Marry a girl

southindian wrote:Welcome on the other side.

So if you marry a woman, would you be commiting adultery or helping your husband, by providing additional choice?

Natalia Romanova wrote:

southindian wrote:Welcome on the other side.

So if you marry a woman, would you be commiting adultery or helping your husband, by providing additional choice?

The access is WIDE open.

southindian wrote:

Natalia Romanova wrote:

southindian wrote:Welcome on the other side.

So if you marry a woman, would you be commiting adultery or helping your husband, by providing additional choice?

The access is WIDE open.

How WIDE?

Natalia Romanova wrote:That's what shaadi.com wants me to do. Yep. God knows who created a profile using my email and maybe his phone.

First they put my account on hold. And now I'm getting pics of women as suggestions.

Maybe this is a sign from gods. They telling me Nats, men are jerk. Start liking *ugh*.

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Natalia Romanova wrote:That's what shaadi.com wants me to do. Yep. God knows who created a profile using my email and maybe his phone.

First they put my account on hold. And now I'm getting pics of women as suggestions.

Maybe this is a sign from gods. They telling me Nats, men are jerk. Start liking *ugh*.

I think it is all a game by the ex-virile1. He probably wants to verify if your channels are really open and if there will be any IRQ conflict if he tried to access an open port.

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Natalia Romanova wrote:That's what shaadi.com wants me to do. Yep. God knows who created a profile using my email and maybe his phone.

First they put my account on hold. And now I'm getting pics of women as suggestions.

Maybe this is a sign from gods. They telling me Nats, men are jerk. Start liking *ugh*.

I think it is all a game by the ex-virile1. He probably wants to verify if your channels are really open and if there will be any IRQ conflict if he tried to access an open port.

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Natalia Romanova wrote:That's what shaadi.com wants me to do. Yep. God knows who created a profile using my email and maybe his phone.

First they put my account on hold. And now I'm getting pics of women as suggestions.

Maybe this is a sign from gods. They telling me Nats, men are jerk. Start liking *ugh*.

I think it is all a game by the ex-virile1. He probably wants to verify if your channels are really open and if there will be any IRQ conflict if he tried to access an open port.

lehngawali bollywood rani made all her 483 announcements of the last six weeks about her imminent break-up with "k" mostly by herself, with a little help from her southern indian minion, kinnamma. the effort was enormous. lehngawali and kinnamma met day and night in the chat room and spoke in "code" that ensured that everyone would understand. in anticipation, bittu singh fobby and "penius" seetharamayya711 went into a state of perpetual perpendicularity.

now, uppusaamy gowNder, may i remind you that your weekly underwear and gynecological report on the women of ch is late?

panini press wrote:

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Natalia Romanova wrote:That's what shaadi.com wants me to do. Yep. God knows who created a profile using my email and maybe his phone.

First they put my account on hold. And now I'm getting pics of women as suggestions.

Maybe this is a sign from gods. They telling me Nats, men are jerk. Start liking *ugh*.

I think it is all a game by the ex-virile1. He probably wants to verify if your channels are really open and if there will be any IRQ conflict if he tried to access an open port.

lehngawali bollywood rani made all her 483 announcements of the last six weeks about her imminent break-up with "k" mostly by herself, with a little help from her southern indian minion, kinnamma. the effort was enormous. lehngawali and kinnamma met day and night in the chat room and spoke in "code" that ensured that everyone would understand. in anticipation, bittu singh fobby and "penius" seetharamayya711 went into a state of perpetual perpendicularity.

now, uppusaamy gowNder, may i remind you that your weekly underwear and gynecological report on the women of ch is late?

LOVVUji, forget her. As of yesterday, she was the third most boring person here. Also forget Uppili; he was the most boring person here. Let's talk instead about the Most Interesting Men on SuCH. What are the terms of your alliance with Rashmun? Is it just a mutual defense treaty, or does it also include access rights one way or the other?

Natalia Romanova wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Natalia Romanova wrote:That's what shaadi.com wants me to do. Yep. God knows who created a profile using my email and maybe his phone.

First they put my account on hold. And now I'm getting pics of women as suggestions.

Maybe this is a sign from gods. They telling me Nats, men are jerk. Start liking *ugh*.

I think it is all a game by the ex-virile1. He probably wants to verify if your channels are really open and if there will be any IRQ conflict if he tried to access an open port.

So many probs can be resolved if one can just ask directly. Privately if not publicly. But people won't do that. Instead keep bringing one bizarre theory after another. Making one bizarre and dirty announcement after another. Hoping someone would snap and declare it here. Old but dirty strategy.

Sasthi wrote:If you are remarrying then marry a gujju guy. I think they make a good husband.

source: life lessons.

If at all I were to remarry I will marry a Tamil guy again. It is the power of Tamil - it will never ever ever let you go! That stupid bond never dies.

Sasthi wrote:You did not?! Well, that's not good. My zero cents advice is of no use.

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Natalia Romanova wrote:That's what shaadi.com wants me to do. Yep. God knows who created a profile using my email and maybe his phone.

First they put my account on hold. And now I'm getting pics of women as suggestions.

Maybe this is a sign from gods. They telling me Nats, men are jerk. Start liking *ugh*.

I think it is all a game by the ex-virile1. He probably wants to verify if your channels are really open and if there will be any IRQ conflict if he tried to access an open port.

lehngawali bollywood rani made all her 483 announcements of the last six weeks about her imminent break-up with "k" mostly by herself, with a little help from her southern indian minion, kinnamma. the effort was enormous. lehngawali and kinnamma met day and night in the chat room and spoke in "code" that ensured that everyone would understand. in anticipation, bittu singh fobby and "penius" seetharamayya711 went into a state of perpetual perpendicularity.

now, uppusaamy gowNder, may i remind you that your weekly underwear and gynecological report on the women of ch is late?

LOVVUji, forget her. As of yesterday, she was the third most boring person here. Also forget Uppili; he was the most boring person here. Let's talk instead about the Most Interesting Men on SuCH. What are the terms of your alliance with Rashmun? Is it just a mutual defense treaty, or does it also include access rights one way or the other?

The PP Method in Action. Since the discussion has turned embarrassing for his 'friend' PP would like to deviate the discussion onto something else. Anything to save his 'friend' embarrassment as per the mutual defense treaty he earlier signed with her.

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

I think it is all a game by the ex-virile1. He probably wants to verify if your channels are really open and if there will be any IRQ conflict if he tried to access an open port.

lehngawali bollywood rani made all her 483 announcements of the last six weeks about her imminent break-up with "k" mostly by herself, with a little help from her southern indian minion, kinnamma. the effort was enormous. lehngawali and kinnamma met day and night in the chat room and spoke in "code" that ensured that everyone would understand. in anticipation, bittu singh fobby and "penius" seetharamayya711 went into a state of perpetual perpendicularity.

now, uppusaamy gowNder, may i remind you that your weekly underwear and gynecological report on the women of ch is late?

LOVVUji, forget her. As of yesterday, she was the third most boring person here. Also forget Uppili; he was the most boring person here. Let's talk instead about the Most Interesting Men on SuCH. What are the terms of your alliance with Rashmun? Is it just a mutual defense treaty, or does it also include access rights one way or the other?

The PP Method in Action. Since the discussion has turned embarrassing for his 'friend' PP would like to deviate the discussion onto something else. Anything to save his 'friend' embarrassment as per the mutual defense treaty he earlier signed with her.

he didn't sign any treaty. he doesn't need to; she, and indeed, all women, are equipped with The Thing he worships. our boy is the Knight of The Thing.

panini press wrote:

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:lehngawali bollywood rani made all her 483 announcements of the last six weeks about her imminent break-up with "k" mostly by herself, with a little help from her southern indian minion, kinnamma. the effort was enormous. lehngawali and kinnamma met day and night in the chat room and spoke in "code" that ensured that everyone would understand. in anticipation, bittu singh fobby and "penius" seetharamayya711 went into a state of perpetual perpendicularity.

now, uppusaamy gowNder, may i remind you that your weekly underwear and gynecological report on the women of ch is late?

LOVVUji, forget her. As of yesterday, she was the third most boring person here. Also forget Uppili; he was the most boring person here. Let's talk instead about the Most Interesting Men on SuCH. What are the terms of your alliance with Rashmun? Is it just a mutual defense treaty, or does it also include access rights one way or the other?

The PP Method in Action. Since the discussion has turned embarrassing for his 'friend' PP would like to deviate the discussion onto something else. Anything to save his 'friend' embarrassment as per the mutual defense treaty he earlier signed with her.

he didn't sign any treaty. he doesn't need to; she, and indeed, all women, are equipped with The Thing he worships. our boy is the Knight of The Thing.

You two do look good together.

southindian wrote:

Sasthi wrote:You did not?! Well, that's not good. My zero cents advice is of no use.

If it's zero cents, then could someone else use your advice, or will you now ask for money, since advice for NR could be used by Germ.

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:LOVVUji, forget her. As of yesterday, she was the third most boring person here. Also forget Uppili; he was the most boring person here. Let's talk instead about the Most Interesting Men on SuCH. What are the terms of your alliance with Rashmun? Is it just a mutual defense treaty, or does it also include access rights one way or the other?

The PP Method in Action. Since the discussion has turned embarrassing for his 'friend' PP would like to deviate the discussion onto something else. Anything to save his 'friend' embarrassment as per the mutual defense treaty he earlier signed with her.

he didn't sign any treaty. he doesn't need to; she, and indeed, all women, are equipped with The Thing he worships. our boy is the Knight of The Thing.

You two do look good together.

do you enjoy it when we take turns screwing you?

panini press wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

The PP Method in Action. Since the discussion has turned embarrassing for his 'friend' PP would like to deviate the discussion onto something else. Anything to save his 'friend' embarrassment as per the mutual defense treaty he earlier signed with her.

he didn't sign any treaty. he doesn't need to; she, and indeed, all women, are equipped with The Thing he worships. our boy is the Knight of The Thing.

You two do look good together.

do you enjoy it when we take turns screwing you?

Please do consider limiting all fantasies of access to within the bounds of your treaty of alliance.

panini press wrote:You two do look good together - NOT THAT THERE IS ANYTHING WRONG WITH THAT.

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:LOVVUji, forget her. As of yesterday, she was the third most boring person here. Also forget Uppili; he was the most boring person here. Let's talk instead about the Most Interesting Men on SuCH. What are the terms of your alliance with Rashmun? Is it just a mutual defense treaty, or does it also include access rights one way or the other?

The PP Method in Action. Since the discussion has turned embarrassing for his 'friend' PP would like to deviate the discussion onto something else. Anything to save his 'friend' embarrassment as per the mutual defense treaty he earlier signed with her.

he didn't sign any treaty. he doesn't need to; she, and indeed, all women, are equipped with The Thing he worships. our boy is the Knight of The Thing.

You two do look good together.

do you enjoy it when we take turns screwing you?

southindian wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

The PP Method in Action. Since the discussion has turned embarrassing for his 'friend' PP would like to deviate the discussion onto something else. Anything to save his 'friend' embarrassment as per the mutual defense treaty he earlier signed with her.

he didn't sign any treaty. he doesn't need to; she, and indeed, all women, are equipped with The Thing he worships. our boy is the Knight of The Thing.

You two do look good together.

do you enjoy it when we take turns screwing you?

Chunmun, please be clean in your posts. There are many here old enough to be your grand children. If you and Germ enjoy the experience then please find a room, where you can express your feelings for Germ.

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:he didn't sign any treaty. he doesn't need to; she, and indeed, all women, are equipped with The Thing he worships. our boy is the Knight of The Thing.

You two do look good together.

do you enjoy it when we take turns screwing you?

Please do consider limiting all fantasies of access to within the bounds of your treaty of alliance.

One of the agendas in the treaty is that we'll take turns screwing you.

Natalia Romanova wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:You two do look good together.

do you enjoy it when we take turns screwing you?

Please do consider limiting all fantasies of access to within the bounds of your treaty of alliance.

One of the agendas in the treaty is that we'll take turns screwing you.

So there *is* a treaty?

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:he didn't sign any treaty. he doesn't need to; she, and indeed, all women, are equipped with The Thing he worships. our boy is the Knight of The Thing.

You two do look good together.

do you enjoy it when we take turns screwing you?

Please do consider limiting all fantasies of access to within the bounds of your treaty of alliance.

One of the agendas in the treaty is that we'll take turns screwing you.

panini press wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:You two do look good together.

do you enjoy it when we take turns screwing you?

Please do consider limiting all fantasies of access to within the bounds of your treaty of alliance.

One of the agendas in the treaty is that we'll take turns screwing you.

Thank you for confirming the existence of your treaty of alliance. Now, does the treaty cover access rights?

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:he didn't sign any treaty. he doesn't need to; she, and indeed, all women, are equipped with The Thing he worships. our boy is the Knight of The Thing.

You two do look good together.

do you enjoy it when we take turns screwing you?

Please do consider limiting all fantasies of access to within the bounds of your treaty of alliance.

One of the agendas in the treaty is that we'll take turns screwing you.

kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:You two do look good together.

do you enjoy it when we take turns screwing you?

Please do consider limiting all fantasies of access to within the bounds of your treaty of alliance.

One of the agendas in the treaty is that we'll take turns screwing you.

The two men who look good together and who do not 'worship all women equipped with The Thing' also have a treaty to screw another man? oh my!

panini press wrote:

kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

do you enjoy it when we take turns screwing you?

Please do consider limiting all fantasies of access to within the bounds of your treaty of alliance.

One of the agendas in the treaty is that we'll take turns screwing you.

The two men who look good together and who do not 'worship all women equipped with The Thing' also have a treaty to screw another man? oh my!

Not that there is anything wrong with it, of course.

kinnera wrote:

panini press wrote:

kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:Please do consider limiting all fantasies of access to within the bounds of your treaty of alliance.

One of the agendas in the treaty is that we'll take turns screwing you.

The two men who look good together and who do not 'worship all women equipped with The Thing' also have a treaty to screw another man? oh my!

Not that there is anything wrong with it, of course.

no no no there isn't, of course!

Rashmun wrote:

kinnera wrote:

panini press wrote:

kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

One of the agendas in the treaty is that we'll take turns screwing you.

The two men who look good together and who do not 'worship all women equipped with The Thing' also have a treaty to screw another man? oh my!

Not that there is anything wrong with it, of course.

no no no there isn't, of course!

Kinnamma are you still wearing 3.5 inches heels so as to compensate for being a shorty?

kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

kinnera wrote:

panini press wrote:

kinnera wrote:

The two men who look good together and who do not 'worship all women equipped with The Thing' also have a treaty to screw another man? oh my!

Not that there is anything wrong with it, of course.

no no no there isn't, of course!

Kinnamma are you still wearing 3.5 inches heels so as to compensate for being a shorty?

oh yeah! you got more news. I also go to the gym 5 x/week to maintain that killer figure and toned body and still wear them 3.5 inch heels to 'attract men'. Like it?

Rashmun wrote:

kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

kinnera wrote:

panini press wrote:Not that there is anything wrong with it, of course.

no no no there isn't, of course!

Kinnamma are you still wearing 3.5 inches heels so as to compensate for being a shorty?

oh yeah! you got more news. I also go to the gym 5 x/week to maintain that killer figure and toned body and still wear them 3.5 inch heels to 'attract men'. Like it?

not impressed. if u had such a killer body you would not have succumbed to Bittu's advances so easily. Since many men would have been hitting on you, the least that was expected of you was to show some nakhras when Bittu was hitting on you on chat. You gave in too easily.

Rashmun wrote:

kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

kinnera wrote:

panini press wrote:Not that there is anything wrong with it, of course.

no no no there isn't, of course!

Kinnamma are you still wearing 3.5 inches heels so as to compensate for being a shorty?

oh yeah! you got more news. I also go to the gym 5 x/week to maintain that killer figure and toned body and still wear them 3.5 inch heels to 'attract men'. Like it?

not impressed. if u had such a killer body you would not have succumbed to Bittu's advances so easily. Since many men would have been hitting on you, the least that was expected of you was to show some nakhras when Bittu was hitting on you on chat. You gave in too easily.

Rashmun wrote:

kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

kinnera wrote:

panini press wrote:Not that there is anything wrong with it, of course.

no no no there isn't, of course!

Kinnamma are you still wearing 3.5 inches heels so as to compensate for being a shorty?

oh yeah! you got more news. I also go to the gym 5 x/week to maintain that killer figure and toned body and still wear them 3.5 inch heels to 'attract men'. Like it?

not impressed. if u had such a killer body you would not have succumbed to Bittu's advances so easily. Since many men would have been hitting on you, the least that was expected of you was to show some nakhras when Bittu was hitting on you on chat. You gave in too easily.

kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

kinnera wrote:

no no no there isn't, of course!

Kinnamma are you still wearing 3.5 inches heels so as to compensate for being a shorty?

oh yeah! you got more news. I also go to the gym 5 x/week to maintain that killer figure and toned body and still wear them 3.5 inch heels to 'attract men'. Like it?

not impressed. if u had such a killer body you would not have succumbed to Bittu's advances so easily. Since many men would have been hitting on you, the least that was expected of you was to show some nakhras when Bittu was hitting on you on chat. You gave in too easily.

Why bring Bittu into these discussions? You and Vee seem to be so obsessed abt him, to the point of being jealous! You g** men you! Keep your eyes off of him. He's totally hetero, fyi.

PS: I''m out of this. not fair to bring in someone who isn't even in this discussion thread.

Rashmun wrote:

Natalia Romanova wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

do you enjoy it when we take turns screwing you?

Please do consider limiting all fantasies of access to within the bounds of your treaty of alliance.

One of the agendas in the treaty is that we'll take turns screwing you.

So there *is* a treaty?

instead of poking your nose everywhere, shouldn't you be more worried about saving your marriage. Only recently you were claiming publicly that your marriage had failed.

Natalia Romanova wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Natalia Romanova wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:Please do consider limiting all fantasies of access to within the bounds of your treaty of alliance.

One of the agendas in the treaty is that we'll take turns screwing you.

So there *is* a treaty?

instead of poking your nose everywhere, shouldn't you be more worried about saving your marriage. Only recently you were claiming publicly that your marriage had failed.

Aah. Personal attacks. Well I may have my marriage to save or not. What about you? You had said you are marrying next year. Still on cards?

Natalia Romanova wrote:That's what shaadi.com wants me to do. Yep. God knows who created a profile using my email and maybe his phone.

First they put my account on hold. And now I'm getting pics of women as suggestions.

Maybe this is a sign from gods. They telling me Nats, men are jerk. Start liking *ugh*.