My idea of a gorgeous white girl

by Bittu Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:38 pm

https://i.imgur.com/uWEgk.jpg

Pic is safe for work but has slight under-the-sweater perkage.

by garam_kuta Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:45 pm

Bittu wrote:https://i.imgur.com/uWEgk.jpg

Pic is safe for work but has slight under-the-sweater perkage.

watch it bittu ..looks more like a jail-

bait

by Propagandhi711 Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:59 pm

oh yea

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:01 pm

garam_kuta wrote:
Bittu wrote:https://i.imgur.com/uWEgk.jpg

Pic is safe for work but has slight under-the-sweater perkage.

watch it bittu ..looks more like a jail- bait

Agree...The Pee-Master will get into trouble...if he tried any webcammage or Skypage.

by Bittu Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:12 pm

garam_kuta wrote:
watch it bittu ..looks more like a jail- bait

yeah now that you mention it, she does look young. oh well *shrug*

by harharmahadev Mon Sep 19, 2011 6:44 pm

Bittu wrote:
garam_kuta wrote:
watch it bittu ..looks more like a jail- bait

yeah now that you mention it, she does look young. oh well *shrug*

Nevertheless, she is gorgeous.

by Guest Mon Sep 19, 2011 7:23 pm

Who's this lolita? She indeed is gorgeous.

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:04 am

kinnera wrote:Who's this lolita? She indeed is gorgeous.

If any man had made a similar comment on another man's picture, he would be termed a gay....

- not that there is anything wrong with it...but just saying..

by Bittu Tue Sep 20, 2011 2:58 am

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
If any man had made a similar comment on another man's picture, he would be termed a gay....

- not that there is anything wrong with it...but just saying..

No wonder your wife can't stand you. and what a horrible way of life that must be.

by Guest Tue Sep 20, 2011 9:27 am

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
kinnera wrote:Who's this lolita? She indeed is gorgeous.

If any man had made a similar comment on another man's picture, he would be termed a gay....

- not that there is anything wrong with it...but just saying..

So when one appreciates a li'l child does one become a pedophile?

by Guest Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:02 am

kinnera wrote:
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
kinnera wrote:Who's this lolita? She indeed is gorgeous.

If any man had made a similar comment on another man's picture, he would be termed a gay....

- not that there is anything wrong with it...but just saying..

So when one appreciates a li'l child does one become a pedophile?

calling a teenaged girl a lolita is not "appreciating a little child", kinnera. unless you are appreciating the lolita-like characteristics?

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:11 am

kinnera wrote:
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
kinnera wrote:Who's this lolita? She indeed is gorgeous.

If any man had made a similar comment on another man's picture, he would be termed a gay....

- not that there is anything wrong with it...but just saying..

So when one appreciates a li'l child does one become a pedophile?

Where did I say that? read again closely...again....and again...

BTW... like NuttyAunty says... a li'l child should not be called a Lolita.

by Guest Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:22 pm

nutmeg wrote:
kinnera wrote:
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
kinnera wrote:Who's this lolita? She indeed is gorgeous.

If any man had made a similar comment on another man's picture, he would be termed a gay....

- not that there is anything wrong with it...but just saying..

So when one appreciates a li'l child does one become a pedophile?

calling a teenaged girl a lolita is not "appreciating a little child", kinnera. unless you are appreciating the lolita-like characteristics?

I didn't say that the girl in the picture is a little child.

And when I said lolita, i meant a beautiful, attractive young girl/woman. nothing more to it.

by Guest Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:33 pm

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
kinnera wrote:
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
kinnera wrote:Who's this lolita? She indeed is gorgeous.

If any man had made a similar comment on another man's picture, he would be termed a gay....

- not that there is anything wrong with it...but just saying..

So when one appreciates a li'l child does one become a pedophile?

Where did I say that? read again closely...again....and again...

BTW... like NuttyAunty says... a li'l child should not be called a Lolita.

It's an analagy, silly. Do ppl have comprehension problems or do I have a problem conveying the message? What I meant was....if someone appreciates a cute little child (a 3,4,5, 6 or 7 yr old child for example, NOT the one in the picture) is one considered a pedophile?

Jeez! ppl are all twisted in their thinking. I'm not even discussing anything in this thread.

by Hellsangel Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:35 pm

kinnera wrote:

Jeez! ppl are all twisted in their thinking. I'm not even discussing anything in this thread.

Kinni Pinni, please refer to Urban Dictionary for the term Lolita.

And from Wikipedia:
Although Nabokov's focus is mainly on Humbert's infatuation with Lolita,
the name has become synonymous with seductive or sexually precocious or
sexually responsive young girls.^[81]
Multiple popular songs employ the name "Lolita" for a girl either
infatuated with an older man, or being pursued by an older man. Notable
examples of such songs include Celine Dion's Lolita (trop jeune pour aimer)
(meaning "Lolita (Too Young to Love)") recorded in 1987 and about a
young girl who wishes she could be in love with an older man. Suzanne Vega's Lolita from her album Nine Objects of Desire
warns a girl named Lolita "almost grown" to get back home rather than
to try beg for affection she is not getting at home. The video of Alizée's 2000 song Moi... Lolita
shows a free-spirited young girl in nightclubs being followed by an
older man. A song written from the point of view of an underage rape
victim is Emilie Autumn's Gothic Lolita. In an interview with Bryan Reesman, Autumn states she never performs the song live because it is too emotionally draining.^[82]
Reviewer Greg Prato believes this is one of two songs on the album in
which she discards other musical influences and finds her own voice.^[83]

by garam_kuta Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:48 pm

kinnera wrote:
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
kinnera wrote:
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
kinnera wrote:Who's this lolita? She indeed is gorgeous.

If any man had made a similar comment on another man's picture, he would be termed a gay....

- not that there is anything wrong with it...but just saying..

So when one appreciates a li'l child does one become a pedophile?

Where did I say that? read again closely...again....and again...

BTW... like NuttyAunty says... a li'l child should not be called a Lolita.

It's an analagy, silly. Do ppl have comprehension problems or do I have a problem conveying the message? What I meant was....if someone appreciates a cute little child (a 3,4,5, 6 or 7 yr old child for example, NOT the one in the picture) is one considered a pedophile?

Jeez! ppl are all twisted in their thinking. I'm not even discussing anything in this thread.

Indeed painful and I sympathize with you - looks like sami yaaru has become hypersensitized with this subject and continues to carry the legacy from sulekha times..

by Sponsored content

My idea of a gorgeous white girl

My idea of a gorgeous white girl

Re: My idea of a gorgeous white girl

Re: My idea of a gorgeous white girl

Re: My idea of a gorgeous white girl

Re: My idea of a gorgeous white girl

Re: My idea of a gorgeous white girl

Re: My idea of a gorgeous white girl

Re: My idea of a gorgeous white girl

Re: My idea of a gorgeous white girl

Re: My idea of a gorgeous white girl

Re: My idea of a gorgeous white girl

Re: My idea of a gorgeous white girl

Re: My idea of a gorgeous white girl

Re: My idea of a gorgeous white girl

Re: My idea of a gorgeous white girl

Re: My idea of a gorgeous white girl

Re: My idea of a gorgeous white girl