Home
Publications
Search
Register
Log inMax, you are an Indian first and only then a Tamilian (NT)
3 posters
Page 1 of 1
Guest- Guest
Re: Max, you are an Indian first and only then a Tamilian (NT)
by Vakavaka Pakapaka Mon Aug 04, 2014 11:49 am
You seem to be comfortable being a BIMARU UP-ite first. In addition, you have been insulting the intelligence of Tamils by asking them to learn Hindi.
Your real reasons are: you have a false sense of superiority and you are in reality extremely insecure. Typical BIMARU behavior - when you can't hack it, you want the systems to change so that you benefit from it at cost to those who are meritorious. The current UPSC agitation by BIMARUs is a good example of it.
People like you make SIs think that they are wasting their time being with NI and are better off to separate.
Your real reasons are: you have a false sense of superiority and you are in reality extremely insecure. Typical BIMARU behavior - when you can't hack it, you want the systems to change so that you benefit from it at cost to those who are meritorious. The current UPSC agitation by BIMARUs is a good example of it.
People like you make SIs think that they are wasting their time being with NI and are better off to separate.
Vakavaka Pakapaka- Posts : 7611
Join date : 2012-08-24
Re: Max, you are an Indian first and only then a Tamilian (NT)
by Guest Mon Aug 04, 2014 11:53 am
Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:You seem to be comfortable being a BIMARU UP-ite first. In addition, you have been insulting the intelligence of Tamils by asking them to learn Hindi.
Your real reasons are: you have a false sense of superiority and you are in reality extremely insecure. Typical BIMARU behavior - when you can't hack it, you want the systems to change so that you benefit from it at cost to those who are meritorious. The current UPSC agitation by BIMARUs is a good example of it.
People like you make SIs think that they are wasting their time being with NI and are better off to separate.
Vakavaka, would you eat this?
Guest- Guest
Re: Max, you are an Indian first and only then a Tamilian (NT)
by nevada Mon Aug 04, 2014 12:32 pm
"Indian" is an artificial identity created by insular, insensitive North Indians. Saying "I am an Indian" makes as much sense as "I am a Soviet". "Soviet" was an artificial, forced union. "India" is very similar to the same concept.
nevada- Posts : 1831
Join date : 2011-04-29
Re: Max, you are an Indian first and only then a Tamilian (NT)
by Guest Mon Aug 04, 2014 12:45 pm
nevada wrote:"Indian" is an artificial identity created by insular, insensitive North Indians. Saying "I am an Indian" makes as much sense as "I am a Soviet". "Soviet" was an artificial, forced union. "India" is very similar to the same concept.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Char_Dham
Guest- Guest
Re: Max, you are an Indian first and only then a Tamilian (NT)
by Guest Mon Aug 04, 2014 12:52 pm
The language Sanskrit was once used as a lingua franca all over the nation during the ancient and medieval era. Most of the inscriptions of those days were in Sanskrit and those inscriptions were found in large numbers in Tamil Nadu, said Dr Chitra Madhavan, a noted historian, here on Thursday.
Delivering the lecture on ‘Sanskrit inscriptions in Tamil Nadu’ at the monthly lecture organised by Tamil Valarchi Kazhagam, she said, “From the Pallava dynasty to the Maratha dynasty, which ruled Tamil Nadu — Sanskrit inscriptions were used, since it was widely followed and the mother tongue of each dynasty was different from others.”
“Through the inscriptions, one can know about the political geography, culture, administration, economy, etc., of these periods,” she said.
She added that most of the inscriptions were found in temples, which indicated that the donations were made by the kings. One can find inscriptions that are centuries old at Thiruparuthikundram near Kanchipuram.”
“Interestingly some of the inscriptions found in Gangai Konda Cholapuram tell us that kings from the Northern parts of India also made their contributions through these donations,” she added.
She said, “Most of the temples in Tamil Nadu do not have the names of the kings. But one of the temples in Thiruvottiyur, which is in the shape of a gajapirushtam, has an inscription naming the builder of the temple as Veera Chola Ravi.”
Another interesting point she noted was that the Vijayanagara Dynasty kings did not sign in their own names on the inscriptions. Whenever they signed on the metal inscriptions, they used the name of Sri Virupaksha, since the latter was the traditional deity of those kings.”
“One can get a lot of information from these inscriptions. But people do not have a conscious sense of history and damage such inscriptions by abandoning them or pasting posters on them. This must be prevented,” she concluded.
http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/chennai/article1512930.ece?goback=.gde_158645_member_225668583
Delivering the lecture on ‘Sanskrit inscriptions in Tamil Nadu’ at the monthly lecture organised by Tamil Valarchi Kazhagam, she said, “From the Pallava dynasty to the Maratha dynasty, which ruled Tamil Nadu — Sanskrit inscriptions were used, since it was widely followed and the mother tongue of each dynasty was different from others.”
“Through the inscriptions, one can know about the political geography, culture, administration, economy, etc., of these periods,” she said.
She added that most of the inscriptions were found in temples, which indicated that the donations were made by the kings. One can find inscriptions that are centuries old at Thiruparuthikundram near Kanchipuram.”
“Interestingly some of the inscriptions found in Gangai Konda Cholapuram tell us that kings from the Northern parts of India also made their contributions through these donations,” she added.
She said, “Most of the temples in Tamil Nadu do not have the names of the kings. But one of the temples in Thiruvottiyur, which is in the shape of a gajapirushtam, has an inscription naming the builder of the temple as Veera Chola Ravi.”
Another interesting point she noted was that the Vijayanagara Dynasty kings did not sign in their own names on the inscriptions. Whenever they signed on the metal inscriptions, they used the name of Sri Virupaksha, since the latter was the traditional deity of those kings.”
“One can get a lot of information from these inscriptions. But people do not have a conscious sense of history and damage such inscriptions by abandoning them or pasting posters on them. This must be prevented,” she concluded.
http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/chennai/article1512930.ece?goback=.gde_158645_member_225668583
Guest- Guest
Re: Max, you are an Indian first and only then a Tamilian (NT)
by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Mon Aug 04, 2014 1:09 pm
nevada wrote:"Indian" is an artificial identity created by insular, insensitive North Indians. Saying "I am an Indian" makes as much sense as "I am a Soviet". "Soviet" was an artificial, forced union. "India" is very similar to the same concept.
Yes. I agree...
That is why we should change the name BACK to "Bharath"
Marathadi-Saamiyaar- Posts : 17675
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 110
Re: Max, you are an Indian first and only then a Tamilian (NT)
by Guest Mon Aug 04, 2014 1:23 pm
nevada wrote:"Indian" is an artificial identity created by insular, insensitive North Indians. Saying "I am an Indian" makes as much sense as "I am a Soviet". "Soviet" was an artificial, forced union. "India" is very similar to the same concept.
oh wow.
Guest- Guest
Re: Max, you are an Indian first and only then a Tamilian (NT)
by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Mon Aug 04, 2014 3:18 pm
Beatrix Kiddo wrote:nevada wrote:"Indian" is an artificial identity created by insular, insensitive North Indians. Saying "I am an Indian" makes as much sense as "I am a Soviet". "Soviet" was an artificial, forced union. "India" is very similar to the same concept.
oh wow.
And, you were blaming KV and Tamilans all these days.
Marathadi-Saamiyaar- Posts : 17675
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 110
Re: Max, you are an Indian first and only then a Tamilian (NT)
by Guest Mon Aug 04, 2014 6:43 pm
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:Beatrix Kiddo wrote:nevada wrote:"Indian" is an artificial identity created by insular, insensitive North Indians. Saying "I am an Indian" makes as much sense as "I am a Soviet". "Soviet" was an artificial, forced union. "India" is very similar to the same concept.
oh wow.
And, you were blaming KV and Tamilans all these days.
i thought nevada is tamil too, no?
Guest- Guest
Sponsored content
Similar topics» There is a Tamilian inside every Indian
» Letearneau - The Tamilian/Indian version
» Delhi: Tamilian dupes North Indian of Rs 20 crore
» Synthesis: A Tamilian in Goa
» Rajinikanth is really a Tamilian
» Letearneau - The Tamilian/Indian version
» Delhi: Tamilian dupes North Indian of Rs 20 crore
» Synthesis: A Tamilian in Goa
» Rajinikanth is really a Tamilian
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum|
|
|