drumpf will flunk an eighth grade civics exam

by MaxEntropy_Man Wed Mar 02, 2016 1:43 pm

says conservative maven george will.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-albatross-of-a-trump-endorsement/2016/02/28/0521c478-de54-11e5-846c-10191d1fc4ec_story.html

The night before his promise to make America great again through censorship, Trump, during the Republican presidential candidates’ debate in Houston , said that his sister, a federal judge, “[signed] a certain bill” and that Supreme Court Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. also “signed that bill.” So, the leading Republican candidate, the breadth of whose ignorance is the eighth wonder of the world, actually thinks that judges “sign” bills. Trump is a presidential aspirant who would flunk an eighth-grade civics exam.

LOL!

by Guest Wed Mar 02, 2016 1:58 pm

i am not totally disheartened yet. while both the candidates are scary, let's see who each one picks for their running partner ...

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Wed Mar 02, 2016 2:44 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:says conservative maven george will.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-albatross-of-a-trump-endorsement/2016/02/28/0521c478-de54-11e5-846c-10191d1fc4ec_story.html

The night before his promise to make America great again through censorship, Trump, during the Republican presidential candidates’ debate in Houston , said that his sister, a federal judge, “[signed] a certain bill” and that Supreme Court Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. also “signed that bill.” So, the leading Republican candidate, the breadth of whose ignorance is the eighth wonder of the world, actually thinks that judges “sign” bills. Trump is a presidential aspirant who would flunk an eighth-grade civics exam.

LOL!

His ignorance puts him at an advantage as he is now on par with Bush 2.

Now you know why I support Trump... I will be assured of some good late night entertainment for at least 4 years. Already, I am a big fan of his hand gestures...

by MaxEntropy_Man Wed Mar 02, 2016 3:06 pm

Meghna Mathur wrote:i am not totally disheartened yet. while both the candidates are scary, let's see who each one picks for their running partner ...

they may both be scary, but only one is also an idiot.

btw, i am curious; what exactly did clinton do that has made you fearful of her?

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Wed Mar 02, 2016 3:15 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Meghna Mathur wrote:i am not totally disheartened yet. while both the candidates are scary, let's see who each one picks for their running partner ...

they may both be scary, but only one is also an idiot.

btw, i am curious; what exactly did clinton do that has made you fearful of her?

I used to like her...But one too many times during that White water - something and Benghazi - something , Email server - something, and several other somethings like speaking fee, etc... have convinced me that she is a fake and a snake with her focus ONLY on the presidency - hook or by crook.She comes across as dubious and she certainly will mortgage all her principles - if she still had any - in the name of national interests - like arming paki military saying it is good way to reduce Chinku influence while doing a Rajasthani dance in Jaipur.

by MaxEntropy_Man Wed Mar 02, 2016 3:21 pm

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Meghna Mathur wrote:i am not totally disheartened yet. while both the candidates are scary, let's see who each one picks for their running partner ...

they may both be scary, but only one is also an idiot.

btw, i am curious; what exactly did clinton do that has made you fearful of her?

I used to like her...But one too many times during that White water - something and Benghazi - something , Email server - something, and several other somethings like speaking fee, etc... have convinced me that she is a fake and a snake with her focus ONLY on the presidency - hook or by crook.She comes across as dubious and she certainly will mortgage all her principles - if she still had any - in the name of national interests - like arming paki military saying it is good way to reduce Chinku influence while doing a Rajasthani dance in Jaipur.

she's the best of the choices available to us and the one most likely to continue obama's legacy. those are good reasons to vote for her.

by Guest Wed Mar 02, 2016 3:31 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Meghna Mathur wrote:i am not totally disheartened yet. while both the candidates are scary, let's see who each one picks for their running partner ...

they may both be scary, but only one is also an idiot.

btw, i am curious; what exactly did clinton do that has made you fearful of her?

for some reason I don't think she's a fake. and whatever favoritism or playing with the rules she has done, i don't care much about that. if you are a politician, you are not a purist, that's a given.

otoh, I think she's more dedicated to her ideologies than her husband. and to me that's the scary part. in theory, I have always been against anyone extreme leading any country. Someone more moderate or balanced does better, especially if they have an extreme support as well as opposition. And she has shown that side of stubbornness and a bit of extremism in the past. This quality of her made her support prez Clinton when he was hammered by GOP, coz she hated GOP more than she was upset about his shenanigans. This quality of her made her fail in whatever health reforms she wanted to make back then. I think in last many years she has improved, but yet to be seen how much balanced she really is.

when I say both are scary, I mean that both are equally capable of 'losing it' under pressure. Here's where the right VP comes in handy.

by seven Wed Mar 02, 2016 5:07 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:says conservative maven george will.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-albatross-of-a-trump-endorsement/2016/02/28/0521c478-de54-11e5-846c-10191d1fc4ec_story.html

The night before his promise to make America great again through censorship, Trump, during the Republican presidential candidates’ debate in Houston , said that his sister, a federal judge, “[signed] a certain bill” and that Supreme Court Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. also “signed that bill.” So, the leading Republican candidate, the breadth of whose ignorance is the eighth wonder of the world, actually thinks that judges “sign” bills. Trump is a presidential aspirant who would flunk an eighth-grade civics exam.

LOL!

First of all, What's Drumph?

Why are we making Trump that?

He's a rich bully who has always got everything he's ever wanted. He might become US President too. What are you talking about making him? Knowing people like are against him makes me want to vote for him. He must be doing the right things if it's upsetting you.

by MaxEntropy_Man Wed Mar 02, 2016 5:20 pm

seven wrote:

LOL!

First of all, What's Drumph?
[/quote]

by MaxEntropy_Man Wed Mar 02, 2016 5:20 pm

seven wrote:

First of all, What's Drumph?

by seven Wed Mar 02, 2016 5:28 pm

Why is this dumb media so obsessed with Trump. Whoa! Trump said that!! Ooh what's Trump gonna say next?!!

That is another reason why he's winning. He's dangerous n should not have had come this far.

Leave the news to be watched by uneducated rednecks. Also I forgot my earphones at home.
Can you type what you mean by Drumph in your signature/ post. Ty.

by MaxEntropy_Man Wed Mar 02, 2016 5:36 pm

seven wrote:Why is this dumb media so obsessed with Trump. Whoa! Trump said that!! Ooh what's Trump gonna say next?!!

That is another reason why he's winning. He's dangerous n should not have had come this far.

Leave the news to be watched by uneducated rednecks. Also I forgot my earphones at home.
Can you type what you mean by Drumph in your signature/ post. Ty.

i will if you quote me correctly. i never spelled it as drumph.

by MaxEntropy_Man Wed Mar 02, 2016 5:44 pm

http://donaldjdrumpf.com/

by seven Wed Mar 02, 2016 5:59 pm

by Kayalvizhi Wed Mar 02, 2016 11:22 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:says conservative maven george will.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-albatross-of-a-trump-endorsement/2016/02/28/0521c478-de54-11e5-846c-10191d1fc4ec_story.html

The night before his promise to make America great again through censorship, Trump, during the Republican presidential candidates’ debate in Houston , said that his sister, a federal judge, “[signed] a certain bill” and that Supreme Court Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. also “signed that bill.” So, the leading Republican candidate, the breadth of whose ignorance is the eighth wonder of the world, actually thinks that judges “sign” bills. Trump is a presidential aspirant who would flunk an eighth-grade civics exam.

LOL!

People in glass hoiuses should not throw stones at others. You people (Indians) have a president and speaker who does not know the basic information from the constitution and ay that "India's national language is Hindi". LOL at India which you people say you love.

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Wed Mar 02, 2016 11:43 pm

Kayalvizhi wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:says conservative maven george will.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-albatross-of-a-trump-endorsement/2016/02/28/0521c478-de54-11e5-846c-10191d1fc4ec_story.html

The night before his promise to make America great again through censorship, Trump, during the Republican presidential candidates’ debate in Houston , said that his sister, a federal judge, “[signed] a certain bill” and that Supreme Court Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. also “signed that bill.” So, the leading Republican candidate, the breadth of whose ignorance is the eighth wonder of the world, actually thinks that judges “sign” bills. Trump is a presidential aspirant who would flunk an eighth-grade civics exam.

LOL!
People in glass hoiuses should not throw stones at others. You people (Indians) have a president and speaker who does not know the basic information from the constitution and ay that "India's national language is Hindi". LOL at India which you people say you love.

Did you ask Trump if e supports an independent TN? I cant wait to hear his answer.

by Hellsangel Wed Mar 02, 2016 11:43 pm

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Meghna Mathur wrote:i am not totally disheartened yet. while both the candidates are scary, let's see who each one picks for their running partner ...

they may both be scary, but only one is also an idiot.

btw, i am curious; what exactly did clinton do that has made you fearful of her?

I used to like her...But one too many times during that White water - something and Benghazi - something , Email server - something, and several other somethings like speaking fee, etc... have convinced me that she is a fake and a snake with her focus ONLY on the presidency - hook or by crook.She comes across as dubious and she certainly will mortgage all her principles - if she still had any - in the name of national interests - like arming paki military saying it is good way to reduce Chinku influence while doing a Rajasthani dance in Jaipur.

https://www.superstation95.com/index.php/world/961

by MaxEntropy_Man Wed Mar 02, 2016 11:49 pm

Hellsangel wrote:
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Meghna Mathur wrote:i am not totally disheartened yet. while both the candidates are scary, let's see who each one picks for their running partner ...

they may both be scary, but only one is also an idiot.

btw, i am curious; what exactly did clinton do that has made you fearful of her?

I used to like her...But one too many times during that White water - something and Benghazi - something , Email server - something, and several other somethings like speaking fee, etc... have convinced me that she is a fake and a snake with her focus ONLY on the presidency - hook or by crook.She comes across as dubious and she certainly will mortgage all her principles - if she still had any - in the name of national interests - like arming paki military saying it is good way to reduce Chinku influence while doing a Rajasthani dance in Jaipur.

https://www.superstation95.com/index.php/world/961

the article says,

...spoke about education, healthcare and individual freedoms for people of all backgrounds and faiths.

and the fellow who organized it says,

...so I really appreciate her whatever effort she is making against Islamaphobia...

is there something illegal about any of this? apparently she went to a fund raising event sponsored by an american citizen and accepted donations to her campaign. and she spoke out in support of a group whose members are routinely harassed in the US.

now contrast this with drumpf who thinks putin is alright.

by Guest Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:01 am

by Hellsangel Thu Mar 03, 2016 8:31 am

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Meghna Mathur wrote:i am not totally disheartened yet. while both the candidates are scary, let's see who each one picks for their running partner ...

they may both be scary, but only one is also an idiot.

btw, i am curious; what exactly did clinton do that has made you fearful of her?

I used to like her...But one too many times during that White water - something and Benghazi - something , Email server - something, and several other somethings like speaking fee, etc... have convinced me that she is a fake and a snake with her focus ONLY on the presidency - hook or by crook.She comes across as dubious and she certainly will mortgage all her principles - if she still had any - in the name of national interests - like arming paki military saying it is good way to reduce Chinku influence while doing a Rajasthani dance in Jaipur.

https://www.superstation95.com/index.php/world/961

the article says,
...spoke about education, healthcare and individual freedoms for people of all backgrounds and faiths.
and the fellow who organized it says,
...so I really appreciate her whatever effort she is making against Islamaphobia...

is there something illegal about any of this? apparently she went to a fund raising event sponsored by an american citizen and accepted donations to her campaign. and she spoke out in support of a group whose members are routinely harassed in the US.

now contrast this with drumpf who thinks putin is alright.

It just means the Pakistanis put a down payment on her.
drumpf will flunk an eighth grade civics exam 3d105248b10b0d962a881701f9482c8d_M

by Guest Thu Mar 03, 2016 9:23 am

Hellsangel wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

they may both be scary, but only one is also an idiot.

btw, i am curious; what exactly did clinton do that has made you fearful of her?

I used to like her...But one too many times during that White water - something and Benghazi - something , Email server - something, and several other somethings like speaking fee, etc... have convinced me that she is a fake and a snake with her focus ONLY on the presidency - hook or by crook.She comes across as dubious and she certainly will mortgage all her principles - if she still had any - in the name of national interests - like arming paki military saying it is good way to reduce Chinku influence while doing a Rajasthani dance in Jaipur.

https://www.superstation95.com/index.php/world/961

the article says,
...spoke about education, healthcare and individual freedoms for people of all backgrounds and faiths.
and the fellow who organized it says,
...so I really appreciate her whatever effort she is making against Islamaphobia...

is there something illegal about any of this? apparently she went to a fund raising event sponsored by an american citizen and accepted donations to her campaign. and she spoke out in support of a group whose members are routinely harassed in the US.

now contrast this with drumpf who thinks putin is alright.
It just means the Pakistanis put a down payment on her.

interesting link to hillary. for a moment it seemed it was sonia talking. is she pandering to the muslims?

by Propagandhi711 Thu Mar 03, 2016 9:24 am

that john oliver had a decent schtick before but now is just shrill and tiring. so the only thing he could stick on bad wig is the german name change. maybe the english poof should try using his guru jon stewart's real name: jonathan stuart leibowitz

by Hellsangel Thu Mar 03, 2016 9:37 am

brie wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

I used to like her...But one too many times during that White water - something and Benghazi - something , Email server - something, and several other somethings like speaking fee, etc... have convinced me that she is a fake and a snake with her focus ONLY on the presidency - hook or by crook.She comes across as dubious and she certainly will mortgage all her principles - if she still had any - in the name of national interests - like arming paki military saying it is good way to reduce Chinku influence while doing a Rajasthani dance in Jaipur.

https://www.superstation95.com/index.php/world/961

the article says,
...spoke about education, healthcare and individual freedoms for people of all backgrounds and faiths.
and the fellow who organized it says,
...so I really appreciate her whatever effort she is making against Islamaphobia...

is there something illegal about any of this? apparently she went to a fund raising event sponsored by an american citizen and accepted donations to her campaign. and she spoke out in support of a group whose members are routinely harassed in the US.

now contrast this with drumpf who thinks putin is alright.
It just means the Pakistanis put a down payment on her.
interesting link to hillary. for a moment it seemed it was sonia talking. is she pandering to the muslims?

She will pander to anyone who buys her.

by MaxEntropy_Man Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:04 am

Propagandhi711 wrote:that john oliver had a decent schtick before but now is just shrill and tiring. so the only thing he could stick on bad wig is the german name change. maybe the english poof should try using his guru jon stewart's real name: jonathan stuart leibowitz

what about all the failed businesses? i can't really fathom your support for drumpf though. i mean most folks in your party seem hell bent on not seeing him become the nominee.

in any case, the original post in this thread was not about john oliver, but one of the most respected conservative minds, george will, repudiating drumpf.

by MaxEntropy_Man Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:06 am

Hellsangel wrote:
She will pander to anyone who buys her.

say something new. this is too cliched and tired. haven't your party overlords written a new book of clinton insults and innuendos to pick from, or are they too busy trying to down drumpf?

by Hellsangel Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:09 am

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
She will pander to anyone who buys her.

say something new. this is too cliched and tired. haven't your party overlords written a new book of clinton insults and innuendos to pick from, or are they too busy trying to down drumpf?

You are free to drink the Clinton Coolaid as a fan boy.

by MaxEntropy_Man Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:14 am

Hellsangel wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
She will pander to anyone who buys her.

say something new. this is too cliched and tired. haven't your party overlords written a new book of clinton insults and innuendos to pick from, or are they too busy trying to down drumpf?
You are free to drink the Clinton Coolaid as a fan boy.

i've already stated my position. i'm not a huge fan, but she is the best available and pragmatic option.

by Hellsangel Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:31 am

http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-35703301

by Guest Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:57 am

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
She will pander to anyone who buys her.

say something new. this is too cliched and tired. haven't your party overlords written a new book of clinton insults and innuendos to pick from, or are they too busy trying to down drumpf?
You are free to drink the Clinton Coolaid as a fan boy.

i've already stated my position. i'm not a huge fan, but she is the best available and pragmatic option.

so you support her taking down payment from pakistan? sold your soul mr. sickular? how ever was pakistan a do-good ally of USA? USA plundered the world to... AND I WILL TELL YOU WHY:

- TO UPHOLD DEMOCRACY. A DEMOCRATIC NATION IS MORALLY WITHIN ITS RIGHTS TO USE PERSUASION AND EVEN FORCE TO PROPAGATE DEMOCRACY. this is the textbook principle and the profound lie USA has been using.

you want all things hunky dory at home and thing asunder in the globe thanks to rogue USA (that holds rogue pakistan an ally)? no tear for those outside USA?

YOU LIKE TO DUMP RUBBISH OUTSIDE YOUR GATE WHILE KEEPING YOUR ABODE SPIC AND SPAN?

answer me!

by MaxEntropy_Man Thu Mar 03, 2016 11:18 am

brie wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
She will pander to anyone who buys her.

say something new. this is too cliched and tired. haven't your party overlords written a new book of clinton insults and innuendos to pick from, or are they too busy trying to down drumpf?
You are free to drink the Clinton Coolaid as a fan boy.

i've already stated my position. i'm not a huge fan, but she is the best available and pragmatic option.
so you support her taking down payment from pakistan? sold your soul mr. sickular? how ever was pakistan a do-good ally of USA? USA plundered the world to... AND I WILL TELL YOU WHY:

- TO UPHOLD DEMOCRACY. A DEMOCRATIC NATION IS MORALLY WITHIN ITS RIGHTS TO USE PERSUASION AND EVEN FORCE TO PROPAGATE DEMOCRACY. this is the textbook principle and the profound lie USA has been using.

you want all things hunky dory at home and thing asunder in the globe thanks to rogue USA (that holds rogue pakistan an ally)? no tear for those outside USA?

YOU LIKE TO DUMP RUBBISH OUTSIDE YOUR GATE WHILE KEEPING YOUR ABODE SPIC AND SPAN?

answer me!

she attended a fund raising meeting organized by an american citizen. that is not illegal. yes he is of pak origin. if you think she's in bed with pakistanis, i urge you to look at what past american administrations (regardless of party affiliation) have done. they have all without exception cozied up to pakistan and equally importnatly to saudi arabia which is one of the most repressive regimes and sponsor of terrorism on the planet. i am not happy about that and don't support that, but it's not as if republicans don't do it.

as a voter in an american election, it would be unnatural for me to not think of my family and my interests first and foremost. after all i live here. and voting for hillary serves my interest best.

by Hellsangel Thu Mar 03, 2016 11:24 am

Even in 2008:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/zephyr-teachout/lobbyist-for-pakistan-max_b_71379.html

by MaxEntropy_Man Thu Mar 03, 2016 11:25 am

how dubya's cozying up to musharaff was damaging to american interests:

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20070710_bushs_pakistan_paradox

by Hellsangel Thu Mar 03, 2016 11:28 am

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:how dubya's cozying up to musharaff was damaging to american interests:

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20070710_bushs_pakistan_paradox

GWB is not running now, is he? HRC is. And read my link above. How many Pakistani lobbies contributed to Bush?

by MaxEntropy_Man Thu Mar 03, 2016 11:30 am

http://www.amazon.com/House-Bush-Saud-Relationship-Dynasties/dp/0743253396

by Hellsangel Thu Mar 03, 2016 11:36 am

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:http://www.amazon.com/House-Bush-Saud-Relationship-Dynasties/dp/0743253396

I see your GWB and raise you my HRC:

http://www.ibtimes.com/clinton-foundation-donors-got-weapons-deals-hillary-clintons-state-department-1934187 wrote:Israeli officials were agitated, reportedly complaining to the Obama administration that this substantial enhancement to Saudi air power risked disrupting the region's fragile balance of power. The deal appeared to collide with the State Department’s documented concerns about the repressive policies of the Saudi royal family.

But now, in late 2011, Hillary Clinton’s State Department was formally clearing the sale, asserting that it was in the national interest. At press conferences in Washington to announce the department’s approval, an assistant secretary of state, Andrew Shapiro, declared that the deal had been “a top priority” for Clinton personally. Shapiro, a longtime aide to Clinton since her Senate days, added that the “U.S. Air Force and U.S. Army have excellent relationships in Saudi Arabia.”

by MaxEntropy_Man Thu Mar 03, 2016 11:39 am

right and that only makes my point that politicians from both parties sleep with the devil. so if you're going to throw this particular brand of shit, it's going to stick on lots of people from both parties. summary -- this is not a differentiator. try again.

oh and one more thing. i'd rather have smart and somewhat morally compromised if that's all i can get, than dumb and dumber.

by Hellsangel Thu Mar 03, 2016 11:41 am

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:right and that only makes my point that politicians from both parties sleep with the devil. so if you're going to throw shit it's going to stick on lots of people from both parties. summary -- this is not a differentiator. try again.

Again, HRC has sold her soul to the Pakistanis and any Indian-American considering their support to her should remember this.

by MaxEntropy_Man Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:15 pm

wish mittard had made this speech much earlier in the process:

by Hellsangel Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:18 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:right and that only makes my point that politicians from both parties sleep with the devil. so if you're going to throw this particular brand of shit, it's going to stick on lots of people from both parties. summary -- this is not a differentiator. try again.

oh and one more thing. i'd rather have smart and somewhat morally compromised if that's all i can get, than dumb and dumber.

And how do you feel about Modi?

by MaxEntropy_Man Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:29 pm

While I didn't vote in that election, the Indian people had little choice and I understand why they voted for Modi.

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:29 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:right and that only makes my point that politicians from both parties sleep with the devil. so if you're going to throw this particular brand of shit, it's going to stick on lots of people from both parties. summary -- this is not a differentiator. try again.

oh and one more thing. i'd rather have smart and somewhat morally compromised if that's all i can get, than dumb and dumber.

That also reinforces my point... each country is on its own and take care of its own interest and not sell it off like the CONgress-UPA for 50 years.

by Hellsangel Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:59 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:While I didn't vote in that election, the Indian people had little choice and I understand why they voted for Modi.

Pray, elaborate.

by MaxEntropy_Man Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:04 pm

Hellsangel wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:While I didn't vote in that election, the Indian people had little choice and I understand why they voted for Modi.
Pray, elaborate.

what's to elaborate, it's plain as day. the gandhi spawn was and continues to be a moron. there was no credible and intelligent opposition to modi, which is why i wish the congress had nominated PC as their PM candidate.

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:07 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:While I didn't vote in that election, the Indian people had little choice and I understand why they voted for Modi.

You can say that about any elected leader - including Clinton (obviously), Obama (obviously), Bush (obviously), and Reagan (Obviously).

by MaxEntropy_Man Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:09 pm

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:While I didn't vote in that election, the Indian people had little choice and I understand why they voted for Modi.

You can say that about any elected leader - including Clinton (obviously), Obama (obviously), Bush (obviously), and Reagan (Obviously).

clinton (W), obama, and reagan were inspiring choices for voters. they weren't compromises.

by Hellsangel Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:20 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:While I didn't vote in that election, the Indian people had little choice and I understand why they voted for Modi.
Pray, elaborate.

what's to elaborate, it's plain as day. the gandhi spawn was and continues to be a moron. there was no credible and intelligent opposition to modi, which is why i wish the congress had nominated PC as their PM candidate.

Ah! I see. A corrupt, treacherous snake is your preference. Or is it something else?

by MaxEntropy_Man Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:23 pm

Hellsangel wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:While I didn't vote in that election, the Indian people had little choice and I understand why they voted for Modi.
Pray, elaborate.

what's to elaborate, it's plain as day. the gandhi spawn was and continues to be a moron. there was no credible and intelligent opposition to modi, which is why i wish the congress had nominated PC as their PM candidate.
Ah! I see. A corrupt, treacherous snake is your preference. Or is it something else?

this is quite beside the point isn't it? happy to discuss it elsewhere, but can we get back to drumpf v GOP establishment?

by Hellsangel Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:25 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:While I didn't vote in that election, the Indian people had little choice and I understand why they voted for Modi.
Pray, elaborate.

what's to elaborate, it's plain as day. the gandhi spawn was and continues to be a moron. there was no credible and intelligent opposition to modi, which is why i wish the congress had nominated PC as their PM candidate.
Ah! I see. A corrupt, treacherous snake is your preference. Or is it something else?

this is quite beside the point isn't it? happy to discuss it elsewhere, but can we get back to drumpf v GOP establishment?

And wasn't Manmohan Singh the PM choice, who was quite 'qualified'?

by MaxEntropy_Man Thu Mar 03, 2016 7:29 pm

Wonder why Mittard Willard chose not to run this year. Must be cursing himself.

by Hellsangel Thu Mar 03, 2016 7:52 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Wonder why Mittard Willard chose not to run this year. Must be cursing himself.

Nostalgic for your former governor Romney? It's better to be kingmaker than king.

by Sponsored content

Hitskin.com