Idéfix wrote:As my guruvu-gaaru once said:

The average youngster in India is no longer lured by extremely brilliant and self-deprecating Indian scholars to do a bhajan on communalism and sikularism.

That is a very good sign. There is hope for India.

https://such.forumotion.com/t22047-quiz-for-such-experts#150268

michelle2 wrote:

Idéfix wrote:As my guruvu-gaaru once said:

The average youngster in India is no longer lured by extremely brilliant and self-deprecating Indian scholars to do a bhajan on communalism and sikularism.

That is a very good sign. There is hope for India.

https://such.forumotion.com/t22047-quiz-for-such-experts#150268

i notice that you had nothing to say about raja's candidacy, the subject of vakavaka's post. do you merely want to pick a childish fight? please settle your private quarrels with your "guruvu-gaaru" via private mail; stop boring everyone here with your juvenile posts.

Idéfix wrote:

michelle2 wrote:

Idéfix wrote:As my guruvu-gaaru once said:

The average youngster in India is no longer lured by extremely brilliant and self-deprecating Indian scholars to do a bhajan on communalism and sikularism.

That is a very good sign. There is hope for India.

https://such.forumotion.com/t22047-quiz-for-such-experts#150268

i notice that you had nothing to say about raja's candidacy, the subject of vakavaka's post. do you merely want to pick a childish fight? please settle your private quarrels with your "guruvu-gaaru" via private mail; stop boring everyone here with your juvenile posts.

In your view, making a post in this thread with nothing to say about Raja's candidacy indicates a desire to pick a childish fight. Applying your view to your post, I notice your desire to pick a fight. But fights with you are boring, and I have better things to do, so no thank you.

michelle2 wrote:

Idéfix wrote:

michelle2 wrote:

Idéfix wrote:As my guruvu-gaaru once said:

The average youngster in India is no longer lured by extremely brilliant and self-deprecating Indian scholars to do a bhajan on communalism and sikularism.

That is a very good sign. There is hope for India.

https://such.forumotion.com/t22047-quiz-for-such-experts#150268

i notice that you had nothing to say about raja's candidacy, the subject of vakavaka's post. do you merely want to pick a childish fight? please settle your private quarrels with your "guruvu-gaaru" via private mail; stop boring everyone here with your juvenile posts.

In your view, making a post in this thread with nothing to say about Raja's candidacy indicates a desire to pick a childish fight. Applying your view to your post, I notice your desire to pick a fight. But fights with you are boring, and I have better things to do, so no thank you.

your first post in this thread: tried gratuitously to pick a fight with vakavaka;
my first post in this thread: objected to your post and suggested an alternative;
your motive: the pleasure that a childish fight apparently brings you; a feeling of achievement in some facet of life;
my motive: avoidance of the boredom that even an accidental glance at your post will bring.

"I have better things to do" -- idefix

i'm glad that you finally recognize that, and there's no danger of your ever forgetting that, for whenever you do, the vise that your employer has installed around your testicles will tighten.

Rashmun wrote:

michelle2 wrote:

Idéfix wrote:

michelle2 wrote:

Idéfix wrote:As my guruvu-gaaru once said:

The average youngster in India is no longer lured by extremely brilliant and self-deprecating Indian scholars to do a bhajan on communalism and sikularism.

That is a very good sign. There is hope for India.

https://such.forumotion.com/t22047-quiz-for-such-experts#150268

i notice that you had nothing to say about raja's candidacy, the subject of vakavaka's post. do you merely want to pick a childish fight? please settle your private quarrels with your "guruvu-gaaru" via private mail; stop boring everyone here with your juvenile posts.

In your view, making a post in this thread with nothing to say about Raja's candidacy indicates a desire to pick a childish fight. Applying your view to your post, I notice your desire to pick a fight. But fights with you are boring, and I have better things to do, so no thank you.

your first post in this thread: tried gratuitously to pick a fight with vakavaka;
my first post in this thread: objected to your post and suggested an alternative;
your motive: the pleasure that a childish fight apparently brings you; a feeling of achievement in some facet of life;
my motive: avoidance of the boredom that even an accidental glance at your post will bring.

"I have better things to do" -- idefix

i'm glad that you finally recognize that, and there's no danger of your ever forgetting that, for whenever you do, the vise that your employer has installed around your testicles will tighten.

PP always had this tendency to pick juvenile and immature fights. With the passage of time one would have expected him to become more mature and behave appropriately but the opposite seems to have happened in his case.

b_A wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

michelle2 wrote:

Idéfix wrote:

michelle2 wrote:
i notice that you had nothing to say about raja's candidacy, the subject of vakavaka's post. do you merely want to pick a childish fight? please settle your private quarrels with your "guruvu-gaaru" via private mail; stop boring everyone here with your juvenile posts.

In your view, making a post in this thread with nothing to say about Raja's candidacy indicates a desire to pick a childish fight. Applying your view to your post, I notice your desire to pick a fight. But fights with you are boring, and I have better things to do, so no thank you.

your first post in this thread: tried gratuitously to pick a fight with vakavaka;
my first post in this thread: objected to your post and suggested an alternative;
your motive: the pleasure that a childish fight apparently brings you; a feeling of achievement in some facet of life;
my motive: avoidance of the boredom that even an accidental glance at your post will bring.

"I have better things to do" -- idefix

i'm glad that you finally recognize that, and there's no danger of your ever forgetting that, for whenever you do, the vise that your employer has installed around your testicles will tighten.

PP always had this tendency to pick juvenile and immature fights. With the passage of time one would have expected him to become more mature and behave appropriately but the opposite seems to have happened in his case.

So you support that hitting below the belt action by a low self-worth individual with no life whose family hates him and who pretends to talk with his 'd' thru SuCH and who wants to spread his misery by complaining to employers about people who dare to disagree with him?
You are a noble person , in deed.

Rashmun wrote:

b_A wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

michelle2 wrote:

Idéfix wrote:
In your view, making a post in this thread with nothing to say about Raja's candidacy indicates a desire to pick a childish fight. Applying your view to your post, I notice your desire to pick a fight. But fights with you are boring, and I have better things to do, so no thank you.

your first post in this thread: tried gratuitously to pick a fight with vakavaka;
my first post in this thread: objected to your post and suggested an alternative;
your motive: the pleasure that a childish fight apparently brings you; a feeling of achievement in some facet of life;
my motive: avoidance of the boredom that even an accidental glance at your post will bring.

"I have better things to do" -- idefix

i'm glad that you finally recognize that, and there's no danger of your ever forgetting that, for whenever you do, the vise that your employer has installed around your testicles will tighten.

PP always had this tendency to pick juvenile and immature fights. With the passage of time one would have expected him to become more mature and behave appropriately but the opposite seems to have happened in his case.

So you support that hitting below the belt action by a low self-worth individual with no life whose family hates him and who pretends to talk with his 'd' thru SuCH and who wants to spread his misery by complaining to employers about people who dare to disagree with him?
You are a noble person , in deed.

Your lies and slander, including family abuse, only serve to expose you.

b_A wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

b_A wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

michelle2 wrote:
your first post in this thread: tried gratuitously to pick a fight with vakavaka;
my first post in this thread: objected to your post and suggested an alternative;
your motive: the pleasure that a childish fight apparently brings you; a feeling of achievement in some facet of life;
my motive: avoidance of the boredom that even an accidental glance at your post will bring.

"I have better things to do" -- idefix

i'm glad that you finally recognize that, and there's no danger of your ever forgetting that, for whenever you do, the vise that your employer has installed around your testicles will tighten.

PP always had this tendency to pick juvenile and immature fights. With the passage of time one would have expected him to become more mature and behave appropriately but the opposite seems to have happened in his case.

So you support that hitting below the belt action by a low self-worth individual with no life whose family hates him and who pretends to talk with his 'd' thru SuCH and who wants to spread his misery by complaining to employers about people who dare to disagree with him?
You are a noble person , in deed.

Your lies and slander, including family abuse, only serve to expose you.

https://such.forumotion.com/t20885-to-d

Rashmun wrote:

b_A wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

b_A wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

PP always had this tendency to pick juvenile and immature fights. With the passage of time one would have expected him to become more mature and behave appropriately but the opposite seems to have happened in his case.

So you support that hitting below the belt action by a low self-worth individual with no life whose family hates him and who pretends to talk with his 'd' thru SuCH and who wants to spread his misery by complaining to employers about people who dare to disagree with him?
You are a noble person , in deed.

Your lies and slander, including family abuse, only serve to expose you.

https://such.forumotion.com/t20885-to-d

This is no evidence. You have not shown that his family hates him nor have you shown that D is any family member. For all we know it could be another poster.
In other words u have resorted to family abuse without provocation from Luke. You have stooped as only the lowest of the low do so. Let us hope you mend your behavior otherwise you will either be ignored or kicked on your teeth by other members of this forum if you continue with the family abuse.

b_A wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

b_A wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

b_A wrote:

So you support that hitting below the belt action by a low self-worth individual with no life whose family hates him and who pretends to talk with his 'd' thru SuCH and who wants to spread his misery by complaining to employers about people who dare to disagree with him?
You are a noble person , in deed.

Your lies and slander, including family abuse, only serve to expose you.

https://such.forumotion.com/t20885-to-d

This is no evidence. You have not shown that his family hates him nor have you shown that D is any family member. For all we know it could be another poster.
In other words u have resorted to family abuse without provocation from Luke. You have stooped as only the lowest of the low do so. Let us hope you mend your behavior otherwise you will either be ignored or kicked on your teeth by other members of this forum if you continue with the family abuse.

You keep proving my assertion about your IQ.

Rashmun wrote:

b_A wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

b_A wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Your lies and slander, including family abuse, only serve to expose you.

https://such.forumotion.com/t20885-to-d

This is no evidence. You have not shown that his family hates him nor have you shown that D is any family member. For all we know it could be another poster.
In other words u have resorted to family abuse without provocation from Luke. You have stooped as only the lowest of the low do so. Let us hope you mend your behavior otherwise you will either be ignored or kicked on your teeth by other members of this forum if you continue with the family abuse.

You keep proving my assertion about your IQ.

i commented on two possibilities. in your post you idiotically suggested that i was only accepting one possibility. hence you are an idiot.

b_A wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

b_A wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

b_A wrote:

https://such.forumotion.com/t20885-to-d

This is no evidence. You have not shown that his family hates him nor have you shown that D is any family member. For all we know it could be another poster.
In other words u have resorted to family abuse without provocation from Luke. You have stooped as only the lowest of the low do so. Let us hope you mend your behavior otherwise you will either be ignored or kicked on your teeth by other members of this forum if you continue with the family abuse.

You keep proving my assertion about your IQ.

i commented on two possibilities. in your post you idiotically suggested that i was only accepting one possibility. hence you are an idiot.

https://such.forumotion.com/t22562-muslims-should-be-communal-for-their-own-good-shazia-ilmi-says#152551