Rashmun wrote:

Vidya, whose name? you have been posting under various handles now and it is amusing to see you asking other people to be bold.

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya, whose name? you have been posting under various handles now and it is amusing to see you asking other people to be bold.

what various handles? You mean all at the same time? I have used one handle at a time, ever since Jan 2009, and have made no attempt to hide them.

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya, whose name? you have been posting under various handles now and it is amusing to see you asking other people to be bold.

what various handles? You mean all at the same time? I have used one handle at a time, ever since Jan 2009, and have made no attempt to hide them.

have you declared anywhere on this forum that you were earlier posting as Natalia Romanova?

Vidya Bagchi wrote:1) it was obvious within 3 posts.

2) when someone asked, I replied - 'koi shaq', instead of denying. I deleted that post later.

3) most posters asked me on chat, and I said yes. others didn't even need to.

4) people called my handles tracy or nats, and I replied their queries.

Vidya Bagchi wrote:1) it was obvious within 3 posts.

2) when someone asked, I replied - 'koi shaq', instead of denying. I deleted that post later.

3) most posters asked me on chat, and I said yes. others didn't even need to.

4) people called my handles tracy or nats, and I replied their queries.

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:1) it was obvious within 3 posts.

2) when someone asked, I replied - 'koi shaq', instead of denying. I deleted that post later.

3) most posters asked me on chat, and I said yes. others didn't even need to.

4) people called my handles tracy or nats, and I replied their queries.

1. it was not .
2. did not see your post which you now claim you deleted.
3. have not visited chat for a long time.
4. the ambiguity remains.

the fact remains that you have no right to accuse someone of lack of boldness when you are yourself extraordinarily timid.

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:1) it was obvious within 3 posts.

2) when someone asked, I replied - 'koi shaq', instead of denying. I deleted that post later.

3) most posters asked me on chat, and I said yes. others didn't even need to.

4) people called my handles tracy or nats, and I replied their queries.

1. it was not .
2. did not see your post which you now claim you deleted.
3. have not visited chat for a long time.
4. the ambiguity remains.

the fact remains that you have no right to accuse someone of lack of boldness when you are yourself extraordinarily timid.

1. to duds like u perhaps.

2. not my fault.

3. you may be lying.

4. *shrug*

the fact remains that i can accuse anyone of anything that i wanna.

Rashmun wrote:
the fact remains that you did not announce publicly about your change of handle on this forum. you can call me whatever you wish to but you cannot accuse people of lack of boldness because you are yourself timid.

Vidya Bagchi wrote:the fact remains that i can accuse anyone of anything that i wanna.

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:the fact remains that i can accuse anyone of anything that i wanna.

If you accuse people of lack of boldness you will only end up with egg on your face.

On another note I am touched by your affection for Bittu. Even though he was clearly in the wrong you came forward to be his shield.

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:the fact remains that i can accuse anyone of anything that i wanna.

If you accuse people of lack of boldness you will only end up with egg on your face.

On another note I am touched by your affection for Bittu. Even though he was clearly in the wrong you came forward to be his shield.

no egg anywhere. You saying so doesn't count unless u prove any timidity factor in my handle change.

Also, let's be clear here. 1) I have never come forward to be anybody's shield on ch, and never will. 2) I don't think anyone here needs one.

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:the fact remains that i can accuse anyone of anything that i wanna.

If you accuse people of lack of boldness you will only end up with egg on your face.

On another note I am touched by your affection for Bittu. Even though he was clearly in the wrong you came forward to be his shield.

no egg anywhere. You saying so doesn't count unless u prove any timidity factor in my handle change.

Also, let's be clear here. 1) I have never come forward to be anybody's shield on ch, and never will. 2) I don't think anyone here needs one.

You accused people of lack of boldness when you yourself prefer to keep changing your handles. You claim that you admitted to having posted under your previous handle but then deleted that post. That is sufficient evidence to show that you are timid.

On another note, did you receive an expensive Christmas present from Bittu this year? That would explain why you came forward to defend his sexist and anti woman views.

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:the fact remains that i can accuse anyone of anything that i wanna.

If you accuse people of lack of boldness you will only end up with egg on your face.

On another note I am touched by your affection for Bittu. Even though he was clearly in the wrong you came forward to be his shield.

no egg anywhere. You saying so doesn't count unless u prove any timidity factor in my handle change.

Also, let's be clear here. 1) I have never come forward to be anybody's shield on ch, and never will. 2) I don't think anyone here needs one.

You accused people of lack of boldness when you yourself prefer to keep changing your handles. You claim that you admitted to having posted under your previous handle but then deleted that post. That is sufficient evidence to show that you are timid.

On another note, did you receive an expensive Christmas present from Bittu this year? That would explain why you came forward to defend his sexist and anti woman views.

not happy with your proof. please do better.

i pointed out something in max's post. please prove how it was for bittu's defense.

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:


If you accuse people of lack of boldness you will only end up with egg on your face.

On another note I am touched by your affection for Bittu. Even though he was clearly in the wrong you came forward to be his shield.

no egg anywhere. You saying so doesn't count unless u prove any timidity factor in my handle change.

Also, let's be clear here. 1) I have never come forward to be anybody's shield on ch, and never will. 2) I don't think anyone here needs one.

You accused people of lack of boldness when you yourself prefer to keep changing your handles. You claim that you admitted to having posted under your previous handle but then deleted that post. That is sufficient evidence to show that you are timid.

On another note, did you receive an expensive Christmas present from Bittu this year? That would explain why you came forward to defend his sexist and anti woman views.

not happy with your proof. please do better.

i pointed out something in max's post. please prove how it was for bittu's defense.

My proof is good enough. You post using various handles and admit to deleting the post where you revealed your previous handle. A person like you has no right to accuse others of lack of boldness.

W.r.t. Bittu you came forward to defend Bittu's claim that he wanted to essentially rape some female posters after knocking them unconscious using chloroform. Women like you are the worst enemies of women.

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

no egg anywhere. You saying so doesn't count unless u prove any timidity factor in my handle change.

Also, let's be clear here. 1) I have never come forward to be anybody's shield on ch, and never will. 2) I don't think anyone here needs one.

You accused people of lack of boldness when you yourself prefer to keep changing your handles. You claim that you admitted to having posted under your previous handle but then deleted that post. That is sufficient evidence to show that you are timid.

On another note, did you receive an expensive Christmas present from Bittu this year? That would explain why you came forward to defend his sexist and anti woman views.

not happy with your proof. please do better.

i pointed out something in max's post. please prove how it was for bittu's defense.

My proof is good enough. You post using various handles and admit to deleting the post where you revealed your previous handle. A person like you has no right to accuse others of lack of boldness.

W.r.t. Bittu you came forward to defend Bittu's claim that he wanted to essentially rape some female posters after knocking them unconscious using chloroform. Women like you are the worst enemies of women.

Your proof is not good enough to prove my handle change lacks in boldness. Sorry to burst it for you.

Max had three guesses and opinions on Bittu's picture. I chose one of those 3 reasons, which I thought was right. If you expect all women to boil at the word chloroform, then it's your issue.

Besides, I said you may be lying about not visiting http://ch.chaikaapi.com/chat/. You never refuted it. What should I assume? When did you got on there last, and using what handle. Please clarify, not that you have to.

Also, what do you have to say about upps claim of YOUR using another handle here? You cannot call me timid for ANY reason if you have posted in various handles here. I mean, using your logic.

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

You accused people of lack of boldness when you yourself prefer to keep changing your handles. You claim that you admitted to having posted under your previous handle but then deleted that post. That is sufficient evidence to show that you are timid.

On another note, did you receive an expensive Christmas present from Bittu this year? That would explain why you came forward to defend his sexist and anti woman views.

not happy with your proof. please do better.

i pointed out something in max's post. please prove how it was for bittu's defense.

My proof is good enough. You post using various handles and admit to deleting the post where you revealed your previous handle. A person like you has no right to accuse others of lack of boldness.

W.r.t. Bittu you came forward to defend Bittu's claim that he wanted to essentially rape some female posters after knocking them unconscious using chloroform. Women like you are the worst enemies of women.

Your proof is not good enough to prove my handle change lacks in boldness. Sorry to burst it for you.

Max had three guesses and opinions on Bittu's picture. I chose one of those 3 reasons, which I thought was right. If you expect all women to boil at the word chloroform, then it's your issue.

Besides, I said you may be lying about not visiting http://ch.chaikaapi.com/chat/. You never refuted it. What should I assume? When did you got on there last, and using what handle. Please clarify, not that you have to.

Also, what do you have to say about upps claim of YOUR using another handle here? You cannot call me timid for ANY reason if you have posted in various handles here. I mean, using your logic.

This thread is about you and your idiotic behavior. With respect to your questions: I have not visited chat for a long time now. I see no reason why I should be more specific than this. Also I have only posted using one handle on this forum.

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

not happy with your proof. please do better.

i pointed out something in max's post. please prove how it was for bittu's defense.

My proof is good enough. You post using various handles and admit to deleting the post where you revealed your previous handle. A person like you has no right to accuse others of lack of boldness.

W.r.t. Bittu you came forward to defend Bittu's claim that he wanted to essentially rape some female posters after knocking them unconscious using chloroform. Women like you are the worst enemies of women.

Your proof is not good enough to prove my handle change lacks in boldness. Sorry to burst it for you.

Max had three guesses and opinions on Bittu's picture. I chose one of those 3 reasons, which I thought was right. If you expect all women to boil at the word chloroform, then it's your issue.

Besides, I said you may be lying about not visiting http://ch.chaikaapi.com/chat/. You never refuted it. What should I assume? When did you got on there last, and using what handle. Please clarify, not that you have to.

Also, what do you have to say about upps claim of YOUR using another handle here? You cannot call me timid for ANY reason if you have posted in various handles here. I mean, using your logic.

This thread is about you and your idiotic behavior. With respect to your questions: I have not visited chat for a long time now. I see no reason why I should be more specific than this. Also I have only posted using one handle on this forum.

This is funny, coz so far I was treating this thread as your idiotic behavior. That's why I started it in the first place.

You may still be lying regarding chat, unless proven otherwise.

I have posted on this forum one handle at a time. Am I now bold like you or not?

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

My proof is good enough. You post using various handles and admit to deleting the post where you revealed your previous handle. A person like you has no right to accuse others of lack of boldness.

W.r.t. Bittu you came forward to defend Bittu's claim that he wanted to essentially rape some female posters after knocking them unconscious using chloroform. Women like you are the worst enemies of women.

Your proof is not good enough to prove my handle change lacks in boldness. Sorry to burst it for you.

Max had three guesses and opinions on Bittu's picture. I chose one of those 3 reasons, which I thought was right. If you expect all women to boil at the word chloroform, then it's your issue.

Besides, I said you may be lying about not visiting http://ch.chaikaapi.com/chat/. You never refuted it. What should I assume? When did you got on there last, and using what handle. Please clarify, not that you have to.

Also, what do you have to say about upps claim of YOUR using another handle here? You cannot call me timid for ANY reason if you have posted in various handles here. I mean, using your logic.

This thread is about you and your idiotic behavior. With respect to your questions: I have not visited chat for a long time now. I see no reason why I should be more specific than this. Also I have only posted using one handle on this forum.

This is funny, coz so far I was treating this thread as your idiotic behavior. That's why I started it in the first place.

You may still be lying regarding chat, unless proven otherwise.

I have posted on this forum one handle at a time. Am I now bold like you or not?

Had you really bold you would not have deleted the post in which you admitted to posting under your previous handle. The fact that you are an idiot was proven when you publicly announced on this forum that your marriage had failed. I recall reprimanding you and telling you that nobody here is interested in your married or sex life.

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:


Your proof is not good enough to prove my handle change lacks in boldness. Sorry to burst it for you.

Max had three guesses and opinions on Bittu's picture. I chose one of those 3 reasons, which I thought was right. If you expect all women to boil at the word chloroform, then it's your issue.

Besides, I said you may be lying about not visiting http://ch.chaikaapi.com/chat/. You never refuted it. What should I assume? When did you got on there last, and using what handle. Please clarify, not that you have to.

Also, what do you have to say about upps claim of YOUR using another handle here? You cannot call me timid for ANY reason if you have posted in various handles here. I mean, using your logic.

This thread is about you and your idiotic behavior. With respect to your questions: I have not visited chat for a long time now. I see no reason why I should be more specific than this. Also I have only posted using one handle on this forum.

This is funny, coz so far I was treating this thread as your idiotic behavior. That's why I started it in the first place.

You may still be lying regarding chat, unless proven otherwise.

I have posted on this forum one handle at a time. Am I now bold like you or not?

Had you really bold you would not have deleted the post in which you admitted to posting under your previous handle. The fact that you are an idiot was proven when you publicly announced on this forum that your marriage had failed. I recall reprimanding you and telling you that nobody here is interested in your married or sex life.

I delete all the posts that I can after a couple of days. That's simply following my own rule.

What part about my declaring of my failed marriage was idiotic? That it failed, or that I shared something private here? Do you think idiots fail in marriage, or do you think only idiots talk in public about their failed marriages?

Why do you think no one here is interested in my married or sex life? Why do you think I should care? And who the heck are you to 'reprimand' me?

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

This thread is about you and your idiotic behavior. With respect to your questions: I have not visited chat for a long time now. I see no reason why I should be more specific than this. Also I have only posted using one handle on this forum.

This is funny, coz so far I was treating this thread as your idiotic behavior. That's why I started it in the first place.

You may still be lying regarding chat, unless proven otherwise.

I have posted on this forum one handle at a time. Am I now bold like you or not?

Had you really bold you would not have deleted the post in which you admitted to posting under your previous handle. The fact that you are an idiot was proven when you publicly announced on this forum that your marriage had failed. I recall reprimanding you and telling you that nobody here is interested in your married or sex life.

I delete all the posts that I can after a couple of days. That's simply following my own rule.

What part about my declaring of my failed marriage was idiotic? That it failed, or that I shared something private here? Do you think idiots fail in marriage, or do you think only idiots talk in public about their failed marriages?

Why do you think no one here is interested in my married or sex life? Why do you think I should care? And who the heck are you to 'reprimand' me?

On this forum it is not possible to delete your posts after two days after someone has responded to any post in the thread where you posted.

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

This is funny, coz so far I was treating this thread as your idiotic behavior. That's why I started it in the first place.

You may still be lying regarding chat, unless proven otherwise.

I have posted on this forum one handle at a time. Am I now bold like you or not?

Had you really bold you would not have deleted the post in which you admitted to posting under your previous handle. The fact that you are an idiot was proven when you publicly announced on this forum that your marriage had failed. I recall reprimanding you and telling you that nobody here is interested in your married or sex life.

I delete all the posts that I can after a couple of days. That's simply following my own rule.

What part about my declaring of my failed marriage was idiotic? That it failed, or that I shared something private here? Do you think idiots fail in marriage, or do you think only idiots talk in public about their failed marriages?

Why do you think no one here is interested in my married or sex life? Why do you think I should care? And who the heck are you to 'reprimand' me?

On this forum it is not possible to delete your posts after two days after someone has responded to any post in the thread where you posted.

I delete all the posts that I can after a couple of days. That's simply following my own rule.

What part about my declaring of my failed marriage was idiotic? That it failed, or that I shared something private here? Do you think idiots fail in marriage, or do you think only idiots talk in public about their failed marriages?

Why do you think no one here is interested in my married or sex life? Why do you think I should care? And who the heck are you to 'reprimand' me?

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Had you really bold you would not have deleted the post in which you admitted to posting under your previous handle. The fact that you are an idiot was proven when you publicly announced on this forum that your marriage had failed. I recall reprimanding you and telling you that nobody here is interested in your married or sex life.

I delete all the posts that I can after a couple of days. That's simply following my own rule.

What part about my declaring of my failed marriage was idiotic? That it failed, or that I shared something private here? Do you think idiots fail in marriage, or do you think only idiots talk in public about their failed marriages?

Why do you think no one here is interested in my married or sex life? Why do you think I should care? And who the heck are you to 'reprimand' me?

On this forum it is not possible to delete your posts after two days after someone has responded to any post in the thread where you posted.

I delete all the posts that I can after a couple of days. That's simply following my own rule.

What part about my declaring of my failed marriage was idiotic? That it failed, or that I shared something private here? Do you think idiots fail in marriage, or do you think only idiots talk in public about their failed marriages?

Why do you think no one here is interested in my married or sex life? Why do you think I should care? And who the heck are you to 'reprimand' me?

Are you now claiming nobody made a single post after you posted on that thread (where you admitted to posting using your previous handle) so that you were able to delete your post after two days of making it?

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

I delete all the posts that I can after a couple of days. That's simply following my own rule.

What part about my declaring of my failed marriage was idiotic? That it failed, or that I shared something private here? Do you think idiots fail in marriage, or do you think only idiots talk in public about their failed marriages?

Why do you think no one here is interested in my married or sex life? Why do you think I should care? And who the heck are you to 'reprimand' me?

On this forum it is not possible to delete your posts after two days after someone has responded to any post in the thread where you posted.

I delete all the posts that I can after a couple of days. That's simply following my own rule.

What part about my declaring of my failed marriage was idiotic? That it failed, or that I shared something private here? Do you think idiots fail in marriage, or do you think only idiots talk in public about their failed marriages?

Why do you think no one here is interested in my married or sex life? Why do you think I should care? And who the heck are you to 'reprimand' me?

Are you now claiming nobody made a single post after you posted on that thread (where you admitted to posting using your previous handle) so that you were able to delete your post after two days of making it?

Yes, no one made a single post on that thread after I did. I deleted it anywhere from 1 to 3 days later.

What part about my declaring of my failed marriage was idiotic? That it failed, or that I shared something private here? Do you think idiots fail in marriage, or do you think only idiots talk in public about their failed marriages?

Why do you think no one here is interested in my married or sex life? Why do you think I should care? And who the heck are you to 'reprimand' me?

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

On this forum it is not possible to delete your posts after two days after someone has responded to any post in the thread where you posted.

There were 30+ more reads after my post. sufficient enough for me to know people read that.

now r u just too timid to answer my questions

I delete all the posts that I can after a couple of days. That's simply following my own rule.

What part about my declaring of my failed marriage was idiotic? That it failed, or that I shared something private here? Do you think idiots fail in marriage, or do you think only idiots talk in public about their failed marriages?

Why do you think no one here is interested in my married or sex life? Why do you think I should care? And who the heck are you to 'reprimand' me?

Are you now claiming nobody made a single post after you posted on that thread (where you admitted to posting using your previous handle) so that you were able to delete your post after two days of making it?

Yes, no one made a single post on that thread after I did. I deleted it anywhere from 1 to 3 days later.

What part about my declaring of my failed marriage was idiotic? That it failed, or that I shared something private here? Do you think idiots fail in marriage, or do you think only idiots talk in public about their failed marriages?

Why do you think no one here is interested in my married or sex life? Why do you think I should care? And who the heck are you to 'reprimand' me?

Why did you delete a post in which you had revealed the previous handle you used for posting here. Surely you would have wanted everyone here to know about your handle unless you are timid and felt the need to delete the post where you disclosed your previous handle here.

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

There were 30+ more reads after my post. sufficient enough for me to know people read that.

now r u just too timid to answer my questions

I delete all the posts that I can after a couple of days. That's simply following my own rule.

What part about my declaring of my failed marriage was idiotic? That it failed, or that I shared something private here? Do you think idiots fail in marriage, or do you think only idiots talk in public about their failed marriages?

Why do you think no one here is interested in my married or sex life? Why do you think I should care? And who the heck are you to 'reprimand' me?

Are you now claiming nobody made a single post after you posted on that thread (where you admitted to posting using your previous handle) so that you were able to delete your post after two days of making it?

Yes, no one made a single post on that thread after I did. I deleted it anywhere from 1 to 3 days later.

What part about my declaring of my failed marriage was idiotic? That it failed, or that I shared something private here? Do you think idiots fail in marriage, or do you think only idiots talk in public about their failed marriages?

Why do you think no one here is interested in my married or sex life? Why do you think I should care? And who the heck are you to 'reprimand' me?

Why did you delete a post in which you had revealed the previous handle you used for posting here. Surely you would have wanted everyone here to know about your handle unless you are timid and felt the need to delete the post where you disclosed your previous handle here.

30+ reads after my post was sufficient enough to know many people read that.

now your turn to reply here:

What part about my declaring of my failed marriage was idiotic? That it failed, or that I shared something private here? Do you think idiots fail in marriage, or do you think only idiots talk in public about their failed marriages?

Why do you think no one here is interested in my married or sex life? Why do you think I should care? And who the heck are you to 'reprimand' me?

Vidya Bagchi wrote:Rashmun, you have no rights to say I am too timid to call max timid.

you sneaked on chat without letting people know what handle you were hiding behind. people learned about it only when you could not contain your excitement about posting about the chat here.

yep, that proves you are timid. but since u are calling me timid, it proves i can call Max timid too.

you timid
i timid
max timid

phew. case closed.

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:Rashmun, you have no rights to say I am too timid to call max timid.

you sneaked on chat without letting people know what handle you were hiding behind. people learned about it only when you could not contain your excitement about posting about the chat here.

yep, that proves you are timid. but since u are calling me timid, it proves i can call Max timid too.

you timid
i timid
max timid

phew. case closed.

Chat is on a different website. Many People have different handles on chat from the ones they use in forum posts.

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:Rashmun, you have no rights to say I am too timid to call max timid.

you sneaked on chat without letting people know what handle you were hiding behind. people learned about it only when you could not contain your excitement about posting about the chat here.

yep, that proves you are timid. but since u are calling me timid, it proves i can call Max timid too.

you timid
i timid
max timid

phew. case closed.

Chat is on a different website. Many People have different handles on chat from the ones they use in forum posts.

what handle did you use when you were sneaking on md-upps convo?

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:Rashmun, you have no rights to say I am too timid to call max timid.

you sneaked on chat without letting people know what handle you were hiding behind. people learned about it only when you could not contain your excitement about posting about the chat here.

yep, that proves you are timid. but since u are calling me timid, it proves i can call Max timid too.

you timid
i timid
max timid

phew. case closed.

Chat is on a different website. Many People have different handles on chat from the ones they use in forum posts.

what handle did you use when you were sneaking on md-upps convo?

I do not respond to questions about my identity on chat on this forum. I treat chat as a different site.

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:Rashmun, you have no rights to say I am too timid to call max timid.

you sneaked on chat without letting people know what handle you were hiding behind. people learned about it only when you could not contain your excitement about posting about the chat here.

yep, that proves you are timid. but since u are calling me timid, it proves i can call Max timid too.

you timid
i timid
max timid

phew. case closed.

Chat is on a different website. Many People have different handles on chat from the ones they use in forum posts.

what handle did you use when you were sneaking on md-upps convo?

I do not respond to questions about my identity on chat on this forum. I treat chat as a different site.

lame excuse. when you can post about chat here, means it's only expected you let other chatters know. or else, u proven timid.

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Chat is on a different website. Many People have different handles on chat from the ones they use in forum posts.

what handle did you use when you were sneaking on md-upps convo?

I do not respond to questions about my identity on chat on this forum. I treat chat as a different site.

lame excuse. when you can post about chat here, means it's only expected you let other chatters know. or else, u proven timid.

I mentioned on the thread on what Uppili said on chat that this was an exception and that ordinarily what is said on chat should not be referred to in forum discussions.

As mentioned earlier many people posting on this forum have a different handle on chat.

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

what handle did you use when you were sneaking on md-upps convo?

I do not respond to questions about my identity on chat on this forum. I treat chat as a different site.

lame excuse. when you can post about chat here, means it's only expected you let other chatters know. or else, u proven timid.

I mentioned on the thread on what Uppili said on chat that this was an exception and that ordinarily what is said on chat should not be referred to in forum discussions.

As mentioned earlier many people posting on this forum have a different handle on chat.

but they all reveal it. what's your hesitation?

Propagandhi711 wrote:Gee when I saw the title I thought this would be another long, boring and pointless thread with the subject displaying his particular brand of mental illness pretending to be a scholar. Wish I could say I was disappointed.

Propagandhi711 wrote:Gee when I saw the title I thought this would be another long, boring and pointless thread with the subject displaying his particular brand of mental illness pretending to be a scholar. Wish I could say I was disappointed.

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:Gee when I saw the title I thought this would be another long, boring and pointless thread with the subject displaying his particular brand of mental illness pretending to be a scholar. Wish I could say I was disappointed.

Have only one question:

IS Rashmunullah's behavior Akbarian or Aurangazebian?

Vidya Bagchi wrote:timid rashmun, why r u sitting on the hard floor that is digging into your bottoms and chatting with strangers, when you can use that time in finding your spouse and/or making babies?

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:timid rashmun, why r u sitting on the hard floor that is digging into your bottoms and chatting with strangers, when you can use that time in finding your spouse and/or making babies?

I am not the one who publicly whines about her life and screams that her marriage has failed to the whole world.

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:timid rashmun, why r u sitting on the hard floor that is digging into your bottoms and chatting with strangers, when you can use that time in finding your spouse and/or making babies?

I am not the one who publicly whines about her life and screams that her marriage has failed to the whole world.

I am not the one who sneaks on chat convos, and at other times, simpy whines.

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:timid rashmun, why r u sitting on the hard floor that is digging into your bottoms and chatting with strangers, when you can use that time in finding your spouse and/or making babies?

I am not the one who publicly whines about her life and screams that her marriage has failed to the whole world.

I am not the one who sneaks on chat convos, and at other times, simpy whines.

You forget the fact that you were the one who whined on this forum that your marriage had failed. You are also the one who prefers to sit on your rickety chair and chat up with strangers in the middle of the night thereby neglecting your husband and children.

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:timid rashmun, why r u sitting on the hard floor that is digging into your bottoms and chatting with strangers, when you can use that time in finding your spouse and/or making babies?

I am not the one who publicly whines about her life and screams that her marriage has failed to the whole world.

I am not the one who sneaks on chat convos, and at other times, simpy whines.

You forget the fact that you were the one who whined on this forum that your marriage had failed. You are also the one who prefers to sit on your rickety chair and chat up with strangers in the middle of the night thereby neglecting your husband and children.

you forget the fact that you were the one who sneaked on chat convo and revealed it here, but refusing ur reveal ur sneaker handle. You are also the one who prefers sitting on the hard floor that is digging into your bottoms and chatting with strangers, when you can use that time in finding your spouse and/or making babies.

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

I am not the one who publicly whines about her life and screams that her marriage has failed to the whole world.

I am not the one who sneaks on chat convos, and at other times, simpy whines.

You forget the fact that you were the one who whined on this forum that your marriage had failed. You are also the one who prefers to sit on your rickety chair and chat up with strangers in the middle of the night thereby neglecting your husband and children.

you forget the fact that you were the one who sneaked on chat convo and revealed it here, but refusing ur reveal ur sneaker handle. You are also the one who prefers sitting on the hard floor that is digging into your bottoms and chatting with strangers, when you can use that time in finding your spouse and/or making babies.

Chat is a different website. I never sneaked up on anyone. Also unlike you I am not timid and hence I do not keep changing my handle on this forum on a regular basis.

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

I am not the one who sneaks on chat convos, and at other times, simpy whines.

You forget the fact that you were the one who whined on this forum that your marriage had failed. You are also the one who prefers to sit on your rickety chair and chat up with strangers in the middle of the night thereby neglecting your husband and children.

you forget the fact that you were the one who sneaked on chat convo and revealed it here, but refusing ur reveal ur sneaker handle. You are also the one who prefers sitting on the hard floor that is digging into your bottoms and chatting with strangers, when you can use that time in finding your spouse and/or making babies.

Chat is a different website. I never sneaked up on anyone. Also unlike you I am not timid and hence I do not keep changing my handle on this forum on a regular basis.

chat is a different website for SUCHers. you revealed its contents here. Upps uses a diff handle there, and you could make the connection. you are a sneak, and since you are revealing your end of the info, you are timid too.

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

You forget the fact that you were the one who whined on this forum that your marriage had failed. You are also the one who prefers to sit on your rickety chair and chat up with strangers in the middle of the night thereby neglecting your husband and children.

you forget the fact that you were the one who sneaked on chat convo and revealed it here, but refusing ur reveal ur sneaker handle. You are also the one who prefers sitting on the hard floor that is digging into your bottoms and chatting with strangers, when you can use that time in finding your spouse and/or making babies.

Chat is a different website. I never sneaked up on anyone. Also unlike you I am not timid and hence I do not keep changing my handle on this forum on a regular basis.

chat is a different website for SUCHers. you revealed its contents here. Upps uses a diff handle there, and you could make the connection. you are a sneak, and since you are revealing your end of the info, you are timid too.

You can call me all kinds of names but I am not the one who prefers to sit on her rickety chair and chat up with strangers in the middle of the night thereby neglecting her husband and children and then complaining that her marriage has failed.

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

You forget the fact that you were the one who whined on this forum that your marriage had failed. You are also the one who prefers to sit on your rickety chair and chat up with strangers in the middle of the night thereby neglecting your husband and children.

you forget the fact that you were the one who sneaked on chat convo and revealed it here, but refusing ur reveal ur sneaker handle. You are also the one who prefers sitting on the hard floor that is digging into your bottoms and chatting with strangers, when you can use that time in finding your spouse and/or making babies.

Chat is a different website. I never sneaked up on anyone. Also unlike you I am not timid and hence I do not keep changing my handle on this forum on a regular basis.

chat is a different website for SUCHers. you revealed its contents here. Upps uses a diff handle there, and you could make the connection. you are a sneak, and since you are revealing your end of the info, you are timid too.

You can call me all kinds of names but I am not the one who prefers to sit on her rickety chair chatting up with strangers in the middle of the night thereby neglecting her husband and children and then complaining that her marriage has failed.

Rashmun wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

you forget the fact that you were the one who sneaked on chat convo and revealed it here, but refusing ur reveal ur sneaker handle. You are also the one who prefers sitting on the hard floor that is digging into your bottoms and chatting with strangers, when you can use that time in finding your spouse and/or making babies.

Chat is a different website. I never sneaked up on anyone. Also unlike you I am not timid and hence I do not keep changing my handle on this forum on a regular basis.

chat is a different website for SUCHers. you revealed its contents here. Upps uses a diff handle there, and you could make the connection. you are a sneak, and since you are revealing your end of the info, you are timid too.

You can call me all kinds of names but I am not the one who prefers to sit on her rickety chair chatting up with strangers in the middle of the night thereby neglecting her husband and children and then complaining that her marriage has failed.

.