Tensions with Pakistan should be permanent---Ashdoc's own theory

yeah i feel so.

consider the case of bangladesh.before it was created ie when it was
east pakistan the border with it was relatively well guarded compared to
at least today.

with the creation of bangladesh that country became a supposed 'friend'
and the border with it began to be neglected. today only 17000 BSF
personnel guard the border roughly ,actually slightly less than half the
sanctioned force of 35000.actually even 35000 is not enough.

this has allowed massive amount of so called refugees to enter the
country at will. there is hardly any army to guard that boundary.
the BSF have been given orders to not shoot at anybody on this border as bangladeshis are our ' friends '.
so they are helpless in stopping the influx of ' refugees'. if they try
to stop them they are physically attacked and mauled and with the order
not to shoot at the ' refugees ' are unable to even protect themselves.

this has allowed practically unchecked influx of bangladeshis into india.
the bordering districts of bengal have shown large increases of muslim
population over the years. obviously this has been
encouraged......massively so by the communist govt of west bengal to
increase what it sees as a captive vote bank....though that perception
has been belied in the current elections.

in assam it has been worse as here the demography has been completely
changed across the state. an estimated 40% of the population is now
muslim in assam. it is not impossible that the population will become
majority muslim in assam in the future.this has been encouraged by both
the congress and the asom gana parishad, both accusing the other of
encouraging bangladeshis to come in the state and then doing exactly
that when they come to power.

worse , over the years the bangladeshis that have come in recent years
have been increasingly radicalised over the years and are clearly
implicated in numerous acts of terrorism in india. radical outfits like
HUJI have sown terror in india.

yet nothing at all is being done to stop this by the central govt.the bangladeshis in india are estimated to be some 40 million.

which brings me to the question of pakistan.

let us suppose the kashmir problem is solved to both sides satisfaction.

tensions along the border cease.

immediately our govt will declare pak to be our ' friend
'.pseudointellectuals like mahesh bhatt will demand ' greater people to
people interaction across the border ' and all that stuff.

the army, which at the moment maintains a strict vigil across the border
wiil over the years be asked to relax it, especially if for several
years there is no exchange of firing on the border. the border could be
more and more open like that of bangladesh.

this will only allow the pakistanis to arrive in the numbers to escape
the drudgery of extreme poverty in pakistan and take advantage of indias
economic success. this obviously will be encouraged by our ' secular '
politicians to increase their vote bank. over the years these people
will be given voter icards and will be 'legalised' to make them vote for
pseudosecular parties just like bangladeshis have been similarly '
legalised'.

worse, these pakis will be influenced by crazed talibani ideas much more
than bangladeshis and try to force their austere version of islam in
the areas they settle in. they will be inculcated with ideas of hatred
to hindus much more than the bangladeshis are . communal riots and bomb
blasts will be a natural corrolary to all this. these people will be far
more tougher than hindus and hindus will be forced go away and settle
in other areas making large areas ' hindu free '. this can especially
occur in bordering states like punjab rajasthan and gujrat.

all under the benign eye of the pseudoscular establishment., of course.

thus we might see a whole new picture in the country.

under these circumstances isnt it better that tensions with pak should be a permanent state of affairs ?

to be sure there will be a constant tension on the border. acts of
terrorism will occur. the military budget will be kept high draining
precious resources.

but surely that is better than large areas of the country becoming muslim dominated.

in fact the tensions will force us to remain on guard to protect
india.otherwise it is our practise to let down our guard at the
slightest hint of peace while others dont.

with peace we might reduce our miltary capabilities while pak may not do
so,our politicos will go to sleep until pak feels confident of taking
on india and suddenly ' wakes ' them from their slumber.

already china has done this once, i need not remind you.

in fact tensions will force us to remain on the alert to protect ourselves.

otherwise our attitude is to relax and do nothing until it is too late.

for a nation of ' sleepers ' on national security issues it is better that constant tensions keep us burning the midnight oil.

under these circumstances i want to advance my own little mad theory--
tensions with pakistan should be a permanent state of affairs .

What say ?

>> immediately our govt will declare pak to be our ' friend


Ashdoc, don't worry about youre country having too many friends.

Today not single neighbor consider you a friend.

"When Rome fell its neighbors stood in awe but there was no tears."

Kayalvizhi wrote:

Today not single neighbor consider you a friend.

bhutan does.....

but dont bother , if your tamil eelam does ever happen , your idea of not a single neighbour being friend will come true---in tamil eelam's case .