This is a Hitskin.com skin preview
Install the skin • Return to the skin page
Gems we are missing from Sulekha
+5
Hellsangel
ashaNirasha
Rekz
CroMagnon
Mosquito
9 posters
Page 1 of 1
Gems we are missing from Sulekha
From Sandilya
He will rationally announce that sex is a mechanical event and all the emotional hype on romance is mental weakness: http://www.ndtv.com/article/world/no-heaven-no-afterlife-says-stephen-hawking-106120
http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/hawking-joins-carvakavaka-forum-1116783.htm#1116799
From Maria
Apparently our comments were so fabulous in Sandilya's thread...someone had to erase it! One more time...I would rather listen to 5 (made it 5 this time) mins of Chopra than 2 mins of Hawking...if Deepak ever says sex is just a mechanical event..he would be downgraded to Hawking's 2 mins. M
http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/chopra-and-hawking-1116803.htm#1116803
He will rationally announce that sex is a mechanical event and all the emotional hype on romance is mental weakness: http://www.ndtv.com/article/world/no-heaven-no-afterlife-says-stephen-hawking-106120
http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/hawking-joins-carvakavaka-forum-1116783.htm#1116799
From Maria
Apparently our comments were so fabulous in Sandilya's thread...someone had to erase it! One more time...I would rather listen to 5 (made it 5 this time) mins of Chopra than 2 mins of Hawking...if Deepak ever says sex is just a mechanical event..he would be downgraded to Hawking's 2 mins. M
http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/chopra-and-hawking-1116803.htm#1116803
Mosquito- Posts : 706
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha
Sandilya hypothesizes what Hawking will say about sex and romance and Maria pronounces judgement on him based on Sandilya's assumptions.
Morons!
No wonder you find Jerry Springer entertaining too!
Morons!
PseudoIntellectual wrote:Gems we are missing from Sulekha
No wonder you find Jerry Springer entertaining too!
CroMagnon- Posts : 418
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha
Gems as in...Ginger eating monkeys?????
Rekz- Posts : 1086
Join date : 2011-04-30
Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha
PI - are you feeling ok about this? As your well wisher, just making sure you are ok...
http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/are-you-serious-of-course-not-1116827.htm#1116827
http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/are-you-serious-of-course-not-1116827.htm#1116827
Guest- Guest
Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha
Maria, like any politician, has successfully made many such u-turns. She first panders to all and sundry and when cornered she comes out saying it was all a joke (remember that thread about a 100+ man marrying a 17 yr. old?).Tracy Whitney wrote:PI - are you feeling ok about this? As your well wisher, just making sure you are ok...
http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/are-you-serious-of-course-not-1116827.htm#1116827
CroMagnon- Posts : 418
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha
We need a sticky for Maria on this forum.
She is the new Muthukumar of old CH. She's taken it over completely.
She is the new Muthukumar of old CH. She's taken it over completely.
ashaNirasha- Posts : 362
Join date : 2011-05-09
Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha
ashaNirasha wrote:We need a sticky for Maria on this forum.
There have been more topics about Queer Bee - why this preferential treatment to M?
CroMagnon- Posts : 418
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha
Because I think M is way more popular than the other. And then, there's the issue of guaranteed response, one way or the other.
ashaNirasha- Posts : 362
Join date : 2011-05-09
Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha
ashaNirasha wrote:Because I think M is way more popular than the other. And then, there's the issue of guaranteed response, one way or the other.
I think you are underestimating the notoriety of Queer Bee. But I agree, Maria's sticky will generate more traffic in the long run since nobody on this forum disagrees about the former.
CroMagnon- Posts : 418
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha
i am convinced no more people will be joining us here from old CH. not maria not kripa or sara boji qb ts. this is just not the same without them. i am losing interest fast **sigh**
oh maybe tineka and andrea when they come back to find sulekha CH dead
oh maybe tineka and andrea when they come back to find sulekha CH dead
Guest- Guest
Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha
PI, what you are doing is simply accentuating the self-importance of the very people you like to mock.
Hellsangel- Posts : 14721
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha
No one. We posted a sign outside that said "Strictly no soliciting".Sasthi wrote:Who is hawking?
Hellsangel- Posts : 14721
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha
PI, your posts are also gems in the same vein.
Propagandhi711- Posts : 6941
Join date : 2011-04-29
Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha
Hellsangel wrote:PI, what you are doing is simply accentuating the self-importance of the very people you like to mock.
Worth mocking=important.
Mosquito- Posts : 706
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha
Propagandhi711 wrote:PI, your posts are also gems in the same vein.
But mine pale in comparison to your posts of sexual fantasies.
Mosquito- Posts : 706
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha
Are you saying that the people you mock are important?PseudoIntellectual wrote:Hellsangel wrote:PI, what you are doing is simply accentuating the self-importance of the very people you like to mock.
Worth mocking=important.
Hellsangel- Posts : 14721
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha
yeah well, mine actually say something.
Propagandhi711- Posts : 6941
Join date : 2011-04-29
Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha
seven wrote:i am convinced no more people will be joining us here from old CH. not maria not kripa or sara boji qb ts. this is just not the same without them. i am losing interest fast **sigh**
oh maybe tineka and andrea when they come back to find sulekha CH dead
i thought sambarvada was sara boji. no?
Guest- Guest
Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha
I think so. I don't think Brahma made two of those.nutmeg wrote:seven wrote:i am convinced no more people will be joining us here from old CH. not maria not kripa or sara boji qb ts. this is just not the same without them. i am losing interest fast **sigh**
oh maybe tineka and andrea when they come back to find sulekha CH dead
i thought sambarvada was sara boji. no?
charvaka- Posts : 4347
Join date : 2011-04-28
Location : Berkeley, CA
Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha
PseudoIntellectual wrote:From Sandilya
He will rationally announce that sex is a mechanical event and all the emotional hype on romance is mental weakness: http://www.ndtv.com/article/world/no-heaven-no-afterlife-says-stephen-hawking-106120
http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/hawking-joins-carvakavaka-forum-1116783.htm#1116799
From Maria
Apparently our comments were so fabulous in Sandilya's thread...someone had to erase it! One more time...I would rather listen to 5 (made it 5 this time) mins of Chopra than 2 mins of Hawking...if Deepak ever says sex is just a mechanical event..he would be downgraded to Hawking's 2 mins. M
http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/chopra-and-hawking-1116803.htm#1116803
Seems like they are playing "Dumb, Dumber, Dumbest" game on Sulekha CH. The retraction was hilarious.
Who needs Deepak Chopra when there is Sulekha CH!
Guest- Guest
Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha
This is classic guruvu-gaaru. He imagined the sex comment when Hawking made none. And Maria painstakingly commented twice assuming Hawking had made such a comment and even speculating what she would do if Deepak Chopra makes such a comment -- both times jokingly of course! This is CH comedy gold.PseudoIntellectual wrote:From Sandilya
He will rationally announce that sex is a mechanical event and all the emotional hype on romance is mental weakness: http://www.ndtv.com/article/world/no-heaven-no-afterlife-says-stephen-hawking-106120
http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/hawking-joins-carvakavaka-forum-1116783.htm#1116799
From Maria
Apparently our comments were so fabulous in Sandilya's thread...someone had to erase it! One more time...I would rather listen to 5 (made it 5 this time) mins of Chopra than 2 mins of Hawking...if Deepak ever says sex is just a mechanical event..he would be downgraded to Hawking's 2 mins. M
http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/chopra-and-hawking-1116803.htm#1116803
charvaka- Posts : 4347
Join date : 2011-04-28
Location : Berkeley, CA
Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha
nothing more frustrating than to see a person replacing his original post with "deleted". you know there was a post made that you could have read, but now you cannot. agony X 10. it is much easier on the readers when one actually deletes a post.
Another Brick- Posts : 1495
Join date : 2011-05-02
Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha
i will avoid "deleting" for i agree with you. in my post i had given options to seven, viz. other sites she could consider if she was looking for a change. seven expresses disenchantment above. later (within ten mins.), i realized that my post could be read as being unnecessarily hostile.
Guest- Guest
Similar topics
» MH 370 - a nice read about his missing wife from his missing life
» Sulekha Founder dines at the famous Nizam's club in Hyderabad with Sulekha bloggers
» A brief history of Sulekha CH part 8: Sulekha Peril
» gulzar gems
» gems from comrade prakash karat
» Sulekha Founder dines at the famous Nizam's club in Hyderabad with Sulekha bloggers
» A brief history of Sulekha CH part 8: Sulekha Peril
» gulzar gems
» gems from comrade prakash karat
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum