Coffeehouse for desis
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

leaders we shoulda had

4 posters

Go down

leaders we shoulda had Empty leaders we shoulda had

Post by Propagandhi711 Tue Apr 01, 2014 9:45 am

instead of the douchebag nehru and his acolytes:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._Rajagopalachari

Propagandhi711

Posts : 6941
Join date : 2011-04-29

Back to top Go down

leaders we shoulda had Empty Re: leaders we shoulda had

Post by Guest Tue Apr 01, 2014 9:52 am

Propagandhi711 wrote:instead of the douchebag nehru and his acolytes:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._Rajagopalachari

Rajagopalachari was a Nehru supporter and Nehru was a Rajagopalachari supporter. It is foolish to try and make a distinction between the two. Both were secular in their outlook.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

leaders we shoulda had Empty Re: leaders we shoulda had

Post by Propagandhi711 Tue Apr 01, 2014 9:53 am

Rashmun wrote:
Propagandhi711 wrote:instead of the douchebag nehru and his acolytes:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._Rajagopalachari

Rajagopalachari was a Nehru supporter and Nehru was a Rajagopalachari supporter. It is foolish to try and make a distinction between the two. Both were secular in their outlook.

douchemun, for you everything starts and ends with secular, nothing more

Propagandhi711

Posts : 6941
Join date : 2011-04-29

Back to top Go down

leaders we shoulda had Empty Re: leaders we shoulda had

Post by Rishi Tue Apr 01, 2014 9:54 am

Rashmun wrote:
Propagandhi711 wrote:instead of the douchebag nehru and his acolytes:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._Rajagopalachari

Rajagopalachari was a Nehru supporter and Nehru was a Rajagopalachari supporter. It is foolish to try and make a distinction between the two. Both were secular in their outlook.


>>>Then why do you think Rajaji quit Congress and started the Swatantra party?

Rishi

Posts : 5129
Join date : 2011-09-02

Back to top Go down

leaders we shoulda had Empty Re: leaders we shoulda had

Post by Guest Tue Apr 01, 2014 9:56 am

Rishi wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
Propagandhi711 wrote:instead of the douchebag nehru and his acolytes:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._Rajagopalachari

Rajagopalachari was a Nehru supporter and Nehru was a Rajagopalachari supporter. It is foolish to try and make a distinction between the two. Both were secular in their outlook.


>>>Then why do you think Rajaji quit Congress and started the Swatantra party?

I am not sure. One thing i know is this: Nehru wanted Rajaji as the first President of India, but Sardar Patel insisted that his man Rajendra Prasad become the President. Patel won that fight. Rajendra Prasad had a relatively poor reputation compared to Rajaji.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

leaders we shoulda had Empty Re: leaders we shoulda had

Post by smArtha Tue Apr 01, 2014 10:39 am

SP & Rajaji as PM & President would have worked better than Nehru and RP combo.

smArtha

Posts : 1229
Join date : 2013-07-29

Back to top Go down

leaders we shoulda had Empty Re: leaders we shoulda had

Post by Guest Tue Apr 01, 2014 10:47 am

smArtha wrote:SP & Rajaji as PM & President would have worked better than Nehru and RP combo.

Nehru and and Rajaji combo would have worked the best.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

leaders we shoulda had Empty Re: leaders we shoulda had

Post by smArtha Tue Apr 01, 2014 11:03 am

Rashmun wrote:
smArtha wrote:SP & Rajaji as PM & President would have worked better than Nehru and RP combo.

Nehru and and Rajaji combo would have worked the best.

We have data that one part of that combo failed to deliver.  Nehru created and left many problems for the country to deal with long after he is gone. And that immediately makes your claim only 50% valid at best.

smArtha

Posts : 1229
Join date : 2013-07-29

Back to top Go down

leaders we shoulda had Empty Re: leaders we shoulda had

Post by Guest Tue Apr 01, 2014 11:10 am

smArtha wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
smArtha wrote:SP & Rajaji as PM & President would have worked better than Nehru and RP combo.

Nehru and and Rajaji combo would have worked the best.

We have data that one part of that combo failed to deliver.  Nehru created and left many problems for the country to deal with long after he is gone. And that immediately makes your claim only 50% valid at best.

Nehru also ensured that India remained a secular country. For this one great act of his i am prepared to forgive him for any mistakes he made. Since a theological Indian (Hindu) state on the lines of Iran or Pakistan would have been a disaster in the long run. And there were many people at that time who were in favor of some kind of a theological Indian state to be established.

But other than this Nehru had a scientific outlook and established technological institutes of excellence, established a heavy industry base in India, did all he could to promote scientific outlook and scientific values, fought against all kinds of superstition, and even his worst enemies have not accused Nehru of being dishonest.

Of course Nehru made mistakes. But the good things he did outweighs his mistakes.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

leaders we shoulda had Empty Re: leaders we shoulda had

Post by Rishi Tue Apr 01, 2014 11:39 am

Rashmun wrote:
smArtha wrote:SP & Rajaji as PM & President would have worked better than Nehru and RP combo.

Nehru and and Rajaji combo would have worked the best.

>>>Rashmun,

It was Rajaji who saw that India was better off by acceding to Jinnah's demand for Pakistan.

Rajaji was totally against license permit raj.

Rajaji would have been a better PM than Nehru. But the NI crowd including Gandhi did not want this SI to lead the country. He was far intelligent than the Oxford educated Nehru. Unlike Nehru who was craving for international recognition, Rajaji would have been more effective and gotten things done quietly.

Rishi

Posts : 5129
Join date : 2011-09-02

Back to top Go down

leaders we shoulda had Empty Re: leaders we shoulda had

Post by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Tue Apr 01, 2014 12:27 pm

Rishi wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
Propagandhi711 wrote:instead of the douchebag nehru and his acolytes:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._Rajagopalachari

Rajagopalachari was a Nehru supporter and Nehru was a Rajagopalachari supporter. It is foolish to try and make a distinction between the two. Both were secular in their outlook.

>>>Then why do you think Rajaji quit Congress and started the Swatantra party?

Now that is too much to think. Expect a cut/vomit/pate from somewhere with a link to a reference from 25 years ago (with no own comments).

Marathadi-Saamiyaar

Posts : 17675
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 110

Back to top Go down

leaders we shoulda had Empty Re: leaders we shoulda had

Post by Guest Tue Apr 01, 2014 12:37 pm

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
Rishi wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
Propagandhi711 wrote:instead of the douchebag nehru and his acolytes:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._Rajagopalachari

Rajagopalachari was a Nehru supporter and Nehru was a Rajagopalachari supporter. It is foolish to try and make a distinction between the two. Both were secular in their outlook.

>>>Then why do you think Rajaji quit Congress and started the Swatantra party?

Now that is too much to think.  Expect a cut/vomit/pate from somewhere with a link to a reference from 25 years ago (with no own comments).

You mean, like one of your Morning Coffee posts?

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

leaders we shoulda had Empty Re: leaders we shoulda had

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum