BRAKING NEWS - blasts at brussels metro

by Guest Tue Mar 22, 2016 3:58 am

armed gunmen conducted twin blasts at brussels metro station. they were atheists for we are informed that terrorists have no religion. please do not hate islam for it has nothing to do with it.

by ashdoc Tue Mar 22, 2016 4:18 am

how dare you say that terrorists have no religion and align yourself with the intolerant BJP led NDA government ?? what about hindu terrorism that the honourable congress home minister sushilkumar shinde had talked about ??

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/RSS-BJP-camps-promoting-Hindu-terror-Sushilkumar-Shinde/articleshow/18100459.cms

by Hellsangel Tue Mar 22, 2016 6:28 am

More Americans will start looking to support Trump.

by Guest Tue Mar 22, 2016 7:32 am

Hellsangel wrote:More Americans will start looking to support Trump.

hahahaahhaahaahaha!

by Hellsangel Tue Mar 22, 2016 7:36 am

Belgium's policy of appeasement.

by Hellsangel Tue Mar 22, 2016 7:52 am

What the libby Western media won't tell you about Twitter.

by Propagandhi711 Tue Mar 22, 2016 8:06 am

damn modi and militant hindus (including ram sene) causing issues again?

b) islam is religion of peace.

by Guest Tue Mar 22, 2016 8:23 am

Horrible!

Will see if Obama and Hillary will have the guts to say the word, 'terrorists' this time. They avoided to call the Paris' terrorists as 'terrorists' last time.

by Guest Tue Mar 22, 2016 8:25 am

brie wrote:armed gunmen conducted twin blasts at brussels metro station. they were atheists for we are informed that terrorists have no religion. please do not hate islam for it has nothing to do with it.

Guns are to be blamed. Not Islam.

by southindian Tue Mar 22, 2016 8:51 am

Kinnera wrote:
brie wrote:armed gunmen conducted twin blasts at brussels metro station. they were atheists for we are informed that terrorists have no religion. please do not hate islam for it has nothing to do with it.
Guns are to be blamed. Not Islam.

Islam is a religion of piece and can never be blamed.

by Guest Tue Mar 22, 2016 9:20 am

southindian wrote:
Kinnera wrote:
brie wrote:armed gunmen conducted twin blasts at brussels metro station. they were atheists for we are informed that terrorists have no religion. please do not hate islam for it has nothing to do with it.
Guns are to be blamed. Not Islam.
Islam is a religion of piece and can never be blamed.

It stands for all the cool values that the libbies pretend to stand for: Equal rights for women, gay rights, freedom of speech, secularism, democracy, liberty, peace, no capital punishment, easier and compassionate criminal laws, etc etc. Just look at the muslim countries. You will know. No wonder the libbies staunchly support everyone following it and try to appease them, radical or not. No no...the sentiments will be hurt even if you say a word against the radicals and the ideology they follow.

The other religions, Christianity and Hinduism are so medieval and bad and the ones following them are horrible!

by MaxEntropy_Man Tue Mar 22, 2016 9:48 am

Kinnera wrote:Horrible!

Will see if Obama and Hillary will have the guts to say the word, 'terrorists' this time. They avoided to call the Paris' terrorists as 'terrorists' last time.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/11/13/statement-president-situation-paris

We’re going to do whatever it takes to work with the French people and with nations around the world to bring these terrorists to justice, and to go after any terrorist networks that go after our people.

too much foxnews indoctrination is injurious to mind and body.

by MaxEntropy_Man Tue Mar 22, 2016 9:55 am

Kinnera wrote:
southindian wrote:
Kinnera wrote:
brie wrote:armed gunmen conducted twin blasts at brussels metro station. they were atheists for we are informed that terrorists have no religion. please do not hate islam for it has nothing to do with it.
Guns are to be blamed. Not Islam.
Islam is a religion of piece and can never be blamed.
It stands for all the cool values that the libbies pretend to stand for: Equal rights for women, gay rights, freedom of speech, secularism, democracy, liberty, peace, no capital punishment, easier and compassionate criminal laws, etc etc. Just look at the muslim countries. You will know. No wonder the libbies staunchly support everyone following it and try to appease them, radical or not. No no...the sentiments will be hurt even if you say a word against the radicals and the ideology they follow.

The other religions, Christianity and Hinduism are so medieval and bad and the ones following them are horrible!

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/full-transcript-mitt-romneys-remarks-on-donald-trump-and-the-2016-race-220176

mitt romney the "libby" said:

Let me turn to national security and the safety of our homes and loved ones. Trump's bombast is already alarming our allies and fueling the enmity of our enemies. Insulting all Muslims will keep many of them from fully engaging with us in the urgent fight against ISIS. And for what purpose? Muslim terrorists would only have to lie about their religion to enter the country.

What he said on “60 Minutes” about Syria and ISIS has to go down as the most ridiculous and dangerous idea of the campaign season: Let ISIS take out Assad, he said, and then we can pick up the remnants. Think about that: Let the most dangerous terror organization the world has ever known take over a country? This is recklessness in the extreme.

Donald Trump tells us that he is very, very smart. I'm afraid that when it comes to foreign policy he is very, very not smart.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/full-transcript-mitt-romneys-remarks-on-donald-trump-and-the-2016-race-220176#ixzz43dyGmUbf
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

by MaxEntropy_Man Tue Mar 22, 2016 9:59 am

Hellsangel wrote:More Americans will start looking to support Trump.

this is certainly possible, but why the crowing tone in recent posts? is it because you have suddenly become a drumpf supporter after first saying that you don't want him to win the nomination? or was your earlier statement that you didn't support him false, and you've always been for him?

by Hellsangel Tue Mar 22, 2016 10:02 am

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:More Americans will start looking to support Trump.

this is certainly possible, but why the crowing tone in recent posts? is it because you have suddenly become a drumpf supporter after first saying that you don't want him to win the nomination? or was your earlier statement that you didn't support him false, and you've always been for him?

I still don't support Trump. But that doesn't mean I support Shrillery Blythe.

by Guest Tue Mar 22, 2016 10:04 am

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:More Americans will start looking to support Trump.

this is certainly possible, but why the crowing tone in recent posts? is it because you have suddenly become a drumpf supporter after first saying that you don't want him to win the nomination? or was your earlier statement that you didn't support him false, and you've always been for him?

i don't know about him but i am quite enjoying his making a mockery of you hypocritical liberals.

by MaxEntropy_Man Tue Mar 22, 2016 10:07 am

Hellsangel wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:More Americans will start looking to support Trump.

this is certainly possible, but why the crowing tone in recent posts? is it because you have suddenly become a drumpf supporter after first saying that you don't want him to win the nomination? or was your earlier statement that you didn't support him false, and you've always been for him?
I still don't support Trump. But that doesn't mean I support Shrillery Blythe.

fair enough. it's too bad that someone reasonable like kasich or mitt romney is not possible as a GOP candidate. i hope the GOP establishment make good on their threat of running a third party candidate who is sane.

that said, crowing about drumpf winning voters on the back of the belgium attacks is terrible because it doesn't hurt just hillary and the dems, but also the sane wing of the GOP, as small as it may be.

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Tue Mar 22, 2016 10:09 am

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Kinnera wrote:
southindian wrote:
Kinnera wrote:
brie wrote:armed gunmen conducted twin blasts at brussels metro station. they were atheists for we are informed that terrorists have no religion. please do not hate islam for it has nothing to do with it.
Guns are to be blamed. Not Islam.
Islam is a religion of piece and can never be blamed.
It stands for all the cool values that the libbies pretend to stand for: Equal rights for women, gay rights, freedom of speech, secularism, democracy, liberty, peace, no capital punishment, easier and compassionate criminal laws, etc etc. Just look at the muslim countries. You will know. No wonder the libbies staunchly support everyone following it and try to appease them, radical or not. No no...the sentiments will be hurt even if you say a word against the radicals and the ideology they follow.

The other religions, Christianity and Hinduism are so medieval and bad and the ones following them are horrible!

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/full-transcript-mitt-romneys-remarks-on-donald-trump-and-the-2016-race-220176

mitt romney the "libby" said:

Let me turn to national security and the safety of our homes and loved ones. Trump's bombast is already alarming our allies and fueling the enmity of our enemies. Insulting all Muslims will keep many of them from fully engaging with us in the urgent fight against ISIS. And for what purpose? Muslim terrorists would only have to lie about their religion to enter the country.

What he said on “60 Minutes” about Syria and ISIS has to go down as the most ridiculous and dangerous idea of the campaign season: Let ISIS take out Assad, he said, and then we can pick up the remnants. Think about that: Let the most dangerous terror organization the world has ever known take over a country? This is recklessness in the extreme.

Donald Trump tells us that he is very, very smart. I'm afraid that when it comes to foreign policy he is very, very not smart.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/full-transcript-mitt-romneys-remarks-on-donald-trump-and-the-2016-race-220176#ixzz43dyGmUbf
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

Are you trying to emulate CD or Rashmunullah?

by Hellsangel Tue Mar 22, 2016 10:10 am

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:More Americans will start looking to support Trump.

this is certainly possible, but why the crowing tone in recent posts? is it because you have suddenly become a drumpf supporter after first saying that you don't want him to win the nomination? or was your earlier statement that you didn't support him false, and you've always been for him?
I still don't support Trump. But that doesn't mean I support Shrillery Blythe.

fair enough. it's too bad that someone reasonable like kasich or mitt romney is not possible as a GOP candidate. i hope the GOP establishment make good on their threat of running a third party candidate who is sane.

Yeah. And I hope Sanders runs as an independent.

by MaxEntropy_Man Tue Mar 22, 2016 10:13 am

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Are you trying to emulate CD or Rashmunullah?

no just setting the record straight. it's not just libbies who are alarmed at drumpf's rhetoric.

by Hellsangel Tue Mar 22, 2016 10:14 am

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Are you trying to emulate CD or Rashmunullah?

no just setting the record straight. it's not just libbies who are alarmed at drumpf's rhetoric.

And it is not just Republicans who think Shrillery is evil and untrustworthy.

by MaxEntropy_Man Tue Mar 22, 2016 10:15 am

Hellsangel wrote:
Yeah. And I hope Sanders runs as an independent.

he should if his supporters want him to, but the policy differences between him and hillary are much smaller than the difference between drumpf and the GOP establishment and cruz and the GOP establishment. 93% of hillary and bernie's votes in the senate have been identical.

by Hellsangel Tue Mar 22, 2016 10:27 am

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
Yeah. And I hope Sanders runs as an independent.

he should if his supporters want him to, but the policy differences between him and hillary are much smaller than the difference between drumpf and the GOP establishment and cruz and the GOP establishment. 93% of hillary and bernie's votes in the senate have been identical.

If you're watching CNN now, you will see the opinion polls showing Sanders beating Trump by a much higher margin than Shrillery. Maybe you should rethink your support for Shrillery.

by Hellsangel Tue Mar 22, 2016 10:35 am

http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/22/politics/donald-trump-brussels-2016-reaction/index.html

Trump was quick to link the attacks to Muslim refugees and migrants from the Middle East who have flooded into Europe as a result of Syria's civil war and turmoil in the region.
"It's going to get worse and worse. In my opinion, this is just the beginning. It will get worse and worse because we are lax and we are foolish -- we can't allow these people, at this point we cannot allow these people to come into our country. I'm sorry," he said. "This is a story that just seems to be more and more happening and it's really not very pretty to watch."

by Guest Tue Mar 22, 2016 10:42 am

i honestly think trump can change america AND THE WORLD. he will uproot islamist terrorism. well, he might castrate you but have you heard of "collateral damage?" c'mon be brave and look for the global good. vote trump!

by MaxEntropy_Man Tue Mar 22, 2016 10:50 am

didn't drumpf just make a comment yesterday that he want to rethink NATO and scale back american involvement in NATO? how is that going to help?

by Guest Tue Mar 22, 2016 10:51 am

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Kinnera wrote:
southindian wrote:
Kinnera wrote:
brie wrote:armed gunmen conducted twin blasts at brussels metro station. they were atheists for we are informed that terrorists have no religion. please do not hate islam for it has nothing to do with it.
Guns are to be blamed. Not Islam.
Islam is a religion of piece and can never be blamed.
It stands for all the cool values that the libbies pretend to stand for: Equal rights for women, gay rights, freedom of speech, secularism, democracy, liberty, peace, no capital punishment, easier and compassionate criminal laws, etc etc. Just look at the muslim countries. You will know. No wonder the libbies staunchly support everyone following it and try to appease them, radical or not. No no...the sentiments will be hurt even if you say a word against the radicals and the ideology they follow.

The other religions, Christianity and Hinduism are so medieval and bad and the ones following them are horrible!

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/full-transcript-mitt-romneys-remarks-on-donald-trump-and-the-2016-race-220176

mitt romney the "libby" said:

Let me turn to national security and the safety of our homes and loved ones. Trump's bombast is already alarming our allies and fueling the enmity of our enemies. Insulting all Muslims will keep many of them from fully engaging with us in the urgent fight against ISIS. And for what purpose? Muslim terrorists would only have to lie about their religion to enter the country.

What he said on “60 Minutes” about Syria and ISIS has to go down as the most ridiculous and dangerous idea of the campaign season: Let ISIS take out Assad, he said, and then we can pick up the remnants. Think about that: Let the most dangerous terror organization the world has ever known take over a country? This is recklessness in the extreme.

Donald Trump tells us that he is very, very smart. I'm afraid that when it comes to foreign policy he is very, very not smart.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/full-transcript-mitt-romneys-remarks-on-donald-trump-and-the-2016-race-220176#ixzz43dyGmUbf
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

I ain't no Trump fan. People will probably vote for Trump only because they have no better choice to make. Clinton didn't allow anyone other democrat to come up against her. Only Sanders is left. I like Sanders as a person. Not sure about his socialist policies. Hillary Vs Trump: I'll probably vote for Trump. Sanders Vs Trump, maybe Sanders. Not sure yet. Despite his extreme rhetoric, people see Trump as someone who recognizes the threat of Islamic terrorism, unlike Clinton and Obama who make excuses for it.

I know for sure that Clinton has no resolve to contain Islamic terrorism and I don't trust her.

by Vakavaka Pakapaka Tue Mar 22, 2016 10:58 am

Merlot, CD and Rashmun will now concentrate on the faults of Modi for the next 3 days. Kafir Modi should resign for hurting the sentiments of ISIS through his recent speech to a Sufi gathering. Aurangajeb must be a satvik person - he worshipped kafir lingams. ISIS guys must be wonderful people because they chanted Gaud's name when they became pieceful in Brussels.

by southindian Tue Mar 22, 2016 11:03 am

AFTER these blasts in Europe, Europe will see nationalist rights gaining momentum, rising against migration. Don't be surprised to see a Trump-like candidate soon in Europe.

That will give impetus to CDs, MDS and such to speak against suppression of minorities and growing intolerance in Europe. They will return fake awards and will ask likes of Arundhati Roy to visit Europe and protest. The Roy types will not go to Europe in fear of their butts kicked which they find safe in India.

by Guest Tue Mar 22, 2016 11:05 am

...and with Clinton as President, US might turn into another Europe. Look what the libbies did to some of the Europian countries with their appeasement and soft and open door policies!

by southindian Tue Mar 22, 2016 11:15 am

brie wrote:i honestly think trump can change america AND THE WORLD. he will uproot islamist terrorism. well, he might castrate you but have you heard of "collateral damage?" c'mon be brave and look for the global good. vote trump!

Trump is a lot of hot air. That's all.

He's feeding on insecurities of American people, promising them heaven. Another version of the same heaven is promised by lords of those terrorists blowing themselves in Brussels.

Americans are idiots. And I can say this again.

Americans are idiots.

With no agenda or plan whatsoever, Trump is getting support from so-called educated and informed Americans, who think Trump can weave a spell or by magic build a wall, throw 12 million migrants and bomb Syria/ISIS.

People voting for him have lost their mind.

by Propagandhi711 Tue Mar 22, 2016 11:18 am

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
Yeah. And I hope Sanders runs as an independent.

he should if his supporters want him to, but the policy differences between him and hillary are much smaller than the difference between drumpf and the GOP establishment and cruz and the GOP establishment. 93% of hillary and bernie's votes in the senate have been identical.

really! is that why sanders supporters hate hidimbi almost as much as they hate repubs, including trump?

by MaxEntropy_Man Tue Mar 22, 2016 11:24 am

Propagandhi711 wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
Yeah. And I hope Sanders runs as an independent.

he should if his supporters want him to, but the policy differences between him and hillary are much smaller than the difference between drumpf and the GOP establishment and cruz and the GOP establishment. 93% of hillary and bernie's votes in the senate have been identical.

really! is that why sanders supporters hate hidimbi almost as much as they hate repubs, including trump?

they may hate hillary (i am not too fond of her candidacy myself after all the email server shenanigans), but if she is the nominee they will be voting for her. can't say the same thing about drumpf and the GOP voters.

by MaxEntropy_Man Tue Mar 22, 2016 11:27 am

Kinnera wrote:...and with Clinton as President, US might turn into another Europe. Look what the libbies did to some of the Europian countries with their appeasement and soft and open door policies!

you are mess of contradictions. on the one hand, you decry "libbies", and in the same thread you say you might vote for bernie, the libbiest of all candidates currently seeking the nomination. if there's anyone who wants to remake america in the image of europe it is bernie.

the number of terrorists "splotched" by the obama administration far exceeds anything that dubya the disaster did. it's a lie to claim that the obama administration and by association his first secretary of state have been anything but harmful to terrorism. please turn off foxnews.

by Propagandhi711 Tue Mar 22, 2016 11:29 am

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Propagandhi711 wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
Yeah. And I hope Sanders runs as an independent.

he should if his supporters want him to, but the policy differences between him and hillary are much smaller than the difference between drumpf and the GOP establishment and cruz and the GOP establishment. 93% of hillary and bernie's votes in the senate have been identical.

really! is that why sanders supporters hate hidimbi almost as much as they hate repubs, including trump?

they may hate hillary (i am not too fond of her candidacy myself after all the email server shenanigans, but if she is the nominee they will be voting for her. can't say the same thing about drumpf and the GOP voters.

wait..email shenanigans are what's causing all this distrust/dislike of hilary? you wouldnt be operating under confirmation bias now, would you?

by Vakavaka Pakapaka Tue Mar 22, 2016 11:31 am

southindian wrote:AFTER these blasts in Europe, Europe will see nationalist rights gaining momentum, rising against migration. Don't be surprised to see a Trump-like candidate soon in Europe.

That will give impetus to CDs, MDS and such to speak against suppression of minorities and growing intolerance in Europe. They will return fake awards and will ask likes of Arundhati Roy to visit Europe and protest. The Roy types will not go to Europe in fear of their butts kicked which they find safe in India.

Sikularists don't realize that there is no major Muslim radicalization in India because of the core Hindu culture. India has been a haven for the oppressed (Parsis, Bahai, Sufi, Iraqi Jews, Tibetans, etc.) mainly because of her "Vasudhaiva kutumbakam" and "all paths leading to the same goal" culture. Sikularists and Commies have been attacking this core culture for their petty selfish vote bank politics. If Hindus become radicalized, it will be in reaction to the filthy mentality of Sikularists. The real enemies of India are Soonya, Doggy, Burkha Dutt, Vir Singhvi, etc., not the average Muslims.

In the West, if iSlamists try to create trouble, they are going to face another essentially intolerant religion - Christianity. When push comes to shove, both Europe and the US will react in ways that won't be that different from other brutal episodes in history. The intra-Semitic settling of scores will be quite bloody. Kafirs should thank their wise ancestors for inculcating universal approaches to their daily living.

by MaxEntropy_Man Tue Mar 22, 2016 11:38 am

Propagandhi711 wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Propagandhi711 wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
Yeah. And I hope Sanders runs as an independent.

he should if his supporters want him to, but the policy differences between him and hillary are much smaller than the difference between drumpf and the GOP establishment and cruz and the GOP establishment. 93% of hillary and bernie's votes in the senate have been identical.

really! is that why sanders supporters hate hidimbi almost as much as they hate repubs, including trump?

they may hate hillary (i am not too fond of her candidacy myself after all the email server shenanigans, but if she is the nominee they will be voting for her. can't say the same thing about drumpf and the GOP voters.

wait..email shenanigans are what's causing all this distrust/dislike of hilary? you wouldnt be operating under confirmation bias now, would you?

i don't know about all the dislike and distrust of hillary, but certainly my discomfort with her candidacy is based on the email server shenanigans which are real. she should have paid more attention. i still don't think there was any deliberate intent of malfeasance, although i grant you that it looks really bad. here is the short summary of the results of the three and a half decades long witch hunt of the clintons by the right wing: bupkus. for all the effort of trying so hard for so long, they haven't landed one punch. i feel sorry for them.

by Hellsangel Tue Mar 22, 2016 11:53 am

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:didn't drumpf just make a comment yesterday that he want to rethink NATO and scale back american involvement in NATO? how is that going to help?

Does NATO have a CTU operating within Europe? How would NATO have prevented what just happened in Brussels? Did you not read my link above about Belgium's policy of appeasement?

by Guest Tue Mar 22, 2016 12:07 pm

brie wrote:armed gunmen conducted twin blasts at brussels metro station. they were atheists for we are informed that terrorists have no religion. please do not hate islam for it has nothing to do with it.

in a way, it's isis that made me more considerate towards islam in general. before that, I too used to associate terrorism with islam, and blame it on the religion, quran, whatever. but seeing isis craziness, it's so extreme, that you do sit back and think, knowing people you do know around you, 'islam can't be this bad'. I hope isis is what makes rest of the muslims and slightly more moderate countries denounce the fanatics among themselves more vociferously and fight it, something they have not been doing for decades.

hate how trump gets to say I told u... one bad thing leading to another worse thing.

by Hellsangel Tue Mar 22, 2016 12:22 pm

Hellsangel wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:didn't drumpf just make a comment yesterday that he want to rethink NATO and scale back american involvement in NATO? how is that going to help?
Does NATO have a CTU operating within Europe? How would NATO have prevented what just happened in Brussels? Did you not read my link above about Belgium's policy of appeasement?

And let me ask you one more thing, the next time you are at an Airport in West Europe and you overhear people talking in Arabic, would you not be looking over your shoulder?

by Guest Tue Mar 22, 2016 12:25 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Kinnera wrote:...and with Clinton as President, US might turn into another Europe. Look what the libbies did to some of the Europian countries with their appeasement and soft and open door policies!

you are mess of contradictions. on the one hand, you decry "libbies", and in the same thread you say you might vote for bernie, the libbiest of all candidates currently seeking the nomination. if there's anyone who wants to remake america in the image of europe it is bernie.

the number of terrorists "splotched" by the obama administration far exceeds anything that dubya the disaster did. it's a lie to claim that the obama administration and by association his first secretary of state have been anything but harmful to terrorism. please turn off foxnews.

I said I 'might', 'haven't decided yet'. I didn't think about that possibility too deeply. now that a libbie like you attests that bernie could turn US into another Europe, i'll have to rethink again and again about that possibility. There's no way i want US to become another 'on the way to becoming another hell' like Europe. I'd rather vote for the egoistic, arrogant, racist, crazy hothead like Trump than anyone else who'd take US through the path of Europe.

What US needs is a good centrist who is well balanced.

by Hellsangel Tue Mar 22, 2016 12:44 pm

by MaxEntropy_Man Tue Mar 22, 2016 12:48 pm

Hellsangel wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:didn't drumpf just make a comment yesterday that he want to rethink NATO and scale back american involvement in NATO? how is that going to help?
Does NATO have a CTU operating within Europe? How would NATO have prevented what just happened in Brussels? Did you not read my link above about Belgium's policy of appeasement?
And let me ask you one more thing, the next time you are at an Airport in West Europe and you overhear people talking in Arabic, would you not be looking over your shoulder?

not in a direct way, but weakening NATO now is not going to benefit the fight against terrorism and ISIS. i have in the recent past flown twice through the middle east to india, and all i heard was arabic. i try not to worry too much about things i have no control over when i fly. worrying excessively makes travel unpleasant. ke sara sara..

by Hellsangel Tue Mar 22, 2016 12:52 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:didn't drumpf just make a comment yesterday that he want to rethink NATO and scale back american involvement in NATO? how is that going to help?
Does NATO have a CTU operating within Europe? How would NATO have prevented what just happened in Brussels? Did you not read my link above about Belgium's policy of appeasement?
And let me ask you one more thing, the next time you are at an Airport in West Europe and you overhear people talking in Arabic, would you not be looking over your shoulder?

not in a direct way, but weakening NATO now is not going to benefit the fight against terrorism and ISIS. i have in the recent past flown twice through the middle east to india, and all i heard was arabic. i try not to worry too much about things i have no control over when i fly. worrying excessively makes travel unpleasant. ke sara sara..

I didn't ask you about flying through Dubai or Abu Dhabi. I asked you about flying through Europe and having to overhear Arabic. Que sera sera, BTW.

And Europe should contribute monetarily more towards NATO for sure. If Obama can blame Cameron and not Blythe for Libya, Trump can for sure ask Europe to contribute more towards NATO.

by Vakavaka Pakapaka Tue Mar 22, 2016 1:16 pm

Hellsangel wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:didn't drumpf just make a comment yesterday that he want to rethink NATO and scale back american involvement in NATO? how is that going to help?
Does NATO have a CTU operating within Europe? How would NATO have prevented what just happened in Brussels? Did you not read my link above about Belgium's policy of appeasement?
And let me ask you one more thing, the next time you are at an Airport in West Europe and you overhear people talking in Arabic, would you not be looking over your shoulder?

not in a direct way, but weakening NATO now is not going to benefit the fight against terrorism and ISIS. i have in the recent past flown twice through the middle east to india, and all i heard was arabic. i try not to worry too much about things i have no control over when i fly. worrying excessively makes travel unpleasant. ke sara sara..
I didn't ask you about flying through Dubai or Abu Dhabi. I asked you about flying through Europe and having to overhear Arabic. Que sera sera, BTW.

And Europe should contribute monetarily more towards NATO for sure. If Obama can blame Cameron and not Blythe for Libya, Trump can for sure ask Europe to contribute more towards NATO.

Stop harassing a rationalist like Max and insulting his high intellect. He believes in irrefutable evidence before coming to a rational conclusion. If an Arab with something wrapped around his waist chants "Gaud is great and death to infidels and kafirs", is sitting next to him, Max will examine all possibilities - may be the guy was hit by a fanatic Hindu on his tummy and so, he is wearing some protection around his waist; he is praying because he is in a lot of pain and is cursing the Hindu when he says death to kafirs and infidels. Max (or whatever will be left of him) will accept only the actual evidence (i.e., the pieceful guy detonates his belt) before making a scientific conclusion that the Arab is a suicide bomber.....

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Tue Mar 22, 2016 1:47 pm

Are you trying to emulate CD or Rashmunullah?[/quote]

no just setting the record straight. it's not just libbies who are alarmed at drumpf's rhetoric. [/quote]When the Rev. Jim Jones, pastor of the Blazing Grace Church here, approached the lectern at City Hall, he was holding a copy of the Quran. The Islamic text commanded followers to embrace intolerance, hate and violence, he told the zoning panel, explaining why he felt uncomfortable with the plan of Middle Eastern students at Idaho State University to build a mosque within walking distance of campus.[quote="MaxEntropy_Man"][quote="Marathadi-Saamiyaar"]

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Tue Mar 22, 2016 1:58 pm

It is not even funny that the Pseudo-eslamists on the board desperately trying to divert the brussels Blast into Trump, Drumps, Sanders, etc... but never even once criticized the bombing itself.

And the Pocatello Padre is right.

by MaxEntropy_Man Tue Mar 22, 2016 2:12 pm

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:It is not even funny that the Pseudo-eslamists on the board desperately trying to divert the brussels Blast into Trump, Drumps, Sanders, etc... but never even once criticized the bombing itself.

And the Pocatello Padre is right.

what criticism would you like to hear? where have you criticized the bombing on this thread? i don't expect you to criticize it because it is a moronic expectation; it is a truism that any act of terrorism is heinous.

europeans have been too hasty in allowing unbridled immigration from the middle-east when it is such an obvious route for terrorists. i would have preferred a US like policy where the checks and balances on allowing asylum seekers in is highly non-trivial. they are now paying the price for their generosity. having said that, many of the terrorists in the french/belgian attacks seem to have been born and raised in those countries and not recent immigrants. not an easy problem to solve.

by Guest Tue Mar 22, 2016 2:40 pm

Meghna Mathur wrote:
brie wrote:armed gunmen conducted twin blasts at brussels metro station. they were atheists for we are informed that terrorists have no religion. please do not hate islam for it has nothing to do with it.

in a way, it's isis that made me more considerate towards islam in general. before that, I too used to associate terrorism with islam, and blame it on the religion, quran, whatever. but seeing isis craziness, it's so extreme, that you do sit back and think, knowing people you do know around you, 'islam can't be this bad'. I hope isis is what makes rest of the muslims and slightly more moderate countries denounce the fanatics among themselves more vociferously and fight it, something they have not been doing for decades.

hate how trump gets to say I told u... one bad thing leading to another worse thing.

Whether Trump said it or not, this was inevitable. It was bound to happen. And more are yet to come...all the bomb blasts, mass shootings, molestation and rapes of women, etc

The way the libbies allowed the influx, possibly to increase the vote banks (as is the case of bangladeshi immigrants in india), this was to happen. And whether inborn or immigrants, muslims cannot integrate with the main stream and they blame the 'alienation' to these acts of terror. they blame the country that housed them. So this problem is not going to go away for generations to come. It's only going to get worse.

The libbies started that already:

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/the-brussels-attacks-are-more-about-the-failures-of-belgium-than-a-global-isis-plot-a6945761.html

"There are the usual factors – unemployment, discrimination, split-identities – which explain the alienation of young Muslims in other European countries." yada, yada...blame everything and everyone but the perpetrators and the common factor: their religion.

by MaxEntropy_Man Tue Mar 22, 2016 2:48 pm

Kinnera wrote:
Meghna Mathur wrote:
brie wrote:armed gunmen conducted twin blasts at brussels metro station. they were atheists for we are informed that terrorists have no religion. please do not hate islam for it has nothing to do with it.

in a way, it's isis that made me more considerate towards islam in general. before that, I too used to associate terrorism with islam, and blame it on the religion, quran, whatever. but seeing isis craziness, it's so extreme, that you do sit back and think, knowing people you do know around you, 'islam can't be this bad'. I hope isis is what makes rest of the muslims and slightly more moderate countries denounce the fanatics among themselves more vociferously and fight it, something they have not been doing for decades.

hate how trump gets to say I told u... one bad thing leading to another worse thing.
Whether Trump said it or not, this was inevitable. It was bound to happen. And more are yet to come...all the bomb blasts, mass shootings, molestation and rapes of women, etc

The way the libbies allowed the influx, possibly to increase the vote banks (as is the case of bangladeshi immigrants in india), this was to happen. And whether inborn or immigrants, muslims cannot integrate with the main stream and they blame the 'alienation' to these acts of terror. they blame the country that housed them. So this problem is not going to go away for generations to come. It's only going to get worse.

The libbies started that already:

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/the-brussels-attacks-are-more-about-the-failures-of-belgium-than-a-global-isis-plot-a6945761.html

"There are the usual factors – unemployment, discrimination, split-identities – which explain the alienation of young Muslims in other European countries." yada, yada...blame everything and everyone but the perpetrators and the common factor: their religion.

earlier in the thread you made claim that obama did not call the perpetrators of the french attack terrorists and i showed you to be flat out wrong. will you have the decency to admit you were wrong?

by Sponsored content