History of Ancient India and douchebags like Rashmun the Doucheman

by SomeProfile Thu May 11, 2017 1:26 pm

When it comes to history of ancient India, ALL dates are SUSPECT. Most of the dates of ancient Indian history as published in many current Western influenced history books were proposed by Christian historians. Many of these idiot Christian historians were working under the assumption that the Universe itself is only 5000 years old, created by their god. Thus, ALL the dates they ascribe to ancient India are highly suspicious and do not stand up under the scrutiny of even amateur historians. In addition to their idiotic 5000-year-old creation assumption, they also had a vested interest to show Indian civilization as being newer and inferior. Since they could not obviously show Indian civilization to be newer than current European civilization, they have tried their best to show it as being newer or contemporary of, and inferior to most other ancient civilizations such as Egyptian, Roman, Greek, even middle eastern Islamic. So, the dates they propose for ancient Indian history should be flushed down the toilet along with douchebags like Rashmun the Doucheman.

Here's a simple example of how even the date for Buddha is wrong: https://controversialhistory.blogspot.com/2009/08/date-of-buddha.html

Controversial History wrote:Conclusion
The above accounts say that Buddha can be earlier than the said dates of 560BC and Western and Indology Scholars have not even explained the contradictions in their own calculations. The fundamental sheet Anchor theory (Megasthanese -Chandragupta Meeting) is itself not established. The Indian literary accounts are being dismissed summarily. And Western scholars themselves dont provide any evidence to backup their account. Since Chandragupta Maurya date by Western and Indology scholars is disputable, Buddha Date is also susequently disputable. Regarding what is being said in Ashoka Edicts and what are the claims made on the edicts , we will see in another article. For now Buddha date is nowhere settled. Date by Indian Literary sources and Astronomical calculations is 1807 BC.

Ancient Indian civilization was already thousands of years old at the time of Buddha. So, if Buddha himself is from 1807 BC, clearly Indian civilization was much older than Egyptian, Greek, Roman civilizations.

by SomeProfile Sun May 14, 2017 11:57 am

History of Ancient India and douchebags like Rashmun the Doucheman

History of Ancient India and douchebags like Rashmun the Doucheman

Re: History of Ancient India and douchebags like Rashmun the Doucheman