Home
Publications
Search
Register
Log inCompared to Karunanidhi, what Lalu stole was nothing
+3
Hellsangel
Seva Lamberdar
Rishi
7 posters
Page 1 of 1
Compared to Karunanidhi, what Lalu stole was nothing
by Rishi Tue Oct 01, 2013 10:01 am
Assets
Lalu’s assets have seen a major upward swing since the 2004 elections. In the Lok Sabha elections of 2004, he had declared assets to the tune of Rs 87 lakh. In the 2009 elections, his assets were worth Rs 3 crore.
Lalu has cash worth Rs 3.75 lakh, his deposits in financial institutions are to the tune of Rs 37 lakh and his bonds and debentures worth Rs 70,000. His NSS and postal savings add up to Rs 4 lakh, while his insurance policy is worth Rs 2 lakh. He owns a Maruti 800 and a military disposal jeep, which are worth Rs 25,000. He has jewels worth Rs 6 lakh and miscellaneous items to the tune of Rs 13 lakh. Lalu has also declared that he has 60 cows and 36 calves.
Lalu has agriculture land to the tune of Rs 1 crore and non-agriculture land worth Rs 23 lakh. He has also declared buildings worth Rs 1 crore.
Lalu’s assets have seen a major upward swing since the 2004 elections. In the Lok Sabha elections of 2004, he had declared assets to the tune of Rs 87 lakh. In the 2009 elections, his assets were worth Rs 3 crore.
Lalu has cash worth Rs 3.75 lakh, his deposits in financial institutions are to the tune of Rs 37 lakh and his bonds and debentures worth Rs 70,000. His NSS and postal savings add up to Rs 4 lakh, while his insurance policy is worth Rs 2 lakh. He owns a Maruti 800 and a military disposal jeep, which are worth Rs 25,000. He has jewels worth Rs 6 lakh and miscellaneous items to the tune of Rs 13 lakh. Lalu has also declared that he has 60 cows and 36 calves.
Lalu has agriculture land to the tune of Rs 1 crore and non-agriculture land worth Rs 23 lakh. He has also declared buildings worth Rs 1 crore.
Rishi- Posts : 5129
Join date : 2011-09-02
Re: Compared to Karunanidhi, what Lalu stole was nothing
by Seva Lamberdar Tue Oct 01, 2013 10:13 am
So unfair. It just proves the north Indians get treated more harshly than the south Indians.
Seva Lamberdar- Posts : 6574
Join date : 2012-11-29 -
Re: Compared to Karunanidhi, what Lalu stole was nothing
by Hellsangel Tue Oct 01, 2013 10:15 am
Yes the SIs are more suave. What to do, Sevaji?Seva Lamberdar wrote:So unfair. It just proves the north Indians get treated more harshly than the south Indians.
Hellsangel- Posts : 14721
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: Compared to Karunanidhi, what Lalu stole was nothing
by Seva Lamberdar Tue Oct 01, 2013 10:17 am
we need a NI version of KV on SUCH.Hellsangel wrote:Yes the SIs are more suave. What to do, Sevaji?Seva Lamberdar wrote:So unfair. It just proves the north Indians get treated more harshly than the south Indians.
Seva Lamberdar- Posts : 6574
Join date : 2012-11-29 -
Re: Compared to Karunanidhi, what Lalu stole was nothing
by Vakavaka Pakapaka Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:09 pm
Jagan tops the list. Even K'nidhi can learn a thing or two from him on how to make money fast. Come think of it, even the Marans are smarter than K'nidhi.
But, the smartest is MT. Vadra does sikular money making and he gets special treatment equivalent to that of the PM. Pappu barks like a dog and pulls down the PM on an issue he doesn't really believe in. He still continues as the vice-president of CONmen. Jagan wants to be the CM of AP; fearing that he may be a threat to the dynasty, she puts him in jail. Laloo, who supported CONwallahs when they needed his help, is pushed over the cliff when Nitish said he is willing to polish her boots. PVN was treated like a dog in his old age because he tried to undermine the dynasty...... Extremely brilliant PiSS scholars sing her praise when she actively destroys the economy for vote bank politics.
Garibi Hatao!
But, the smartest is MT. Vadra does sikular money making and he gets special treatment equivalent to that of the PM. Pappu barks like a dog and pulls down the PM on an issue he doesn't really believe in. He still continues as the vice-president of CONmen. Jagan wants to be the CM of AP; fearing that he may be a threat to the dynasty, she puts him in jail. Laloo, who supported CONwallahs when they needed his help, is pushed over the cliff when Nitish said he is willing to polish her boots. PVN was treated like a dog in his old age because he tried to undermine the dynasty...... Extremely brilliant PiSS scholars sing her praise when she actively destroys the economy for vote bank politics.
Garibi Hatao!
Vakavaka Pakapaka- Posts : 7611
Join date : 2012-08-24
Re: Compared to Karunanidhi, what Lalu stole was nothing
by indophile Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:56 pm
No one from the "first" family attended PVN's funeral (I am not sure if the AP CM at the time paid respects or not). Also, the Congress AKs got the airport in Hyderabad named after Rajiv Gandhi, completely ignoring PVN.Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote: PVN was treated like a dog in his old age because he tried to undermine the dynasty...... Extremely brilliant PiSS scholars sing her praise when she actively destroys the economy for vote bank politics.
indophile- Posts : 4338
Join date : 2011-04-29
Location : Glenn Dale, MD
Re: Compared to Karunanidhi, what Lalu stole was nothing
by garam_kuta Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:00 pm
hmm..PVN reminds me a shade of Gorbachev.indophile wrote:No one from the "first" family attended PVN's funeral (I am not sure if the AP CM at the time paid respects or not). Also, the Congress AKs got the airport in Hyderabad named after Rajiv Gandhi, completely ignoring PVN.Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote: PVN was treated like a dog in his old age because he tried to undermine the dynasty...... Extremely brilliant PiSS scholars sing her praise when she actively destroys the economy for vote bank politics.
garam_kuta- Posts : 3768
Join date : 2011-05-18
Re: Compared to Karunanidhi, what Lalu stole was nothing
by Kayalvizhi Tue Oct 01, 2013 9:28 pm
9. Andhra's Narasimha Rao Humiliated
Congress(I) emerged victorious by a slight margin in the 1991 parliamentary elections. While it lost many seats in the Hindi belt, it won substantial seats in the south. That numbers game lead to the election of Andhra Pradesh's Narasimha Rao as the Prime Minister. He was a veteran Congress leader and had served in the cabinet of many previous governments. Although his mother tongue was Telugu, he was fluent in Hindi. He never spoke against Hindi imposition in all his years in politics (unlike Kamaraj). This, to some extent, made him acceptable to Hindian politicians temporarily. In the case of all previous Congress Party Prime Ministers (all Hindians), once elected they remained unchallenged leaders. This was not the case with this first southern Prime Minister. He was constantly challenged by Arjun Singh from the Hindi belt. Rao's position was never considered safe in Congress(I). He knew the power of Hindians within the party. He placated them by speaking in Hindi in radio and television addresses, instead of his native Telugu. If the Indian Government's policy is to promote all Indian languages, as it claims, would it not be prudent for the Prime Minister to speak on radio and television is his/her mother tongue and translated to English for the benefit of those who do not know the Prime Minister's language (as Hindi speeches were usually done)? He also did nothing to stop or even reduce the transfer of large amount of tax monies from many non-Hindi states into the Hindi belt. His government spent more money on Hindi propagation and development than the previous ones; he wanted to appease Hindian politicians as best he could. Even with him totally subservient to Hindians, as Hindian politicians consolidated their positions within the party, he was unceremoniously deposed and humiliated by not even offering him a seat to contest the next election. No Hindian leader of Congress Party was thus humiliated in the past. (This was years before charges were filed against Narasimha Rao for bribing members of parliament to support his government. So it has nothing to do with the way Congress (I) treated him.)
Narasinha Rao' s humiliation within the party by not even offering him a seat to contest the next election was meant as a warning to all non-Hindi politicians not to be too ambitious; they better know their position in Indian politics and accept Hindian supremacy. (This is not an isolated case. We already discussed in Section 8 how Hindians of his own party undermined Karnataka's Ramakrishna Hegde. We discuss in Section 11, the case of former Prime Minister Deve Gowda. You will see a common thread of preventing non-Hindi politicians from becoming Prime Ministers, and if they do against all odds, to depose them as quickly as possible.)
Read the full article at
http://www.tamiltribune.com/00/1101.html
A Few Preliminary Notes
1. Introduction
2. Evidence of Hindian Rule over India
3. Democratic Process in India
4. Hindi Domination of the Indian Government
5. K. M. Panicker's Prophetic Statement from Kerala
6. Tamil Nadu's Rajaji Sidelined
7. Tamil Nadu's Kamaraj Attacked
8. Karnataka's Hegde Back-Stabbed
9. Andhra's Narasimha Rao Humiliated
10. Karnataka's Deva Gowda reads his Speeches in Hindi
11. Karnataka's Deva Gowda Deposed
12. Sonia Gandhi reads her Speeches in Hindi
13. Unwritten Law: Only Hindians or Hindian-Puppets can become Prime Minister of India
14. Dominance of Hindian Leaders during One-Party Rule
15. Dominance of Hindian Leaders during Coalition Rule
http://www.tamiltribune.com/00/1101.html[
Congress(I) emerged victorious by a slight margin in the 1991 parliamentary elections. While it lost many seats in the Hindi belt, it won substantial seats in the south. That numbers game lead to the election of Andhra Pradesh's Narasimha Rao as the Prime Minister. He was a veteran Congress leader and had served in the cabinet of many previous governments. Although his mother tongue was Telugu, he was fluent in Hindi. He never spoke against Hindi imposition in all his years in politics (unlike Kamaraj). This, to some extent, made him acceptable to Hindian politicians temporarily. In the case of all previous Congress Party Prime Ministers (all Hindians), once elected they remained unchallenged leaders. This was not the case with this first southern Prime Minister. He was constantly challenged by Arjun Singh from the Hindi belt. Rao's position was never considered safe in Congress(I). He knew the power of Hindians within the party. He placated them by speaking in Hindi in radio and television addresses, instead of his native Telugu. If the Indian Government's policy is to promote all Indian languages, as it claims, would it not be prudent for the Prime Minister to speak on radio and television is his/her mother tongue and translated to English for the benefit of those who do not know the Prime Minister's language (as Hindi speeches were usually done)? He also did nothing to stop or even reduce the transfer of large amount of tax monies from many non-Hindi states into the Hindi belt. His government spent more money on Hindi propagation and development than the previous ones; he wanted to appease Hindian politicians as best he could. Even with him totally subservient to Hindians, as Hindian politicians consolidated their positions within the party, he was unceremoniously deposed and humiliated by not even offering him a seat to contest the next election. No Hindian leader of Congress Party was thus humiliated in the past. (This was years before charges were filed against Narasimha Rao for bribing members of parliament to support his government. So it has nothing to do with the way Congress (I) treated him.)
Narasinha Rao' s humiliation within the party by not even offering him a seat to contest the next election was meant as a warning to all non-Hindi politicians not to be too ambitious; they better know their position in Indian politics and accept Hindian supremacy. (This is not an isolated case. We already discussed in Section 8 how Hindians of his own party undermined Karnataka's Ramakrishna Hegde. We discuss in Section 11, the case of former Prime Minister Deve Gowda. You will see a common thread of preventing non-Hindi politicians from becoming Prime Ministers, and if they do against all odds, to depose them as quickly as possible.)
Read the full article at
http://www.tamiltribune.com/00/1101.html
A Few Preliminary Notes
1. Introduction
2. Evidence of Hindian Rule over India
3. Democratic Process in India
4. Hindi Domination of the Indian Government
5. K. M. Panicker's Prophetic Statement from Kerala
6. Tamil Nadu's Rajaji Sidelined
7. Tamil Nadu's Kamaraj Attacked
8. Karnataka's Hegde Back-Stabbed
9. Andhra's Narasimha Rao Humiliated
10. Karnataka's Deva Gowda reads his Speeches in Hindi
11. Karnataka's Deva Gowda Deposed
12. Sonia Gandhi reads her Speeches in Hindi
13. Unwritten Law: Only Hindians or Hindian-Puppets can become Prime Minister of India
14. Dominance of Hindian Leaders during One-Party Rule
15. Dominance of Hindian Leaders during Coalition Rule
http://www.tamiltribune.com/00/1101.html[
Kayalvizhi- Posts : 3659
Join date : 2011-05-16
Similar topics» On Karunanidhi birthday, little known information of Karunanidhi revealed in Facebook
» Comedian Raju Shrivastav mimicking Lalu Yadav in front of Lalu
» Sonia calls Lalu to greet him on release from jail, speculation mounts on Lalu-Congress-Paswan alliance in Bihar (such an alliance will decimate a divided Nitish and BJP)
» where led zeppelin stole from
» How Google stole an idea from Batman
» Comedian Raju Shrivastav mimicking Lalu Yadav in front of Lalu
» Sonia calls Lalu to greet him on release from jail, speculation mounts on Lalu-Congress-Paswan alliance in Bihar (such an alliance will decimate a divided Nitish and BJP)
» where led zeppelin stole from
» How Google stole an idea from Batman
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum|
|
|