keywords: ivy league professor, sex, desi

Tracy Whitney wrote:one of the earliest gay-marriage estrangement stories.

Tracy Whitney wrote:one of the earliest gay-marriage estrangement stories.

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:one of the earliest gay-marriage estrangement stories.

earliest? i have known of three in the last six years.

Prof, you clearly move in circles of folks with flamboyant sexuality.

Hellsangel wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:one of the earliest gay-marriage estrangement stories.

earliest? i have known of three in the last six years.

Prof, you clearly move in circles of folks with flamboyant sexuality.

Il Professor-ai and Meena Kandasamy are buddies?

Hellsangel wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:one of the earliest gay-marriage estrangement stories.

earliest? i have known of three in the last six years.

Prof, you clearly move in circles of folks with flamboyant sexuality.

Il Professor-ai and Meena Kandasamy are buddies?

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:one of the earliest gay-marriage estrangement stories.

earliest? i have known of three in the last six years.

Prof, you clearly move in circles of folks with flamboyant sexuality.

Il Professor-ai and Meena Kandasamy are buddies?

Possible. But flamboyant sexuality is not Meena Kandaswamy's monopoly.

Rishi wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:one of the earliest gay-marriage estrangement stories.

earliest? i have known of three in the last six years.

Prof, you clearly move in circles of folks with flamboyant sexuality.

Il Professor-ai and Meena Kandasamy are buddies?

ROFL

They make a good pair.

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:rishi you are sleeping on the job.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/yale-professor-jail-death-stranger-male-escort-report-article-1.1533366

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:why do the gay couples resort husband-wife equation?  one of them might as well have a sex-change operation.

Mahalakshmi wrote:How do they decide who's the husband and who's the wife? Criteria kya?

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Mahalakshmi wrote:How do they decide who's the husband and who's the wife? Criteria kya?

clue newsletter for the clueless: there is NO wife. there are only two husbands, i.e. they call each other husband.

Mahalakshmi wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Mahalakshmi wrote:How do they decide who's the husband and who's the wife? Criteria kya?

clue newsletter for the clueless: there is NO wife. there are only two husbands, i.e. they call each other husband.

oh..ok. So if two lesbies marry will they both be wives? 

Why can't they just say partners? why this husbands and wives business?

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Mahalakshmi wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Mahalakshmi wrote:How do they decide who's the husband and who's the wife? Criteria kya?

clue newsletter for the clueless: there is NO wife. there are only two husbands, i.e. they call each other husband.

oh..ok. So if two lesbies marry will they both be wives? 

Why can't they just say partners? why this husbands and wives business?

do you call your husband a partner? why do you call him DH rather than DP?

Mahalakshmi wrote:Why do they want to draw parallels to this one?

truthbetold wrote:What do you call your partner, husband? What does he call you?
I think it is different in your household. Be honest.

Mahalakshmi wrote:I have no strong opinions about them either. But gays shouldn't get so defensive when the heteros just query about them.

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Mahalakshmi wrote:I have no strong opinions about them either. But gays shouldn't get so defensive when the heteros just query about them.

walk a mile in the shoes of people whose rights have been denied them a long time before you make judgments about things that sound defensive. i have no strong opinions, but my sympathies are on their side.

Mahalakshmi wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Mahalakshmi wrote:I have no strong opinions about them either. But gays shouldn't get so defensive when the heteros just query about them.

walk a mile in the shoes of people whose rights have been denied them a long time before you make judgments about things that sound defensive. i have no strong opinions, but my sympathies are on their side.

I didn't make any judgments. You don't need to get all worked up and take on the role of the champion of gay rights.

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Mahalakshmi wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Mahalakshmi wrote:I have no strong opinions about them either. But gays shouldn't get so defensive when the heteros just query about them.

walk a mile in the shoes of people whose rights have been denied them a long time before you make judgments about things that sound defensive. i have no strong opinions, but my sympathies are on their side.

I didn't make any judgments. You don't need to get all worked up and take on the role of the champion of gay rights.

"defensive" is not a judgment? i am no champion of gay rights, but i am curious about your motives.

Mahalakshmi wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Mahalakshmi wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Mahalakshmi wrote:I have no strong opinions about them either. But gays shouldn't get so defensive when the heteros just query about them.

walk a mile in the shoes of people whose rights have been denied them a long time before you make judgments about things that sound defensive. i have no strong opinions, but my sympathies are on their side.

I didn't make any judgments. You don't need to get all worked up and take on the role of the champion of gay rights.

"defensive" is not a judgment? i am no champion of gay rights, but i am curious about your motives.

"but IMO it's not the business of heteros to query what terminology gay people use. heteros' lives are unimpacted by gays' usage of marriage terminology."


Doesn't the above statement seem defensive? All I asked was a simple question. 

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Mahalakshmi wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Mahalakshmi wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:walk a mile in the shoes of people whose rights have been denied them a long time before you make judgments about things that sound defensive. i have no strong opinions, but my sympathies are on their side.

I didn't make any judgments. You don't need to get all worked up and take on the role of the champion of gay rights.

"defensive" is not a judgment? i am no champion of gay rights, but i am curious about your motives.

"but IMO it's not the business of heteros to query what terminology gay people use. heteros' lives are unimpacted by gays' usage of marriage terminology."


Doesn't the above statement seem defensive? All I asked was a simple question. 

no they're just asking you to fuck off. defensive is trying to justify what they do and reason with you. they're not doing that, they're simply showing you the middle finger and asking you to mind your own business.

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Mahalakshmi wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:

Mahalakshmi wrote:

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:walk a mile in the shoes of people whose rights have been denied them a long time before you make judgments about things that sound defensive. i have no strong opinions, but my sympathies are on their side.

I didn't make any judgments. You don't need to get all worked up and take on the role of the champion of gay rights.

"defensive" is not a judgment? i am no champion of gay rights, but i am curious about your motives.

"but IMO it's not the business of heteros to query what terminology gay people use. heteros' lives are unimpacted by gays' usage of marriage terminology."


Doesn't the above statement seem defensive? All I asked was a simple question. 

no they're just asking you to fuck off. defensive is trying to justify what they do and reason with you. they're not doing that, they're simply showing you the middle finger and asking you to mind your own business.