Abolish 'My Lord' and 'Your Lordship' 'slavery symbols', lawyer asks SC; Judge recuses, case to be relisted

goodcitizn wrote:If public political display of prostrating to a CM is an accepted practice why should addressing the Court as Your Lordship be considered a slave symbol?

Rashmun wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:If public political display of prostrating to a CM is an accepted practice why should addressing the Court as Your Lordship be considered a slave symbol?

So Perry Mason, do you have any idea about why the judge recused himself from the case?

goodcitizn wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:If public political display of prostrating to a CM is an accepted practice why should addressing the Court as Your Lordship be considered a slave symbol?

So Perry Mason, do you have any idea about why the judge recused himself from the case?

Before that he is waiting to hear from the defendant in the Case of the Mislaid Facts.

Rashmun wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:If public political display of prostrating to a CM is an accepted practice why should addressing the Court as Your Lordship be considered a slave symbol?

So Perry Mason, do you have any idea about why the judge recused himself from the case?

Before that he is waiting to hear from the defendant in the Case of the Mislaid Facts.

Your explanation sucks big time. The reason seems to be that the petitioner is claiming that one of his earlier cases was dismissed by the court because he refused to address the court as "My Lord" or "Lordship". Presumably the judge who recused himself from this case was also hearing the earlier case. Henceforth, I will be calling you Hamilton Burger.

goodcitizn wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:If public political display of prostrating to a CM is an accepted practice why should addressing the Court as Your Lordship be considered a slave symbol?

So Perry Mason, do you have any idea about why the judge recused himself from the case?

Before that he is waiting to hear from the defendant in the Case of the Mislaid Facts.

Your explanation sucks big time. The reason seems to be that the petitioner is claiming that one of his earlier cases was dismissed by the court because he refused to address the court as "My Lord" or "Lordship". Presumably the judge who recused himself from this case was also hearing the earlier case. Henceforth, I will be calling you Hamilton Burger.

How conveniently you misinterpret! I was referring to your dodge ball maneuver in not being able to substantiate with facts your claim that the muslim population rate of India is lower than the overall population growth rate. Kindly let me know when that happens between now and when hell freezes over.

Rashmun wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:

Rashmun wrote:So Perry Mason, do you have any idea about why the judge recused himself from the case?

Before that he is waiting to hear from the defendant in the Case of the Mislaid Facts.

Your explanation sucks big time. The reason seems to be that the petitioner is claiming that one of his earlier cases was dismissed by the court because he refused to address the court as "My Lord" or "Lordship". Presumably the judge who recused himself from this case was also hearing the earlier case. Henceforth, I will be calling you Hamilton Burger.

How conveniently you misinterpret! I was referring to your dodge ball maneuver in not being able to substantiate with facts your claim that the muslim population rate of India is lower than the overall population growth rate. Kindly let me know when that happens between now and when hell freezes over.

Only someone like  Hamilton Burger would mix up two different arguments.

goodcitizn wrote:If public political display of prostrating to a CM is an accepted practice why should addressing the Court as Your Lordship be considered a slave symbol?

Rishi wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:If public political display of prostrating to a CM is an accepted practice why should addressing the Court as Your Lordship be considered a slave symbol?

>>> People who fall the feet of JJ do it on their own volition. But lawyers are forced to address the judges as "Your lordship".

Btw people fall at M.K. Stalin's feet also. But the media is making a big stink when it happens to JJ.