This is a Hitskin.com skin preview
Install the skin • Return to the skin page
The difference between the West and India in response to.......
Page 1 of 1
The difference between the West and India in response to.......
........ monomaniac piece work.
When 9/11 happened, the US pulverized Taliban & Al Qaeda in Afghanistan, threatened Musharraf into submission and put down several Al Qaeda and Taliban cowards hiding among civilians. Several countries came together in this fight against the pieceful.
When the attack on Paris took place, the leaders of the West came together to show solidarity in the fight against monomaniac terrorism. France has sent their military cargo plane to assist in the fight against ISIS. Charlie Hobdo came out with another addition of their magazine that is sold out right away.
When 26/11 happened, the meek Indian PM and his associates (Doggy, Aiyer) wanted to have a dialogue with Pakis knowing that the latter have been directly involved in trying to harm India. The current Indian PM doesn't attend the Paris march nor send a high profile representative. Yet, he made a big fuss about international terrorism at the G-20 meet and wanted the whole world to come together in the fight against terrorism.
I am not stating anything new here. India is Sikular and cowardly. Indian politicians should wake up and see reality for what it is. If they participate in the global fight against monomaniacs, the country will gain some credibility. Expecting others to do their work is idiotic.
When 9/11 happened, the US pulverized Taliban & Al Qaeda in Afghanistan, threatened Musharraf into submission and put down several Al Qaeda and Taliban cowards hiding among civilians. Several countries came together in this fight against the pieceful.
When the attack on Paris took place, the leaders of the West came together to show solidarity in the fight against monomaniac terrorism. France has sent their military cargo plane to assist in the fight against ISIS. Charlie Hobdo came out with another addition of their magazine that is sold out right away.
When 26/11 happened, the meek Indian PM and his associates (Doggy, Aiyer) wanted to have a dialogue with Pakis knowing that the latter have been directly involved in trying to harm India. The current Indian PM doesn't attend the Paris march nor send a high profile representative. Yet, he made a big fuss about international terrorism at the G-20 meet and wanted the whole world to come together in the fight against terrorism.
I am not stating anything new here. India is Sikular and cowardly. Indian politicians should wake up and see reality for what it is. If they participate in the global fight against monomaniacs, the country will gain some credibility. Expecting others to do their work is idiotic.
Vakavaka Pakapaka- Posts : 7611
Join date : 2012-08-24
Similar topics
» What if India were not partitioned? A response to supporters of Partition
» LOC: Disadvantage India - Indian response well explained.
» Vishwaroopam getting good response in North India
» China set to gain a decisive military advantage: No response from India
» Hindutva on the west coast of India
» LOC: Disadvantage India - Indian response well explained.
» Vishwaroopam getting good response in North India
» China set to gain a decisive military advantage: No response from India
» Hindutva on the west coast of India
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|