#2 for the Thambees

by Guest Sat Aug 24, 2013 10:33 am

O Re Thambee, O Ri Thambee, Maan Bhi Le Baat Mori
Maine Pyaar Tujhi Se Hai Kiya, Ho
Tere Bin Main Jeeya To Kya Jeeya
Oh, Tere Nainon Mein Yeh Jo Kaajal Hai
Sapnon Ka Baadal Hai
Mann Tere Hi Kaaran Paagal Hai, O Goriya
Ho Oh, Oh, Oh Oh Oh

O Re Thambey, Dil Se Nikle, Bol More - 2
Maine Pyaar Tujhi Se Hai Kiya, Ho
Maine Tujhko Hi Maana Hai Piya
Oh, Tune Thaama Aaj Yeh Aanchal Hai
Mann Mein Ek Halchal Hai
Main Na Bhooloongi Yeh Voh Pal Hai, Saanwariya
Oh Oh, Oh, Oh Oh Oh

My Heart, It Speaks A Thousand Words
I Feel Eternal Bliss
The Roses Pout Their Scarlet Mouths
Like Offering A Kiss
No Drop Of Rain, No Glowing Flame
Has Ever Been So Pure
If Being In Love Can Feel Like This
Then I'm In Love For Sure

More Mann Mein
More Mann Mein Thi Jo Baat Chhupi
Aayi Hai Jabaan Par
More Dil Mein Kahin Ek Teer Jo Tha
Aaya Hai Kamaan Par
Sun Sun Le Sajan Rahe Janam Janam
Hum Prem Nagar Ke Baasi
Thambee Thambee Haath, Rahe Saath Saath
Kabhi Doore Ho Na Jara Si
Chaloon Main Sang Sang Teri Raah Mein
Bas Teri Chaah Mein, Ho Oh Oh Oh
O Re Thambey

O Ri Thambee

Oh, I'm In Love, I Am In Love, Yes I'm In Love

Mm, Koi Poochhe
Koi Poochhe To Main Boloon Kya
Ke Mujhko Hua Hai Kya
More Ang Ang Mein Hai Sughand
Jo Tune Hai Chhoo Liya

Tan Maheka Maheka, Rang Daheka Baheka
Mujhe Tu Gulaab Si Laage
Jo Hai Yeh Nikhaar Aur Yeh Singhaar
To Kyoon Na Kaamna Jaaga
Tera Ujla Ujla Jo Roop Hai
Yovan Ki Dhoop Hai, Oh Oh Oh Oh
O Ri Thambee

(Oh, I'm In Love)

O Re Chhore
(Oh, I'm In Love)

Dil Se Nikle

(Yes, I'm In Love)

Bol More
Maine Pyaar Tujhi Se Hai Kiya, Ho
Maine Tujhko Hi Maana Hai Piya
Oh, Tune Thaama Aaj Yeh Aanchal Hai
Mann Mein Ek Halchal Hai
Main Na Bhooloongi Yeh Voh Pal Hai

O Goriya, Ho Oh, Oh, Oh Oh Oh
(Yes, I'm In Love)

http://www.lyricsmasti.com/song/1468/get_lyrics_of_O-Re-Chori.html

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Sat Aug 24, 2013 10:36 am

Bittu wrote:

Is it some new Keral-Punju collaborative program?

by goodcitizn Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:05 pm

I pointed out the exception to you. 70s doesn't require an apostrophe so 70's is wrong. But the exception is with zeroes. It is wrong to write 0s. The right way is 0's. I had given you the grammar link to verify for yourself.

And where you have another number or alphabet in conjunction with zero, that also gets an apostrophe by this rule.

For example, it is wrong to write, "2002 has two 2s and two 0s," because 0 has to have an apostrophe in plural. And the conjunction also gets an apostrophe in that sentence. The right way to write is, "2002 has two 2's and two 0's."

However, skipping the apostrophe is correct in this sentence where there is no zero involved: "2662 has two 2s and two 6s."

As I said, English is one fucked up language. Jats and Thambis should be cognizant of that.

by truthbetold Sat Aug 24, 2013 7:38 pm

goodcitizn wrote:I pointed out the exception to you. 70s doesn't require an apostrophe so 70's is wrong. But the exception is with zeroes. It is wrong to write 0s. The right way is 0's. I had given you the grammar link to verify for yourself.

And where you have another number or alphabet in conjunction with zero, that also gets an apostrophe by this rule.

For example, it is wrong to write, "2002 has two 2s and two 0s," because 0 has to have an apostrophe in plural. And the conjunction also gets an apostrophe in that sentence. The right way to write is, "2002 has two 2's and two 0's."

However, skipping the apostrophe is correct in this sentence where there is no zero involved: "2662 has two 2s and two 6s."

As I said, English is one fucked up language. Jats and Thambis should be cognizant of that.

Where is the grammer patrol of this fucked up language?
Hope he is safe somewhere.

by Bittu Sat Aug 24, 2013 7:43 pm

goodcitizn wrote:I pointed out the exception to you. 70s doesn't require an apostrophe so 70's is wrong. But the exception is with zeroes. It is wrong to write 0s. The right way is 0's. I had given you the grammar link to verify for yourself.

I didn't respond earlier because my brain was fully pako-ed by that point and I didn't want you to pakao it any further.

goodcitizn wrote:For example, it is wrong to write, "2002 has two 2s and two 0s," because 0 has to have an apostrophe in plural. And the conjunction also gets an apostrophe in that sentence. The right way to write is, "2002 has two 2's and two 0's."

Think about this one for a minute. 2002. The round things between the two 2s are zeros unless you're a philosopher and then they can be a pair of tits or eggs or pancho bhagwan ke tatte. They cannot be confused for the letter '0'. It's a fucking number. Therefore, if you write "2002 has two 2s and two 0s" it's perfectly legit.

Men should think things through.

by goodcitizn Sun Aug 25, 2013 7:34 am

Bittu wrote:
goodcitizn wrote:I pointed out the exception to you. 70s doesn't require an apostrophe so 70's is wrong. But the exception is with zeroes. It is wrong to write 0s. The right way is 0's. I had given you the grammar link to verify for yourself.
I didn't respond earlier because my brain was fully pako-ed by that point and I didn't want you to pakao it any further.

goodcitizn wrote:For example, it is wrong to write, "2002 has two 2s and two 0s," because 0 has to have an apostrophe in plural. And the conjunction also gets an apostrophe in that sentence. The right way to write is, "2002 has two 2's and two 0's."

Think about this one for a minute. 2002. The round things between the two 2s are zeros unless you're a philosopher and then they can be a pair of tits or eggs or pancho bhagwan ke tatte. They cannot be confused for the letter '0'. It's a fucking number. Therefore, if you write "2002 has two 2s and two 0s" it's perfectly legit.

Men should think things through.

That's your rule, NOT the rule of grammar and punctuation.

See below from the link:
http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/apostro.asp

Exception:
Use apostrophes with capital letters and numbers when the meaning would be unclear otherwise.
Examples:
Please dot your i's.
You don't mean is.
Ted couldn't distinguish between his 6's and 0's.
You need to use the apostrophe to indicate the plural of zero or it will look like the word Os. To be consistent within a sentence, you would also use the apostrophe to indicate the plural of 6's.

It beats me how 0s can be mistaken for Os. But that's the f'n rule.

by goodcitizn Sun Aug 25, 2013 8:22 am

I personally don't give a rat's ass about apostrophes.

Since you posted "grammar peeves" saying, "Apostrophes do NOT make something plural", I was curious to see if there were exceptions.

I pointed out one earlier. Here's another:

DO use the apostrophe to form the plural of an abbreviation that combines upper and lowercase letters or has interior periods:

The department graduated five M.A.’s and two Ph.D.’s this year.

NOTE: If you leave out the periods, you can write MAs but you’d still have to write PhD’s.

http://www.dailywritingtips.com/when-to-form-a-plural-with-an-apostrophe/

by Sponsored content

#2 for the Thambees

#2 for the Thambees

Re: #2 for the Thambees

Re: #2 for the Thambees

Re: #2 for the Thambees

Re: #2 for the Thambees

Re: #2 for the Thambees

Re: #2 for the Thambees

Re: #2 for the Thambees

Re: #2 for the Thambees