Akal Takht head honours Indira Gandhi assassins

by Seva Lamberdar Fri Nov 01, 2013 4:28 pm

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/akal-takht-head-honours-indira-gandhi-assassins/article4279756.ece

by Vakavaka Pakapaka Fri Nov 01, 2013 6:42 pm

So, will CONmen go ape shit now? Hopefully, Rashmun won't commit hara kiri blaming Modi.

by Guest Fri Nov 01, 2013 6:54 pm

Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:So, will CONmen go ape shit now? Hopefully, Rashmun won't commit hara kiri blaming Modi.

This is a 10 month old news.

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Fri Nov 01, 2013 7:02 pm

Rashmun wrote:
Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:So, will CONmen go ape shit now? Hopefully, Rashmun won't commit hara kiri blaming Modi.
This is a 10 month old news.

You mean it is not old enough - like you post 2007 and 2005 news?

by Guest Fri Nov 01, 2013 7:07 pm

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:So, will CONmen go ape shit now? Hopefully, Rashmun won't commit hara kiri blaming Modi.
This is a 10 month old news.
You mean it is not old enough - like you post 2007 and 2005 news?

I posted the 2007 article because Modi fanboys continue to find it relevant as can be seen in the comments section in the article. They are slamming the article right up till today in the comments section.

by Rishi Fri Nov 01, 2013 11:29 pm

Those people murdered Smt. Indira Gandhi not in a war or a battle.
Attacking an unarmed women by acting as her confidants and killing
mercilessly is an act of cowardice. It is a blemish in the history of
the Sikhism. It is a shame to honor those killers whatever the reason
Akal Thakt has an argument. They are also going to be alienated in the
hearts of millions of Indians.
from: Ranjan Singh Sodhi
Posted on: Jan 6, 2013 at 21:11 IST

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Fri Nov 01, 2013 11:59 pm

Rishi wrote:Those people murdered Smt. Indira Gandhi not in a war or a battle.
Attacking an unarmed women by acting as her confidants and killing
mercilessly is an act of cowardice. It is a blemish in the history of
the Sikhism. It is a shame to honor those killers whatever the reason
Akal Thakt has an argument. They are also going to be alienated in the
hearts of millions of Indians.
from: Ranjan Singh Sodhi
Posted on: Jan 6, 2013 at 21:11 IST

Indira Gandhi indulged in anti-national activity by creating Bindranwale - for her narrow selfish interests - and letting him kill hindus, then sikhs get killed by her party under her son's leadership.

This is what I call double dipping.

by Kayalvizhi Sat Nov 02, 2013 12:08 am

Bindranwale-Perunjsiththiranar coalese against Indian military occupation of their respective homelands.

2. Sikh-Tamil Collaborations of the Past
During the early 1980s there was an attempt to establish some collaboration and cooperation between Sikhs and Tamils in their respective struggle for freedom from Indian rule.

During the early 1980s when the great Sikh freedom fighter Sant Jarnail Singh Khalsa Bhindranwale was still alive, two of his representatives visited the office of the Tamil writer-poet-editor Perunchithiranar in Chennai, Tamil Nadu. This Perunchithiranar has championed the cause of a free Tamil Nadu through his speeches and his prolific writings since the late 1950s. Mr. Bhindranwale's representatives invited him to visit Punjab and give a series of speeches at various places in support of Khalistan. Perunchithiranar agreed. He was eager to visit Punjab and establish a liaison between Sikhs and Tamils. But, before the tour materialized, in 1984, the then Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi sent the Indian army into the Amritsar Golden Temple and killed Mr. Bhinderwalle and many other freedom fighters during Operation Blue Star.

Perunchithiranar wrote and published some articles supporting the Sikh freedom struggle in Tamil magazines. I myself published a Tamil article "Sikh's Thirst for Freedom" in the Tamil magazine Tamil Nilam (March 1991). Perunchithiranar passed away in 1995.

read the full article at
http://www.tamiltribune.com/c/index.html

by Rishi Sat Nov 02, 2013 12:11 am

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
Rishi wrote:Those people murdered Smt. Indira Gandhi not in a war or a battle.
Attacking an unarmed women by acting as her confidants and killing
mercilessly is an act of cowardice. It is a blemish in the history of
the Sikhism. It is a shame to honor those killers whatever the reason
Akal Thakt has an argument. They are also going to be alienated in the
hearts of millions of Indians.
from: Ranjan Singh Sodhi
Posted on: Jan 6, 2013 at 21:11 IST
Indira Gandhi indulged in anti-national activity by creating Bindranwale - for her narrow selfish interests - and letting him kill hindus, then sikhs get killed by her party under her son's leadership.

This is what I call double dipping.

>>> I don't think Indira stood silently when Bhindranwale killed Hindus.

She used him to bring down the Akali dal government. But the monster turned on her. Nobody expected that. I think it was socialism that was the problem. There were a lot of Sikh youth who were unemployed. Naturally they were drawn to Bhindranwale.

by Kayalvizhi Sat Nov 02, 2013 12:12 am

Rishi wrote:Those people murdered Smt. Indira Gandhi not in a war or a battle.
Attacking an unarmed women by acting as her confidants and killing
mercilessly is an act of cowardice. from: Ranjan Singh Sodhi
Posted on: Jan 6, 2013 at 21:11 IST

Inviting a foreign leader to your capital for talks and when he refused to sign on the dotted lines, put him in hotel arrest is great bravery, I suppose.

by Kris Sat Nov 02, 2013 1:09 am

Kayalvizhi wrote:
Rishi wrote:Those people murdered Smt. Indira Gandhi not in a war or a battle.
Attacking an unarmed women by acting as her confidants and killing
mercilessly is an act of cowardice. from: Ranjan Singh Sodhi
Posted on: Jan 6, 2013 at 21:11 IST
Inviting a foreign leader to your capital for talks and when he refused to sign on the dotted lines, put him in hotel arrest is great bravery, I suppose.

>>>Of course they don't measure up to the bravery of those who recruit children to carry out acts of terrorism and use as shields those who they are supposedly protecting.

by Seva Lamberdar Sat Nov 02, 2013 10:17 am

Rashmun wrote:
Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:So, will CONmen go ape shit now? Hopefully, Rashmun won't commit hara kiri blaming Modi.
This is a 10 month old news.

This news appeared on the TV in Canada (Toronto) only a couple of days ago (Oct. 30'13).

by Seva Lamberdar Sat Nov 02, 2013 10:20 am

Rishi wrote:Those people murdered Smt. Indira Gandhi not in a war or a battle.
Attacking an unarmed women by acting as her confidants and killing
mercilessly is an act of cowardice. It is a blemish in the history of
the Sikhism. It is a shame to honor those killers whatever the reason
Akal Thakt has an argument. They are also going to be alienated in the
hearts of millions of Indians.
from: Ranjan Singh Sodhi
Posted on: Jan 6, 2013 at 21:11 IST

Could such a thing happen in the USA -- people in a church, mosque or temple honoring John Wilks Boothe or Osama Bin Ladin?

by Sponsored content

Akal Takht head honours Indira Gandhi assassins

Akal Takht head honours Indira Gandhi assassins

Re: Akal Takht head honours Indira Gandhi assassins

Re: Akal Takht head honours Indira Gandhi assassins

Re: Akal Takht head honours Indira Gandhi assassins

Re: Akal Takht head honours Indira Gandhi assassins

Re: Akal Takht head honours Indira Gandhi assassins

Re: Akal Takht head honours Indira Gandhi assassins

Re: Akal Takht head honours Indira Gandhi assassins

Re: Akal Takht head honours Indira Gandhi assassins

Re: Akal Takht head honours Indira Gandhi assassins

Re: Akal Takht head honours Indira Gandhi assassins

Re: Akal Takht head honours Indira Gandhi assassins

Re: Akal Takht head honours Indira Gandhi assassins

Re: Akal Takht head honours Indira Gandhi assassins