Jinnah and the secular obsession of liberals who praise him.

by Rishi Thu Sep 19, 2013 9:42 pm

Sholka Bose
September 5, 2013 8:32 pm
I don't understand the obsession of these proclaimed liberals and secularists to portray Jinnah a secular to maximum possible extent. Citing from what he said to, what he wore to, what he ate, no aspect is spared. These so called secularists dangle the medal of secularism, if you are not riding on the secularism bus, you might as well be a low life worth all the contempt.
Without understanding what ails the society, no ability to define issues, no real solutions, these are liberals are like one pony show. No mater who turns up to watch, show him the same pony called secularism. Everything good starts with secularism and end there.
Jinnah fought for muslims of the sub continent, no matter what he said, wore or ate. I am not trying to be irreverent here. Jinnah saw this religious distinction as powerful enough to ask for separate nation. He was not indifferent to religion, he might have been lousy practitioner, but not apathetic. A person who sees religion as basis enough to create a whole separate nation, for him boat of secularism has long sailed. As a thinker and architect he has already conceded religion does play a significant role in the psyche of the nation. Did Jinnah want a theocratic state of course not. But a nation bereft of religious under pinning was not his dream, otherwise he would not have wanted one.

http://dawn.com/news/1040709/beyond-jinnahs-secularism

>>>> I wonder why the idiot LK Advani thought highly of Jinnah

by Kris Thu Sep 19, 2013 10:10 pm

Rishi wrote:
Sholka Bose
September 5, 2013 8:32 pm
I don't understand the obsession of these proclaimed liberals and secularists to portray Jinnah a secular to maximum possible extent. Citing from what he said to, what he wore to, what he ate, no aspect is spared. These so called secularists dangle the medal of secularism, if you are not riding on the secularism bus, you might as well be a low life worth all the contempt.
Without understanding what ails the society, no ability to define issues, no real solutions, these are liberals are like one pony show. No mater who turns up to watch, show him the same pony called secularism. Everything good starts with secularism and end there.
Jinnah fought for muslims of the sub continent, no matter what he said, wore or ate. I am not trying to be irreverent here. Jinnah saw this religious distinction as powerful enough to ask for separate nation. He was not indifferent to religion, he might have been lousy practitioner, but not apathetic. A person who sees religion as basis enough to create a whole separate nation, for him boat of secularism has long sailed. As a thinker and architect he has already conceded religion does play a significant role in the psyche of the nation. Did Jinnah want a theocratic state of course not. But a nation bereft of religious under pinning was not his dream, otherwise he would not have wanted one.

http://dawn.com/news/1040709/beyond-jinnahs-secularism

>>>> I wonder why the idiot LK Advani thought highly of Jinnah

>>>Yeah, maybe, but it is also possible he couldn't have envisioned how big his monster would grow into.

Jinnah and the secular obsession of liberals who praise him.

Jinnah and the secular obsession of liberals who praise him.

Re: Jinnah and the secular obsession of liberals who praise him.