So, why did patriotic NDA appoint this traitor? Hitskin_logo Hitskin.com

This is a Hitskin.com skin preview
Install the skinReturn to the skin page

Coffeehouse for desis
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

So, why did patriotic NDA appoint this traitor?

2 posters

Go down

So, why did patriotic NDA appoint this traitor? Empty So, why did patriotic NDA appoint this traitor?

Post by confuzzled dude Sun Mar 01, 2015 1:30 pm

In an exchange worth listening to, Arvind Subramanian from the Peterson Institute for International Economics noted that India officials did not agree with the assessment that they were not in compliance with trade standards. Subramanian also was skeptical that certain unilateral sanctions would be effective. Subramanian suggested that if India was not in compliance with WTO TRIPS rules, U.S. trade officials use the dispute resolution procedures within the WTO. (17:15 to 19:13 in the clip above)

Pfizer referred to the WTO dispute resolution option as a blunt instrument with unintended consequences
http://www.keionline.org/node/1689

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Modis-chief-economic-adviser-Arvind-Subramanian-had-opposed-India-on-IPR-till-recently/articleshow/44929094.cms

Is that because he is a Brahmin who fits well into the tradition of brahmin-bania party?

confuzzled dude

Posts : 10205
Join date : 2011-05-08

Back to top Go down

So, why did patriotic NDA appoint this traitor? Empty Re: So, why did patriotic NDA appoint this traitor?

Post by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Sun Mar 01, 2015 1:58 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
In an exchange worth listening to, Arvind Subramanian from the Peterson Institute for International Economics noted that India officials did not agree with the assessment that they were not in compliance with trade standards. Subramanian also was skeptical that certain unilateral sanctions would be effective. Subramanian suggested that if India was not in compliance with WTO TRIPS rules, U.S. trade officials use the dispute resolution procedures within the WTO. (17:15 to 19:13 in the clip above)

Pfizer referred to the WTO dispute resolution option as a blunt instrument with unintended consequences
http://www.keionline.org/node/1689

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Modis-chief-economic-adviser-Arvind-Subramanian-had-opposed-India-on-IPR-till-recently/articleshow/44929094.cms

Is that because he is a Brahmin who fits well into the tradition of brahmin-bania party?

Unlike Rajan, I am not sure if Arvind is even an Indian Citizen. Based on his stay/resume at U of MD and then Columbia there is a very good chance that he is a US Citizen... Of course, one need not be an Indian Citizen to be an economic advisor to the PM of India, but he will be privy to classfied info. So, theoretically there is always the issue of double-play.

I am not too impressed with him and I suspect his selection is mainly due to his familiarity and proximity to Rajan.

Marathadi-Saamiyaar

Posts : 17675
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 110

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum