dear [name removed by Admin]

panileni paparao wrote:HK, please let me know if you would like admin intervention to remove the relevant information on this thread.

Huzefa Kapasi wrote:

panileni paparao wrote:HK, please let me know if you would like admin intervention to remove the relevant information on this thread.

i do not think i have used the real name of any poster. if someone here has been been inadvertendy addresed by me by his/her real name then that someone should write to you and i would not mind if the entire thread is deleted.

panileni paparao wrote:

Huzefa Kapasi wrote:

panileni paparao wrote:HK, please let me know if you would like admin intervention to remove the relevant information on this thread.

i do not think i have used the real name of any poster. if someone here has been been inadvertendy addresed by me by his/her real name then that someone should write to you and i would not mind if the entire thread is deleted.

You know exactly what you posted, and you don't want admin to remove it. I get it; no need to play games. What I don't get is what you are trying to accomplish by doing this. This is unacceptable behavior, and you know it.

I hope the affected person requests admin intervention so this can be removed.

goodcitizn wrote:Its like giving a condom after conception.

panileni paparao wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:Its like giving a condom after conception.

LOL, yes that is how it is turning out over the last few days. I am wary of accusations of admin bias, if I start deleting threads without a request from the poster or the affected party. Do you have any suggestions for improving this situation?

goodcitizn wrote:Nobody respects an admin who wears khadi at a time when he should be wearing khaki.

The current policy is like handing out a can of pepper spray after the rape.

If I were you, I'd delete a post or an entire thread if there is even an inkling of someone's privacy being jeopardized. We are not talking just an individual's privacy here; sometimes even the privacy of one's family members. Given how sensitive this subject is, it is far better to ask for an apology than ask for permission.

Time to change from the Great Glut to the Great Gut.

Hellsangel wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:Nobody respects an admin who wears khadi at a time when he should be wearing khaki.
Time to change from the Great Glut to the Great Gut.

You want the great glut Admin to have a big gut?

Hellsangel wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:Nobody respects an admin who wears khadi at a time when he should be wearing khaki.

The current policy is like handing out a can of pepper spray after the rape.

If I were you, I'd delete a post or an entire thread if there is even an inkling of someone's privacy being jeopardized. We are not talking just an individual's privacy here; sometimes even the privacy of one's family members. Given how sensitive this subject is, it is far better to ask for an apology than ask for permission.

Time to change from the Great Glut to the Great Gut.

You want the great glut Admin to have a big gut?

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:Nobody respects an admin who wears khadi at a time when he should be wearing khaki.

The current policy is like handing out a can of pepper spray after the rape.

If I were you, I'd delete a post or an entire thread if there is even an inkling of someone's privacy being jeopardized. We are not talking just an individual's privacy here; sometimes even the privacy of one's family members. Given how sensitive this subject is, it is far better to ask for an apology than ask for permission.

Time to change from the Great Glut to the Great Gut.

You want the great glut Admin to have a big gut?

vTTy!

goodcitizn wrote:Nobody respects an admin who wears khadi at a time when he should be wearing khaki.

The current policy is like handing out a can of pepper spray after the rape.

If I were you, I'd delete a post or an entire thread if there is even an inkling of someone's privacy being jeopardized. We are not talking just an individual's privacy here; sometimes even the privacy of one's family members. Given how sensitive this subject is, it is far better to ask for an apology than ask for permission.

Time to change from the Great Glut to the Great Gut.

Huzefa Kapasi wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:Nobody respects an admin who wears khadi at a time when he should be wearing khaki.

The current policy is like handing out a can of pepper spray after the rape.

If I were you, I'd delete a post or an entire thread if there is even an inkling of someone's privacy being jeopardized. We are not talking just an individual's privacy here; sometimes even the privacy of one's family members. Given how sensitive this subject is, it is far better to ask for an apology than ask for permission.

Time to change from the Great Glut to the Great Gut.

i agree with you. but with JM i personally follow no rules. the admin did not ask for an apology. yet i apologize if it makes you happy. there you go! want a popsicle too?

goodcitizn wrote:

Huzefa Kapasi wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:Nobody respects an admin who wears khadi at a time when he should be wearing khaki.

The current policy is like handing out a can of pepper spray after the rape.

If I were you, I'd delete a post or an entire thread if there is even an inkling of someone's privacy being jeopardized. We are not talking just an individual's privacy here; sometimes even the privacy of one's family members. Given how sensitive this subject is, it is far better to ask for an apology than ask for permission.

Time to change from the Great Glut to the Great Gut.

i agree with you. but with JM i personally follow no rules. the admin did not ask for an apology. yet i apologize if it makes you happy. there you go! want a popsicle too?

HK: You misunderstood what I said. It is better for admin to apologize later if a mistake is made in deleting a post or thread that seems to reveal any private info than to wait for permission to delete it. I meant that admin should be proactive than reactive. Once the tooth paste is out, you can't put it back in the tube.

goodcitizn wrote:

HK: You misunderstood what I said. It is better for admin to apologize later if a mistake is made in deleting a post or thread that seems to reveal any private info than to wait for permission to delete it. I meant that admin should be proactive than reactive. Once the tooth paste is out, you can't put it back in the tube.

Huzefa Kapasi wrote:
got you and agree with you! the only caveat being that the admin cannot afford to be active all the time to monitor posts.

goodcitizn wrote:Seems to me there are just 5 little mischievous kindergarten kids running amok here.

Huzefa Kapasi wrote:needles to say his (public) acquiescence would also have been consigned to trash to spare him of everlasting humility humiliation. but it was not to be.

truthbetold wrote:...admin...here is a guy juvenile spending stealing his personal employer's time to support our ONLINE community.


instead of admin alone making such a policy, we can create a group of elders(based on thought maturity rather than age) other juveniles, and ask them to create policy provide direction. admin's role is then execute to bitch about the policy. they can meet online as necessary or once a week.


ok. only one gult other than admin. amended: and one person from each caashTu, subcaashTu, and sexu; at least one northindian, at least one dravidgurrl of the pavakkai pitlai subcaste, at least one lesbian angel with a single, exploding testicle, one BIMARU of indeterminate sex with hairy, jiggly breasts, and one gult proudly married to a kannadiga female who sports a dense growth of curly black hair on her unshaven legs.

Hellsangel wrote:Plus one loser who is a waste of tax-payer money to proof-read the meeting minutes.

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:Plus one loser who is a waste of tax-payer money to proof-read the meeting minutes.

truthbetold wrote:Jm,
do you have any suggestions to improve the forum?

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

truthbetold wrote:...admin...here is a guy juvenile spending stealing his personal employer's time to support our ONLINE community.


instead of admin alone making such a policy, we can create a group of elders(based on thought maturity rather than age) other juveniles, and ask them to create policy provide direction. admin's role is then execute to bitch about the policy. they can meet online as necessary or once a week.


ok. only one gult other than admin. amended: and one person from each caashTu, subcaashTu, and sexu; at least one northindian, at least one dravidgurrl of the pavakkai pitlai subcaste, at least one lesbian angel with a single, exploding testicle, one BIMARU of indeterminate sex with hairy, jiggly breasts, and one gult proudly married to a kannadiga female who sports a dense growth of curly black hair on her unshaven legs.

** fixed ** haranya kashyapoooo!

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

truthbetold wrote:Jm,
do you have any suggestions to improve the forum?

tbt, i don't have conversations with habitual name-callers.

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

truthbetold wrote:...admin...here is a guy juvenile spending stealing his personal employer's time to support our ONLINE community.


instead of admin alone making such a policy, we can create a group of elders(based on thought maturity rather than age) other juveniles, and ask them to create policy provide direction. admin's role is then execute to bitch about the policy. they can meet online as necessary or once a week.


ok. only one gult other than admin. amended: and one person from each caashTu, subcaashTu, and sexu; at least one northindian, at least one dravidgurrl of the pavakkai pitlai subcaste, at least one lesbian angel with a single, exploding testicle, one BIMARU of indeterminate sex with hairy, jiggly breasts, and one gult proudly married to a kannadiga female who sports a dense growth of curly black hair on her unshaven legs.

** fixed ** haranya kashyapoooo!