Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:The casteist on this forum is JM. Rishi is a distant second.

regardless, the meaning of "perdition" remains eternal damnation.

That is what you live in; in your old musty house in a University town of not insignificant size all by yourself.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/perdition?s=t

per·di·tion

[per-dish-uhn] Show IPA
noun
1.
a state of final spiritual ruin; loss of the soul; damnation.
2.
the future state of the wicked.
3.
hell ( def 1 ) .
4.
utter destruction or ruin.
5.
Obsolete , loss.

thank you for confirming what i said.

Huzefa Kapasi wrote:

Maria S wrote:*And even if we are offended by something/offend others as we all "normal" people do- we are just human ..a simple "sincere" apology and forgiveness goes a long way in mending friendships-relationships with anyone. I have no problem doing that..as I do expect others to forgive me as well

+1

goodcitizn wrote:

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:The casteist on this forum is JM. Rishi is a distant second.

regardless, the meaning of "perdition" remains eternal damnation.

You are right about "perdition" in the theological sense. For example, this word can be used in a sentence as follows:

May you incur everlasting perdition for nitpicking the usage of perdition.

I have also seen "perdition" being used to signify loss. For example, this word can be used in a sentence as follows:

Obsessive and excessive preoccupation with the word perdition can lead to perdition of sanity.

Your friend Webster also says:

perdition

Listen See in ThesaurusSee in a sentence
(pər dis̸h′ən)

noun

1. Archaic complete and irreparable loss; ruin
   
2. Theol.
   
   
   1. the loss of the soul; damnation
      
   2. hell
      
   </LI>
   

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:the obsession is all yours.

panini press wrote:

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:the obsession is all yours.

You say so; therefore it must be true!

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:The casteist on this forum is JM. Rishi is a distant second.

regardless, the meaning of "perdition" remains eternal damnation.

You are right about "perdition" in the theological sense. For example, this word can be used in a sentence as follows:

May you incur everlasting perdition for nitpicking the usage of perdition.

I have also seen "perdition" being used to signify loss. For example, this word can be used in a sentence as follows:

Obsessive and excessive preoccupation with the word perdition can lead to perdition of sanity.

Your friend Webster also says:

perdition

Listen See in ThesaurusSee in a sentence
(pər dis̸h′ən)

noun

1. Archaic complete and irreparable loss; ruin
   
2. Theol.
   
   
   1. the loss of the soul; damnation
      
   2. hell
      
   
   </LI>
   

according to the quote above, the only current meaning of "perdition" is theological. if one uses "perdition," one means eternal damnation; if one wants to mean loss, especially of cows (hahaha), one should simply use "loss." your attempt at pompous english turned around and bit you. FAIL!

btw, "everlasting perdition" - see the red text above - is incorrect. FAIL! "perdition" is eternal damnation, so it's unnecessary and incorrect to precede the word with "everlasting."

the obsession is all yours.

Hellsangel wrote:Actually Perdition is a nice bar in mid-town Manhattan.

Hellsangel wrote:Actually Perdition is a nice bar in mid-town Manhattan.

Rashmun wrote:I recall you had unkind things to say about Maria after she refused to appear on this forum despite your repeated requests. It was only after the sulekha forums were brought to an end that she came here.

Incidentally the reason i am not prepared to have friendly relations with her is that not only did she openly take sides in my fight with PP, but she went to the extent of saying something along the lines of those who have an issue with the Admin of this forum (PP) should leave this forum and start posting elsewhere. I do not believe she has the right to say this to me or to anyone else particularly so since she was not around at the inception of this forum and she refuses to acknowledge the fact that the credit for creating this forum does not go to PP alone but to many people (including you).

Huzefa Kapasi wrote:why don't you put all this to poll?

panini press wrote:

Huzefa Kapasi wrote:why don't you put all this to poll?

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:are you a thread cop? who the fuck are you to decide what's relevant to be posted on which thread?

hahahaha! coming apart at the seams! pissed in his pants from the intensity of his feelings on behalf of his lord and master.

hahahah, projection! upset now! angry now! giving 105 yard saree cover for his learning difficulties boy-girlfriend!

multiple problems. difficulty composing a sentence in english. doesn't know any other language either. except perhaps c-plussu-plussu.

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:

Huzefa Kapasi wrote:why don't you put all this to poll?

That LOL is because PP knows the polls on this forum are rigged.

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:

Huzefa Kapasi wrote:why don't you put all this to poll?

That LOL is because PP knows the polls on this forum are rigged.

douche munmun lost every single poll he tried to stage hence is bitter and feels the odds are stacked against him.

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:

Huzefa Kapasi wrote:why don't you put all this to poll?

That LOL is because PP knows the polls on this forum are rigged.

douche munmun lost every single poll he tried to stage hence is bitter and feels the odds are stacked against him.

panini press wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:

Huzefa Kapasi wrote:why don't you put all this to poll?

That LOL is because PP knows the polls on this forum are rigged.

douche munmun lost every single poll he tried to stage hence is bitter and feels the odds are stacked against him.

It is understandable for one to get upset, angry, and bitter if one gets fewer positive votes than Velupillai Prabhakaran.

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:are you a thread cop? who the fuck are you to decide what's relevant to be posted on which thread?

hahahaha! coming apart at the seams! pissed in his pants from the intensity of his feelings on behalf of his lord and master.

hahahah, projection! upset now! angry now! giving 105 yard saree cover for his learning difficulties boy-girlfriend!

multiple problems. difficulty composing a sentence in english. doesn't know any other language either. except perhaps c-plussu-plussu.

since you have issues with prose written after 1850s in addition to being IBS prone and constipated, here's a breakdown:

105 saree cover is a reference to krishna's rescue job of draupadi's modesty during her attempted disrobification in kaurava court. your girl rashmun's the proverbial draupadi cried to you and it's positively mythological the way you hitched up your sagging trousers up to your chest to come to her rescue.

learning difficulties boy-girl = douchemun, the retarded object of your current geriatric affections.

Rashmun wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:hahahaha! coming apart at the seams! pissed in his pants from the intensity of his feelings on behalf of his lord and master.

hahahah, projection! upset now! angry now! giving 105 yard saree cover for his learning difficulties boy-girlfriend!

multiple problems. difficulty composing a sentence in english. doesn't know any other language either. except perhaps c-plussu-plussu.

since you have issues with prose written after 1850s in addition to being IBS prone and constipated, here's a breakdown:

105 saree cover is a reference to krishna's rescue job of draupadi's modesty during her attempted disrobification in kaurava court. your girl rashmun's the proverbial draupadi cried to you and it's positively mythological the way you hitched up your sagging trousers up to your chest to come to her rescue.

learning difficulties boy-girl = douchemun, the retarded object of your current geriatric affections.

Propa, i feel sorry for you. It seems the voices in your head have disoriented your brain so completely that you have now become a lunatic.

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:
hahahah, projection! upset now! angry now! giving 105 yard saree cover for his learning difficulties boy-girlfriend!

multiple problems. difficulty composing a sentence in english. doesn't know any other language either. except perhaps c-plussu-plussu.

since you have issues with prose written after 1850s in addition to being IBS prone and constipated, here's a breakdown:

105 saree cover is a reference to krishna's rescue job of draupadi's modesty during her attempted disrobification in kaurava court. your girl rashmun's the proverbial draupadi cried to you and it's positively mythological the way you hitched up your sagging trousers up to your chest to come to her rescue.

learning difficulties boy-girl = douchemun, the retarded object of your current geriatric affections.

Propa, i feel sorry for you. It seems the voices in your head have disoriented your brain so completely that you have now become a lunatic.

douchemun, you keep saying you're sorry for others. is that an invitation for others to feel sorry for you?

Rashmun wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:multiple problems. difficulty composing a sentence in english. doesn't know any other language either. except perhaps c-plussu-plussu.

since you have issues with prose written after 1850s in addition to being IBS prone and constipated, here's a breakdown:

105 saree cover is a reference to krishna's rescue job of draupadi's modesty during her attempted disrobification in kaurava court. your girl rashmun's the proverbial draupadi cried to you and it's positively mythological the way you hitched up your sagging trousers up to your chest to come to her rescue.

learning difficulties boy-girl = douchemun, the retarded object of your current geriatric affections.

Propa, i feel sorry for you. It seems the voices in your head have disoriented your brain so completely that you have now become a lunatic.

douchemun, you keep saying you're sorry for others. is that an invitation for others to feel sorry for you?

No. I truly feel sorry for you.

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

since you have issues with prose written after 1850s in addition to being IBS prone and constipated, here's a breakdown:

105 saree cover is a reference to krishna's rescue job of draupadi's modesty during her attempted disrobification in kaurava court. your girl rashmun's the proverbial draupadi cried to you and it's positively mythological the way you hitched up your sagging trousers up to your chest to come to her rescue.

learning difficulties boy-girl = douchemun, the retarded object of your current geriatric affections.

Propa, i feel sorry for you. It seems the voices in your head have disoriented your brain so completely that you have now become a lunatic.

douchemun, you keep saying you're sorry for others. is that an invitation for others to feel sorry for you?

No. I truly feel sorry for you.

now you want me to be truly sorry for you?

Hellsangel wrote:Maybe this can help define if Paparajan is or isn't:

https://such.forumotion.com/t4149-which-of-these-is-a-casteist

panini press wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:Maybe this can help define if Paparajan is or isn't:

https://such.forumotion.com/t4149-which-of-these-is-a-casteist

Haha. We need a comprehensive self-evaluation toolkit like an IQ or personality type test. I tentatively call it the Casteism QuotientTM, with a few dozen multiple-choice questions covering both words and actions in online fora and in real life, and result in an overall score between 1 and 100.

panini press wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:Maybe this can help define if Paparajan is or isn't:

https://such.forumotion.com/t4149-which-of-these-is-a-casteist

Haha. We need a comprehensive self-evaluation toolkit like an IQ or personality type test. I tentatively call it the Casteism QuotientTM, with a few dozen multiple-choice questions covering both words and actions in online fora and in real life, and result in an overall score between 1 and 100.

panini press wrote:

panini press wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:Maybe this can help define if Paparajan is or isn't:

https://such.forumotion.com/t4149-which-of-these-is-a-casteist

Haha. We need a comprehensive self-evaluation toolkit like an IQ or personality type test. I tentatively call it the Casteism QuotientTM, with a few dozen multiple-choice questions covering both words and actions in online fora and in real life, and result in an overall score between 1 and 100.

On further reflection, I think the CQTM toolkit should be designed for both self-evaluation and for pollability. That way it can cater to Rishi's need for understanding whether other people think he is casteist.

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:

panini press wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:Maybe this can help define if Paparajan is or isn't:

https://such.forumotion.com/t4149-which-of-these-is-a-casteist

Haha. We need a comprehensive self-evaluation toolkit like an IQ or personality type test. I tentatively call it the Casteism QuotientTM, with a few dozen multiple-choice questions covering both words and actions in online fora and in real life, and result in an overall score between 1 and 100.

On further reflection, I think the CQTM toolkit should be designed for both self-evaluation and for pollability. That way it can cater to Rishi's need for understanding whether other people think he is casteist.

In my opinion an enema may help alleviate PP's perpetual poo pooing problem.

Hellsangel wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

panini press wrote:

panini press wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:Maybe this can help define if Paparajan is or isn't:

https://such.forumotion.com/t4149-which-of-these-is-a-casteist

Haha. We need a comprehensive self-evaluation toolkit like an IQ or personality type test. I tentatively call it the Casteism QuotientTM, with a few dozen multiple-choice questions covering both words and actions in online fora and in real life, and result in an overall score between 1 and 100.

On further reflection, I think the CQTM toolkit should be designed for both self-evaluation and for pollability. That way it can cater to Rishi's need for understanding whether other people think he is casteist.

In my opinion an enema may help alleviate PP's perpetual poo pooing problem.

Rashman, first with His Holiness and now with the great glut Admin, you seem obsessed with caca. What gives?

Hellsangel wrote:Rashmun, i am still cleaning up.

Hellsangel wrote:Back to being an example of butt-head synthesis as you can see.

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:Back to being an example of butt-head synthesis as you can see.

I sure can.

Hellsangel wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:Back to being an example of butt-head synthesis as you can see.

I sure can.

Didn't take that long for my meds to stop working today and for me to go off the bender.

Hellsangel wrote:Like I said, one-trick middle-parted head. butt-head synthesis, that's me.

Hellsangel wrote:Yes, Rashmun. You are I am Beavis's partner.

Hellsangel wrote:Poor Rashman. Now all the kids who teased you when you were little must p-p-p-pay.

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:Poor Rashman. Now all the kids who teased you when you were little must p-p-p-pay.

on the contrary i thank everyone who teased my speech impediment because it encouraged me to cure my problem.

Hellsangel wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:Poor Rashman. Now all the kids who teased you when you were little must p-p-p-pay.

on the contrary i thank everyone who teased my speech impediment because it encouraged me to cure my problem.

Ah well! It just transformed into a mental impediment.

Rashmun wrote:

A crazy person is bound to see the problem he suffers from in others.

Hellsangel wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

A crazy person is bound to see the problem he suffers from in others.

No sense of irony there either.

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

A crazy person is bound to see the problem he suffers from in others.

No sense of irony there either.

i am glad you agree.

Hellsangel wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

A crazy person is bound to see the problem he suffers from in others.

No sense of irony there either.

i am glad you agree.

Oh! I agree you are a deranged loonie who think he is a great debater. Maybe to compensate for something you lost in childhood, kind of like the Napoleon complex. You have no sense of irony. And you go postal every time your views are mocked. Maybe again to compensate for all the teasing you had to endure in your childhood only to find that the teasing hasn't really changed in the online world either.

Rashmun wrote:

The first rule in forum debates is to respect the privacy of other posters. i have always respected this rule and never violated it. You, in contrast, have repeatedly and habitually violated this rule again and again. Even the Admin of this forum, who happens to be your buddy, had to step in and remove the private information about other posters you posted and serve you warnings.

So, i would submit that it is you who is the deranged loonie thinking he is a great debater, you who lost something in childhood, developed a Napoleon complex, and now wish to damage the reputation of other people by mining private information of posters you disagree with and then revealing them publicly. Maybe you use private information of other posters to attack them to compensate for all the teasing you went through in childhood which resulted in a lot of pent up hatred within you.

I said earlier that you are completely malicious, mean, vindictive, and vicious and your erstwhile friend Huzefa Kapasi responded saying he agrees with me completely and that he has stopped communicating with you after your repeated usage of private information of posters to attack them.

Hellsangel wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

The first rule in forum debates is to respect the privacy of other posters. i have always respected this rule and never violated it. You, in contrast, have repeatedly and habitually violated this rule again and again. Even the Admin of this forum, who happens to be your buddy, had to step in and remove the private information about other posters you posted and serve you warnings.

So, i would submit that it is you who is the deranged loonie thinking he is a great debater, you who lost something in childhood, developed a Napoleon complex, and now wish to damage the reputation of other people by mining private information of posters you disagree with and then revealing them publicly. Maybe you use private information of other posters to attack them to compensate for all the teasing you went through in childhood which resulted in a lot of pent up hatred within you.

I said earlier that you are completely malicious, mean, vindictive, and vicious and your erstwhile friend Huzefa Kapasi responded saying he agrees with me completely and that he has stopped communicating with you after your repeated usage of private information of posters to attack them.

Like I said, no sense of irony or a sense of humor either. Kind of like your proof for b_A == HA. And the only trick you know is projection.

BTW, I don't care about debating with you.