Indian high court favors the oppressor and rules against the victim
4 posters
Page 1 of 1
Indian high court favors the oppressor and rules against the victim
http://www.ndtv.com/article/world/in-us-another-ruling-in-favour-of-maid-who-accused-indian-diplomat-of-slavery-188466?pfrom=home-otherstories
In his recommendation filed on February 21, Maas had said that Gurung should be awarded the compensation as she was a victim of "outrageous and shocking conduct."
Shanti Gurung was employed by the Malhotras when Neena was serving as a counsellor at the Consulate General of India in Manhattan.
Shanti Gurung had alleged that she was treated like a slave by the Malhotras and forced to work long hours without adequate compensation.
Marrero's ruling came just days after the Delhi High Court restrained Gurung from pursuing her lawsuit in the US.
The Delhi court had also accepted the argument that Mrs Neena is a diplomat in the services of the Government of India and was sent in official capacity to the US and thus enjoys sovereign immunity.
Any order passed by a court there would tantamount to interfering with the right of the Indian government to determine terms and conditions of employment of its diplomatic officers abroad, Justice Kailash Gambhir had ruled.
In his recommendation filed on February 21, Maas had said that Gurung should be awarded the compensation as she was a victim of "outrageous and shocking conduct."
Shanti Gurung was employed by the Malhotras when Neena was serving as a counsellor at the Consulate General of India in Manhattan.
Shanti Gurung had alleged that she was treated like a slave by the Malhotras and forced to work long hours without adequate compensation.
Marrero's ruling came just days after the Delhi High Court restrained Gurung from pursuing her lawsuit in the US.
The Delhi court had also accepted the argument that Mrs Neena is a diplomat in the services of the Government of India and was sent in official capacity to the US and thus enjoys sovereign immunity.
Any order passed by a court there would tantamount to interfering with the right of the Indian government to determine terms and conditions of employment of its diplomatic officers abroad, Justice Kailash Gambhir had ruled.
MulaiAzhagi- Posts : 1254
Join date : 2011-12-20
Re: Indian high court favors the oppressor and rules against the victim
MulaiAzhagi wrote:http://www.ndtv.com/article/world/in-us-another-ruling-in-favour-of-maid-who-accused-indian-diplomat-of-slavery-188466?pfrom=home-otherstories
In his recommendation filed on February 21, Maas had said that Gurung should be awarded the compensation as she was a victim of "outrageous and shocking conduct."
Shanti Gurung was employed by the Malhotras when Neena was serving as a counsellor at the Consulate General of India in Manhattan.
Shanti Gurung had alleged that she was treated like a slave by the Malhotras and forced to work long hours without adequate compensation.
Marrero's ruling came just days after the Delhi High Court restrained Gurung from pursuing her lawsuit in the US.
The Delhi court had also accepted the argument that Mrs Neena is a diplomat in the services of the Government of India and was sent in official capacity to the US and thus enjoys sovereign immunity.
Any order passed by a court there would tantamount to interfering with the right of the Indian government to determine terms and conditions of employment of its diplomatic officers abroad, Justice Kailash Gambhir had ruled.
Now all the babus will take with them young nannys as concubines and sex slaves. A good perk from the GoI.
Marathadi-Saamiyaar- Posts : 17675
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 110
Re: Indian high court favors the oppressor and rules against the victim
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:MulaiAzhagi wrote:http://www.ndtv.com/article/world/in-us-another-ruling-in-favour-of-maid-who-accused-indian-diplomat-of-slavery-188466?pfrom=home-otherstories
In his recommendation filed on February 21, Maas had said that Gurung should be awarded the compensation as she was a victim of "outrageous and shocking conduct."
Shanti Gurung was employed by the Malhotras when Neena was serving as a counsellor at the Consulate General of India in Manhattan.
Shanti Gurung had alleged that she was treated like a slave by the Malhotras and forced to work long hours without adequate compensation.
Marrero's ruling came just days after the Delhi High Court restrained Gurung from pursuing her lawsuit in the US.
The Delhi court had also accepted the argument that Mrs Neena is a diplomat in the services of the Government of India and was sent in official capacity to the US and thus enjoys sovereign immunity.
Any order passed by a court there would tantamount to interfering with the right of the Indian government to determine terms and conditions of employment of its diplomatic officers abroad, Justice Kailash Gambhir had ruled.
Now all the babus will take with them young nannys as concubines and sex slaves. A good perk from the GoI.
you are smoking with J..it's less of the guy's and more of his wife's situation on this issue..think and think hard Upps.. and resubmit with the same theme, perhaps
garam_kuta- Posts : 3768
Join date : 2011-05-18
Re: Indian high court favors the oppressor and rules against the victim
The problem is, besides the rich, even reasonably well off Indians (middle class?) are used to having a servant do the chores in the house. The Indian govt. allows their officials to continue with the practice in foreign lands as some sort of a perk. Now, I heard claims on both sides - servants being mistreated, servants using mistreatment as a ploy to stick around even when their bosses get transfered.
The best solution is - except for may be the ambassador, an Executive Director at the World Bank, or a Counsel in New York, Chicago, SF, servants should not be allowed. They should keep house on their own.
The best solution is - except for may be the ambassador, an Executive Director at the World Bank, or a Counsel in New York, Chicago, SF, servants should not be allowed. They should keep house on their own.
indophile- Posts : 4338
Join date : 2011-04-29
Location : Glenn Dale, MD
Similar topics
» gujarat high court rules hindi is NOT the national language
» High Court Ends Controversy: Rules in Favor of Isha Yoga Center
» Supreme Court steps in after Madras High Court judge goes rogue
» Supreme Court stays Gujarat High Court order quashing quota for poor
» Is this desi high school kid a victim of racism?
» High Court Ends Controversy: Rules in Favor of Isha Yoga Center
» Supreme Court steps in after Madras High Court judge goes rogue
» Supreme Court stays Gujarat High Court order quashing quota for poor
» Is this desi high school kid a victim of racism?
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|