Attention Merlot

Hellsangel wrote:Dear Satya Upadhyayji, you should learn to trust your own opinion and gut and not have to rely on what everyone else thinks. It is not like you are buying a car here.

Hellsangel wrote:Or, on second thoughts, maybe you are like George Costanza, and you need to do the opposite of what your instinct says.

Hellsangel wrote:Dear Satya Upadhyayji, you should learn to trust your own opinion and gut and not have to rely on what everyone else thinks. It is not like you are buying a car here.

SomeProfile wrote:The most hilarious and pathetically desperate attempt was, of course, to post ancient comments on the group Charvakas, and hoping that would reflect badly on the person Charvaka. He's lost it!

charvaka wrote:

SomeProfile wrote:The most hilarious and pathetically desperate attempt was, of course, to post ancient comments on the group Charvakas, and hoping that would reflect badly on the person Charvaka. He's lost it!

On another thread, he says he posted a poll on whether he should be banned, presumably to demonstrate that people think he should not be banned, and then deleted the thread because it got three yes votes including his own. I submit -- humbly, in my non-admin hat -- that that is somewhat more hilarious than posting some ancient comments about the Charvakas by philosophers who were hostile to them (comments which Rashmun himself presumably disagrees with at an intellectual level) in order to make me look bad.

Rashmun wrote:

charvaka wrote:

SomeProfile wrote:The most hilarious and pathetically desperate attempt was, of course, to post ancient comments on the group Charvakas, and hoping that would reflect badly on the person Charvaka. He's lost it!

On another thread, he says he posted a poll on whether he should be banned, presumably to demonstrate that people think he should not be banned, and then deleted the thread because it got three yes votes including his own. I submit -- humbly, in my non-admin hat -- that that is somewhat more hilarious than posting some ancient comments about the Charvakas by philosophers who were hostile to them (comments which Rashmun himself presumably disagrees with at an intellectual level) in order to make me look bad.

--> you are right, i inadvertently cast the vote to ban myself. and in this case i agree the laugh is on me.

--> on the other hand, isn't it more classy to have Jayanta Bhatta call you dhurta (scounderel) rather than responding with that word myself to your 'shameless liar' abuse?

Tracy Whitney wrote:uncle chhod, nakli naam ke heritage par be hamla!!!!.... uff rashmun, leave some ammo for later too.

Tracy Whitney wrote:uncle chhod, nakli naam ke heritage par be hamla!!!!.... uff rashmun, leave some ammo for later too.

Hellsangel wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:uncle chhod, nakli naam ke heritage par be hamla!!!!.... uff rashmun, leave some ammo for later too.

I think you could have simply said

ऱश्मुन्, यार इतना बोर मत कर यार!

charvaka wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:uncle chhod, nakli naam ke heritage par be hamla!!!!.... uff rashmun, leave some ammo for later too.

I think there's a kitchen sink headed my way on Fedex Ground.

charvaka wrote:

Tracy Whitney wrote:uncle chhod, nakli naam ke heritage par be hamla!!!!.... uff rashmun, leave some ammo for later too.

I think there's a kitchen sink headed my way on Fedex Ground.

Impedimenta wrote:admin man,
here,


speaking of fedex, i hate them. that is all. spent 1.5 hrs and 30 something bucks to ground ship a book worth less than that to canada. i hate them. did i already say that? here, this is a song that befits this forum....

please ignore the lyrics.

Rashmun wrote:

charvaka wrote:

SomeProfile wrote:The most hilarious and pathetically desperate attempt was, of course, to post ancient comments on the group Charvakas, and hoping that would reflect badly on the person Charvaka. He's lost it!

On another thread, he says he posted a poll on whether he should be banned, presumably to demonstrate that people think he should not be banned, and then deleted the thread because it got three yes votes including his own. I submit -- humbly, in my non-admin hat -- that that is somewhat more hilarious than posting some ancient comments about the Charvakas by philosophers who were hostile to them (comments which Rashmun himself presumably disagrees with at an intellectual level) in order to make me look bad.

--> you are right, i inadvertently cast the vote to ban myself. and in this case i agree the laugh is on me.

Merlot Daruwala wrote:Rashmun, you're losing perspective. Don't forget that most of us come to this forum primarily to argue. And when you state strong opinions, be ready to um..cross kukris with others holding equally strong, opposing views. Disagreement is the essence of this board.

Second, you're taking the fight with Carvaka as a personal betrayal. I don't know when exactly your discussion soured (I'm guessing it was when he first used the term "Rashmun method") but at any rate, surely you know that nobody here is a saint. Once the temperature soars, people will use anything they can find to undermine the other. IMO, arguments such as see-what-everyone-here-thinks-of-you are childish but after you gave back in full measure and more, I don't see why you're still sulking and obsessing over it.

Lastly, given that the audience consists of nameless, faceless handles in cyber-space, popularity means nothing (unless it results in comely Suchinis pinging you in private). So stop seeking approval from others. Learn to wear your contrarian positions comfortably.

Most importantly, recognize when to disengage and move on. After all, CH is only an escape from the real world. Don't give it any more importance. Just as you disregard cretins like Uppili, similarly ignore people when they begin to gang up against you. The more sensitivity you show to such schoolyard tactics, the more they'll yank your chain.

Just my two cents.



PS: I don't see Carvaka's Admin status as being relevant to the disagreement or namecalling; unless of course your microwave has begun to mysteriously misbehave over the last few days.

Merlot Daruwala wrote:but after you gave back in full measure and more, I don't see why you're still sulking and obsessing over it.

Merlot Daruwala wrote:PS: I don't see Carvaka's Admin status as being relevant to the disagreement or namecalling; unless of course your microwave has begun to mysteriously misbehave over the last few days.

Merlot Daruwala wrote:Rashmun, you're losing perspective. Don't forget that most of us come to this forum primarily to argue. And when you state strong opinions, be ready to um..cross kukris with others holding equally strong, opposing views. Disagreement is the essence of this board.

Second, you're taking the fight with Carvaka as a personal betrayal. I don't know when exactly your discussion soured (I'm guessing it was when he first used the term "Rashmun method") but at any rate, surely you know that nobody here is a saint. Once the temperature soars, people will use anything they can find to undermine the other. IMO, arguments such as see-what-everyone-here-thinks-of-you are childish but after you gave back in full measure and more, I don't see why you're still sulking and obsessing over it.

Lastly, given that the audience consists of nameless, faceless handles in cyber-space, popularity means nothing (unless it results in comely Suchinis pinging you in private). So stop seeking approval from others. Learn to wear your contrarian positions comfortably.

Most importantly, recognize when to disengage and move on. After all, CH is only an escape from the real world. Don't give it any more importance. Just as you disregard cretins like Uppili, similarly ignore people when they begin to gang up against you. The more sensitivity you show to such schoolyard tactics, the more they'll yank your chain.

Just my two cents.



PS: I don't see Carvaka's Admin status as being relevant to the disagreement or namecalling; unless of course your microwave has begun to mysteriously misbehave over the last few days.

Rekz wrote:unlike some low self-esteem unkils who soon resort to pulling down women handles dupatta,pallu and kurti.They think it's funny.

Merlot Daruwala wrote:Rashmun, you're losing perspective. Don't forget that most of us come to this forum primarily to argue. And when you state strong opinions, be ready to um..cross kukris with others holding equally strong, opposing views. Disagreement is the essence of this board.

Second, you're taking the fight with Carvaka as a personal betrayal. I don't know when exactly your discussion soured (I'm guessing it was when he first used the term "Rashmun method") but at any rate, surely you know that nobody here is a saint. Once the temperature soars, people will use anything they can find to undermine the other. IMO, arguments such as see-what-everyone-here-thinks-of-you are childish but after you gave back in full measure and more, I don't see why you're still sulking and obsessing over it.

Lastly, given that the audience consists of nameless, faceless handles in cyber-space, popularity means nothing (unless it results in comely Suchinis pinging you in private). So stop seeking approval from others. Learn to wear your contrarian positions comfortably.

Most importantly, recognize when to disengage and move on. After all, CH is only an escape from the real world. Don't give it any more importance. Just as you disregard cretins like Uppili, similarly ignore people when they begin to gang up against you. The more sensitivity you show to such schoolyard tactics, the more they'll yank your chain.

Just my two cents.



PS: I don't see Carvaka's Admin status as being relevant to the disagreement or namecalling; unless of course your microwave has begun to mysteriously misbehave over the last few days.

Rekz wrote:SP-Remember this,when i say unkils..im not talking about U...

You are uyire uyire single guy of CH:P & well wisher of mine...so be that way.

SomeProfile wrote:

Rekz wrote:SP-Remember this,when i say unkils..im not talking about U...

You are uyire uyire single guy of CH:P & well wisher of mine...so be that way.

I know you are not talking about me. That is why I am jealous that most of your posts are for, to or about them.

SomeProfile wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:but after you gave back in full measure and more, I don't see why you're still sulking and obsessing over it.

Thanks for the vote of confidence. Until I read this, I was under the impression that I was badly beaten in that debate. Hence all the sulking and obsessing.

SomeProfile wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:PS: I don't see Carvaka's Admin status as being relevant to the disagreement or namecalling; unless of course your microwave has begun to mysteriously misbehave over the last few days.

It is my opinion that an admin of a forum should remain neutral and should not get involved in arguments and fights. Otherwise, how will the common members feel safe enough to exercise their freedom of speech? Are you saying that when Diggy Raja becomes the cabinet minister, he should not remain neutral and should be allowed to fight and slap around innocent, powerless people? That is what even I have always been saying. But the same rules don't apply to forum admins. They should remain neutral and never threaten the freedom of speech of the forum members the way Charvaka has been threatening me. I have been cowering in my boots for the past few weeks in fear that Charvaka will murder my handle on this forum at any moment, thus destroying my online presence forever and ever.

Ram Sharan wrote:

SomeProfile wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:PS: I don't see Carvaka's Admin status as being relevant to the disagreement or namecalling; unless of course your microwave has begun to mysteriously misbehave over the last few days.

It is my opinion that an admin of a forum should remain neutral and should not get involved in arguments and fights. Otherwise, how will the common members feel safe enough to exercise their freedom of speech? Are you saying that when Diggy Raja becomes the cabinet minister, he should not remain neutral and should be allowed to fight and slap around innocent, powerless people? That is what even I have always been saying. But the same rules don't apply to forum admins. They should remain neutral and never threaten the freedom of speech of the forum members the way Charvaka has been threatening me. I have been cowering in my boots for the past few weeks in fear that Charvaka will murder my handle on this forum at any moment, thus destroying my online presence forever and ever.

Munni badnam hui Diggy tere liye.

Richard Hed wrote:

SomeProfile wrote:

Rekz wrote:SP-Remember this,when i say unkils..im not talking about U...

You are uyire uyire single guy of CH:P & well wisher of mine...so be that way.

I know you are not talking about me. That is why I am jealous that most of your posts are for, to or about them.

All you have to do SP - is to call out stupidity when you see like & like you see it. Seething CHaunties will see red, raise their thick unruly, unshaven eyebrows, sweat & then slobber over every post of yours to "bash" you back, homie... :-)

It's that simple and it's a gift that keeps on giving!

Rekz wrote:

Richard Hed wrote:

SomeProfile wrote:

Rekz wrote:SP-Remember this,when i say unkils..im not talking about U...

You are uyire uyire single guy of CH:P & well wisher of mine...so be that way.

I know you are not talking about me. That is why I am jealous that most of your posts are for, to or about them.

All you have to do SP - is to call out stupidity when you see like & like you see it. Seething CHaunties will see red, raise their thick unruly, unshaven eyebrows, sweat & then slobber over every post of yours to "bash" you back, homie... :-)

It's that simple and it's a gift that keeps on giving!

DKhead:farao: ...In this forum where unkils like you participate and contribute,aunties nahi aayenge toh kya kachi kaliyan aake nachnewale hai?If you have a paypal account tell me, i will end ur frustration by sending nice Rajinikanth wig...so that whenever you choose to reply to my post, can wear it and confidently type away.