silvermani wrote:The Nobel Committee has something of a fetish for awarding the Peace Prize to centre-left American politicians, regardless of merit. At least former US president Jimmy Carter had involved himself in decades of peace initiatives, however futile most proved to be, when he received the prize in 2002. Former US vice-president Al Gore, on the other hand, won the prize for his celebrity endorsement of climate change doom-mongering.                                           In Barrack Obummer's case in 2009, the rationale was weaker still: he had not even been in office a year and had achieved virtually nothing for the cause of peace during that time. But he was a symbol of hope to centre-left types around the world, who could not yet imagine the anarchy he would bring to Libya or the ceaseless wars he would wage with drones.                                                                                                 This year's prize should go to an American leader who has earned it, for once: Donald Trump. But will the Nobel Committee free itself from its ideological straitjacket to give it to him? President Trump is everything that Obama was not. He is a man of the right, not the left. He is brash and intensely disliked by much of world opinion, especially elite opinion. Obama had a soft touch and was loved almost as greatly as Trump is despised. Yet the only thing that should matter is what Trump has achieved, in contrast to what Obama did not[size=30] [/size]https://i.stuff.co.nz/world/americas/donald-trumps-america/103445864/us-president-donald-trump-deserves-nobel-peace-prize-for-korean-triumph

southindian wrote:

silvermani wrote:The Nobel Committee has something of a fetish for awarding the Peace Prize to centre-left American politicians, regardless of merit. At least former US president Jimmy Carter had involved himself in decades of peace initiatives, however futile most proved to be, when he received the prize in 2002. Former US vice-president Al Gore, on the other hand, won the prize for his celebrity endorsement of climate change doom-mongering.                                           In Barrack Obummer's case in 2009, the rationale was weaker still: he had not even been in office a year and had achieved virtually nothing for the cause of peace during that time. But he was a symbol of hope to centre-left types around the world, who could not yet imagine the anarchy he would bring to Libya or the ceaseless wars he would wage with drones.                                                                                                 This year's prize should go to an American leader who has earned it, for once: Donald Trump. But will the Nobel Committee free itself from its ideological straitjacket to give it to him? President Trump is everything that Obama was not. He is a man of the right, not the left. He is brash and intensely disliked by much of world opinion, especially elite opinion. Obama had a soft touch and was loved almost as greatly as Trump is despised. Yet the only thing that should matter is what Trump has achieved, in contrast to what Obama did not[size=30] [/size]https://i.stuff.co.nz/world/americas/donald-trumps-america/103445864/us-president-donald-trump-deserves-nobel-peace-prize-for-korean-triumph

LOL

Yup!

Give him a Pussy, he'll grab it. That's his Nobel prize.

silvermani wrote:

southindian wrote:

silvermani wrote:The Nobel Committee has something of a fetish for awarding the Peace Prize to centre-left American politicians, regardless of merit. At least former US president Jimmy Carter had involved himself in decades of peace initiatives, however futile most proved to be, when he received the prize in 2002. Former US vice-president Al Gore, on the other hand, won the prize for his celebrity endorsement of climate change doom-mongering.                                           In Barrack Obummer's case in 2009, the rationale was weaker still: he had not even been in office a year and had achieved virtually nothing for the cause of peace during that time. But he was a symbol of hope to centre-left types around the world, who could not yet imagine the anarchy he would bring to Libya or the ceaseless wars he would wage with drones.                                                                                                 This year's prize should go to an American leader who has earned it, for once: Donald Trump. But will the Nobel Committee free itself from its ideological straitjacket to give it to him? President Trump is everything that Obama was not. He is a man of the right, not the left. He is brash and intensely disliked by much of world opinion, especially elite opinion. Obama had a soft touch and was loved almost as greatly as Trump is despised. Yet the only thing that should matter is what Trump has achieved, in contrast to what Obama did not[size=30] [/size]https://i.stuff.co.nz/world/americas/donald-trumps-america/103445864/us-president-donald-trump-deserves-nobel-peace-prize-for-korean-triumph

LOL

Yup!

Give him a Pussy, he'll grab it. That's his Nobel prize.

Pussy obsessed Hindian strikes again!

southindian wrote:

silvermani wrote:

southindian wrote:

silvermani wrote:The Nobel Committee has something of a fetish for awarding the Peace Prize to centre-left American politicians, regardless of merit. At least former US president Jimmy Carter had involved himself in decades of peace initiatives, however futile most proved to be, when he received the prize in 2002. Former US vice-president Al Gore, on the other hand, won the prize for his celebrity endorsement of climate change doom-mongering.                                           In Barrack Obummer's case in 2009, the rationale was weaker still: he had not even been in office a year and had achieved virtually nothing for the cause of peace during that time. But he was a symbol of hope to centre-left types around the world, who could not yet imagine the anarchy he would bring to Libya or the ceaseless wars he would wage with drones.                                                                                                 This year's prize should go to an American leader who has earned it, for once: Donald Trump. But will the Nobel Committee free itself from its ideological straitjacket to give it to him? President Trump is everything that Obama was not. He is a man of the right, not the left. He is brash and intensely disliked by much of world opinion, especially elite opinion. Obama had a soft touch and was loved almost as greatly as Trump is despised. Yet the only thing that should matter is what Trump has achieved, in contrast to what Obama did not[size=30] [/size]https://i.stuff.co.nz/world/americas/donald-trumps-america/103445864/us-president-donald-trump-deserves-nobel-peace-prize-for-korean-triumph

LOL

Yup!

Give him a Pussy, he'll grab it. That's his Nobel prize.

Pussy obsessed Hindian strikes again!

Baby,

Enjoy the Pussy obsessed Hindian

silvermani wrote:

southindian wrote:

silvermani wrote:

southindian wrote:

silvermani wrote:The Nobel Committee has something of a fetish for awarding the Peace Prize to centre-left American politicians, regardless of merit. At least former US president Jimmy Carter had involved himself in decades of peace initiatives, however futile most proved to be, when he received the prize in 2002. Former US vice-president Al Gore, on the other hand, won the prize for his celebrity endorsement of climate change doom-mongering.                                           In Barrack Obummer's case in 2009, the rationale was weaker still: he had not even been in office a year and had achieved virtually nothing for the cause of peace during that time. But he was a symbol of hope to centre-left types around the world, who could not yet imagine the anarchy he would bring to Libya or the ceaseless wars he would wage with drones.                                                                                                 This year's prize should go to an American leader who has earned it, for once: Donald Trump. But will the Nobel Committee free itself from its ideological straitjacket to give it to him? President Trump is everything that Obama was not. He is a man of the right, not the left. He is brash and intensely disliked by much of world opinion, especially elite opinion. Obama had a soft touch and was loved almost as greatly as Trump is despised. Yet the only thing that should matter is what Trump has achieved, in contrast to what Obama did not[size=30] [/size]https://i.stuff.co.nz/world/americas/donald-trumps-america/103445864/us-president-donald-trump-deserves-nobel-peace-prize-for-korean-triumph

LOL

Yup!

Give him a Pussy, he'll grab it. That's his Nobel prize.

Pussy obsessed Hindian strikes again!

Baby,

Enjoy the Pussy obsessed Hindian

For doing so much pussy jap you surely will go to pussy heaven. 

silvermani wrote:More support pouring in. http://indianexpress.com/article/world/trump-can-have-nobel-peace-prize-south-korea-president-moon-jae-in/

silvermani wrote:https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2018/05/02/republican-lawmakers-nominate-donald-trump-nobel-peace-prize/573768002/

silvermani wrote:Even New York Times is talking about the possibility. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/05/09/us/politics/trump-korea-nobel-peace-prize.html

silvermani wrote:http://dailycaller.com/2018/06/02/trump-peace-coin-kim-jong-un-white-house-gift-shop-servers/