Congress/UPA leaves a gutted Exchequer: 45% of the fiscal deficit target used in two months

confuzzled dude wrote:  Why did they think voters elected NDA? If Modi's comedy gang is not prepared for this or not expecting this, then I'm afraid a bunch of bojos are running the show.

rawemotions wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:  Why did they think voters elected NDA? If Modi's comedy gang is not prepared for this or not expecting this, then I'm afraid a bunch of bojos are running the show.

It looks like, you are endorsing Congress party's alleged incompetence. Hope people remember this , next time Congress party comes calling, asking for votes.

confuzzled dude wrote:

rawemotions wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:  Why did they think voters elected NDA? If Modi's comedy gang is not prepared for this or not expecting this, then I'm afraid a bunch of bojos are running the show.

It looks like, you are endorsing Congress party's alleged incompetence. Hope people remember this , next time Congress party comes calling, asking for votes.

For that to happen NDA has to prove that they're better administrators than UPA; so far all the indications are they're not.

rawemotions wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

rawemotions wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:  Why did they think voters elected NDA? If Modi's comedy gang is not prepared for this or not expecting this, then I'm afraid a bunch of bojos are running the show.

It looks like, you are endorsing Congress party's alleged incompetence. Hope people remember this , next time Congress party comes calling, asking for votes.

For that to happen NDA has to prove that they're better administrators than UPA; so far all the indications are they're not.

It took you 10 years to admit/endorse alleged, congress party/UPA's incompetence.  Given that it takes 10 years  to judge somebody, perhaps it is better to wait 10 years before we start making comparisons.

truthbetold wrote:Raw
If Indian wiped out poverty in the next 10 years,  cd will still say each Indian did not have a car.  Some people are motivated to oppose for reasons other than real economics.

confuzzled dude wrote:

truthbetold wrote:Raw
If Indian wiped out poverty in the next 10 years,  cd will still say each Indian did not have a car.  Some people are motivated to oppose for reasons other than real economics.

What real economics we keep bragging about? We will talk when poverty in India is wiped out; Do you realize that you sound like one of those phony Sadhus with your predictions & unflinching support and loyalty to Modiji.

truthbetold wrote:
Your sore loser mentality is what is on evidence here.  It is just over one month of modi govt and you all ready declared it failed.  Who is predicting?  

truthbetold wrote:
Do you have a single metric to support your logic?  No. All you have is your key board and your right to post whatever nonsense you want.  

Years of CBI investigation resulting in court cases against Jagan are not evidence. But your feelings and nonsensical predictions are sufficient to declare modi a failure in less than 50 days. Is that how your evidence works? 

Wake up. It may work in your family and friends circle. Rest of the world is little more rigorous than that.

confuzzled dude wrote:

rawemotions wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

rawemotions wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:  Why did they think voters elected NDA? If Modi's comedy gang is not prepared for this or not expecting this, then I'm afraid a bunch of bojos are running the show.

It looks like, you are endorsing Congress party's alleged incompetence. Hope people remember this , next time Congress party comes calling, asking for votes.

For that to happen NDA has to prove that they're better administrators than UPA; so far all the indications are they're not.

It took you 10 years to admit/endorse alleged, congress party/UPA's incompetence.  Given that it takes 10 years  to judge somebody, perhaps it is better to wait 10 years before we start making comparisons.

What incompetency? India did pretty good in their first term after taking over from subpar NDA. Looks like you have no faith in NDA's capabilities, which is why you want to wait 10 years, can't blame you though; Modiji himself displayed lack of confidence in himself when he asked for 10 years, the day after election results.

confuzzled dude wrote:

truthbetold wrote:
Your sore loser mentality is what is on evidence here.  It is just over one month of modi govt and you all ready declared it failed.  Who is predicting?  

You sound like a broken record by bringing up the same old idiotic point time and again without much substance, calling me a sore loser repeatedly doesn't make me one. Why does NDA need 10 years to show any improvement, is that new normal?

truthbetold wrote:
Do you have a single metric to support your logic?  No. All you have is your key board and your right to post whatever nonsense you want.  

Years of CBI investigation resulting in court cases against Jagan are not evidence. But your feelings and nonsensical predictions are sufficient to declare modi a failure in less than 50 days. Is that how your evidence works? 

Wake up. It may work in your family and friends circle. Rest of the world is little more rigorous than that.

There is plenty of evidence available of Modiji's modus operandi. Be it is handling of price hikes or supreme court justice nomination, be it is IB report on NGOs or Amit Shah's court case. All these issues are not made up by congress supporters rather have been on all national media outlets and pretty much give us the trend. You're the one that needs to take the blinders off.

rawemotions wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

rawemotions wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

rawemotions wrote:
It looks like, you are endorsing Congress party's alleged incompetence. Hope people remember this , next time Congress party comes calling, asking for votes.

For that to happen NDA has to prove that they're better administrators than UPA; so far all the indications are they're not.

It took you 10 years to admit/endorse alleged, congress party/UPA's incompetence.  Given that it takes 10 years  to judge somebody, perhaps it is better to wait 10 years before we start making comparisons.

What incompetency? India did pretty good in their first term after taking over from subpar NDA. Looks like you have no faith in NDA's capabilities, which is why you want to wait 10 years, can't blame you though; Modiji himself displayed lack of confidence in himself when he asked for 10 years, the day after election results.

You need to fix your reading comprehension. I did not talk about how long it takes for NDA to show improvement. I said given that it took you 10 years to confirm that UPA screwed up the country, your judgement timelines are around 10 years. So any statement you make sort of converges only after 10 years. Until then it does not make sense to discuss this with you!. End of discussion!

truthbetold wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

truthbetold wrote:
Your sore loser mentality is what is on evidence here.  It is just over one month of modi govt and you all ready declared it failed.  Who is predicting?  

You sound like a broken record by bringing up the same old idiotic point time and again without much substance, calling me a sore loser repeatedly doesn't make me one. Why does NDA need 10 years to show any improvement, is that new normal?

truthbetold wrote:
Do you have a single metric to support your logic?  No. All you have is your key board and your right to post whatever nonsense you want.  

Years of CBI investigation resulting in court cases against Jagan are not evidence. But your feelings and nonsensical predictions are sufficient to declare modi a failure in less than 50 days. Is that how your evidence works? 

Wake up. It may work in your family and friends circle. Rest of the world is little more rigorous than that.

There is plenty of evidence available of Modiji's modus operandi. Be it is handling of price hikes or supreme court justice nomination, be it is IB report on NGOs or Amit Shah's court case. All these issues are not made up by congress supporters rather have been on all national media outlets and pretty much give us the trend. You're the one that needs to take the blinders off.

CD

Go ahead and show us the metrics.  What exactly is the metric you saw in modi's regime regarding price rise?  The veg prices never rise in other govt rule?  All the other issues listed by you are non economic  issues and are open to interpretation bu either case. In any case they do not prove anything about any future performance of modi govt. 

You just throw out meaningless words and examples and say modi failed.  The only failure I am observing is a logical imbalance on your side.

truthbetold wrote:What tends? what deductions? More like your hallucinations?  You would not see metrics if they hit you in the face in this mental frame.

confuzzled dude wrote:

rawemotions wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

rawemotions wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:
For that to happen NDA has to prove that they're better administrators than UPA; so far all the indications are they're not.

It took you 10 years to admit/endorse alleged, congress party/UPA's incompetence.  Given that it takes 10 years  to judge somebody, perhaps it is better to wait 10 years before we start making comparisons.

What incompetency? India did pretty good in their first term after taking over from subpar NDA. Looks like you have no faith in NDA's capabilities, which is why you want to wait 10 years, can't blame you though; Modiji himself displayed lack of confidence in himself when he asked for 10 years, the day after election results.

You need to fix your reading comprehension. I did not talk about how long it takes for NDA to show improvement. I said given that it took you 10 years to confirm that UPA screwed up the country, your judgement timelines are around 10 years. So any statement you make sort of converges only after 10 years. Until then it does not make sense to discuss this with you!. End of discussion!

UPA screwing the country might be a figment of your imagination. What I meant was voters were not happy with the state of affairs, I said the same prior to the elections, and also said, if Modiji can't win now he will never.

rawemotions wrote:
Another flip-flop within a matter of days, after acknowledging that Chidu and Co have ravaged the treasury over spending 50% of the deficit within 2 months. 

Anyway, the following links show clearly how Chidu and Congress have created a death trap for the incoming government. 

UPA's economic mess

https://such.forumotion.com/t23540-mani-shankar-iyer-and-chidambaram-s-son-lose-deposits-in-tn#156963

https://such.forumotion.com/t24085-upa-s-economic-mess

confuzzled dude wrote:

rawemotions wrote:
Another flip-flop within a matter of days, after acknowledging that Chidu and Co have ravaged the treasury over spending 50% of the deficit within 2 months. 

Anyway, the following links show clearly how Chidu and Congress have created a death trap for the incoming government. 

UPA's economic mess

https://such.forumotion.com/t23540-mani-shankar-iyer-and-chidambaram-s-son-lose-deposits-in-tn#156963

https://such.forumotion.com/t24085-upa-s-economic-mess

flip-flop! must be another figment of your imagination. Hope you're not like this in real life too, for your own good.. living in constant irrational state of fear.. first you're worried that BJP cannot win in state elections due to some perceived harakiri by congress, then you're worried that Modi won't win bcz everyone is ganging up against him; now you're worried that Modi's government will not be able to function due to financial machinations of congress.A