US lawmaker disappointed at Modi cancellation

trofimov wrote:Is he a lawmaker if he cannot vote on any law in the House?

Modiji is in good company when he gets his support:

Faleomavaega is known for his vocal support of Bahrain's monarchy during the Bahraini uprising. One of Faleomavaega's top campaign donors, William Nixon, is a Washington, D.C.-based lobbyist whose firm, Policy Impact Communications, founded the pro-monarchy Bahrain American Council. He has taken various paid trips to Bahrain to meet with that country's rulers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eni_Faleomavaega#Support_for_Bahrain.27s_monarchy

And here is more on the dude:

Delegates such as Faleomavaega are more like super-lobbyists than Members of Congress. They cast no binding votes, and therefore they have no voting record by which their political views can be analyzed.

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=1760

Uppili wrote:

trofimov wrote:Is he a lawmaker if he cannot vote on any law in the House?

Modiji is in good company when he gets his support:

Faleomavaega is known for his vocal support of Bahrain's monarchy during the Bahraini uprising. One of Faleomavaega's top campaign donors, William Nixon, is a Washington, D.C.-based lobbyist whose firm, Policy Impact Communications, founded the pro-monarchy Bahrain American Council. He has taken various paid trips to Bahrain to meet with that country's rulers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eni_Faleomavaega#Support_for_Bahrain.27s_monarchy

And here is more on the dude:

Delegates such as Faleomavaega are more like super-lobbyists than Members of Congress. They cast no binding votes, and therefore they have no voting record by which their political views can be analyzed.

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=1760

A congressman is a congressman - whether he is a voting or a non-voting member. His words make more sense than Digvijay or any of the secular fanatics of SuCH. Did you see the WSJ survey in which more than 90% agreed Wharton was wrong and only some 6.7% agree with Wharton action? I bet the secular fanatics will deny that report as well.

The fanatic is not Modi but you guys - who falsely claim to be for free speech and freedom for all..... yeah rite...