should Charvak compensate [named removed by Admin] for the time he has spent at suCH?

by Jeremiah Mburuburu Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:24 pm

during the last one to two years, admin charvak has spent, and continues to spend, a great amount of time at suCH, much of it in the daytime, harassing members, especially those who are not telugus or hindus, slandering relatives of members who play no role at suCH, and providing his accomplices a platform from which to attack "the others" with impunity. is charvak's employer, [name removed by Admin], entitled to compensation from him for the time he diligently spends here?

This post has been edited by Admin due to a violation of policy. JM, please do NOT disclose personal information about posters.

by Guest Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:28 pm

lol, will max now protest and ask for deletion of this thread?

by Idéfix Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:30 pm

JM, you have just violated a basic rule of this forum when you mentioned the private information of a poster -- in this case, the name of my purported employer. As a poster, I do want this information removed.

Please do not disclose private information about other posters. I remember you suggesting that doing so may be illegal.

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:36 pm

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:during the last one to two years, admin charvak has spent, and continues to spend, a great amount of time at suCH, much of it in the daytime, harassing members, especially those who are not telugus or hindus, slandering relatives of members who play no role at suCH, and providing his accomplices a platform from which to attack "the others" with impunity. is charvak's employer, [name removed by Admin], entitled to compensation from him for the time he diligently spends here?

The survey is mischievously flawed. It combines different issues; stealing time from company, spending time on SuCH. For example either of the 2 answers will implicate PP. That is a seriously biased survey.

Also, PP harassing those who are NOT hindus??? Like who ? You ? if it is you, then you are disqualified in starting a survey that involves you indirectly. Then who else is he harassing ?

Rashmunullah ? Are you saying he is not a Hindu ? Beware that you newfound gay friendship will be jeopardized.

by Guest Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:48 pm

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:during the last one to two years, admin charvak has spent, and continues to spend, a great amount of time at suCH, much of it in the daytime, harassing members, especially those who are not telugus or hindus, slandering relatives of members who play no role at suCH, and providing his accomplices a platform from which to attack "the others" with impunity. is charvak's employer, [name removed by Admin], entitled to compensation from him for the time he diligently spends here?

This post has been edited by Admin due to a violation of policy. JM, please do NOT disclose personal information about posters.

would have been good if you would have been as proactive when JM's personal information was being disclosed by others.

by Guest Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:51 pm

panini press wrote:JM, you have just violated a basic rule of this forum when you mentioned the private information of a poster -- in this case, the name of my purported employer. As a poster, I do want this information removed.

Please do not disclose private information about other posters. I remember you suggesting that doing so may be illegal.

he is following the cue of your friends Hellsangel and Propagandhi. you never rebuked them, so why are you now rebuking him?

by goodcitizn Wed Jan 23, 2013 2:35 pm

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:during the last one to two years, admin charvak has spent, and continues to spend, a great amount of time at suCH, much of it in the daytime, harassing members, especially those who are not telugus or hindus, slandering relatives of members who play no role at suCH, and providing his accomplices a platform from which to attack "the others" with impunity. is charvak's employer, [name removed by Admin], entitled to compensation from him for the time he diligently spends here?

The survey is mischievously flawed. It combines different issues; stealing time from company, spending time on SuCH. For example either of the 2 answers will implicate PP. That is a seriously biased survey.

Also, PP harassing those who are NOT hindus??? Like who ? You ? if it is you, then you are disqualified in starting a survey that involves you indirectly. Then who else is he harassing ?

Rashmunullah ? Are you saying he is not a Hindu ? Beware that you newfound gay friendship will be jeopardized.

Yes, the survey is completely one-sided so disqualified. Who are the non-Hindus being harassed here? If Luke is one of those, he is usually the harasser not the harassed. Speaking of which, he used to harass Maria (a non-Hindu) as the Kishtian girl. Is that okay in his book because he is a fellow Christian? This survey is nothing but a vendetta to settle scores with Carvaka.

by Vakavaka Pakapaka Wed Jan 23, 2013 2:37 pm

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:during the last one to two years, admin charvak has spent, and continues to spend, a great amount of time at suCH, much of it in the daytime, harassing members, especially those who are not telugus or hindus, slandering relatives of members who play no role at suCH, and providing his accomplices a platform from which to attack "the others" with impunity. is charvak's employer, [name removed by Admin], entitled to compensation from him for the time he diligently spends here?

This post has been edited by Admin due to a violation of policy. JM, please do NOT disclose personal information about posters.

Are you indirectly hinting that Rashmun's employers should seek compensation? He spends a lot more time on SU-CH than anyone else. Basketball

by Guest Wed Jan 23, 2013 2:42 pm

Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:during the last one to two years, admin charvak has spent, and continues to spend, a great amount of time at suCH, much of it in the daytime, harassing members, especially those who are not telugus or hindus, slandering relatives of members who play no role at suCH, and providing his accomplices a platform from which to attack "the others" with impunity. is charvak's employer, [name removed by Admin], entitled to compensation from him for the time he diligently spends here?

This post has been edited by Admin due to a violation of policy. JM, please do NOT disclose personal information about posters.

Are you indirectly hinting that Rashmun's employers should seek compensation? He spends a lot more time on SU-CH than anyone else.

i am self employed.

by Hellsangel Wed Jan 23, 2013 2:44 pm

Rashmun wrote:
Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:during the last one to two years, admin charvak has spent, and continues to spend, a great amount of time at suCH, much of it in the daytime, harassing members, especially those who are not telugus or hindus, slandering relatives of members who play no role at suCH, and providing his accomplices a platform from which to attack "the others" with impunity. is charvak's employer, [name removed by Admin], entitled to compensation from him for the time he diligently spends here?

This post has been edited by Admin due to a violation of policy. JM, please do NOT disclose personal information about posters.

Are you indirectly hinting that Rashmun's employers should seek compensation? He spends a lot more time on SU-CH than anyone else.

i am self employed.

Sorry that you have such a horrible boss, Rashman.

by Guest Wed Jan 23, 2013 2:46 pm

Hellsangel wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:during the last one to two years, admin charvak has spent, and continues to spend, a great amount of time at suCH, much of it in the daytime, harassing members, especially those who are not telugus or hindus, slandering relatives of members who play no role at suCH, and providing his accomplices a platform from which to attack "the others" with impunity. is charvak's employer, [name removed by Admin], entitled to compensation from him for the time he diligently spends here?

This post has been edited by Admin due to a violation of policy. JM, please do NOT disclose personal information about posters.

Are you indirectly hinting that Rashmun's employers should seek compensation? He spends a lot more time on SU-CH than anyone else.

i am self employed.

Sorry that you have such a horrible boss, Rashman.

Slave, looks like JM has managed to shut you up for good with respect to your using his real name on this forum.

by Hellsangel Wed Jan 23, 2013 2:50 pm

Rashmun wrote: respect to your using his real name on this forum.

You mean unlike here?

http://indiapulse.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse_vivekananda-on-caste-system-1083049#1083240

by Guest Wed Jan 23, 2013 2:53 pm

Hellsangel wrote:
Rashmun wrote: respect to your using his real name on this forum.

You mean unlike here?

http://indiapulse.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse_vivekananda-on-caste-system-1083049#1083240

you are confined to giving links to other forums but you do not dare to write his name in a forum post.

by Hellsangel Wed Jan 23, 2013 2:55 pm

Rashmun wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
Rashmun wrote: respect to your using his real name on this forum.

You mean unlike here?

http://indiapulse.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse_vivekananda-on-caste-system-1083049#1083240

you are confined to giving links to other forums but you do not dare to write his name in a forum post.

Oh! Now he is he-who-shall-not-be named?

by goodcitizn Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:03 pm

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote: is charvak's employer entitled to compensation from him for the time he diligently spends here?

Seriously, who died and made you the Time Card Nazi?

Most people who post here during the day do so on their employer's clock. So what is the "time threshold" before you decide to cry foul and threaten to call their employer -- 30 mins/day? an hour/day? 2 hours/day? Or, do you only go by the time someone spends criticizing you for not living up to the same ethical standards you expect of others and for being a hypocrite?

by Hellsangel Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:12 pm

Everyone missed this important lesson. You can teach an old dog a new trick! He learned how to create a poll.

by Idéfix Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:13 pm

Hellsangel wrote:Everyone missed this important lesson. You can teach an old dog a new trick! He learned how to create a poll.

Not quite. Yes and No are not mutually exclusive options on his poll. Damn you, IIT aerospace engineers!

by Jeremiah Mburuburu Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:15 pm

goodcitizn wrote:
Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote: is charvak's employer entitled to compensation from him for the time he diligently spends here?

Seriously, who died and made you the Time Card Nazi?

Most people who post here during the day do so on their employer's clock. So what is the "time threshold" before you decide to cry foul and threaten to call their employer -- 30 mins/day? an hour/day? 2 hours/day? Or, do you only go by the time someone spends criticizing you for not living up to the same ethical standards you expect of others and for being a hypocrite?

i have lived up to those ethical standards. in particular, i haven't disclosed anyone's private info; i haven't encouraged anyone to do so. the "time threshold" for using the employer's time to encourage and support extreme incivility is zero.

by Idéfix Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:16 pm

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:i have lived up to those ethical standards. in particular, i haven't disclosed anyone's private info

You are lying.

Repeating a lie a hundred times is not a way to make it the truth.

by Jeremiah Mburuburu Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:25 pm

panini press wrote:
Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:i have lived up to those ethical standards. in particular, i haven't disclosed anyone's private info
You are lying.

Repeating a lie a hundred times is not a way to make it the truth.

you posted lies about me. you need education and training to help you recognize that many of your words are dishonest and unethical.

by Hellsangel Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:29 pm

Looks like a certain consultancy in a University town of not insignificant size in good old Texas has branched out into education and training.

by Guest Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:31 pm

Good to see JM standing up to PP and his slaves.

by Propagandhi711 Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:34 pm

Hellsangel wrote:Looks like a certain consultancy in a University town of not insignificant size in good old Texas has branched out into education and training.

the so called consultancy that had total revenues of <110k? will they also teach spelling, grammar and proper (and the only way) to make dosa(i)?

by Idéfix Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:39 pm

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:
panini press wrote:
Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:i have lived up to those ethical standards. in particular, i haven't disclosed anyone's private info
You are lying.

Repeating a lie a hundred times is not a way to make it the truth.
you posted lies about me. you need education and training to help you recognize that many of your words are dishonest and unethical.

You are full of empty lies. You cannot prove any of your claims that I am lying. I can prove it to you that you are lying right now.

In hundreds of posts over the years, you have used the purported names of several posters. In your own wrods: whether or not those names are actually those of the posters in question, your deeds violate criminal and civil laws, and well-known ethical standards.

Here are three quick instances of your deeds that violate criminal and civil laws, and well-known ethical standards.

http://indiapulse.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse_sulekha-why-did-you-delete-my-posts-968791: ... (mrs.) XXX "tiana" XXX's ...
http://indiapulse.sulekha.com/forums/personal_does-size-matters-277529: there's a fella here called propagandhi, aka sandeep DUTtarajulu seetharamayya
http://indiapulse.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse_rekha-788642: sandeep seetharamayya, did you buy your wife vijayasundari

by goodcitizn Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:52 pm

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:
goodcitizn wrote:
Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote: is charvak's employer entitled to compensation from him for the time he diligently spends here?

Seriously, who died and made you the Time Card Nazi?

Most people who post here during the day do so on their employer's clock. So what is the "time threshold" before you decide to cry foul and threaten to call their employer -- 30 mins/day? an hour/day? 2 hours/day? Or, do you only go by the time someone spends criticizing you for not living up to the same ethical standards you expect of others and for being a hypocrite?
i have lived up to those ethical standards. in particular, i haven't disclosed anyone's private info; i haven't encouraged anyone to do so. the "time threshold" for using the employer's time to encourage and support extreme incivility is zero.

I know for a fact that you brought up Tiana's real name to mock her on several occasions. I also remember Moxi asking you to refrain from doing so because of privacy rights but that never stopped you. Frankly, I don't care if it was you or someone else who initially "outed" Tiana because that is irrelevant. What is relevant as being unethical and incivil is that you continued to harass Tiana using her real name despite protests from her and others. So it is untrue that you never disclosed anyone's private info.

I think it is silly to threaten anyone here about calling their employer because most posters are at work during the day. By your definition they are all cheating on their employers when they browse or post, so why pick on Carvaka in particular? Why should the time threshold apply only to the time spent (real or imagined) in incivility?

by Jeremiah Mburuburu Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:30 pm

panini press wrote:
Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:
panini press wrote:
Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:i have lived up to those ethical standards. in particular, i haven't disclosed anyone's private info
You are lying.

Repeating a lie a hundred times is not a way to make it the truth.
you posted lies about me. you need education and training to help you recognize that many of your words are dishonest and unethical.
You are full of empty lies. You cannot prove any of your claims that I am lying. I can prove it to you that you are lying right now.

In hundreds of posts over the years, you have used the purported names of several posters. In your own wrods: whether or not those names are actually those of the posters in question, your deeds violate criminal and civil laws, and well-known ethical standards.

Here are three quick instances of your deeds that violate criminal and civil laws, and well-known ethical standards.

http://indiapulse.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse_sulekha-why-did-you-delete-my-posts-968791: ... (mrs.) meghna "tiana" joshi's ...
http://indiapulse.sulekha.com/forums/personal_does-size-matters-277529: there's a fella here called propagandhi, aka sandeep DUTtarajulu seetharamayya
http://indiapulse.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse_rekha-788642: sandeep seetharamayya, did you buy your wife vijayasundari

you and hellsangel searched years of posts, and this is all you could dig out!

the last two are obvious parodies of incongruent names i made up for self-loathing southern indians who aspire to more "fashionable" northindian names. and it was tiana herself who disclosed her pen-name to be meghana joshi; you'll have to ask her why.

i used "mrs" with meghana joshi for the same reason i use mrs with vidya bagchi and shrivastav-khare -- to stress my belief that they are traditional, firmly-married women with children, and not the mini-skirted, nubile young maidens over whom your bro propagandhi experiences spontaneous ejaculations.

you have always been angry and upset about my parodying telugus for their self-loathing ways, but that doesn't mean that i violate people's privacy or break laws. others do, especially propagandhi and hellsangel; they do so routinely. you knew all this, and yet you accused me of violating laws and ethics! you are therefore a liar and a hypocrite of low ethical standards who needs to be sent off to reform school or whipped by the employer you steal from every day.

by Idéfix Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:37 pm

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:
panini press wrote:Here are three quick instances of your deeds that violate criminal and civil laws, and well-known ethical standards.

http://indiapulse.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse_sulekha-why-did-you-delete-my-posts-968791: ... (mrs.) meghna "tiana" joshi's ...
http://indiapulse.sulekha.com/forums/personal_does-size-matters-277529: there's a fella here called propagandhi, aka sandeep DUTtarajulu seetharamayya
http://indiapulse.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse_rekha-788642: sandeep seetharamayya, did you buy your wife vijayasundari
you and hellsangel searched years of posts, and this is all you could dig out!

Hahaha! Your paranoia is my best reward from this thread. I don't need HA's help to find many, many more instances. I even posted the first time you mentioned Tiana's real name several years ago. You conveniently went groundhog on that thread. I also posted a warning given to you several years ago to not disclose the names, etc. of other posters.

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:the last two are obvious parodies of incongruent names i made up

What were your words again? Ah, here they are; I hope you chose your words carefully when you said this:
whether or not the names you publish as mine ... are actually mine, ... your deeds violate criminal and civil laws, and well-known ethical standards.

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote: needs to be sent off to reform school or whipped by the employer you steal from every day.

Some fantasies you have!

by Idéfix Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:44 pm

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:you have always been angry and upset about my parodying telugus for their self-loathing ways, but that doesn't mean that i violate people's privacy or break laws.

Your parodying of Telugus has nothing to do with privacy violations. Your repeated use of purported names of people, despite several warnings from other posters, violates people's privacy and break laws. I am no lawyer; I am just relying on your considered opinion on this matter.

by b_A Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:47 pm

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:during the last one to two years, admin charvak has spent, and continues to spend, a great amount of time at suCH, much of it in the daytime, harassing members, especially those who are not telugus or hindus, slandering relatives of members who play no role at suCH, and providing his accomplices a platform from which to attack "the others" with impunity.

You are extremely angry. You are extremely upset.
Trivia question - Whose patented mocking words are those?

"Religion is the last refuge of a Scoundrel" .
Quiz question - Who is credited with the above quote?

Bonus : Correct any spellings , Grammatical/semantic errors in this post.

by b_A Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:50 pm

Rashmun wrote:i am self employed.

Is that an euphemism for "Unemployed" ? Maybe , Propa was onto something about your failed Ph D. Doesn't come as a surprise to anyone who has been witnessing your IQ and EQ levels.

Personally , I think jobless is the more appropriate word for you.

by b_A Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:57 pm

Rashmun wrote:Good to see JM standing up to PP and his slaves.

Good to to see you bare your hypocrisy about revealing personal details of posters.

by Guest Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:00 pm

b_A wrote:
Rashmun wrote:i am self employed.

Is that an euphemism for "Unemployed" ? Maybe , Propa was onto something about your failed Ph D. Doesn't come as a surprise to anyone who has been witnessing your IQ and EQ levels.

Personally , I think jobless is the more appropriate word for you.

you are reminding me of a crow who keeps croaking 'kai kai'.

by b_A Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:08 pm

Rashmun wrote:
b_A wrote:
Rashmun wrote:i am self employed.

Is that an euphemism for "Unemployed" ? Maybe , Propa was onto something about your failed Ph D. Doesn't come as a surprise to anyone who has been witnessing your IQ and EQ levels.

Personally , I think jobless is the more appropriate word for you.

you are reminding me of a crow who keeps croaking 'kai kai'.

Do hindian crows croak as "kai kai" ? Telugu crows go "kav kav".

by Guest Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:10 pm

b_A wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
b_A wrote:
Rashmun wrote:i am self employed.

Is that an euphemism for "Unemployed" ? Maybe , Propa was onto something about your failed Ph D. Doesn't come as a surprise to anyone who has been witnessing your IQ and EQ levels.

Personally , I think jobless is the more appropriate word for you.

you are reminding me of a crow who keeps croaking 'kai kai'.

Do hindian crows croak as "kai kai" ? Telugu crows go "kav kav".

ok "kav kav" then.

by Jeremiah Mburuburu Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:10 pm

goodcitizn wrote:I don't care if it was you or someone else who initially "outed" Tiana because that is irrelevant.

tiana is the one who disclosed her own pen-name, and it's entirely legitimate to use it.

goodcitizn wrote:What is relevant as being unethical and incivil is that you continued to harass Tiana using her real name...

i didn't harass her; i used her pen-name, and criticized certain romantic notions that she held, and possibly her writing.

goodcitizn wrote:...despite protests from her and others.

i feel free to express my opinion.

goodcitizn wrote:So it is untrue that you never disclosed anyone's private info.

it is true because i never disclosed anyone's name, address, telephone number, email address, or relatives' names. that's a remarkable statement because i've been here for approx 14 years, and people have called me and those close to me many names.

goodcitizn wrote:I think it is silly to threaten anyone here about calling their employer because most posters are at work during the day. By your definition they are all cheating on their employers when they browse or post, so why pick on Carvaka in particular? Why should the time threshold apply only to the time spent (real or imagined) in incivility?

"time threshold" is your term. because of the malicious use to which the employer's time is put, the employer should know, so that they can educate and retrain the rogue poster, or otherwise deter him. this applies particularly to charvaka because he set up this site and made himself its admin, so that he and his tribe can engage in incivility with impunity.

by b_A Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:10 pm

Let's guess who cast the third vote in this poll. First two votes are obviously of JM and Rashmunemployed.

by Idéfix Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:14 pm

b_A wrote:Let's guess who cast the third vote in this poll. First two votes are obviously of JM and Rashmunemployed.

Let me give you a hint. If I remember right, this site limits you to giving 20 + or - ratings to a post per day. On some days, I post more than 20 posts. But almost every post eventually gets a negative vote.

by Hellsangel Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:16 pm

Looks like Rashman has Caca on his mind a lot these days.

by Guest Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:16 pm

panini press wrote:
b_A wrote:Let's guess who cast the third vote in this poll. First two votes are obviously of JM and Rashmunemployed.
Let me give you a hint. If I remember right, this site limits you to giving 20 + or - ratings to a post per day. On some days, I post more than 20 posts. But almost every post eventually gets a negative vote.

just to keep things in perspective, you have made more than 3,000 posts in your PP handle and more than 4,000 posts in your Charvaka handle.

by b_A Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:22 pm

panini press wrote:
b_A wrote:Let's guess who cast the third vote in this poll. First two votes are obviously of JM and Rashmunemployed.
Let me give you a hint. If I remember right, this site limits you to giving 20 + or - ratings to a post per day. On some days, I post more than 20 posts. But almost every post eventually gets a negative vote.

Are you saying Rashmunployed has another handle? Maybe , that's why , he is quick to see that b_a== HA .

by Jeremiah Mburuburu Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:24 pm

Rashmun wrote:
panini press wrote:
b_A wrote:Let's guess who cast the third vote in this poll. First two votes are obviously of JM and Rashmunemployed.
Let me give you a hint. If I remember right, this site limits you to giving 20 + or - ratings to a post per day. On some days, I post more than 20 posts. But almost every post eventually gets a negative vote.

just to keep things in perspective, you have made more than 3,000 posts in your PP handle and more than 4,000 posts in your Charvaka handle.

hahaha. he's one busy boy! he's also mother to propa and hellsangel.

by Idéfix Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:25 pm

b_A wrote:
panini press wrote:
b_A wrote:Let's guess who cast the third vote in this poll. First two votes are obviously of JM and Rashmunemployed.
Let me give you a hint. If I remember right, this site limits you to giving 20 + or - ratings to a post per day. On some days, I post more than 20 posts. But almost every post eventually gets a negative vote.

Are you saying Rashmunployed has another handle? Maybe , that's why , he is quick to see that b_a== HA .

https://such.forumotion.com/t2818-why-you-should-give-charvaka-multiple-negative-votes

by Guest Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:27 pm

panini press wrote:
b_A wrote:
panini press wrote:
b_A wrote:Let's guess who cast the third vote in this poll. First two votes are obviously of JM and Rashmunemployed.
Let me give you a hint. If I remember right, this site limits you to giving 20 + or - ratings to a post per day. On some days, I post more than 20 posts. But almost every post eventually gets a negative vote.

Are you saying Rashmunployed has another handle? Maybe , that's why , he is quick to see that b_a== HA .
https://such.forumotion.com/t2818-why-you-should-give-charvaka-multiple-negative-votes

That was a protest post. It worked because you fixed the problem and i was again able to cast negative votes.

by Propagandhi711 Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:28 pm

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
panini press wrote:
b_A wrote:Let's guess who cast the third vote in this poll. First two votes are obviously of JM and Rashmunemployed.
Let me give you a hint. If I remember right, this site limits you to giving 20 + or - ratings to a post per day. On some days, I post more than 20 posts. But almost every post eventually gets a negative vote.

just to keep things in perspective, you have made more than 3,000 posts in your PP handle and more than 4,000 posts in your Charvaka handle.
hahaha. he's one busy boy! he's also mother to propa and hellsangel.

do you know how many posts your pet monkey made over the same time? 7100....most of them consist of:
a) dotting, b) cross posting crap about places he knows nothing abt, from wiki sources, c) complaining about ppl from places he knows nothing about.

by Idéfix Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:29 pm

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:hahaha. he's one busy boy!

I suspect you are not at all busy. So how about producing evidence for the slanderous accusations you have made against me? Perhaps you think I am biased against you, so here are questions you need to answer from those more favorably disposed towards you.

https://such.forumotion.com/t10234-warning-to-jeremiah-mburuburu-from-luke-warmus#78286
https://such.forumotion.com/t10172-poll-was-jm-malicious#77782
https://such.forumotion.com/t10234-warning-to-jeremiah-mburuburu-from-luke-warmus#78290

Go ahead, answer them.

by Jeremiah Mburuburu Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:37 pm

panini press wrote:
Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:hahaha. he's one busy boy!
I suspect you are not at all busy. So how about producing evidence for the slanderous accusations you have made against me? Perhaps you think I am biased against you, so here are questions you need to answer from those more favorably disposed towards you.

https://such.forumotion.com/t10234-warning-to-jeremiah-mburuburu-from-luke-warmus#78286
https://such.forumotion.com/t10172-poll-was-jm-malicious#77782
https://such.forumotion.com/t10234-warning-to-jeremiah-mburuburu-from-luke-warmus#78290

Go ahead, answer them.

7,000 posts? amazing! you are one efficient cheat!

by Idéfix Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:38 pm

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:
panini press wrote:
Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:hahaha. he's one busy boy!
I suspect you are not at all busy. So how about producing evidence for the slanderous accusations you have made against me? Perhaps you think I am biased against you, so here are questions you need to answer from those more favorably disposed towards you.

https://such.forumotion.com/t10234-warning-to-jeremiah-mburuburu-from-luke-warmus#78286
https://such.forumotion.com/t10172-poll-was-jm-malicious#77782
https://such.forumotion.com/t10234-warning-to-jeremiah-mburuburu-from-luke-warmus#78290

Go ahead, answer them.
7,000 posts? amazing! you are one efficient cheat!

I take it that you are going to stick to name-calling, libel and slander. Enjoy yourself.

by Propagandhi711 Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:53 pm

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:
panini press wrote:
Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:hahaha. he's one busy boy!
I suspect you are not at all busy. So how about producing evidence for the slanderous accusations you have made against me? Perhaps you think I am biased against you, so here are questions you need to answer from those more favorably disposed towards you.

https://such.forumotion.com/t10234-warning-to-jeremiah-mburuburu-from-luke-warmus#78286
https://such.forumotion.com/t10172-poll-was-jm-malicious#77782
https://such.forumotion.com/t10234-warning-to-jeremiah-mburuburu-from-luke-warmus#78290

Go ahead, answer them.
7,000 posts? amazing! you are one efficient cheat!

phlegmy, funny how when you have no answers to questions, you repeat yourself like your failed phd understudy, who incidentally uses the same tactics. did you teach him or did you absorb them as part of some reverse osmosis process while he was changing your diaper?

by Guest Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:36 am

congratulations JM for having discovered google! we are now hopeful you will discover life on another planet in 2013. Smile

old, ganjedi kutta (one of the k's stands for kutta) is back in business. tum sale kuttey se bhi gaye beetey ho madarchod.

by Idéfix Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:48 am

HK, here is a Bangla sher for you...

na shokha karEnge na gIlA karEngE
tum, shAlA, mat rahO, yehI duA karEngE!

And here is the Hindian original:

na shikwA karEnge na gilA karEngE,
tum salAmat rahO yehI duA karEngE!

by Sponsored content