorism and yet claim that as secular position.

truthbetold wrote: If you don't have balls,  you can't be a man.

Kris wrote:

Seva Lamberdar wrote:

Kris wrote:

Seva Lamberdar wrote:ALIGARH: Turning down the demand of students of Women's College, Aligarh Muslim University, for access to the varsity's Maulana Azad Library, vice-chancellor Lt Gen Zameer Uddin Shah has said there would be "four times more boys" in the library if girls were allowed in.

           .  .

There is something sexy about girls who hang out libraries>>> That will attract boys to the library---->>> That is a bad thing

This Univ. also has a significant number of non-Muslim male students. That could also be the reason in having the girls, mostly Muslims, kept out of the main library (a hang out for many male students, Muslim and non-Muslim).

>>>Ok, there's the rub then. I didn't know this subtext.

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:If space is an issue, then ban the boys and keep the girls. simble work for all solution.

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:If space is an issue, then ban the boys and keep the girls. simble work for all solution.

Yeah... When did Boys start going to the libraries ? In fact, they should encourage ALL girls to go to library in the hope the boys also will go to library. Any hanky panky can be monitored and (reasonable) silence will have to be maintained.

If the woman gets raped - it is the woman's fault

If the man gets attracted to a woman - it is the woman's fault

If the man is not attracted to a woman - it is also the woman's fault

If the man is attracted to another man - then also it is the woman's fault.

Imagine the response of the Center - if it had been UPA and Madam Mohan Singh.

confuzzled dude wrote:
You mean separate canteens for vegetarians is very forward thinking but this is not?!

Apparently, this is not the first time this issue was raised  
http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/amu-womens-college-students-seek-more-liberal-rules/article2478115.ece

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/girl-students-of-aligarh-battle-to-use-pg-library/article2474324.ece#comments

Seva Lamberdar wrote:ALIGARH: Turning down the demand of students of Women's College, Aligarh Muslim University, for access to the varsity's Maulana Azad Library, vice-chancellor Lt Gen Zameer Uddin Shah has said there would be "four times more boys" in the library if girls were allowed in.

"The issue is not of discipline, but of space. Our library is packed," the VC said, justifying why the girls were not allowed membership.

Women's College principal Naima Gulrez, echoed the VC's views. Addressing the audience on Monday during the oath-taking ceremony of the new students' union, she said, "We understand the demand for access to the library. But have you girls ever seen the library? It is jam-packed with boys. If girls too were to be present in it, the discipline issue might crop up."

Students of the Women's College are not allowed membership of the Maulana Azad Library, reportedly better stocked than the Women's College library. Several previous students' unions, too, had demanded access to the famed Maulana Azad Library, located within AMU and 3 km from the Women's College. ....................

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/agra/Girls-in-AMU-library-will-attract-boys-VC/articleshow/45101345.cms

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:
You mean separate canteens for vegetarians is very forward thinking but this is not?!

Apparently, this is not the first time this issue was raised  
http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/amu-womens-college-students-seek-more-liberal-rules/article2478115.ece

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/girl-students-of-aligarh-battle-to-use-pg-library/article2474324.ece#comments

So you are ok with the AMU decision to bar women from the central library....If not what are you saying.?

truthbetold wrote:Is it confusion or deliberate attempt to deflect criticism?

Cd and merlot use many tricks to protect their favorite minorities. A truly liberal and secular person would find
Aligarh Muslim university's action barring women to enter library as gender bias, religious stupidity, unscientific , and   So 7th century. The same person would have no hesitation to condemn hooliganism against women going to bar or young couples in park. Those who try to confuse such simple logic are opportunists or closet partisans.

confuzzled dude wrote:

truthbetold wrote:Is it confusion or deliberate attempt to deflect criticism?

Cd and merlot use many tricks to protect their favorite minorities. A truly liberal and secular person would find
Aligarh Muslim university's action barring women to enter library as gender bias, religious stupidity, unscientific , and   So 7th century. The same person would have no hesitation to condemn hooliganism against women going to bar or young couples in park. Those who try to confuse such simple logic are opportunists or closet partisans.

Context, my friend, don't try to take my comments out of context; You've obviously missed my point in your haste to label me (or merlot) as opportunists. Just like those BJP/RSS fools i.e. self-appointed guardians of Hindu sanskriti, who want to control how a hindu girl should be dressed or behave, these idiots at AMU have appointed themselves as watchdog of Muslim women.

Seva Lamberdar wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

truthbetold wrote:Is it confusion or deliberate attempt to deflect criticism?

Cd and merlot use many tricks to protect their favorite minorities. A truly liberal and secular person would find
Aligarh Muslim university's action barring women to enter library as gender bias, religious stupidity, unscientific , and   So 7th century. The same person would have no hesitation to condemn hooliganism against women going to bar or young couples in park. Those who try to confuse such simple logic are opportunists or closet partisans.

Context, my friend, don't try to take my comments out of context; You've obviously missed my point in your haste to label me (or merlot) as opportunists. Just like those BJP/RSS fools i.e. self-appointed guardians of Hindu sanskriti, who want to control how a hindu girl should be dressed or behave, these idiots at AMU have appointed themselves as watchdog of Muslim women.

Why is that whenever there is a discussion / controversy related to some custom or issue involving the Muslims, others (non-Muslims) also are dragged into it, such as people giving the explanation that it's not just the Muslims doing or having such things, but others also have same / similar things / issues?

confuzzled dude wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:
You mean separate canteens for vegetarians is very forward thinking but this is not?!

Apparently, this is not the first time this issue was raised  
http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/amu-womens-college-students-seek-more-liberal-rules/article2478115.ece

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/girl-students-of-aligarh-battle-to-use-pg-library/article2474324.ece#comments

So you are ok with the AMU decision to bar women from the central library....If not what are you saying.?

Aren't you one of the gentlemen thought it was wonderful and progressive move to have separate canteens for vegetarians, so why are you complaining about this practice at AMU, isn't this similar to what you were preaching the other day?

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:
You mean separate canteens for vegetarians is very forward thinking but this is not?!

Apparently, this is not the first time this issue was raised  
http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/amu-womens-college-students-seek-more-liberal-rules/article2478115.ece

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/girl-students-of-aligarh-battle-to-use-pg-library/article2474324.ece#comments

So you are ok with the AMU decision to bar women from the central library....If not what are you saying.?

Aren't you one of the gentlemen thought it was wonderful and progressive move to have separate canteens for vegetarians, so why are you complaining about this practice at AMU, isn't this similar to what you were preaching the other day?

AGAIN: So you are ok with the AMU decision to bar women from the central library....If not what are you saying.?

confuzzled dude wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:
You mean separate canteens for vegetarians is very forward thinking but this is not?!

Apparently, this is not the first time this issue was raised  
http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/amu-womens-college-students-seek-more-liberal-rules/article2478115.ece

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/girl-students-of-aligarh-battle-to-use-pg-library/article2474324.ece#comments

So you are ok with the AMU decision to bar women from the central library....If not what are you saying.?

Aren't you one of the gentlemen thought it was wonderful and progressive move to have separate canteens for vegetarians, so why are you complaining about this practice at AMU, isn't this similar to what you were preaching the other day?

AGAIN: So you are ok with the AMU decision to bar women from the central library....If not what are you saying.?

Is this a rhetorical question? Had you opened the link(s) that I posted & made an attempt to read those articles, you'd have understood my position.

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

So you are ok with the AMU decision to bar women from the central library....If not what are you saying.?

Aren't you one of the gentlemen thought it was wonderful and progressive move to have separate canteens for vegetarians, so why are you complaining about this practice at AMU, isn't this similar to what you were preaching the other day?

AGAIN: So you are ok with the AMU decision to bar women from the central library....If not what are you saying.?

Is this a rhetorical question? Had you opened the link(s) that I posted & made an attempt to read those articles, you'd have understood my position.

YES or NO.  Not Umpteen links to draw own conclusion of what YOU might think - which you will disagree anyway....(Hope you are not called to a court as a witness. You will be held on Contempt charges by the Judge).

One last chance:

YES or NO.

confuzzled dude wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

YES or NO.  Not Umpteen links to draw own conclusion of what YOU might think - which you will disagree anyway....(Hope you are not called to a court as a witness. You will be held on Contempt charges by the Judge).

One last chance:

YES or NO.

Stop being lazy. I've already expressed my view, read the thread over again.